Genome plasticity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: microevolution of the 'pandemic group'

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Haihong Han (1) (2)
  Hin-chung Wong (3)
  Biao Kan (4)
  Zhaobiao Guo (1)
  Xiaotao Zeng (1)
  Shengjun Yin (1)
  Xiumei Liu (2)
  Ruifu Yang (1)
  Dongsheng Zhou (1)
  
• 刊名：BMC Genomics
• 出版年：2008
• 出版时间：December 2008
• 年：2008
• 卷：9
• 期：1
• 全文大小：2611KB
• 参考文献：1. Zhang XH, Austin B: Haemolysins in Vibrio species. / J Appl Microbiol 2005,98(5):1011鈥?019. CrossRef
  2. Tada J, Ohashi T, Nishimura N, Shirasaki Y, Ozaki H, Fukushima S, Takano J, Nishibuchi M, Takeda Y: Detection of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene (tdh) and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by polymerase chain reaction. / Mol Cell Probes 1992,6(6):477鈥?87. CrossRef
  3. Yeung PS, Boor KJ: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections. / Foodborne Pathog Dis 2004,1(2):74鈥?8. CrossRef
  4. Park KS, Ono T, Rokuda M, Jang MH, Okada K, Iida T, Honda T: Functional characterization of two type III secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. / Infect Immun 2004,72(11):6659鈥?665. CrossRef
  5. Chowdhury NR, Stine OC, Morris JG, Nair GB: Assessment of evolution of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus by multilocus sequence typing. / J Clin Microbiol 2004,42(3):1280鈥?282. CrossRef
  6. Wong HC, Lu KT, Pan TM, Lee CL, Shih DY: Subspecies typing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. / J Clin Microbiol 1996,34(6):1535鈥?539.
  7. Chowdhury NR, Chakraborty S, Ramamurthy T, Nishibuchi M, Yamasaki S, Takeda Y, Nair GB: Molecular evidence of clonal Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strains. / Emerg Infect Dis 2000,6(6):631鈥?36. CrossRef
  8. Gonzalez-Escalona N, Martinez-Urtaza J, Romero J, Espejo RT, Jaykus LA, Depaola A: Molecular phylogenetics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains by Multilocus Sequence Typing. / J Bacteriol 2008.
  9. Wong HC, Liu SH, Chiou CS, Nishibuchi M, Lee BK, Suthienkul O, Nair GB, Kaysner CA, Taniguchi H: A pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing scheme for Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from fifteen countries. / International journal of food microbiology 2007,114(3):280鈥?87. CrossRef
  10. Matsumoto C, Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Iwanaga M, Garg P, Rammamurthy T, Wong HC, Depaola A, Kim YB, Albert MJ, / et al.: Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. / J Clin Microbiol 2000,38(2):578鈥?85.
  11. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta B, Takeda Y, Sack DA: Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. / Clinical microbiology reviews 2007,20(1):39鈥?8. CrossRef
  12. Okura M, Osawa R, Iguchi A, Arakawa E, Terajima J, Watanabe H: Genotypic analyses of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and development of a pandemic group-specific multiplex PCR assay. / J Clin Microbiol 2003,41(10):4676鈥?682. CrossRef
  13. Iida T, Hattori A, Tagomori K, Nasu H, Naim R, Honda T: Filamentous phage associated with recent pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. / Emerg Infect Dis 2001,7(3):477鈥?78.
  14. Nasu H, Iida T, Sugahara T, Yamaichi Y, Park KS, Yokoyama K, Makino K, Shinagawa H, Honda T: A filamentous phage associated with recent pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 strains. / J Clin Microbiol 2000,38(6):2156鈥?161.
  15. Williams TL, Musser SM, Nordstrom JL, DePaola A, Monday SR: Identification of a protein biomarker unique to the pandemic O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. / J Clin Microbiol 2004,42(4):1657鈥?665. CrossRef
  16. Okura M, Osawa R, Iguchi A, Takagi M, Arakawa E, Terajima J, Watanabe H: PCR-based identification of pandemic group Vibrio parahaemolyticus with a novel group-specific primer pair. / Microbiol Immunol 2004,48(10):787鈥?90.
  17. Okura M, Osawa R, Arakawa E, Terajima J, Watanabe H: Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic group-specific DNA sequence by genomic subtraction. / J Clin Microbiol 2005,43(7):3533鈥?536. CrossRef
  18. Meador CE, Parsons MM, Bopp CA, Gerner-Smidt P, Painter JA, Vora GJ: Virulence gene- and pandemic group-specific marker profiling of clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. / J Clin Microbiol 2007,45(4):1133鈥?139. CrossRef
  19. Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T, Tagomori K, Iijima Y, Najima M, Nakano M, Yamashita A, / et al.: Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V cholerae. / Lancet 2003,361(9359):743鈥?49. CrossRef
  20. Boyd EF, Cohen AL, Naughton LM, Ussery DW, Binnewies TT, Stine OC, Parent MA: Molecular analysis of the emergence of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. / BMC Microbiol 2008, 8:110. CrossRef
  21. Luan XY, Chen JX, Zhang XH, Jia JT, Sun FR, Li Y: Comparison of different primers for rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus using the polymerase chain reaction. / Letters in applied microbiology 2007,44(3):242鈥?47. CrossRef
  22. Venkateswaran K, Dohmoto N, Harayama S: Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gyrB gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its application in detection of this pathogen in shrimp. / Appl Environ Microbiol 1998,64(2):681鈥?87.
  23. Kim YB, Okuda J, Matsumoto C, Takahashi N, Hashimoto S, Nishibuchi M: Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains at the species level by PCR targeted to the toxR gene. / J Clin Microbiol 1999,37(4):1173鈥?177.
  24. Meador CE, Bird MM, Bopp CA, Gerner-Smidt P, Painter JA, Vora GJ: Virulence Gene and Pandemic Group-Specific Marker Profiling of Clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates. / J Clin Microbiol 2007,45(4):1133鈥?139. CrossRef
  25. Hurley CC, Quirke A, Reen FJ, Boyd EF: Four genomic islands that mark post-1995 pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. / BMC Genomics 2006, 7:104. CrossRef
  26. Croci L, Suffredini E, Cozzi L, Toti L, Ottaviani D, Pruzzo C, Serratore P, Fischetti R, Goffredo E, Loffredo G, / et al.: Comparison of different biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. / Journal of applied microbiology 2007,102(1):229鈥?37. CrossRef
  27. Zhou G, Zheng Q, Engin F, Munivez E, Chen Y, Sebald E, Krakow D, Lee B: Dominance of SOX9 function over RUNX2 during skeletogenesis. / Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006,103(50):19004鈥?9009. CrossRef
  28. Izutsu K, Kurokawa K, Tashiro K, Kuhara S, Hayashi T, Honda T, Iida T: Comparative genomic analysis using microarray demonstrates a strong correlation between the presence of the 80-kilobase pathogenicity island and pathogenicity in Kanagawa phenomenon-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains. / Infect Immun 2008,76(3):1016鈥?023. CrossRef
  29. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. / Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998,95(25):14863鈥?4868. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Haihong Han (1) (2)
  Hin-chung Wong (3)
  Biao Kan (4)
  Zhaobiao Guo (1)
  Xiaotao Zeng (1)
  Shengjun Yin (1)
  Xiumei Liu (2)
  Ruifu Yang (1)
  Dongsheng Zhou (1)
  
  1. State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, PR China
  2. Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100050, Beijing, PR China
  3. Department of Microbiology, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan, PR China
  4. Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 102206, Beijing, PR China
  

文摘

Background Outbreak of V. parahaemolyticus infections occurred since 1996 was linked to a proposed clonal complex, the pandemic group. The whole genome sequence provides an unprecedented opportunity for dissecting genome plasticity and phylogeny of the populations of V. parahaemolyticus. In the present work, a whole-genome cDNA microarray was constructed to compare the genomic contents of a collection of 174 strains of V. parahaemolyticus. Results Genes that present variably in the genome accounted for about 22% of the whole gene pool on the genome. The phylogenetic analysis of microarray data generated a minimum spanning tree that depicted the phylogenetic structure of the 174 strains. Strains were assigned into five complexes (C1 to C5), and those in each complex were related genetically and phylogenetically. C3 and C4 represented highly virulent clinical clones. C2 and C3 constituted two different clonal complexes 'old-O3:K6 clone' and 'pandemic clone', respectively. C3 included all the 39 pandemic strains tested (trh -, tdh + and GS-PCR+), while C2 contained 12 pre-1996 'old' O3:K6 strains (trh +, tdh - and GS-PCR-) tested herein. The pandemic clone (post-1996 'new' O3:K6 and its derivates O4:K68, O1:K25, O1:KUT and O6:K18) might be emerged from the old-O3:K6 clone, which was promoted by acquisition of toxRS/new sequence and genomic islands. A phylogenetic intermediate O3:K6 clade (trh -, tdh - and GS-PCR+) was identified between the pandemic and old-O3:K6 clones. Conclusion A comprehensive overview of genomic contents in a large collection of global isolates from the microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization data enabled us to construct a phylogenetic structure of V. parahaemolyticus and an evolutionary history of the pandemic group (clone) of this pathogen.