企业管理人员人格特质与风险决策相关性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文系统研究了中小企业经理对各种经营决策风险的认知与评估,并对经理人格特质与风险决策进行了相关研究。
     81名企业经理填答了风险决策认知表和管理人员人格特质问卷。
     结果显示,竞争性、果断性、勤奋性是企业经理最重要的人格特质,与各类风险决策均有显著相关。同时,不同类型的风险决策与不同的人格特质相关。结果如下:
     1.对于企业战略风险决策,企业经理认为市场分析与预测不准、政策不稳定、经济政策调整等风险因素较大;竞争性、果断性、关心人等人格特质与战略风险决策相关。
     2.对于投资风险决策,企业经理认为市场分析与预测有误、经营管理不善、经济政策变更等风险因素较大;竞争性、责任感、果断性、关心人、勤奋性等人格特质与投资风险决策相关。
     3.对于新产品开发风险决策,企业经理认为开发项目选择、市场需求变化、开发能力有限、后继资金不足风险较大;竞争性、果断性、积极性人格特质与新产品开发风险决策显著相关。
     4.对于人事风险决策,企业经理认为对人了解有误、本人信心不足、对本人适合与否判断有误等风险因素较大;竞争性、果断性、成就动机、积极性、坚持性人格特质与人事风险决策有正相关。
     5.对于营销风险决策,企业经理认为产品质量有问题、产品适销不对路、企业形象、代理商缺乏信誉、消费需求变化风险较大;竞争性、果断性、勤奋性、关心人、积极性人格特质与营销决策相关。
This thesis has investigated the perception of risk in types of situation and their decision making . Then, investigated the relationship of the personality and decision making under risk.
    The Risky Decision Making Survey is administered to 81 company managers .
    The result indicates that aggressiveness , firm ,and motivation are the most important personalities of managers ,and the three personalities have broad relationship with the risky decision. And different types of risky decision have relationship with personalities. That is to say special position needs special personality.
    The result as follow:
    (1) Inaccurate market analysis and prediction, instable politics and the changes of economic policy are the more risky elements to strategy decision; The personalities of Aggressive, Firm, Humanity have the positive relationship with the strategy decision .
    (2) Erroneous market analysis and prediction, fail of management, the changes of economic policy are the more risky elements to investment decision; The personalities of Aggressive, Firm, Humanity, Responsibility and Diligence have a broad relationship with the investment.
    (3) Wrong choice in development project, the changes of market demands,
    
    
    limitation of the development ability and shortage of the development fund are the more risky elements to new production development decesion. The personalities of Aggressive, Firm, and Diligence have a broad relationship with the new production development decesion.
    (4) Unfamilarity with oneself and misjudgement in quality of oneself are the more risky elements to personal decision; The personalities of Aggressive, Firm, Diligence, and Motivation of success have positive relationship with the personal decision.
    (5) Defects in product quality, bad market of the product, the appearance of company, and the changes of consumers demands are the more risky elements to market decision; The personalities of Aggressive, Firm, Diligence, and Humanity have a broad relationship with the market decision.
引文
[1]Eysenck,H.J: Experiments in personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1955.
    [2]Cattel,R.B: The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore: Penguin Books,1965.
    [3]Lazarus, R.:Personality.N.J:Prentice Hall,1978.
    [4]Mischel,W. Introduction to personality New York: Holt,Rinehart and Winston 1980
    [5]杨国枢,人格定义引自刘英茂主编的《普通心理学》,台北大洋出版社1978年版。
    [6]潘菽主编《教育心理学》人民教育出版社1980,第400页。
    [7]陈仲庚、张雨新(1986)《人格心理学》辽宁人民出版社。
    [8]Jerry M.Burger:Personality. 1997,121-122.
    [9]Leary,M.(1994,Spring).How should we teach undergraduates about personality? Dialogue 19,8-9.
    [10]Mayer, J.D.(1995).A framework for the classification of personality components. Journal of Personality. 63, 819-878.
    [11]Emmons,R.A.(1995).Levels and domains in personality: An introduction Journal of Personality,63,341-364.
    [12]Allport,G.W.,&Odbert,H.S.(1936).Trait names: A psycho-lexical study.Psychological Monographs,47.
    [13]Mischel,W(1981).George Kelly's anticipation of psychology: A personal tribute.In M.J.Mahoney (Ed3).Psychotherapy process.New York: Plenum.
    
    
    [14]Mischel,W(1982). Alternative in the pursuit of the predictability and consistency of person: Stable data that yield unstable interpretation.Journal of Personality,51,578-604.
    [15]董云雄、秦启庚:《市场经济条件下股份制企业领导者心理品质的研究》《心理科学》1994,353-357
    [16]程正方:《现代管理心理学》,北京师范大学出版社(1998)。
    [17]董云雄、秦启庚:《市场经济条件下股份制企业领导者心理品质的研究》《心理科学》1994,353-357
    [18]吴正、张厚粲:《大五人格理论与人事测评中的人格结构分析》,《心理科学》,1999.22:(3)209-212.
    [19]翟洪昌、许铎:《管理人员个性的因子分析及其科学评价问题的研究》,《心理科学》2000年,第23卷,第2期211-213.
    [20]王黎、张建新:《从人格特质角度看管理人员应付组织变革》,《心理学动态》2000.8:(4)57-61.
    [21]马前锋、孔克勤:《人格无因素结构研究的新进展》,《心理科学》,1997.1,84-86
    [22]Saucier, G.,&Goldberg,L.R.(1996).The language of personality:lexical perspective on the five-factor model. In.J.S.Wiggins. The Five-factor Model of personality,The Guilford Press,New York/London,pp,21-50.
    [23]Eysenck,H.J.(1986). Models and paradigms in personality research.In A.Angleiner, A.Furnbam,&G.Van Heck, Personality Psychology inEurope:Vol.2 Current trends and controversies (pp.213-223).
    [24]Eysenck,H.J.(1991).Dimensions of personality:16,5,or3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences,12,773-790.
    [25]Eysenck,H.J.(1992).Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and
    
    Individual Differences,13,667-673.
    [26] Eysenck ,H.J.(1993) .Comment on Goldberg.American Psychologist, 12,1299-1330
    [27] Eysenck ,H.J.(1986) .Models and paradigms in personality research .In A.Angleiner,A.Furnbam,&G.Van Heck,Personality Psychology in Europe: Vol.2. Current trends and controversies (pp.213-223) .
    [28] Tellegen,A.(1985) .Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety ,with an emphasis on self-report .In A.H.Tuma &J.D.Maser,.Anxietyand the anxiety disorder (pp.681-716) Hillsdale ,NJ: Erlbaum.
    [29] Tellegen,A.( 1993) .Folk-concepts and psychology concepts of personality and personality disorder .Psychology Inquiry,4,122-130. v[30] Cattell,R.B.(1943) .The description if personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,38,476-506.
    [31] Tupes,E.C.,& Christal,R.E.(1992) .Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings .Journal of Personality.
    [32] Norman,W.T.( 1967) .2,800 Personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population .Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology,University of Michigan.
    [33] Goldberg,L.R.(1990) .An alternative "Description of personality":The big-five factor structure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 59,1216-1229.
    [34] Digman,J.M.,&Takernoto-Chock .N.K.(1981) .Factors in the natural language of personality :Reanalysis,comparison,and interpretation of six major studies.Multivariate Behavioral Research,16,149-160.
    
    
    [35]Smith, G. M.(1967). Usefulness of peer ratings of personality in educational research.Education Psychology Measure,27,967-84.
    [36]McCrae,RR.,& Costa T. T.(1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,586-595.
    [37]Zuckerman,M.,Kuhlman,D.M.,& Camac,C.(1991). What lies beyond E and N Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality of Psychology. 28,75-95.
    [38]宋维真、张妙清:《编制中国人个性量表(CPAI)的意义与程序》《心理学报》1993.4,400-407。
    [39]杨波:《5因素模型的两种理论:词汇观和特质论》《心理科学》1999.22,83-85.
    [40]王登峰:《人格特质研究的大五因素分类》,《心理学动态》1994.2,34-41
    [41]张智勇、王登峰:《论人格特质“大七”因素模型》,《心理科学》,1997.1,48-51.
    [42]王登峰、崔红《中国人人格量表(QZPS)的编制过程与初步结果》2001《科学决策知识讲座》,人民出版社(1987)。
    [43]翟洪昌、许铎:《管理人员个性的因子分析及其科学评价问题的研究》,《心理科学》2000年,第23卷,第2期211-213.
    [44]Hansson,S.D.(1989). Dimensions of risk. Risk Analysis,9,107-112.
    [45]Yates.J.F.,& Stone,E.R.(1992). Risk appraisal In.J.F. Yates, Risk-taking behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    [46]Camerer, C.F.,&Kunreuther,,H.C.(1989).Experimental markets for insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2,265-300.
    [47]谢晓非.:《企业管理人员的风险决策模式研究》,《科学管理研究》1995.13:(6)27-31.
    
    
    [48]周非.:《风险决策中的认知心理学问题》,《辽宁大学学报》1999.4,24-28.
    [49]宣国良、杨建一、郝葆华.:《跨国投资的国家风险决策评价系统》.Industrial Engineering and Management No 1,1997,30-33.
    [50]杨保安、赵康、封志学:《基于知识的新产品开发风险决策系统》,《决策与决策支持系统》1995.5:(3)28-33.
    [51]黄两辅:《新产品开发之谋略》,《中国经济出版社》,1991.
    [52]《科学决策知识讲座》,人民出版社,(1987)
    [53]谢晓非、徐联仓:《工作情境中管理人员的风险认知研究》,《心理学报》2000.32:(1)115-120
    [54]谢晓非、徐联仓:《一般社会情境中风险认知的实验研究》,《心理科学》1998。
    [55]陶郁、傅静义:《试论教练员的个性与风险决策》,《山东体育科技》1997.19:(1)27-29.
    [56]王重明、梁立.:《风险决策中动态框架效应研究》,《心理学报》1998.30:(4)394-399.
    [57]Payne,J.W., Bettman,J.,& Johnson ,E.(1992). Behavioral decision research: Theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology,43,88-131.
    [58]李剑锋、徐联仓:《企业经理风险决策行为的实证研究》,《中国管理科学》1996.3,17-25
    [59]Slovic,P.(1972). Psychological study of human judgment:Implication for investment decision making: A methodological proposal. Journal of Business, 45,283-301.
    [60]Grey, R.J.,&Gordon,G.G.(1978).Risk-taking managers: Who gets the top jobs? Management review.67,8-13.
    
    
    [61]Shapira, Z.(1994). Risk taking: A managerial perspective. New York: Elsever.
    [62]谢晓非、徐联仓:《风险认知策略的计算机模拟实验》,《心理学报》1996.28(2)192-199.
    [63]谢晓非、徐联仓:《工作情境中管理人员的风险认知研究》,《心理学报》2000.32:(1)115-120
    [64]MacCrimmon, K.R.,& Wehrung, D.A.(1986). Taking risk: The management of uncertainty, New York: The Free Press.
    [65]March,J.G.,&Shapira,Z.(1987). Managerial perspective on risk and risk taking. Management Science,33,1404-1418.
    [66]卢纹岱《SPSS FOR WINDOWS 10.0》,电子工业出版社(2000)。