Adaptation of lift forces in object manipulation through action observation

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Andreas F. Reichelt (1)
  Alyssa M. Ash (1)
  Lee A. Baugh (1)
  Roland S. Johansson (3)
  J. Randall Flanagan (1) (2)
  
• 关键词：Action observation ; Object manipulation ; Motor learning ; Human
• 刊名：Experimental Brain Research
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：July 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：228
• 期：2
• 页码：221-234
• 全文大小：1062KB
• 参考文献：1. Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11:1109-116 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2182">CrossRef
  2. Alaerts K, Senot P, Swinnen SP, Craighero L, Wenderoth N, Fadiga L (2010a) Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 31:1144-153 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07124.x">CrossRef
  3. Alaerts K, Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N (2010b) Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? Neuropsychologia 48:2082-090 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.029">CrossRef
  4. Baugh LA, Kao M, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2012) Material Evidence- interaction of well-learned priors and sensorimotor memory when lifting objects. J Neurophysiol 108:1262-269 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00263.2012">CrossRef
  5. Bingham GP (1987) Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:155-77 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.155">CrossRef
  6. Brass M, Schmitt RM, Spengler S, Gergely G (2007) Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Curr Biol 17:2117-121 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.057">CrossRef
  7. Braun DA, Aertsen A, Wolpert DM, Mehring C (2009) Motor task variation induces structural learning. Curr Biol 19:352-57 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.036">CrossRef
  8. Braun DA, Waldert S, Aertsen A, Wolpert DM, Mehring C (2010) Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task. PLoS One 5:e8973 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008973">CrossRef
  9. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Obhi SS, Gribble PL (2010) Effect of trial order and error magnitude on motor learning by observing. J Neurophysiol 104:1409-416 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.01047.2009">CrossRef
  10. Falck-Ytter T, Gredeback G, von Hofsten C (2006) Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nat Neurosci 9:878-79 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1729">CrossRef
  11. Flanagan JR, Beltzner MA (2000) Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat Neurosci 3:737-41 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/76701">CrossRef
  12. Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424:769-71 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01861">CrossRef
  13. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519-528
  14. Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS (2006) Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:650-59 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.005">CrossRef
  15. Flanagan JR, Bittner JP, Johansson RS (2008) Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weights. Curr Biol 18:1742-747 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.042">CrossRef
  16. Gordon AM, Westling G, Cole KJ, Johansson RS (1993) Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. J Neurophysiol 69:1789-796
  17. Hamilton AF, Joyce DW, Flanagan JR, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2007) Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting. Psychol Res 71:13-1 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0032-4">CrossRef
  18. Hesse MD, Sparing R, Fink GR (2009) End or means–the “what-and “how-of observed intentional actions. J Cogn Neurosci 21:776-90 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21058">CrossRef
  19. Heyes CM, Foster CL (2002) Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:593-07
  20. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (1999) Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286:2526-528 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2526">CrossRef
  21. Iacoboni M, Koski LM, Brass M, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau MC, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (2001) Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13995-3999 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241474598">CrossRef
  22. Ingram JN, Howard IS, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM (2010) Multiple grasp-specific representations of tool dynamics mediate skillful manipulation. Curr Biol 20:618-23 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.054">CrossRef
  23. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:345-59 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2621">CrossRef
  24. Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59-1
  25. Lackner JR, DiZio P (2005) Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:653-59 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.012">CrossRef
  26. Land MF, Furneaux S (1997) The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1231-239 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0105">CrossRef
  27. Malfait N, Valyear KF, Culham JC, Anton JL, Brown LE, Gribble PL (2010) fMRI activation during observation of others-reach errors. Journal of Cogn Neurosci 22:1493-503 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21281">CrossRef
  28. Mattar AA, Gribble PL (2005) Motor learning by observing. Neuron 46:153-60 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.009">CrossRef
  29. Meulenbroek RG, Bosga J, Hulstijn M, Miedl S (2007) Joint-action coordination in transferring objects. Exp Brain Res 180:333-43 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0861-z">CrossRef
  30. Oztop E, Wolpert D, Kawato M (2005) Mental state inference using visual control parameters. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22:129-51 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.004">CrossRef
  31. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169-92 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230">CrossRef
  32. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M (2008) The mirror system and its role in social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:179-84 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.001">CrossRef
  33. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661-70 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35090060">CrossRef
  34. Rotman G, Troje NF, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2006) Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. J Neurophysiol 96:1358-369 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00227.2006">CrossRef
  35. Runeson S, Frykholm G (1981) Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol 7:733-40
  36. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW (2010) Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:89-08 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135">CrossRef
  37. Shim J, Carlton LG (1997) Perception of kinematic characteristics in the motion of lifted weight. J Mot Behav 29:131-46 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222899709600828">CrossRef
  38. Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Caltagirone C, Petrosini L (2007) The what and how of observational learning. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1656-663 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1656">CrossRef
  39. Webb A, Knott A, Macaskill MR (2010) Eye movements during transitive action observation have sequential structure. Acta Psychol (Amst) 133:51-6 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.09.001">CrossRef
  40. Westling G, Johansson RS (1987) Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp Brain Res 66:128-40 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00236209">CrossRef
  41. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11:R729–R732 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8">CrossRef
  42. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2010) Motor learning. Curr Biol 20:R467–R472 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.035">CrossRef
  43. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan JR (2001) Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5:487-94 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01773-3">CrossRef
  44. Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358:593-02 ternal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1238">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Andreas F. Reichelt (1)
  Alyssa M. Ash (1)
  Lee A. Baugh (1)
  Roland S. Johansson (3)
  J. Randall Flanagan (1) (2)
  
  1. Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
  3. Physiology Section, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Ume? University, SE-901 87, Ume?, Sweden
  2. Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
  
• ISSN：1432-1106

文摘

The ability to predict accurately the weights of objects is essential for skilled and dexterous manipulation. A potentially important source of information about object weight is through the observation of other people lifting objects. Here, we tested the hypothesis that when watching an actor lift an object, people naturally learn the object’s weight and use this information to scale forces when they subsequently lift the object themselves. Participants repeatedly lifted an object in turn with an actor. Object weight unpredictably changed between 2 and 7?N every 5th to 9th of the actor’s lifts, and the weight lifted by the participant always matched that previously lifted by the actor. Even though the participants were uninformed about the structure of the experiment, they appropriately adapted their lifting force in the first trial after a weight change. Thus, participants updated their internal representation about the object’s weight, for use in action, when watching a single lift performed by the actor. This ability presumably involves the comparison of predicted and actual sensory information related to actor’s actions, a comparison process that is also fundamental in action.