注册会计师执业环境研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,国内外资本市场接连发生的公司破产、会计舞弊、审计失败等事件,无一不涉及注册会计师,各种针对注册会计师职责的指责纷纷而至,会计师面临着前所未有的“诚信危机”。但我们也说注册会计师不会积极作假,很多时候是迫于对现实的妥协甚至出于无奈。本文基于此研究背景,选用“注册会计师执业环境研究”这一题目,拟通过对注册会计师执业环境的全面系统研究,以期挖掘出导致审计质量低下的原因,并最终探索出净化注册会计师执业环境的途径。
     本文针对我国具体的注册会计师执业环境现状进行剖析,从宏观、中观、微观三个角度分别对我国注册会计师执业环境的现状进行描述,并对导致注册会计师执业环境低下的原因进行分析:宏观环境中政府过度干预的影响、缺乏高质量会计信息需求市场的原因以及法律法规不完善等原因;中观环境现状的缺陷则为会计师制度安排的缺陷、社会公众期望差和公司治理环境中所存在的各种问题;微观环境方面的影响则为制约注册会计师协会发展的问题,会计师事务所组织形式的影响以及注册会计师自身缺陷等方面。
     结合案例分析,通过安达信的毁灭之路,安永卷入南方保健审计失败案(南方保健审计失败是继《萨班斯——奥克斯莱法》实施后的第一个重大事件)给我们的启示,针对性地对以上导致注册会计师执业环境低下的原因提出完善执业环境的各项建议。并最终认为重典并不是最完善的解决的办法,根治审计失败、治理舞弊行为,应从全社会、全方位着手净化注册会计师的执业环境,其中需要政府及社会各部门的正确引导,更需要社会公众对注册会计师行业的正确认识。但重中之重是注册会计师行业应加强自身建设,严谨的执业道德与超然的独立性乃为注册会计师行业立于不败的基石。
In recent years, the capital markets of domestic and international take placed in succession go bankrupt, accountants practice fraud, audit incident of failing etc., all involved certified public accountants, various kinds of criticism to CPA's duty come one after another, the accountants are facing the unprecedented "sincere crisis". But we would say CPAs would not play tricks actively, it is sometimes because there is no alternative under the pressure of compromise in reality frequently. Base on this research background, this article selects this topic of "Study on the Operation Environment of Certified Public Accountant", through studying systematically operation environment of CPA, we hope find the reasons that made low quality of audit, and at last we want to explore the way to purify the operation environment of CPA.
    Aim at idiographic actuality of our country's operation environment of CPA, this article respectively analyzed actuality and reasons about why our country's operation environment of CPA is so low from microscopical normal and microscopical angles: the influence of government excessive intervene in macroscopical environment, the reason lack high quality accounting information demand and laws and regulations are not perfect etc.; the defect of normal environmental is the defect of arrange of CPA's system, the public's expect difference and various kinds of questions stored in the managing environment of companies; and the influence of the micro environment is the question that would restrict the development of association of chartered accountants, and the influence of the organizational form in the accounting firm and CPA's own defect ,etc.
    Combining case analysis, through the way of ruin of Arthur Andersen, Ernst & Young involving in southern health care audit failing case give our many enlightenments, aim at the cause that made the operation environment of CPA so low, we proposed some suggestions to perfect the operation environment of CPA. And finally, we do not think the focal point is the most perfect settlement method, if we want to cure audit failing, manage the behavior of practicing fraud, we should set about purifying the operation environment of the CPAs from the whole society and omni-directionally, among them we need correct guide of the government and society every department, need the public's correct understanding to the CPA trade even more.
    
    
    But the most important thing is that the certified accountant trade should strengthen self-building, rigorous operation morals and detached independent character are foundation stones of placing oneself in an invincible position for the CPA trade.
引文
[1] 黄世忠.南方保健审计失败案例剖析.中国注册会计师.2004.2.
    [2] 孙常言.现行审计制度的缺陷及其改革探讨.财务与会计导刊.2002.9.
    [3] 李若山等.注册会计师:经济警察吗.北京:中国财政经济出版社.2003.7.
    [4] 杨雄胜.会计诚信问题的理性思考.会计研究.2002.3.
    [5] 李心合.会计制度的信誉基础.会计研究.2002.4.
    [6] 刘峰、许菲.风险导向型审计、法律风险、审计质量.会计研究,2002.2.
    [7] 从审计环境为逻辑起点构建审计理论体系.刘明辉.审计与经济研究.2003.11.
    [8] 张以宽.论审计环境.会计文苑.2002.3.
    [9] 周华楣.审计环境论.陕阳审计.1992.6.
    [10] 审计干部审计知识读本.李金华.北京:中国审计出版社.2000.6.
    [11] 王文博.谈谈审计环境.财会审1990.2.
    [12] 叶陈刚.注册会计师诚信的现实反思.审计研究.2003.2.
    [13] 上海课题组.注册会计师独立审计执业环境研究.审计研究资料.1999.9.
    [14] 刘德银.我国独立审计欺诈的法律风险研究.财务与会计导刊.2004.4.
    [15] 柴芳云.论注册会计师执业环境及风险治理.集美大学学报.2000.9.
    [16] 罗韵轩、彭志军.从安然公司破产看根治上市公司会计造价.审计与经济研究.2002.7.
    [17] 胡佳俊.上市公司法人治理结构对注册会计师审计工作的影响.上海会计,2002.5.
    [18] 陈汉文:王华 郑新成.安达信事件与反思.广州:暨南大学出版社.2003.6.
    [19] 孙铮、王志伟、吴茜.市场监管、公司治理、会计改革.北京:中国会计学会第六次全国会员代表大会.2002.9.
    [20] 孙昌言.现行审计制度的缺陷及其改革探讨.财务与会计导刊.2002.9.
    [21] 汤云为.关于中国注册会计师职业发展若干问题的探讨.会计文苑.2000.8.
    [22] 王善平.独立审计的诚信问题.会计研究.2002.7.
    [23] 李连军.审计独立性的制度陷阱与制度重建.财务与会计 2002.9.
    [24] 王曙光.CPA业务拓展与独立性的冲突和协调.审计与经济研究.2002.4.
    [25] 薛云奎.准收买了注册会计师.会计文苑.2002.11.
    [26] 刘国常.对注册会计师诚信问题的反思.中国审计 2002.7.
    [27] 李维安等.美国的公司治理:马奇诺防线.中国财政经济出版社.2003.7.
    [28] 崔宏、刘尔奎.独立性的含义与经济性质.中国注册会计师.2003.1.
    [29] 裴红卫、柯大钢.注册会计师诚信:一个基于制度的分析框架.审计与经济研究.2003.3
    
    
    [30] 王善平.资本市场规模化中的独立审计机制创新问题研究.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2002.12.
    [31] 张连起.舞弊行为与舞弊审计.财务与会计.2002.9.
    [32] 袁远.CPA打造注册会计师行业诚信文化的思考.中国注册会计师.2003.12.
    [33] 葛家澍、黄世忠.安然事件的反思.会计研究.2002.2.
    [34] 阎达五、李勇.也谈美国会计造假事件.会计研究.2002.9.
    [35] 陈志武、周年洋.安然 华尔街完美案例.北京:中国城市出版社.2002.8.
    [36] 蔡计准.美国会计监管和透明度法案对我们的启示.财务与会计.2002.9
    [37] 潘晓江.安然公司破产与美国会计研究.会计研究.2002.4.
    [38] 对《索克斯法案》有关注册会计师行业治理内容的解读.山东:青岛大学国际商学院.2002.
    [39] 亚瑟·莱维特.美国会计业向何处去.财务与会计导刊.2002.6.
    [40] 马克·史蒂文思著.陈玉新译.领袖的风险世界顶级会计师事务所揭秘.北京:中央编译出版社.2003.9.
    [41] 刘国常.论政府审计对社会审计监督的必要性.中国审计.2002.3.
    [42] 孙俊英.注册会计师介入法律领域的重要性.中国审计.2002.10.
    [43] 张艳.论我国证券市场独立审计.财务与会计导刊.2002.1.
    [44] 张兴华.审计业务质量:一个不容忽视的问题.中国审计.2002.9.
    [45] 田存礼,戴作玲.财务报告舞弊的社会思考.财务与会计导刊.2002.6
    [46] 宫严惠.美国注册会计师行业的改革与启示.中国审计.2002.9.
    [47] 张瑞.独立性的重要性.财会研究.2002.1.
    [48] 黄震.信任危机的原因与对策.财务与会计导刊.2002.8.
    [49] 宣言.注册会计师为何屡屡卷入上市公司“造假”漩涡.财务与会计导刊.2002.8.
    [50] 赵鑫福译.会计制度弊端严重令人震惊.财务与会计导刊.2002.6.
    [51] 柴珐.关于完善我国注册会计管理体制的思考.中国注册会计师.2003.2.
    [52] 陆基康.中国注册会计师执业环境与行业体制改革.会计文苑.2002.11.
    [53] The House of the United States, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. July 24, 2002.
    [54] Eugence A. Imhoff, Jr.,Employment Effects on Auditor Independence. Accounting Review, July 1978: 587-593. ~
    [55] Briloff, A.J., Old Myths and New Realities in Accountancy. Accounting Review, July 1966: 484-495.
    [56] Harvey L. Pitt, 2002b (January 23, 2002). Remarks at the 29th Annual Securities
    
    Regulation Institute. WWW.Sec.gov/news/speech/spch536.htm.
    [57] Arthur Levitt. 2002. Who Audits the Auditors?. New York Times, January 17.
    [58] Statement From Big Five CEOs on Enron, www.aicpa.
    [59] James. A. Largay, Lessons from Erron. Accounting Horizons, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2002.