基于生态系统服务价值评价的四川南河国家湿地公园优化策略研究
|
摘要
为科学评价四川南河国家湿地公园建设成效,并进一步提出国家湿地公园优化策略,本文利用单位面积生态系统服务价值当量表,计算了四川南河国家湿地公园2005年至2018年生态系统服务价值变化。结果表明:四川南河国家湿地公园生态系统服务价值逐年增加,增长率达到40.4%,其中气候调节、生物多样性、美学景观和土壤保持方面价值增长率分别是330.7%、267.0%、201.1%和193.9%,气体调节、原料生产、维持养分循环、净化环境、水资源供给、水文调节增长率分别是176.9%、120.2%、94.2%、71.4%、31.7%、18.5%。基于以上研究,本文提出结合功能区划,逐步增加湿地面积,完善生态结构的优化策略。
In order to scientifically evaluate the effectiveness of Sichuan Nanhe National Wetland Park establishment, and to further propose an National Wetland Park superior strategy, the unit area ecosystem service value equivalent table was used to calculate the changes of ecosystem service value in Sichuan Nanhe National Wetland Park from 2005 to 2018. The results showed that the value of ecosystem services increased year by year in Nanhe National Wetland Park, with a growth rate of 40.4%. The growth rates of climate regulation, biodiversity, aesthetic landscape and soil conservation were 330.7%, 267.0%, 201.1% and 193.9%, respectively. Gas regulation, raw material production, maintenance of nutrient recycling, purification environment, water supply, and hydrological regulation growth rates were 176.9%, 120.2%, 94.2%, 71.4%, 31.7%, and 18.5%.Based on the above research, an optimization strategy was proposed in combining functional zoning, gradually increasing the wetland area, and improving the ecological structure.
In order to scientifically evaluate the effectiveness of Sichuan Nanhe National Wetland Park establishment, and to further propose an National Wetland Park superior strategy, the unit area ecosystem service value equivalent table was used to calculate the changes of ecosystem service value in Sichuan Nanhe National Wetland Park from 2005 to 2018. The results showed that the value of ecosystem services increased year by year in Nanhe National Wetland Park, with a growth rate of 40.4%. The growth rates of climate regulation, biodiversity, aesthetic landscape and soil conservation were 330.7%, 267.0%, 201.1% and 193.9%, respectively. Gas regulation, raw material production, maintenance of nutrient recycling, purification environment, water supply, and hydrological regulation growth rates were 176.9%, 120.2%, 94.2%, 71.4%, 31.7%, and 18.5%.Based on the above research, an optimization strategy was proposed in combining functional zoning, gradually increasing the wetland area, and improving the ecological structure.
引文
[1] Costanza R ,D″Arge R ,De Groot R ,et al.The value of the world”s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].WORLD ENVIRONMENT,1997,387(6630):253～260.
[2] 谢高地,肖玉.农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):645～51.
[3] 张翼然,周德民,刘苗.中国内陆湿地生态系统服务价值评估——以71个湿地案例点为数据源[J].生态学报,2015,35(13):4279～4286.
[4] 庄大昌.洞庭湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].2004,经济地理,24(3):391～394.
[5] 孔东升,张灏.张掖黑河湿地自然保护区生态服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2015,35(4):972～983.
[6] 卢书兵,杨琳琳,李波,等.3个时期华阳河湖群湿地生态系统服务价值估算[J].湿地科学,2014,(6):747～752.
[7] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,(8):1243～54.
[8] 彭文甫,周介铭,杨存建,等.基于土地利用变化的四川省生态系统服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(7):1011.
[9] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189～96.
[10] 郭小燕,刘学录,王联国.以提高生态系统服务为导向的土地利用优化研究——以兰州市为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(24):7992～8001.
[11] 王立龙,陆林,唐勇,等.中国国家级湿地公园运行现状、区域分布格局与类型划分[J].生态学报,2010,30(9):2406～15.
[12] 岑晓腾.土地利用景观格局与生态系统服务价值的关联分析及优化研究 [D].浙江大学,2016.
[13] 胡金龙.漓江流域土地利用变化及生态效应研究[D].华中农业大学,2016.
[2] 谢高地,肖玉.农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):645～51.
[3] 张翼然,周德民,刘苗.中国内陆湿地生态系统服务价值评估——以71个湿地案例点为数据源[J].生态学报,2015,35(13):4279～4286.
[4] 庄大昌.洞庭湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].2004,经济地理,24(3):391～394.
[5] 孔东升,张灏.张掖黑河湿地自然保护区生态服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2015,35(4):972～983.
[6] 卢书兵,杨琳琳,李波,等.3个时期华阳河湖群湿地生态系统服务价值估算[J].湿地科学,2014,(6):747～752.
[7] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,(8):1243～54.
[8] 彭文甫,周介铭,杨存建,等.基于土地利用变化的四川省生态系统服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(7):1011.
[9] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189～96.
[10] 郭小燕,刘学录,王联国.以提高生态系统服务为导向的土地利用优化研究——以兰州市为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(24):7992～8001.
[11] 王立龙,陆林,唐勇,等.中国国家级湿地公园运行现状、区域分布格局与类型划分[J].生态学报,2010,30(9):2406～15.
[12] 岑晓腾.土地利用景观格局与生态系统服务价值的关联分析及优化研究 [D].浙江大学,2016.
[13] 胡金龙.漓江流域土地利用变化及生态效应研究[D].华中农业大学,2016.