Annex proceeding and the continued interplay with the Brussels Ia Regulation

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Rimvydas Norkus
• 关键词：Insolvency proceedings ; Annex proceedings ; Brussels Ia Regulation
• 刊名：ERA Forum
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：August 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：16
• 期：2
• 页码：197-217
• 全文大小：1,006 KB
• 参考文献：1. Clermont, K.M., Palmer, J.R.B.: Exorbitant jurisdiction. Meine Law Rev. 58, 474 (2006)
  2. Fletcher, I.F.: Insolvency in Private International Law: National and International Approaches, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London (2005)
  3. Hartley, T.C.: International Commercial Litigation: Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009) CrossRef
  4. Hess, B., Pfeiffer, T., Schlosser, P.: Report on the application of regulation Brussels I in the member states. Study JLS/C4/2005/03, 2007
  5. Kessedjian, C.: International jurisdiction and foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters. In: Hague Conference on Private International Law, Preliminary Document No. 7 of April of 1997 for the attention the Special Commission of June 1997 on the question of jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters, No. 138 (1976)
  6. Kelsen, H.: The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law J. 53(2), 208-09 (1944) CrossRef
  7. Kruger, T.: Civil Jurisdiction Rules of the EU and their Impact on Third States. Oxford University Press, London (2008)
  8. Laukemann, B.: Avoidance actions against third state defendants: jurisdictional justice or curtailment of legal protection? European Court of Justice 16 January 2014, Case C-328/12 -Schmid/Hertel Int. Insolv. Law Rev. 5, 101-10 (2014)
  9. Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. (eds.): Brussels I Regulation, 2nd edn. Sellier European Law Publishers, Munich (2012)
  10. McCormack, G.: Corporate Rescue Law—An Anglo-American Perspective. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Glos (2008) CrossRef
  11. McCormack, G.: Reconstructing European insolvency law—putting in place a new paradigm. J. Leg. Stud. 30(1), 126-46 (2010) CrossRef
  12. Nielsen, P.A.: The recast Brussels I Regulation. Nordic J. Int. Law 83, 61-1 (2014) CrossRef
  13. Omar, P.J.: The European insolvency regulation 2000: a paradigm of international insolvency cooperation. Bond Law Rev. 15(1), 10 (2003)
  14. Russell, A.K.: Exorbitant jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments: the Brussels system as an impetus for United States action. Syracuse J. Int. J. Law Commer. 19 (1993)
  15. Simotta, A.: Die internationale Zust?ndigkeit für insolvenzrechtliche Annexverfahren. In: Grenzüberschreitende Insolvenzen im europ?ischen Binnenmarkt -die EuInsVO. Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna (2011)
  16. Virgos, M., Schmit, E.: Report on the Convention on Insolvency Proceedings No. 6500/96. DRS 8 CFC, Brussels (1996)
  17. Virgos, M., Garcimartín, F.: The European Insolvency Regulation: Law and Practice. Kluwer Law International (2004)
  
• 作者单位：Rimvydas Norkus (1)
  
  1. Gyn?j? str. 6, 01109, Vilnius, Lithuania
  
• 刊物主题：Public International Law; European Integration; Political Science, general;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1863-9038

文摘

This article deals with the interrelation between recast Brussels I Regulation and European Insolvency Regulation in respect of proceedings featuring connection with insolvency. It is essential to accommodate these proceedings within the scope of one or another regulation since it determines applicable jurisdictional rules and different possibilities for refusing the recognition or enforcement of a judgment. The article examines which type of actions could qualify as “deriving directly from the insolvency proceedings and which are closely linked to them-(annex proceedings) and therefore fall within European Insolvency Regulation. The possibility to invoke this regulation against third state defendants and exclusivity of jurisdiction in annex proceedings are also discussed. Keywords Insolvency proceedings Annex proceedings Brussels Ia Regulation