学科评估服务“双一流”建设:第三方评估的困境与突围
|
摘要
学科评估是"双一流"建设的"风向标""催化剂"和"推进器"。在"双一流"建设中引入第三方评估是回应利益相关者诉求的现实需要,是打破信息不对称僵局的迫切要求,是落实"管办评分离"原则的必然选择。高校学科第三方评估服务"双一流"建设的主要问题表现为制度阙如,独立性孱弱;法规缺失,合法性贫血;人员匮乏,专业性打折;理论滞后,公信力不足。高校学科第三方评估为"双一流"建设提供高质量、高水平、高品质的服务,需要着力制度创新,确立第三方机构的独立身份;加强立法工作,保证第三方机构的合法地位;优化评估队伍,提升第三方评估的专业水准;深化理论研究,增强第三方评估的实际效果。
The discipline assessment of higher-learning institutions is the "wind vane","catalyst"and "propeller"for the"double first-class"construction.The introduction of third-party assessment in the construction of the"double first-class"universities is a practical need in response to the demands of stakeholders,an urgent requirement to break through the deadlock of information asymmetry,and an inevitable choice to implement the principle of separating supervision,execution,and assessment.The major issues that impact the third-party discipline assessment service for the"double first-class"university construction include an incomplete institutional system,weak independence,lack of laws and regulations,legitimacy uncertainty,inadequate professionals,insufficient expertise,lag-behind theory,and unconfident public trust.In order to receive high-quality,high-level and highly rated discipline assessment for the "double first-class"construction from thirdparties,institutional innovation should be carried out for the establishment of the independent status of the third party,legislative work should be strengthened to ensure the legal status of the third party,the assessment team should be optimized to enhance the professional level of the third party and theoretical research should be deepened to enhance the practical effectiveness of the third-party assessment.
The discipline assessment of higher-learning institutions is the "wind vane","catalyst"and "propeller"for the"double first-class"construction.The introduction of third-party assessment in the construction of the"double first-class"universities is a practical need in response to the demands of stakeholders,an urgent requirement to break through the deadlock of information asymmetry,and an inevitable choice to implement the principle of separating supervision,execution,and assessment.The major issues that impact the third-party discipline assessment service for the"double first-class"university construction include an incomplete institutional system,weak independence,lack of laws and regulations,legitimacy uncertainty,inadequate professionals,insufficient expertise,lag-behind theory,and unconfident public trust.In order to receive high-quality,high-level and highly rated discipline assessment for the "double first-class"construction from thirdparties,institutional innovation should be carried out for the establishment of the independent status of the third party,legislative work should be strengthened to ensure the legal status of the third party,the assessment team should be optimized to enhance the professional level of the third party and theoretical research should be deepened to enhance the practical effectiveness of the third-party assessment.
引文
[1]张继平.高等教育评估的价值取向博弈:“双一流”建设与学科评估的视角[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2018.46-47.
[2]方跃平,邹放鸣.我国学科类型化评估机制的完善[J].江苏高教,2018(7):21-25.
[3]黄全明.改革呼唤独立公正的第三方[N].中国教育报,2018-11-20(5).
[4]冒荣.直面学科评估的透视力和导向性[J].高教发展与评估,2018(3):5-7.
[5]顾晟.日本高等教育多元化评估体系的现状、特点与启示[J].高教学刊,2018(19):1-3.
[6]曹辉,郑智伟.高等教育第三方评估的法律地位探讨[J].上海教育评估研究,2018(4):1-5.
[7]郭晓.问题梳理价值反思内涵再探—全国第四次学科评估对我国艺术学学科建设的意义和价值[J].艺术教育,2018(3):8-15.
[2]方跃平,邹放鸣.我国学科类型化评估机制的完善[J].江苏高教,2018(7):21-25.
[3]黄全明.改革呼唤独立公正的第三方[N].中国教育报,2018-11-20(5).
[4]冒荣.直面学科评估的透视力和导向性[J].高教发展与评估,2018(3):5-7.
[5]顾晟.日本高等教育多元化评估体系的现状、特点与启示[J].高教学刊,2018(19):1-3.
[6]曹辉,郑智伟.高等教育第三方评估的法律地位探讨[J].上海教育评估研究,2018(4):1-5.
[7]郭晓.问题梳理价值反思内涵再探—全国第四次学科评估对我国艺术学学科建设的意义和价值[J].艺术教育,2018(3):8-15.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |