微创拔牙结合牙龈成形术在义齿美观修复中的应用分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Application of minimally invasive tooth extraction combined with gingivoplasty in denture repair 作者：刘洋 ; 彭树新 ; 遆云飞 英文作者：LIU Yang;PENG Shu-xin;TI Yun-fei;Department of Stomatology, the third people's Hospital of Zhengzhou City;oral plastic surgery Third People's Hospital of Zhengzhou City; 关键词：微创拔牙 ; 牙龈成形术 ; 义齿美观修复 英文关键词：minimally invasive tooth extraction;;gingivoplasty;;denture repair 中文刊名：YLMR 英文刊名：China Medical Cosmetology 机构：郑州市第三人民医院口腔科;郑州市第三人民医院口腔整形外科; 出版日期：2018-01-15 出版单位：中国医疗美容 年：2018 期：v.8;No.53 语种：中文; 页：YLMR201801021 页数：4 CN：01 ISSN：11-6007/R 分类号：62-65

摘要

目的探讨微创拔牙结合牙龈成形术在义齿美观修复中的应用效果。方法将2016年2月至2016年12月我院收治的90例因单颗患牙病变需拔牙患者按拔牙方式的不同分为微创组(n=45)与常规组(n=45),微创组行微创拔牙术,并在术后安装临时义齿;常规组行常规拔牙术。对比两组龈缘与牙槽突形态改变情况。结果微创组患者龈缘形态呈现扇贝状比例为95.56%(43/45),明显高于常规组82.22%(37/45),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);微创组患者牙槽突形态A级率为77.78%(35/45),明显高于常规组26.67%(12/45),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在义齿美观修复中应用微创拔牙结合牙龈成形术可有效保留牙龈的正常状态与牙槽骨骨量,同时降低对牙周组织的损伤程度,值得推广。
        Objective To investigate the application effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction combined with gingivoplasty in denture repair. Methods 90 patients with single diseased tooth lesion needed tooth extraction in our hospital from February 2016 to December 2016 were selected, and they were divided into minimally invasive group(n=45) and routine group(n=45) by tooth extraction methods. Minimally invasive group was given minimally invasive tooth extraction, and they were given temporary denture after surgery; routine group was given routine tooth extraction. The changes of gingival margin and alveolar process shape were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of scalloped gingival margin in minimally invasive group was 95.56%(43/45), which was higher than 82.22%(37/45) in routine group(P<0.05); The A-level rate of alveolar process shape in minimally invasive group was 77.78%(35/45), which was higher than 26.67%(12/45) in routine group(P<0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive tooth extraction combined with gingivoplasty in denture repair can effectively retain normal gum status and amount of alveolar bone, decrease periodontal tissue injury, which is worthy of promotion.

引文

[1]吕卓,梁丽娟,王敏玲.常规全口义齿修复单颌牙列缺失的临床效果[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(7):1285-1286.
    [2]王茵,崔广,郑洁,等.套筒冠义齿修复牙列缺损伴牙周病老年患者的临床观察[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2016,14(4):212-215.
    [3]谢晓珍.综合治疗结合固定义齿修复保存牙周病松动牙的临床疗效观察[J].中国基层医药,2016,23(7):1091-1093.
    [4]黎孔芬.种植修复与固定义齿修复对牙列缺损的治疗效果对比观察[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(6):624-627.
    [5]何雨桐,沈玉凤,刘晶,等.圆锥型套筒冠义齿和传统可摘义齿修复孤立基牙的三维有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(8):1146-1152.
    [6]王晓玲,王立军,朱晓英,等.种植义齿修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的咬合力分析[J].武警医学,2016,27(9):891-894.
    [7]曲娟,刘曼,江助子,等.ITI种植体支持球帽附着体在下颌覆盖全口义齿修复中的应用[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2016,35(2):219-221.
    [8]隋淑丽,隋红萍,赵美玉,等.28颗Straumman种植体在上颌前牙区种植修复的临床研究[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(13):1969-1970.