Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Vaama Patel (1)
  Sjoerd Stuit (2)
  Randolph Blake (1) (3) (4)
  
  1. Department of Psychology/Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience ; Vanderbilt University ; Nashville ; TN ; USA
  2. Helmholtz Institute/Neuroscience & Cognition ; Utrecht University ; Utrecht ; The Netherlands
  3. Brain and Cognitive Sciences ; Seoul National University ; Seoul ; Republic of Korea
  4. Department of Psychology ; Vanderbilt University ; 111 21st Avenue South ; 301 Wilson Hall ; Nashville ; TN ; 37240 ; USA
  
• 关键词：Perceptual organization ; Visual perception ; Visual awareness ; Cognitive neuroscience
• 刊名：Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：April 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：22
• 期：2
• 页码：476-482
• 全文大小：444 KB
• 参考文献：1. Alais, D, Cass, J, O鈥橲hea, RP, Blake, R (2010) Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Current Biology 20: pp. 1362-1367 CrossRef
  2. Bhardwaj, R, O鈥橲hea, RP, Alais, D, Parker, A (2008) Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images. Journal of Vision 8: pp. 2.1-13 CrossRef
  3. Blake, R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96: pp. 145-167 CrossRef
  4. Blake, R, Brascamp, J, Heeger, DJ (2014) Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 369: pp. 20130211 CrossRef
  5. Blake, R, Logothetis, N (2002) Visual competition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 3: pp. 13-21 CrossRef
  6. Bonneh, Y, Sagi, D, Karni, A (2001) A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research 41: pp. 981-989 CrossRef
  7. Brainard, DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: pp. 433-436 CrossRef
  8. Brascamp, J, Sohn, H, Lee, S-H, Blake, R (2013) A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: pp. 8337-8344 CrossRef
  9. Brascamp, JW, Ee, R, Pestman, WR, Berg, AV (2005) Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5: pp. 287-298 CrossRef
  10. Carter, OL, Pettigrew, JD (2003) A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?. Perception 32: pp. 295-305 CrossRef
  11. Crick, F, Koch, C (1998) Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex 8: pp. 97-107 CrossRef
  12. Dayan, P (1998) A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation 10: pp. 1119-1135 CrossRef
  13. Denison, RN, Silver, MA (2012) Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: pp. 246-259 CrossRef
  14. Hancock, S, Gareze, L, Findlay, JM, Andrews, TJ (2012) Temporal patterns of saccadic eye movements predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry. i-Perception 3: pp. 88-96 CrossRef
  15. Hohwy, J, Roepstorff, A, Friston, K (2008) Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition 108: pp. 687-701 CrossRef
  16. Kang, M-S, Blake, R (2008) Enhancement of bistable perception associated with visual stimulus rivalry. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15: pp. 586-591 CrossRef
  17. Klink, PC, Brascamp, JW, Blake, R, Wezel, RJA (2010) Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision. Current Biology 20: pp. 1464-1469 CrossRef
  18. Kov谩cs, I, Papathomas, TV, Yang, M, Feher, A (1996) When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: pp. 15508-15511 CrossRef
  19. Lee, S-H, Blake, R (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39: pp. 1447-1454 CrossRef
  20. Leopold, DA, Logothetis, NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: pp. 254-264 CrossRef
  21. Levelt, WJM (1968) On binocular rivalry. Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands
  22. Liu, YH, Wang, XJ (2001) Spike-frequency adaptation of a generalized leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 10: pp. 25-45 CrossRef
  23. Logothetis, NK (1998) Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353: pp. 1801-1818 CrossRef
  24. Logothetis, NK, Leopold, DA, Sheinberg, DL (1996) What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380: pp. 621-624 CrossRef
  25. Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A. (Eds.). (2012). Binocular rivalry: A gateway to consciousness [Special issue]. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, / 6(263). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263
  26. Nguyen, VA, Freeman, AW, Alais, D (2003) Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 43: pp. 2003-2008 CrossRef
  27. Pelli, DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: pp. 437-442 CrossRef
  28. Shpiro, A, Moreno-Bote, R, Rubin, N, Rinzel, J (2009) Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 27: pp. 37-54 CrossRef
  29. Sterzer, P, Kleinschmidt, A, Rees, G (2009) The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13: pp. 310-318 CrossRef
  30. Stollenwerk, L, Bode, M (2003) Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation 15: pp. 2863-2882 CrossRef
  31. Stuit, SM, Cass, J, Paffen, CLE, Alais, D (2009) Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. Journal of Vision 9: pp. 17.1-15 CrossRef
  32. Tong, F, Meng, M, Blake, R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: pp. 502-511 CrossRef
  33. Ee, R (2009) Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: Evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 26: pp. 2612-2622 CrossRef
  34. Ee, R (2011) Percept-switch nucleation in binocular rivalry reveals local adaptation characteristics of early visual processing. Journal of Vision 11: pp. 13:1-12
  35. Loon, AM, Knapen, T, Scholte, HS, St. John-Saaltink, E, Donner, TH, Lamme, VAF (2013) GABA shapes the dynamics of bistable perception. Current Biology 23: pp. 823-827 CrossRef
  36. Verhoeff, FH (1935) A new theory of binocular vision. Archives of Ophthalmology 13: pp. 151-175 CrossRef
  37. Wade, NJ Landmarks in the history of binocular rivalry. In: Alais, D, Blake, R eds. (2005) Binocular rivalry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-27
  38. Walker, P (1978) Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes?. Psychological Bulletin 85: pp. 376-389 CrossRef
  39. Wilson, HR (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: pp. 14499-14503 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1531-5320

文摘

Binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry are two forms of perceptual instability that arise when the visual system is confronted with conflicting stimulus information. In the case of binocular rivalry, dissimilar monocular stimuli are presented to the two eyes for an extended period of time, whereas for stimulus rivalry the dissimilar monocular stimuli are exchanged rapidly and repetitively between the eyes during extended viewing. With both forms of rivalry, one experiences extended durations of exclusive perceptual dominance that fluctuate between the two stimuli. Whether these two forms of rivalry arise within different stages of visual processing has remained debatable. Using an individual-differences approach, we found that both stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry exhibited same-shaped distributions of dominance durations among a sample of 30 observers and, moreover, that the dominance durations measured during binocular and stimulus rivalry were significantly correlated among our sample of observers. Furthermore, we found a significant, positive correlation between alternation rate in binocular rivalry and the incidence of stimulus rivalry. These results suggest that the two forms of rivalry may be tapping common neural mechanisms, or at least different mechanisms with comparable time constants. It remains to be learned just why the incidences of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry vary so greatly among people.