New approach to age estimation of male and female adult skeletons based on the morphological characteristics of the acetabulum

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marta San-Millán ; Carme Rissech ; Daniel Turbón
• 关键词：Acetabular method ; Aging ; Bayesian inference ; Adult age estimation ; Os coxa
• 刊名：International Journal of Legal Medicine
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：March 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：131
• 期：2
• 页码：501-525
• 全文大小：
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Forensic Medicine; Medical Law; Medicine/Public Health, general;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1437-1596
• 卷排序：131

文摘

Age estimation is essential to the human identification process, both in forensic and archeological contexts. Based on the previous male-specific method of Rissech et al. (J Forensic Sci, 2006, 51:213–229), a new approach to age estimation based on the acetabulum has been described and evaluated in 611 individuals from the Lisbon Collection (Lisbon, Portugal). This paper has two main goals: (1) to revise and better define the variables of Rissech’s method related to the acetabular fossa, namely, variables 5, 6, and 7, and (2) to extend the applicability of this new approach to both sexes while analyzing age-related sex differences in the acetabular aging process. The results demonstrate the suitability of combining acetabulum traits and a Bayesian approach to estimating age in adults of both sexes. This study has confirmed the usefulness of the redefined variables of the acetabular fossa when age-related changes are considered. Furthermore, the newly defined variables have good to excellent values of repeatability. The study has also extended the method’s applicability to females. The revised method has absolute error averages of 7.28 years for males and 7.09 years for females, based on a sex-specific reference sample. In addition, approximately 74 % of the individuals estimated had an absolute error less than 10 years. Interestingly, the acetabular aging process follows similar trends in both sexes, but the aging rate seems to be different between males and females, especially in middle-aged individuals. Despite the fact that the age estimates, on average, did not improve significantly with the use of a sex-specific reference sample, it is recommended that the sexes be analyzed separately due to the differences in aging rates and inaccuracy values.