摘要
本研究目的在于对比单位时间微课教学与传统教学在药理课堂教学中的效果。结果表明:与传统教学相比,微课教学在总体上并没有显现出优势;微课教学只在临床八年制的学生中能产生较好的教学效果,但是在临床五年制和临床护理学生中,其教学效果却不如传统教学。因此,微课在大学的课堂教学中不是最经济、最有效的教学模式,让微课主导大学课堂教学还有待商榷。
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of unit-time micro-class teaching with traditional teaching in pharmacology classroom teaching in the same time span. The results showed that compared with traditional teaching, micro-teaching did not show any advantages in general; micro-teaching could only produce better teaching effect among the students of clinical eight-year system, but its teaching effect among the students of clinical five-year system and clinical nursing was not as good as that of traditional teaching. Therefore, micro-course is not the most economical and effective teaching mode in university classroom teaching, so it remains to be discussed to let micro-course dominate university classroom teaching.
引文
[1] 单莹.从幕课、微课看碎片化和娱乐化学习[J].中国教育信息化,2014(11):18-19.
[2] 谢春苗.基于微课的翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].新课程研究旬刊,2014(3):60-62.
[3] 陈玉琨.中小学慕课与翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].课程·教材·教法,2014,34(10):10-17.
[4] 李娇.“互联网+”时代高校微课教学模式探讨[J].中国成人教育,2017(5):89-92.
[5] 范建利,方辉平.“互联网+”时代高校微课发展的对策及应用[J].远程教育杂志,2016(3):104-112.
[6] 曾明星,周清平,蔡国平,等.基于mooc的翻转课堂教学研究[J].中国电化教育,2015(4):102-108.
[7] 胡杰辉,伍忠杰.基于mooc的大学英语翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2014(6):40-45.
[8] 谢春苗.基于微课的翻转课堂教学模式研究[J].新课程研究,2014(5):60-61.
[9] 景红.微课在护理高校生理学教学中的应用[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(36):196-197.
[10] 黄英辉,缪洪明,周杰.幕课法在肿瘤学教学中的应用[J].现代医药卫生,2016,32(9):1410-1412.
[11] 龙海波.“慕课”在高等数学教学中的应用及评价研究[J].哈尔滨金融学院学报,2015(5):87-89.
[12] 刘名卓,祝智庭.视频微课的实用学分析[J].开放教育研究,2015,21(1):89-96.
[13] 王竹立.微课勿重走“课内整合”老路——对微课应用的再思考[J].远程教育杂志,2014(5):34-40.