Applying Machine Reasoning and Learning in Real World Applications

详细信息    查看全文

• 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：9885
• 期：1
• 页码：241-257
• 参考文献：1.Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic Web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRef
  2.Smith, M.K.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004). http://​www.​w3c.​org/​TR/​owl-guide/​
  3.Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003). ISBN 0521781760
  4.Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRef
  5.Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 13–22. ACM (2006)
  6.Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Horridge, M., Sirin, E.: Finding All Justifications of OWL DL Entailments. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRef
  7.Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York (2006)MATH
  8.Kingdon, J.: AI fights money laundering. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19(3), 87–89 (2004)CrossRef
  9.Yu, L., Chen, H., Wang, S., Lai, K.K.: Evolving least squares support vector machines for stock market trend mining. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(1), 87–102 (2009)CrossRef
  10.Joachims, T.: Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.​1007/​BFb0026683
  11.Schrank, D., Eisele, B.: 2012 urban mobility report (2012). http://​goo.​gl/​Ke2xU
  12.Koslowsky, M., Krausz, M.: On the relationship between commuting, stress symptoms, and attitudinal measures: a LISREL application. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 29(4), 485–492 (1993)CrossRef
  13.Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y.: Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E 51, 1035–1042 (1995)CrossRef
  14.Lecue, F., Pan, J.Z.: Consistent knowledge discovery from evolving ontologies. In: AAAI (2015)
  15.Lécué, F., Pan, J.Z.: Predicting knowledge in an ontology stream. In: IJCAI (2013)
  16.Li, L., Horrocks, I.: A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology. In: WWW, pp. 331–339 (2003)
  17.Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T.R., Sycara, K.: Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 333–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.​1007/​3-540-48005-6_​26 CrossRef
  18.Dehaspe, L., Raedt, L.: Mining association rules in multiple relations. In: Lavrač, N., Džeroski, S. (eds.) ILP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1297, pp. 125–132. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). doi:10.​1007/​3540635149_​40 CrossRef
  19.Srikant, R., Agrawal, R.: Mining generalized association rules. In: VLDB, pp. 407–419 (1995)
  20.Pan, J.Z., Vetere, G., Gomez-Perez, J.M., Wu, H.: Exploiting Linked Data and Knowledge Graphs for Large Organisations. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
  21.Pan, J., Staab, S., Amann, U., Ebert, J., Zhao, Y.E.: Ontology-Driven Software Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)MATH
  22.Kotoulas, S., Lopez, V., Lloyd, R., Sbodio, M.L., Lécué, F., Stephenson, M., Daly, E.M., Bicer, V., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., Lorenzo, G.D., Schumann, A., Aonghusa, P.M.: SPUD - semantic processing of urban data. J. Web Sem. 24, 11–17 (2014). doi:10.​1016/​j.​websem.​2013.​12.​003 CrossRef
  23.Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). ISBN 0-521-78176-0MATH
  24.Lécué, F., Tallevi-Diotallevi, S., Hayes, J., Tucker, R., Bicer, V., Sbodio, M.L., Tommasi, P.: Smart traffic analytics in the semantic web with STAR-CITY: scenarios, system and lessons learned in Dublin city. J. Web Sem. 27, 26–33 (2014). doi:10.​1016/​j.​websem.​2014.​07.​002 CrossRef
  25.Lécué, F., Tucker, R., Bicer, V., Tommasi, P., Tallevi-Diotallevi, S., Sbodio, M.: Predicting Severity of Road Traffic Congestion Using Semantic Web Technologies. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 611–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-07443-6_​41 CrossRef
  26.Lécué, F., Pan, J.Z.: Predicting knowledge in an ontology stream. In: IJCAI 2013, Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China, 3–9 August 2013 (2013). http://​www.​aaai.​org/​ocs/​index.​php/​IJCAI/​IJCAI13/​paper/​view/​6608
  27.Lécué, F.: Diagnosing changes in an ontology stream: a DL reasoning approach. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 22–26 July 2012 (2012). http://​www.​aaai.​org/​ocs/​index.​php/​AAAI/​AAAI12/​paper/​view/​4988
  28.Lécué, F., Schumann, A., Sbodio, M.L.: Applying semantic web technologies for diagnosing road traffic congestions. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7650, pp. 114–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-35173-0_​8 CrossRef
  29.Lécué, F.: Towards scalable exploration of diagnoses in an ontology stream. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Québec City, Québec, Canada, 27–31 July 2014, pp. 87–93 (2014). http://​www.​aaai.​org/​ocs/​index.​php/​AAAI/​AAAI14/​paper/​view/​8194
  30.Lécué, F., et al.: Semantic traffic diagnosis with STAR-CITY: architecture and lessons learned from deployment in Dublin, Bologna, Miami and Rio. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8797, pp. 292–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-11915-1_​19
  
• 作者单位：Freddy Lecue (20) (21)
  
  20. Accenture Technology Labs, Dublin, Ireland
  21. Inria, Rocquencourt, France
  
• 丛书名：Reasoning Web: Logical Foundation of Knowledge Graph Construction and Query Answering
• ISBN：978-3-319-49493-7
• 卷排序：9885

文摘

Knowledge discovery, as an area focusing upon methodologies for extracting knowledge through deduction (a priori) or from data (a posteriori), has been largely studied in Database and Artificial Intelligence. Deductive reasoning such as logic reasoning gains logically knowledge from pre-established (certain) knowledge statements, while inductive inference such as data mining or learning discovers knowledge by generalising from initial information. While deductive reasoning and inductive learning are conceptually addressing knowledge discovery problems from different perspectives, they are inference techniques that nicely complement each other in real-world applications. In this chapter we will present how techniques from machine learning and reasoning can be reconciled and integrated to address large scale problems in the context of (i) transportation in cities of Bologna, Dublin, Miami, Rio and (ii) spend optimisation in finance.