用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Productivity growth persistence: firm strategies, size and system properties
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Cristiano Antonelli (1) (2)
    Francesco Crespi (2) (3)
    Giuseppe Scellato (2) (4)

    1. Dipartimento di Economia
    ; Universit脿 di Torino ; Turin ; Italy
    2. BRICK (Bureau of Research in Complexity
    ; Knowledge ; Innovation) ; Collegio Carlo Alberto ; Moncalieri ; Italy
    3. Dipartimento di Economia
    ; Universit脿 Roma Tre ; Rome ; Italy
    4. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale e della Produzione
    ; Politecnico di Torino ; Turin ; Italy
  • 关键词:Productivity ; Persistence ; Dynamic capabilities ; Path dependence ; TFP ; Emergent system properties ; O31 ; C23 ; C25 ; L20 ; M20 ; L26
  • 刊名:Small Business Economics
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:June 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:45
  • 期:1
  • 页码:129-147
  • 全文大小:319 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Abramovsky, L, Griffith, R (2006) Outsourcing and offshoring of business services: How important is ICT?. Journal of the European Economic Association 4: pp. 594-601
    2. Adams, J (2006) Learning internal research and spillovers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: pp. 5-36
    3. Aghion, P, Howitt, P (1997) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
    4. Ahn, S. (2000), Firm dynamics and productivity growth: A review of micro evidence from OECD countries, OECD Economic Department WP 297.
    5. Amiti, M, Wei, S (2009) Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the US. World Economy 32: pp. 203-220
    6. Antonelli, C (1997) The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: pp. 643-675
    7. Antonelli, C The economic complexity of technological change: Knowledge interactions and path dependence. In: ditors">Antonelli, C eds. (2011) Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 1-62
    8. Antonelli, C, Amidei, FB, Fassio, C (2014) The mechanisms of knowledge governance: State owned corporations and Italian economic growth, 1950-1994. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 31: pp. 43-63
    9. Antonelli, C, Crespi, F, Scellato, G (2012) Inside innovation persistence: New evidence from Italian micro-data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23: pp. 341-353
    10. Antonelli, C, Crespi, F, Scellato, G (2013) Internal and external factors in innovation persistence. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 22: pp. 256-280
    11. Antonelli, C, Scellato, G (2011) Out of equilibrium profits and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20: pp. 405-421
    12. Antonelli, C, Scellato, G (2015) Firms size and directed technical change. Small Business Economics 44: pp. 207-218
    13. Arrighetti, A, Landini, F, Lasagni, A (2014) Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy 43: pp. 202-213
    14. Baily, C., Hulten, D., Campbell, T. Bresnahan, & Caves, R. E. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants, Brooking / Papers on Economic activity. Microeconomics (pp 187鈥?49).
    15. Bartelsman, E, Dhrymes, P (1998) Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants 1972鈥?986. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9: pp. 5-34
    16. Bartelsman, E, Doms, M (2000) Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature 38: pp. 569-594
    17. Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2009). Cross country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. NBER Working Paper 15490.
    18. Bergek, A, Berggren, C, Magnusson, T, Hobday, M (2013) Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?. Research Policy 42: pp. 1210-1224
    19. Bloom, N, Reenen, J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: pp. 1351-1408
    20. Bloom, N, Reenen, J (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?. Journal of economic perspectives 24: pp. 203-224
    21. Bontempi, M., & Mairesse, J. (2008), Intangible capital and productivity: An exploration on a panel of Italian manufacturing firms, Working Papers 14108, / National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER.
    22. Bottazzi, G, Secchi, A, Tamagni, F (2008) Productivity, profitability and financial performance. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: pp. 711-751
    23. Bou, JC, Satorra, A (2007) The persistence of abnormal returns at industry and firm levels: Evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal 28: pp. 707-722
    24. Broedner, P, Kinkel, S, Lay, G (2009) Productivity effects of outsourcing: New evidence on the strategic importance of vertical integration decisions. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 29: pp. 127-150
    25. Brynjolffson, E, Hitt, LM (2000) Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: pp. 23-48
    26. Cefis, E (2003) Is there persistence in innovative activities?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21: pp. 489-515
    27. Cefis, E, Orsenigo, L (2001) The persistence of innovative activities. A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy 30: pp. 1139-1158
    28. Chandler, AD (1977) The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
    29. Chandler, AD (1990) Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
    30. Clausen, T, Pohjola, M, Sapprasert, K, Verspagen, B (2012) Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 21: pp. 553-585
    31. Cohen, WM, Klepper, S (1996) A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal 106: pp. 25-51
    32. Colombelli, A, Krafft, J, Quatraro, F (2014) High growth firms and technological knowledge: Do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?. Industrial and Corporate Change 23: pp. 261-291
    33. Colombelli, A, Tunzelmann, NG The persistence of innovation and path dependence. In: ditors">Antonelli, C eds. (2011) The handbook of the system dynamics of technological change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 105-119
    34. Corrado, C, Hulten, C, Sichel, D (2009) Intangible capital and economic growth. The Review of Income and Wealth 55: pp. 661-685
    35. Cr茅pon, B, Duguet, E, Mairesse, J (1998) Research and development, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7: pp. 115-158
    36. Crespi, F IT services and productivity in European industries. In: ditors">Kox, HLM, Rubalcaba, L eds. (2007) Business services in European economic growth. Palgrave Mac Millan, London
    37. Crespi, F, Scellato, G Knowledge cumulability and path dependence in innovation persistence. In: ditors">Antonelli, C, Link, A eds. (2014) The routledge handbook of the economics of knowledge. Routledge, London, pp. 116-134
    38. David, PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75: pp. 332-337
    39. David, PA (2007) Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica: Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History 1: pp. 91-114
    40. Deschryvere, M (2014) R&D, firm growth and the role of innovation persistence: An analysis of Finnish SMEs and large firms. Small Business Economics 43: pp. 767-785
    41. Dobusch, L, Sch眉ler, E (2013) Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change 22: pp. 617-647
    42. Faggio, G., Salvanes, K. G., & Van Reenen, J. (2009). The evolution of inequality in productivity and wages: Panel data evidence, LSE Working Paper.
    43. Foster, L, Haltiwanger, J, Krizan, CJ Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. In: ditors">Dean, E, Harper, M, Hulten, C eds. (2001) New developments in productivity analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 303-372
    44. Galindo-Rueda, F., & Haskel, J. (2005). Skills, workforce characteristics and firm-level productivity in England, Report prepared for the Department of Trade and Industry, Department for Education and Skills, Office for National Statistics.
    45. Geroski, P, Kretschmer, T, Walters, C (2009) Corporate productivity growth: Leaders and laggards. Economic Enquiry 47: pp. 1-17
    46. Geroski, P, Lazarova, S, Urga, G, Walters, CF (2003) Are difference in firm size transitory or permanent?. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: pp. 47-59
    47. Giannangeli, S., & Gomez-Salvador, R. (2008). Evolution and sources of manufacturing productivity growth: Evidence from a panel of European countries. European Central Bank: Working Paper Series.
    48. Gilley, K, Rasheed, A (2000) Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management 26: pp. 763-790
    49. Griliches, Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: pp. 92-116
    50. Grossman, G, Helpman, E (2005) Outsourcing in a global economy. Review of Economic Studies 72: pp. 135-159
    51. Harper, DA, Lewis, P (2012) New perspectives on emergence in economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 82: pp. 329-337
    52. Heckman, JJ The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time: Discrete data stochastic process. In: ditors">Manski, CF, McFadden, D eds. (1981) Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 179-195
    53. Henrekson, M, Johansson, D (2010) Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics 35: pp. 227-244
    54. Heshmati, A (2003) Productivity growth, efficiency and outsourcing in manufacturing and service industries. Journal of Economic Surveys 17: pp. 79-112
    55. H枚lzl, W (2009) Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics 33: pp. 59-75
    56. Ilmakunnas, P, Maliranta, M, Vainiom盲ki, J (2004) The roles of employer and employee characteristics for plant productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis 21: pp. 249-276
    57. Ito, K, Lechevalier, S (2010) Why some firms persistently out-perform others: Investigating the interactions between innovation and exporting strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change 19: pp. 1997-2039
    58. Johansson, B, L枚枚f, H (2008) Innovation activities explained by firm attributes and location. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16: pp. 533-552
    59. Kim, J, Chang-Yang, L (2011) Technological regimes and the persistence of first-mover advantages. Industrial and Corporate Change 20: pp. 1305-1333
    60. Bas, C, Scellato, G (2014) Firms innovation persistence: A fresh look at the framework of analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23: pp. 423-446
    61. Loasby, BJ (2010) Capabilities and strategy: Problems and prospects. Industrial and Corporate Change 19: pp. 1301-1316
    62. Lokshin, B, Belderbos, R, Carree, M (2008) The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70: pp. 399-413
    63. Lopez-Garzia, P, Puente, S (2012) What makes a high growth firm?. A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data, Small Business Economics 39: pp. 1029-1041
    64. Malerba, F, Orsenigo, L, Petretto, P (1997) Persistence of innovative activities sectoral patters of innovation and international technological specialization. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: pp. 801-826
    65. M谩帽ez, J, Rochina-Barrachina, M, Sanchis-Llopis, A (2014) The determinants of R&D persistence in SMEs. Small Business Economics.
    66. Marrocu, E, Paci, R, Pontis, M (2012) Intangible capital and firms鈥?productivity. Industrial and Corporate Change 21: pp. 377-402
    67. McEvily, SK, Chakravarthy, B (2002) The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 23: pp. 285-305
    68. Merino, F, Rodr铆guez, D (2007) Business services outsourcing by manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 16: pp. 1147-1173
    69. Mohnen, P, Hall, BH (2013) Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review 3: pp. 47-65
    70. Nelson, R, Winter, S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
    71. Parker, S, Storey, D, Witteloostuijn, A (2010) What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy. Small Business Economics 35: pp. 203-226
    72. Peters, B (2009) Persistence of innovation: Stylized facts and panel data evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer 36: pp. 226-243
    73. Raymond, W., Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., & Palm, F. (2013). Dynamic Models of R&D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing, NBER Working Paper N. 19074.
    74. Roper, S, Hewitt-Dundas, N (2008) Innovation persistence: Survey and case-study evidence. Research Policy 37: pp. 149-162
    75. Rothaermel, FT, Hess, AM (2007) Building dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 18: pp. 898-921
    76. Santarelli, E, Vivarelli, M (2007) Entrepreneurship and the process of firms鈥?entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 16: pp. 455-488
    77. Schumpeter, JA (1947) The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History 7: pp. 149-159
    78. Suarez, D (2014) Persistence of innovation in unstable environments: Continuity and change in the firm鈥檚 innovative behavior. Research Policy 43: pp. 726-736
    79. Syverson, C (2011) What determines productivity?. Journal of Economic Literature 49: pp. 326-365
    80. Teece, D (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: pp. 1319-1350
    81. Teece, D, Pisano, G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3: pp. 537-555
    82. Triguero, A, Corcoles, D (2013) Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy 42: pp. 340-352
    83. Triguero, A, Corcoles, D, Cuerva, MC (2014) Persistence of innovation and firm鈥檚 growth: Evidence from a panel of SME and large Spanish manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics 43: pp. 787-804
    84. Vergne, JP, Durand, R (2011) The path of most persistence: An evolutionary perspective on path dependence and dynamic capabilities. Organization Studies 32: pp. 365-382
    85. Verona, G, Ravasi, D (2003) Unbundling dynamic capabilities: An exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 12: pp. 577-607
    86. Winter, SG Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In: ditors">Teece, DJ eds. (1987) The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 159-184
    87. Wooldridge, J (2005) Simple solutions to the initial conditions. Dynamic nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20: pp. 39-54
  • 刊物类别:Business and Economics
  • 刊物主题:Economics
    Management
    Microeconomics
    Entrepreneurship
    Industrial Organization
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-0913
文摘
This paper investigates the dynamics of productivity in a large sample of Italian manufacturing firms, focusing on the determinants of firm-level persistence in time of high total factor productivity (TFP) growth rates relative to the corresponding sectoral distributions. In particular, we assess the impact of both the internal characteristics of companies, including size and management strategies, and external systemic conditions, including business cycles and regional innovation performance. In order to disentangle the effects of the mix of internal and systemic factors in shaping firm-level persistence, we implement both transition probability matrices and dynamic probit models. Results reveal the presence of significant persistence in TFP growth rates. Such persistence turns out to be path-dependent since it is shaped by a number of complementary and contingent factors that locally affect the dynamics of the process.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700