湖南南天竹遗传多样性及园林利用评价体系研究
|
摘要
南天竹(Nandina domestica Thunb.),属小檗科南天竹属植物,是一种具有观赏、生态、药用等多种价值的树种。
针对目前国内外对于南天竹的种质资源、遗传多样性、生长发育规律和抗性选育研究较少以及园林资源开发和利用混乱等问题,本论文对湖南地区南天竹种源进行调查,研究南天竹在湖南的分布、资源类型及生态适应性。通过对南天竹形态特征、生长发育规律、繁殖特性及园林利用特性、遗传多样性的系统研究,分析南天竹在园林中的观赏特性和观赏效果,并对不同种源南天竹进行种源遗传结构分析及分子鉴别,建立一套南天竹种质资源开发利用价值评价标准和体系。
主要结论如下：
南天竹在湖南地区的物候变化规律：春季萌芽早,能在土壤解冻后、春季大风来临之前很快萌芽,约在2月中旬至3月初树芽开始萌动,3月上旬至3月下旬底为芽子膨大期,4月初抽生出尚未展开的花序和嫩叶,4月上旬至4月下旬,为花蕾期,从5月上旬至7月中旬,为花期,近3个月,种子10月上中旬成熟,成熟期晚,且红叶和果实观赏期长。南天竹主芽具有较强的萌芽力,主芽受损后,副芽和隐芽往往同时萌发,抽生成枝条；其新梢的年生长、叶片生长规律遵循Logistic方程的拟合曲线。南天竹属于当年花芽分化,翌年开花结实类型；从开花到果实成熟大致需要180-210 d左右。
表型性状研究表明,南天竹地理种源遗传变异丰富,25个形态特征平均变异系数达到了29.956%。13个种源间的欧氏遗传距离为0.001～1.000。平均遗传距离为0.5005。25个表型性状中,叶片形状、果实形状、花器官特征和嫩梢(叶)秋冬季颜色等反映了南天竹70.986%的表型信息,利用这些特征可基本对不同地方来源的南天竹进行分类。根据聚类及主成分分析结果,并结合不同地方种源性状特征,可将13个湖南南天竹种源分为5大类型：观赏效果较差的南天竹主要分布于第一类,有张家界南天竹、宜章南天竹、新化南天竹；而树体高大、果实圆形或椭圆形,颜色红色或棕红色,观赏效果较好的南天竹主要分布于第二类,有岳阳南天竹、韶山南天竹、衡山南天竹、祁阳南天竹；秋冬季节叶片颜色为紫红色的V02(柏加南天竹)和V10分别单独为一类,属于第四类和第五类；其余种源属于第三类,其表型性状特征不明显。
根据对南天竹过氧化物酶、超氧化物岐化酶、细胞色素酶、酯酶等同工酶的研究,探求湖南南天竹不同种源之间的亲源关系及遗传多样性。同工酶电泳染色后,绘制图谱,测Rf值。结果表明南天竹13个种源不同同工酶的酶带数目、位置差异较大,表明湖南南天竹种源变异十分丰富、亲缘关系复杂。根据13个种源不同同工酶的酶带电泳图谱,采用Dice相似系数计算方法,计算各种源之间的相似系数。结果表明,不同种源之间相似系数差异较大。其中POD相似系数为0.500-1.000,EST相似系数为0.500-1.000,SOD相似系数为0.364-1.000,COD相似系数为0.556～1.000。采用SPSS13.0软件进行种源聚类,根据各种源之间的距离绘制的分类树状图,13个种源在不同的相似距离处分开,表明13个种源大致可分为不同的三大类群。利用NTSYSpc2.1分析软件,进行主坐标分析。将Dice遗传相似性系数矩阵进行Dcenter数据转化,求其特征值和特征向量,生成主坐标二维和三维图。从二维和三维图上可以看出,同一种同工酶的主坐标聚类与系统聚类结果是一致的。
通过对ISSR反应程序中的一些重要参数进行摸索和优化试验,建立了稳定的、适用于南天竹13个种源遗传多样性和遗传分化研究的ISSR-PCR分析反应体系和反应程序,对湖南13个南天竹种源进行遗传多样性分析。从100条引物中筛选出10条重复性好、条带特异、多态性明显的引物。该10条引物扩增出56条清晰可重复的条带,其中48条是多态带,平均每条引物为4.8条多态带,总多态带百分率为85.7%,扩增片段长度范围为300～1600 bpo Nei遗传距离和遗传一致度的结果表明：V05和V12之间的遗传距离最小(0.1133),相应的遗传一致度最大(0.9286)；而V09与V10之间的遗传距离最大(0.6581),相应的遗传一致度最小(0.5179)。这说明V05和V12两个种源的生长环境相类似,而V09和V10之间的差异可能较大。通过NTSYS-pc软件和MVSP32软件对南天竹的13个种源的Nei的遗传距离分析发现,V05、V07、V08、V12在遗传上较相似,聚为.一类；V1l、V13很相似,聚为一类；V02、V03、V04的相似性较近,可以聚为一类；V01、V06、V09、V10则同其它三类的相似性较远,且彼此单独为一类。形态标记与分子标记之间的相关性系数为,0.213,两者相关性不高。
南天竹观赏特性较高,其观赏特性主要表现为直接观赏性和间接观赏性；观赏方式有绿化观赏、室内点缀观赏和盆栽观赏；绿化手法多种多样,常见的有片植、从植、绿篱、地被植物、庭院绿化、盆景盆栽以及插花等。
采用灰色关联分析方法综合评价南天竹的观赏价值。从最终评价结果来,13个南天竹种源,按从优到劣排序,依次为浏阳柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹、.黄花机场南天竹、衡山南天竹、宜章南天竹、韶山南天竹、祁阳南天竹、洪江南天竹、泪罗南天竹、株洲芦淞区南天竹、娄底新化南天竹、张家界南天竹、益阳桃江南天竹。浏阳柏加的南天竹在13个测试种源排名第一,观赏特性极好,景观美观最优。试验分析结果与园林实际应用效果的一致性较好。
利用模糊数学的多级综合评判法(AHP法)进行南天竹开发利用价值评价。从最终评价结果来看：柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹、黄花机场南天竹、祁阳南天竹、衡山南天竹和宜章南天竹列入第Ⅰ或第Ⅱ级,其观赏价值、资源潜力、生物学特性各方面分值都相对很高；桃江南天竹、韶山南天竹等观赏价值很高却被列入第Ⅲ级,主要原因是资源数量、抗逆性或生物学特性等方面的限制,造成综合评价值偏低。通过对观赏植物南天竹种源开发价值评价体系的建立,使评价方法,不再局限于对观赏植物南天竹观赏价值的定性描述和评价,能比较全面准确地反映特定区域特定生态环境下观赏植物南天竹种质资源开发利用的特点,可以避免开发过程中对生态环境的严重破坏和资源浪费等问题,是一种比较理想的评价方法。此评价方法应用在湖南地区观赏植物南天竹资源的评价结果,将为湖南观赏植物南天竹资源的开发利用起到一定的指导作用。
综合试验结果可得：从园林利用的角度上,湖南地区南天竹种质资源以浏阳柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹这两个地方种源为最佳种源,可以在园林中广泛开发利用,且利用价值高。而张家界南天竹、邵东南天竹,应结合其特性进行其它方面的开发利用,其余各种源可以根据开发利用途径和目的,进行如盆景和水土保持等方面的开发利用。AHP模型评价湖南南天竹的结果,将为今后开发利用湖南南天竹资源提供理论依据。
Common Nandina(Nandina domestica Thunb)belonges to Berberidaceae. It is a plant that has many values in Ornamental,ecology,medicine and so on.
In order to solve the problems of researches on its species resource,genetic diversity,growing regularities,stress breeding study,and less exploitation and utilization in landscaping,the article inquired into the different endemic species and studied it's distribution,resource type and ecological adaptability of Common Nandina in Hunan. The systemic researches of morphology,growth regularities and of the reproductive characteristics and exploitation and utilization in garden,and genetic diversity have been done in this article.The ornamental characteristics and impression were analyzed,and the genetic structure analysis and molecular identification among different species have been done,result in the standard system for exploitation and utilization were established in Hunan.
Primary conclusion as follows:
In Hunan area,the change rules of Common Nandina Phonology:The bud in early spring sprout after the soil thaw and before gale coming,about mid-February to early March tree buds begin to germinate,The time from early March to late March to the end is buds bulked period,the leaves and inflorescence,which are not starting expanding, take out in early April.The bud period is the time from in early April to late April.And the florescene period is as long as sustained about three months from early May to mid-July,seeds mature in the mid-October,which belong to late mature is later,the ornamental force,after the strong injury,auxiliary shoots and bud often sprout soon,and the branches germinates.The annual growth regularity of new shoots and leaves follows the fitted curve of the Logistic equation.Common Nandina completes bud differentiation in the first year,and blessoms next year.belongs bud differentiation 180-210 days is needed from blossoms to fruit.
The results of Morphological research showed that genetic diversity was much abundant in Common Nandina in Hunan. The average variation coefficient(CV)was 29.956% among the 25 morphological characters. Genetic distance(Nei's)ranged from 0.001 to 1.000,and the average genetic distance was 0.5005.In 25 morphological characters,the shape of leaf and the fruit,characters of flower,color of soft tip(leaf)were the decisive factors limit classification of Common Nandina,of which revealed about 70.986% morphological information.Common Nandina from different place can classify by these characters.According to UPGMA clustering results and principal components analysis(PCA)and their geographical origins'characters,13 sources from Hunan were classified in 5 clusters:Having not good ornamental effect were the first type,such as zhangjiajie,Yizhang,Xinhua; And the second type has big body,circular or ellipse fruit,which were red or brown red,has better ornamental effect such as Yueyang,Shaoshan,Hengshan Mount,Qiyang; the V02(Baijia)of purple-red leaf in fall and winter and the V10 were different type alone,belong to the fourth type and the fifth typerespectively;Other sources belong to the third type,their Morphological characters were not obvious.
According to these researches on Peroxidase(POD),Superoxid dismutase Isoenzyme(SOD),Enzyme(EST)Cytochrome(COD),Esterase isozymes,the, connection and genetic diversity were selected in different source of Hunan.After isoenzyme electricity swimming and dying,drawing up the patterns,measuring the Rf value,the results showed that 13 sources different isoenzyme'belt number,position had bigger difference and 13 sources diversity were much abundant,the blood relationship were complex in Hunan. According to 13 sources of different isoenzyme electrophoresis patterns,We use the method of the Dice coefficient to calculate their coefficient. The results showed that the difference of coefficient in sources was bigger. The POD Dice coefficient was 0.500-1.000, the EST Dice coefficient was 0.500-1.000,the SOD Dice coefficient was 0.364-1.000, the COD Dice coefficient was 0.556-1.000. By using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS13.0)software,to carry out the source UPGMA clustering,13 sources were detached in different distance and were placed into three different clusters.By using NTSYSpc2.1 analysis software,the principal components analysis was carried out. the Dice coefficient matrix were transformed by the Dcenter data means,eigenvalue and eigenvector were calculated. two-dimensional chart and three-dimensional chart were drew.The 2D and 3D charts showed that the cluster from the same isozyme by the Principal Coordinates Analysis(PCOD)and the cluster of UPGMA clustering method were consistent.
The exploration and optimization tests have been carried on through some important parameters in ISSR response procedure,which established the reacting system and the response procedure which have been stable and suitable to Common Nandina 13 sources genetic diversity and genetic differentiation research by ISSR-PCR analysis. The genetic diversity was analyzed to 13 Common Nandina sources of Hunan. From 100 ISSR primer combinations,10 were selected for the analysis based on numeber and quality of polymorphic fragments,which repetition were better,the strip belt was special,polymorphric were obvious. A total of 56 ISSR markers were identified,of which 48(85.7%)were polymorphic,there were 4.8 polymorphic in every primer combinations.The fragments of amplified bands ranging were from 300 to 1600 bp.The results of genetic distance(Nei's)and genetic similar coefficient showed:the genetic distance was the least between the V05 and the V12 (0.1133),the corresponding genetic similar coefficient was the biggest (0.9286). But the Nei's genetic distance was the farthest between V09 and the V10(0.6581),the corresponding genetic similar coefficient was the smallest(0.5179).This indicated the V05 and the V12 sources habitats were similar,but the difference of the V09 and the V10 may be bigger.
Through NTSYS-pc software and MVSP32 software to analyze 13 sources Common Nandina Nei's distance,we found that V05,V07,V08,V12 comparatively were similar in the heredity,and they were clustered as one type kind;V11,V13 were more similar,and they were clustered as another type; the similarity of V02,V03,V04 was nearer,its may be clustered as one type; V01,V06,V09,V10 were farther with other three kinds of similarities, and each was clustered as one type respectively. The relevant coefficient between the morphological mark and the molecular mark was 0.213,both correlation were not higher.
The ornamental characters of Common Nandina was higher,of which main performance were directly or indirectly to be viewed; the manners of view had the landscape,indoor potted ornamental plants and ornamental decorations; The green technique were varied and the common such as mass planting, clump planting,hedgerow,and the grassprot planting,the garden virescence,bonsai and pot plantingand ikebana.
Common Nandina ornamental Characters were analyzed by Grey correlative Degree comprehensive evaluation.From finally appraising the results,the order of 13 different Common Nandina sources were in turn Liuyang Baijia Nandina,Yueyang County Nandina,the Huanghua airport Nandina,Hengshan Nandina, Yichang Nandina, Shaoshan Nandina, Qiyang Nandina,the Hong Chiang Nandina;Miluo Nandina,the Zhuzhou Lusong area Nandina,Loudi Xinhua Nandina, Zhangjiajie Nandina,the Yiyang Taojiang from good to poor.The Liuyang BaiJia Nandina was the No.1 in 13 source,and the ornamental Characters was. extremely good,and the landscape impression was the best. The uniformity between the experimental analysis result and the garden application actual effect was better.
The evaluation system for exploitation and utilization value of Common Nandina was established by using Analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Based on final evaluation result,BaiJia Nandina,Yueyang County Nandina,Huanghua airpot Nandina,Qiyang Nandina,Hengshan Nandina and Yizhang Nandina were listed in the gradeⅠorⅡ, its score of ornamental value,rescourcese potential, biology characteristic were the highest. Taojiang Nandina,Shaoshan Nandina and so on which had very high ornamental value actually,but they were ordered in the gradeⅢ, the main reasons were some restrictively factors such as resisting ability, resources quantity,nature or biology characteristic property, of which brought about that its appraisal synthesis value were the lowest.
By establishment of the evaluation system for exploitation and utilization value of Common Nandina in Hunan,the evaluation method was no longer restricted to the qualitative description and appraisal of Common Nandina viewing value to ornamental plants. It can quite comprehensively accurately reflect the exploitation and utilization character of the ornamental plant resources;This was a perfect evaluation method to avoid environment havoc and resource waste in exploitation and utilization. It was one quite ideal evaluation method. The evaluation result which was applied to ornamental plants in the Hunan area,will play a guiding role in the local ornamental plants for the development and utilization of Common Nandina resources.
In conclusion, the resources of Baijia,Yueyang Common Nandina were the best and the exploitation and utilization value were the highest and may be exploited and utilized to the garden widely. The other aspects value of Zhangjiajie Common Nandina,Shaodong Common Nandina were exploited for the purpose, such as minisize bonsai and keeping natural environment.This method system was proved to be satisfied in flexibility and accuracy and it was a scientific foundation for exploiting and utilizing the Nandina domestic in Hunan.
针对目前国内外对于南天竹的种质资源、遗传多样性、生长发育规律和抗性选育研究较少以及园林资源开发和利用混乱等问题,本论文对湖南地区南天竹种源进行调查,研究南天竹在湖南的分布、资源类型及生态适应性。通过对南天竹形态特征、生长发育规律、繁殖特性及园林利用特性、遗传多样性的系统研究,分析南天竹在园林中的观赏特性和观赏效果,并对不同种源南天竹进行种源遗传结构分析及分子鉴别,建立一套南天竹种质资源开发利用价值评价标准和体系。
主要结论如下：
南天竹在湖南地区的物候变化规律：春季萌芽早,能在土壤解冻后、春季大风来临之前很快萌芽,约在2月中旬至3月初树芽开始萌动,3月上旬至3月下旬底为芽子膨大期,4月初抽生出尚未展开的花序和嫩叶,4月上旬至4月下旬,为花蕾期,从5月上旬至7月中旬,为花期,近3个月,种子10月上中旬成熟,成熟期晚,且红叶和果实观赏期长。南天竹主芽具有较强的萌芽力,主芽受损后,副芽和隐芽往往同时萌发,抽生成枝条；其新梢的年生长、叶片生长规律遵循Logistic方程的拟合曲线。南天竹属于当年花芽分化,翌年开花结实类型；从开花到果实成熟大致需要180-210 d左右。
表型性状研究表明,南天竹地理种源遗传变异丰富,25个形态特征平均变异系数达到了29.956%。13个种源间的欧氏遗传距离为0.001～1.000。平均遗传距离为0.5005。25个表型性状中,叶片形状、果实形状、花器官特征和嫩梢(叶)秋冬季颜色等反映了南天竹70.986%的表型信息,利用这些特征可基本对不同地方来源的南天竹进行分类。根据聚类及主成分分析结果,并结合不同地方种源性状特征,可将13个湖南南天竹种源分为5大类型：观赏效果较差的南天竹主要分布于第一类,有张家界南天竹、宜章南天竹、新化南天竹；而树体高大、果实圆形或椭圆形,颜色红色或棕红色,观赏效果较好的南天竹主要分布于第二类,有岳阳南天竹、韶山南天竹、衡山南天竹、祁阳南天竹；秋冬季节叶片颜色为紫红色的V02(柏加南天竹)和V10分别单独为一类,属于第四类和第五类；其余种源属于第三类,其表型性状特征不明显。
根据对南天竹过氧化物酶、超氧化物岐化酶、细胞色素酶、酯酶等同工酶的研究,探求湖南南天竹不同种源之间的亲源关系及遗传多样性。同工酶电泳染色后,绘制图谱,测Rf值。结果表明南天竹13个种源不同同工酶的酶带数目、位置差异较大,表明湖南南天竹种源变异十分丰富、亲缘关系复杂。根据13个种源不同同工酶的酶带电泳图谱,采用Dice相似系数计算方法,计算各种源之间的相似系数。结果表明,不同种源之间相似系数差异较大。其中POD相似系数为0.500-1.000,EST相似系数为0.500-1.000,SOD相似系数为0.364-1.000,COD相似系数为0.556～1.000。采用SPSS13.0软件进行种源聚类,根据各种源之间的距离绘制的分类树状图,13个种源在不同的相似距离处分开,表明13个种源大致可分为不同的三大类群。利用NTSYSpc2.1分析软件,进行主坐标分析。将Dice遗传相似性系数矩阵进行Dcenter数据转化,求其特征值和特征向量,生成主坐标二维和三维图。从二维和三维图上可以看出,同一种同工酶的主坐标聚类与系统聚类结果是一致的。
通过对ISSR反应程序中的一些重要参数进行摸索和优化试验,建立了稳定的、适用于南天竹13个种源遗传多样性和遗传分化研究的ISSR-PCR分析反应体系和反应程序,对湖南13个南天竹种源进行遗传多样性分析。从100条引物中筛选出10条重复性好、条带特异、多态性明显的引物。该10条引物扩增出56条清晰可重复的条带,其中48条是多态带,平均每条引物为4.8条多态带,总多态带百分率为85.7%,扩增片段长度范围为300～1600 bpo Nei遗传距离和遗传一致度的结果表明：V05和V12之间的遗传距离最小(0.1133),相应的遗传一致度最大(0.9286)；而V09与V10之间的遗传距离最大(0.6581),相应的遗传一致度最小(0.5179)。这说明V05和V12两个种源的生长环境相类似,而V09和V10之间的差异可能较大。通过NTSYS-pc软件和MVSP32软件对南天竹的13个种源的Nei的遗传距离分析发现,V05、V07、V08、V12在遗传上较相似,聚为.一类；V1l、V13很相似,聚为一类；V02、V03、V04的相似性较近,可以聚为一类；V01、V06、V09、V10则同其它三类的相似性较远,且彼此单独为一类。形态标记与分子标记之间的相关性系数为,0.213,两者相关性不高。
南天竹观赏特性较高,其观赏特性主要表现为直接观赏性和间接观赏性；观赏方式有绿化观赏、室内点缀观赏和盆栽观赏；绿化手法多种多样,常见的有片植、从植、绿篱、地被植物、庭院绿化、盆景盆栽以及插花等。
采用灰色关联分析方法综合评价南天竹的观赏价值。从最终评价结果来,13个南天竹种源,按从优到劣排序,依次为浏阳柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹、.黄花机场南天竹、衡山南天竹、宜章南天竹、韶山南天竹、祁阳南天竹、洪江南天竹、泪罗南天竹、株洲芦淞区南天竹、娄底新化南天竹、张家界南天竹、益阳桃江南天竹。浏阳柏加的南天竹在13个测试种源排名第一,观赏特性极好,景观美观最优。试验分析结果与园林实际应用效果的一致性较好。
利用模糊数学的多级综合评判法(AHP法)进行南天竹开发利用价值评价。从最终评价结果来看：柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹、黄花机场南天竹、祁阳南天竹、衡山南天竹和宜章南天竹列入第Ⅰ或第Ⅱ级,其观赏价值、资源潜力、生物学特性各方面分值都相对很高；桃江南天竹、韶山南天竹等观赏价值很高却被列入第Ⅲ级,主要原因是资源数量、抗逆性或生物学特性等方面的限制,造成综合评价值偏低。通过对观赏植物南天竹种源开发价值评价体系的建立,使评价方法,不再局限于对观赏植物南天竹观赏价值的定性描述和评价,能比较全面准确地反映特定区域特定生态环境下观赏植物南天竹种质资源开发利用的特点,可以避免开发过程中对生态环境的严重破坏和资源浪费等问题,是一种比较理想的评价方法。此评价方法应用在湖南地区观赏植物南天竹资源的评价结果,将为湖南观赏植物南天竹资源的开发利用起到一定的指导作用。
综合试验结果可得：从园林利用的角度上,湖南地区南天竹种质资源以浏阳柏加南天竹、岳阳县南天竹这两个地方种源为最佳种源,可以在园林中广泛开发利用,且利用价值高。而张家界南天竹、邵东南天竹,应结合其特性进行其它方面的开发利用,其余各种源可以根据开发利用途径和目的,进行如盆景和水土保持等方面的开发利用。AHP模型评价湖南南天竹的结果,将为今后开发利用湖南南天竹资源提供理论依据。
Common Nandina(Nandina domestica Thunb)belonges to Berberidaceae. It is a plant that has many values in Ornamental,ecology,medicine and so on.
In order to solve the problems of researches on its species resource,genetic diversity,growing regularities,stress breeding study,and less exploitation and utilization in landscaping,the article inquired into the different endemic species and studied it's distribution,resource type and ecological adaptability of Common Nandina in Hunan. The systemic researches of morphology,growth regularities and of the reproductive characteristics and exploitation and utilization in garden,and genetic diversity have been done in this article.The ornamental characteristics and impression were analyzed,and the genetic structure analysis and molecular identification among different species have been done,result in the standard system for exploitation and utilization were established in Hunan.
Primary conclusion as follows:
In Hunan area,the change rules of Common Nandina Phonology:The bud in early spring sprout after the soil thaw and before gale coming,about mid-February to early March tree buds begin to germinate,The time from early March to late March to the end is buds bulked period,the leaves and inflorescence,which are not starting expanding, take out in early April.The bud period is the time from in early April to late April.And the florescene period is as long as sustained about three months from early May to mid-July,seeds mature in the mid-October,which belong to late mature is later,the ornamental force,after the strong injury,auxiliary shoots and bud often sprout soon,and the branches germinates.The annual growth regularity of new shoots and leaves follows the fitted curve of the Logistic equation.Common Nandina completes bud differentiation in the first year,and blessoms next year.belongs bud differentiation 180-210 days is needed from blossoms to fruit.
The results of Morphological research showed that genetic diversity was much abundant in Common Nandina in Hunan. The average variation coefficient(CV)was 29.956% among the 25 morphological characters. Genetic distance(Nei's)ranged from 0.001 to 1.000,and the average genetic distance was 0.5005.In 25 morphological characters,the shape of leaf and the fruit,characters of flower,color of soft tip(leaf)were the decisive factors limit classification of Common Nandina,of which revealed about 70.986% morphological information.Common Nandina from different place can classify by these characters.According to UPGMA clustering results and principal components analysis(PCA)and their geographical origins'characters,13 sources from Hunan were classified in 5 clusters:Having not good ornamental effect were the first type,such as zhangjiajie,Yizhang,Xinhua; And the second type has big body,circular or ellipse fruit,which were red or brown red,has better ornamental effect such as Yueyang,Shaoshan,Hengshan Mount,Qiyang; the V02(Baijia)of purple-red leaf in fall and winter and the V10 were different type alone,belong to the fourth type and the fifth typerespectively;Other sources belong to the third type,their Morphological characters were not obvious.
According to these researches on Peroxidase(POD),Superoxid dismutase Isoenzyme(SOD),Enzyme(EST)Cytochrome(COD),Esterase isozymes,the, connection and genetic diversity were selected in different source of Hunan.After isoenzyme electricity swimming and dying,drawing up the patterns,measuring the Rf value,the results showed that 13 sources different isoenzyme'belt number,position had bigger difference and 13 sources diversity were much abundant,the blood relationship were complex in Hunan. According to 13 sources of different isoenzyme electrophoresis patterns,We use the method of the Dice coefficient to calculate their coefficient. The results showed that the difference of coefficient in sources was bigger. The POD Dice coefficient was 0.500-1.000, the EST Dice coefficient was 0.500-1.000,the SOD Dice coefficient was 0.364-1.000, the COD Dice coefficient was 0.556-1.000. By using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS13.0)software,to carry out the source UPGMA clustering,13 sources were detached in different distance and were placed into three different clusters.By using NTSYSpc2.1 analysis software,the principal components analysis was carried out. the Dice coefficient matrix were transformed by the Dcenter data means,eigenvalue and eigenvector were calculated. two-dimensional chart and three-dimensional chart were drew.The 2D and 3D charts showed that the cluster from the same isozyme by the Principal Coordinates Analysis(PCOD)and the cluster of UPGMA clustering method were consistent.
The exploration and optimization tests have been carried on through some important parameters in ISSR response procedure,which established the reacting system and the response procedure which have been stable and suitable to Common Nandina 13 sources genetic diversity and genetic differentiation research by ISSR-PCR analysis. The genetic diversity was analyzed to 13 Common Nandina sources of Hunan. From 100 ISSR primer combinations,10 were selected for the analysis based on numeber and quality of polymorphic fragments,which repetition were better,the strip belt was special,polymorphric were obvious. A total of 56 ISSR markers were identified,of which 48(85.7%)were polymorphic,there were 4.8 polymorphic in every primer combinations.The fragments of amplified bands ranging were from 300 to 1600 bp.The results of genetic distance(Nei's)and genetic similar coefficient showed:the genetic distance was the least between the V05 and the V12 (0.1133),the corresponding genetic similar coefficient was the biggest (0.9286). But the Nei's genetic distance was the farthest between V09 and the V10(0.6581),the corresponding genetic similar coefficient was the smallest(0.5179).This indicated the V05 and the V12 sources habitats were similar,but the difference of the V09 and the V10 may be bigger.
Through NTSYS-pc software and MVSP32 software to analyze 13 sources Common Nandina Nei's distance,we found that V05,V07,V08,V12 comparatively were similar in the heredity,and they were clustered as one type kind;V11,V13 were more similar,and they were clustered as another type; the similarity of V02,V03,V04 was nearer,its may be clustered as one type; V01,V06,V09,V10 were farther with other three kinds of similarities, and each was clustered as one type respectively. The relevant coefficient between the morphological mark and the molecular mark was 0.213,both correlation were not higher.
The ornamental characters of Common Nandina was higher,of which main performance were directly or indirectly to be viewed; the manners of view had the landscape,indoor potted ornamental plants and ornamental decorations; The green technique were varied and the common such as mass planting, clump planting,hedgerow,and the grassprot planting,the garden virescence,bonsai and pot plantingand ikebana.
Common Nandina ornamental Characters were analyzed by Grey correlative Degree comprehensive evaluation.From finally appraising the results,the order of 13 different Common Nandina sources were in turn Liuyang Baijia Nandina,Yueyang County Nandina,the Huanghua airport Nandina,Hengshan Nandina, Yichang Nandina, Shaoshan Nandina, Qiyang Nandina,the Hong Chiang Nandina;Miluo Nandina,the Zhuzhou Lusong area Nandina,Loudi Xinhua Nandina, Zhangjiajie Nandina,the Yiyang Taojiang from good to poor.The Liuyang BaiJia Nandina was the No.1 in 13 source,and the ornamental Characters was. extremely good,and the landscape impression was the best. The uniformity between the experimental analysis result and the garden application actual effect was better.
The evaluation system for exploitation and utilization value of Common Nandina was established by using Analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Based on final evaluation result,BaiJia Nandina,Yueyang County Nandina,Huanghua airpot Nandina,Qiyang Nandina,Hengshan Nandina and Yizhang Nandina were listed in the gradeⅠorⅡ, its score of ornamental value,rescourcese potential, biology characteristic were the highest. Taojiang Nandina,Shaoshan Nandina and so on which had very high ornamental value actually,but they were ordered in the gradeⅢ, the main reasons were some restrictively factors such as resisting ability, resources quantity,nature or biology characteristic property, of which brought about that its appraisal synthesis value were the lowest.
By establishment of the evaluation system for exploitation and utilization value of Common Nandina in Hunan,the evaluation method was no longer restricted to the qualitative description and appraisal of Common Nandina viewing value to ornamental plants. It can quite comprehensively accurately reflect the exploitation and utilization character of the ornamental plant resources;This was a perfect evaluation method to avoid environment havoc and resource waste in exploitation and utilization. It was one quite ideal evaluation method. The evaluation result which was applied to ornamental plants in the Hunan area,will play a guiding role in the local ornamental plants for the development and utilization of Common Nandina resources.
In conclusion, the resources of Baijia,Yueyang Common Nandina were the best and the exploitation and utilization value were the highest and may be exploited and utilized to the garden widely. The other aspects value of Zhangjiajie Common Nandina,Shaodong Common Nandina were exploited for the purpose, such as minisize bonsai and keeping natural environment.This method system was proved to be satisfied in flexibility and accuracy and it was a scientific foundation for exploiting and utilizing the Nandina domestic in Hunan.
引文
[1]Magurran, A. E. Ecological diversity and its measurement[M]. New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1988.
[2]Hamrick, J. L. et al. Allozyme diversity in plant species, In Brown A. H. D. et al. (eds.) Plant Population Genetics, breeding, and Genetic Resources[J]. Sunderland:Sinauer.1990.43-63.
[3]Grant, V. The Evolutionary Process:A Critical Study of Evolutionary Theory (2nd ed.) [J]. New York:Columbia University Press.1991.
[4]Millar, C.I. and W. J. Lib. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species, In Falk D. A. and K. E. Hols inger (eds.) Genetics and Conservation of Rare plants[J]. New York:Oxford University Press.1991.149-170.
[5]尚占环,姚爱兴(2002)生物遗传多样性研究方法及其保护措施[J].宁夏农学院学报.23(1)：66-69.
[6]王明庥.林木育种学概论[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1989,36-56..
[7]Bretting, P. K., Widrlechner, M. P. Genetic markers and plant genetic resource management in Julea Janick (ed.) Plant Breading Review[J]. John Wiley&Sons, Inc USA.1995,13:11-18.
[8]Davidson RH, Edwards, DGW et al. Genetic variation in germination parameters am ong populations of Pacific silver fir[J]. Sflvae Genetica.1996,45 (2-3):165-171.
[9]曹家树,曹寿春,缪颖等.中国白菜各类型的分枝分析和演化关系研究[J].园艺学报,1997,24(1)：35-42.
[10]Ziegenhagen, B. Kormut, A. Restriction site polymorphisms in chloroplast DNA of silver fir (Abies alba Mill) [J].Forest Genetics,1995,2 (2):99-107.
[11]Merrell,D.J.(黄瑞复等译).生态遗传学[M].北京：科学出版社,1991：278-279.
[12]12]王斌.水稻的ALFP研究初报—反应条件的优化及对温敏核不育等位突变系的分析[J].植物学报,1999,41(5)：502-507.
[13]葛颂.遗传多样性及其检查方法.见：生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M].北京：中国科技出版社,1994,123-140.
[14]张兴平,王鸣.甜瓜种质资源同工酶电泳分析[J].西北农业大学学报,1988,16(2)：5-10
[15]Tanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J. Isoryme in Plant Genetics and Breeding[J]. Part A E B. B. V. msterdam: Elsvier Science Publishers,1983,231-233.
[16]Botstein, Annalisa, Rotondi, Massimiliano Magli, Claudia Ricciolini etc. Morphological and molecular analyses for the characterization of a group of Italian olive cultivars[J]. Euphytica 2003, (132):129-137.
[17]潘莹,赵桂仿.分子水平的遗传多样性及其测量方法[J].西北植物学报.1998,18(4)：645-653.
[18]陈向明,郑国生,张圣旺.牡丹栽培品种的RAPD分析[J].园艺学报,2001,28 (4):370-372.
[19]Hashizume, H., Shimamoto, L, Harushima, Y, et al. Construction of a linkage map for watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum&Nakai) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [J]. Euphytica.1996.90:265-273.
[20]Vos, P. K. et al. AFLP:a new technique ror DNA finger printing[J]. Nucleic Acid Res.1995, 23 (21):4407-4414.
[21]尹佟明,孙晔,易能君,等.美洲黑杨无性系AFLP指纹分析[J].植物学报,1998,40(8)：778-780
[22]Hartl, L. And S. Seefelder. Diversity of selected hop cultivars detected by fluorescent AFLPs[J]. Theor Appl Genet,1998,96:112-116.
[23]陈杰中,徐春香,梁立峰.低温对香蕉叶片中蛋白质及脯氨酸的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,1999,20(3)：54-58.
[24]张德强,张志毅,杨凯.FLP在林木遗传改良中的应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(6)：75-78.
[25]Hayashi, E, bukata, M. Genetic diferentiation of organele DNA polymorphisms in fir from Hokkuido [J]. Forest Genetics,2000,7(1):31-38.
[26]Tohme, J., Orlando, G. D., Beebe, S. et al. AFLP analysis of Gene Pools of a WildBean Core Collection[J]. Crop Science.1996,36:1375-1384.
[27]Tautz, D., Hypervariability of simple sequence as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers[J]. Nucl Acids Res.1989,17:6463-6471.
[28]Rongwen, J., Akkaya, M.S. Bhagwat, A. A. et al. The use of microsatel lite DNA markers for soybean genotype identification[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet.1995,90:43-48.
[29]L. Parducci, A, E, Szmidt. Genetic variation at chloroplast microsatelites (cpssRs) in Abies nebrodensis (jac.) Mattei and three neighboring Abiesspocies[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics.2001,102 (5):733-740.
[30} Senior, M. L., Murphy, J. p., Goodman, M. M. et al. Utility of SSRs for determing genetic similarties and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system[J]. crop Sci 1998, 38:1088-1098.
[31]Ziekiewicz, Alain Charcosset &Laurence Moreau. et al. Use of molecular markers for the development of new cultivars amd the evaluation of gene4ic diversily[J]. Euphytica.2004, 37:81-94,
[32]Jiang Jing, YANG Chuan-ping, LIU Gui-Feng, WU Jin-hua, et al. Genetic relation of interspecies for eight birch species [J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2002,13 (4):281-284.
[33]Fang Xiu-xu and Mei Sun. Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetic Relation of Grain Amaramtbus and Their Wild Relation (Amaranthus, Amarantliaceae)Using inter Transcribed Spaced, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism, and Double-Primer Fluorescent Intersimple Sequence Repeat Markers [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2001,3 (21):372-387.
[34]祁建民,周东新,吴为人,等.用RAPD和ISSR检测黄麻属遗传多样性的比较研究[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(12)：2006-2010.
[35]JIN Yan, ZHANG Wen-Ju. Sampling Strategy Within a Wild Soybean Population Based on Its Genetic Variation Detected ISSR Marker [J]. Acta Botanica Sinica 2003,45 (8):995-1002.
[36]Li Ang, Song Ge. Genetic Variation and Clonal Diversity of Psammochloa villosa (Poaceae) Detected by ISSR Markers [J]. Annals of Botany,2001,87:585-590.
[37]Ge-Xuejun, ZHAO Li-Ming, WANG Hua. Molecular Genetic Variation in a Clonal Plant Population of Leyrnus cjzirzerzsis (Trin) Tzvel [J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2005,47 (9):1055 - 1064.
[38]A. Asankar, Tomkins J. P, T. C. Wood, L. S. Barnes, A. Westan, R. A. Wing, et al. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hetnerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers [J]. Theory Apple Genet 2001,102:489-496.
[39]Masumi Yamagishi, Hiromi Abe, Micliibaru Nakano, et al. PCR-based molecular markers in Asiatic hybrid lily [J]. Scientia Horticulture 2002,96:225-234.
[40]Ratnaparkhe M. B, D. K. Santra. Inheritance of inter-simple-sequence-repeat polymorphisms and Linkage with a fusatium wilt resistance gene in chickpea [J] Theory Apple Genet,1998, 96:348-353.
[41]Hiromori Akagi, Tsumura Y., K. Obba, S. H. Strauss. Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) [J]. Theory Apple Genet,1996,92:40-45.
[42]Wiesnerova D., L Wiesner. ISSR-Based Clustering of Cultivated Flax Germplasm is Statistically Correlated to Thousand Seed Mass[J]. Molecular Biotechnology,2004,26 (3):207-214.
[43]M. V. Camaclio, M. Matos, B. Pernaure. Secalecereale intermicrosatellite (SCIMs):Chromosomal location and genetic inheritance [J]. Genetica 2005,123:303-311.
[44]宣继萍,章镇,房经贵,高志红,车胜科.苹果品种ISSR指纹图谱构建[J]果树学报,2002,19(5)21-23, Secale cereal.
[45]王心宇,陈佩度,业生物技术学报,马正强等.ISSR标记在小麦指纹图谱分析中的应用研究初探[J].农2001,9(3)：261-263.
[46]Prevost, Chia-Szu Wen and Ju-Ying Hsiao. Genetic differentiation of Lilium longiflorum Thunb var. scabrum Masam. (Liliaceae) in Taiwan using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Bot. Bull. Acad Sin,1999,40:65-71.
[47]K. Vijayan, Collard B. C. Y, E. C. K. Pang&P. WJ. Taylor. Selection of wild Cicer accession for the generation of mapping population segregating for resistance to ascochyta blight[J].Euphytica,2003,130:1-9.
[48]Tapan Kwnar Mondal, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity of tea Camellia sinensis by Inter-simple seallence repeat polymerase chain reaction [J]. Eupliytica 128:307-315.200-2.
[49]PaplauskieneV, M.W Humphreys. Anchored simple-sequence repeals as primers to generate species-specific DNA marker in Lilium and Festuca grasses [J].Theory Apple Genet,2000, 100:384-390.
[50]Blair M. W,0. Panaud, S. R. McCouch. Inter-simple sequence repeals (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Theory Apple Genet,1999,98:780-792.
[51]Chunlan, Lian. Taizo, Hogetsu. Development of microsatellite markers from an ectomycorrhizal fungus Tricholorma matsutake, by ISSR-suppression-PCR method [J]. Mycorrhiza,2003,13:27-31.
[52]胡志昂,张亚平.中国动植物的遗传多样性[M].杭州：浙江科技出版社,1997,67-74.
[53]赵华伟,陈希周.城市化进程中加快园林绿化发展的探讨[J].中国园林,2004(4)：62-64.
[54]陈自新.城市大园林—现代城市发展的必由之路[J].中国园林,2001,(5)：7-10.
[55]易小林.当前植物造景中的几个问题分析及对策研究[J].中国园林,2002,(1)：84-86.
[56]朱建宁.植物景观设计应以自然为师[N].中国花卉报,2005.8.4第5版.
[57]史素珍.我国城市园林绿化中存在的问题及对策[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(6)：80-83.
[58]吴宏.生态园林是现代城市园林绿化的发展方向[J].中外建筑,2004,(4)：83-85.
[59]周向频.景观规划中的审美研究[J].城市规划汇刊,1995,(2)：54-60.
[60]陈俊愉.中国农业百科全书·观赏园艺卷[M].北京：农业出版社,1996.213-225.
[61]陈植.观赏树木学.北京：中国林业出版社,1984增订版.
[62]陈有民.园林树木学北京：中国林业出版社,1998.
[63]赵耘,胡文英.沪沽湖自然保护区园林树木资源功能分类研究.云南地理环境研究,2004,16(3)：32-37.
[64]商洪池.浅议园林植物的分类及其在城市园林中的应用河北林业科技,2004,(1)：1-1.
[65]刘俊磊.辉县市野生园林绿化植物资源的开发利用[J].中国林特产,2002(2)：53-54.
[66]吴征谧主编.中国植被[M].北京：科学出版社,1980.
[67]继成.国内外红豆杉及紫杉醇系列产品开发和市场前景看好[J].中国制药信息,2004,20(4)
[68]林夏珍,赵建强中国野生花卉种质资源调查综述[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,18(4)：441-444.
[69]刘慧涛等.吉林省西部草原观赏植物资源研究[J].北方园艺,1997. (6)：59-62.
[70]包满珠,陈龙清等.鄂西南地区观赏植物种质资源初报[J].园艺学报,1994,21(4)：408-409.
[71]张克,郁东宁.宁夏野生花卉及观赏树木资源调查及利用[J].北京农学院学报2002,17,(1)：18-21.
[72]关传友.皖西大别山区野生草本观赏植物资源的分类及评价[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(2)：195-197.
[73]王玉勤,王希华.安徽黔县野生观赏植物资源的研究[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)2001,(2)：89-95.
[74]张敏.阿诺德·伯林特的环境美学建构[J].文艺研究,2004,(4)：90-94.
[75]俞孔坚.论景观概念及其研究的发展[J].北京林业人学学报,1987,9(4)：433-438.
[76]李泽厚.美的历程[M].天津：天津社会科学院出版社,2001.
[77]周维权.中国古典园林史[M].北京：清华人学出版社,1999.
[78]李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版).2005,38(1)：143-147.
[79]虞晓芬,傅玳.多指标综合评价方法综述[J].统计与决策,2004,11：119-121.
[80]唐东芹.生态园林观及其实施发展途径[J].上海交通大学学报,2001,(2)：130-134.
[81]杨芸,祝龙彪.城市生态支持系统指标体系研究——以上海为例[J].城市发展研究,2001,(1)：45-49.
[82]封培波.上海露地宿根花卉景观价值的综合评价[J],北京林业大学学报,2003,25(6)：84-87.
[83]刘娜娜,达良俊.城市住区水景生态评价指标体系的构建[J].现代城市研究,2005(4)：36-40.
[84]刘秀晨.抓住机遇,勇于探索,绘就首都现代园林新景观[J].中国园林,2004,(2)：36-37.
[85]欧阳勋志.婆源县森林景观美学评价及其对生态旅游影响的研究[D].南京：南京林业大学,2004.
[86]王欢.关于城市生态园林建设[J].南京农专学报,2003,19(3)：31-35.
[87]马军山.现代园林种植设计研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2005.
[88]李文.园林植物在景观设计中的应用[J].林业科技,2003,28(4)：54-56.
[89]周廷刚.模糊综合法在城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价中的应用——以上海市为例[J].城市环境与城市生杰,1999,12(4)：23-25.
[90]李仲信,刘学.园林空间设计[J].齐鲁艺苑(山东艺术学院学报),2002,(3)：27-28.
[91]李端杰.植物空间构成与景观设计[J].规划师,2002,18(5)：83-86.
[92]邓云兰.住宅区水景评价体系研究——以杭州市为例[J].中国园林,2003,(6)：64-67.
[93]谢花林.乡村景观美感效果评价指标体系及其模糊综合评价——以北京市海淀区温泉镇百家瞳村为例[J],中国园林,2003(1)：59-61.
[94]张洁.基于模糊数学的旅游地现实形象评价系统[J].科技进步与对策,2003,(10)：133-135.
[95]马光艳,朱洪革.城市绿化工程质量的模糊综合评价[J].中国园林,2004,(4)：65-67.
[96]张振良.应用模糊数学[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,1985,88-93.
[97]祁海文.走向生态美育——对生态美学发展的一种思考[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,33(5)：70-74.
[98]袁鼎生.生态人类学的审美走向[J].广西民族研究,2004(4)：39-43.
[99]潘辉,张晓萍,许春如.日本森林景观计量化研究现状及发展动向[J].世界林业研究.1988(4)：55-60.
[100]杨种,梁光义,钟幻思等.德务淫羊藿的化学成分研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(1)：34-35.
[101]苏应娟,刘启宏,程莲银等.湖北八角莲属3种植物的解剖学研究[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,12(2)：111-116.
[102]马绍宾,胡志浩.小檗科鬼臼亚科植物的核型研究[J].云南植物研究,1996,18(3)：325-330.
[103]SuYingjuan, WangTing, Yang Weidong etal. DNA extraction and RAPD analysis of Podocarpus[J].ACTASCI.NAT.U-NIV.SUNYATSENI.1998,37:13-18.
[104]诚静容,黄普华.中国植物志[M].北京：科学出版社,1999,45(3)：9.
[105]王艇,苏应娟,朱建明等.部分小檗科植物的RAPD分析[J].植物研究,2001,21(3)：428-431.
[106]王志安,宋克.红叶小檗的繁育与管理[J].河南林业科技,2006,26(3).
[107]高延厅.新优园林绿化树种[J].中国花卉园艺,2002,1：29.
[108]郭学望,包满珠.园林树木栽培养护学[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2002,246-248.
[109]刘锦春.南天竹资源利用与开发研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2004,23(6)：22-23.
[110]文国琴,何道文,何震.南天竹不同叶色与若干生理生化指标关系的研[J].亚热带植物科学,2005,34(4)38-40.
[111]朱志祥,蒋伟,刘燕,冯菊芳.野生南天竹的驯化栽培技术[J].江苏林业科技,2006,33(3)：31-33.
[112]张长发,胡一民.南天竹播种育苗新法[J].绿化与生活,2000,(5)：33.
[113]杜永芹,倪林娟,王玉勤.耐寒彩叶树种火焰南天竹的快繁技术研究[J].上海农业学报,2004,20(4)：1-4.
[114]周南鏰,黄一青,王青华等.火焰南天竹的组织培养[J].农业科技通讯,2002,11：17.
[115]周峰,胡水华.南天竹夏插育苗技术[J].林业科技开发,2002,16(4)：58-59.
[116]龙江峰.科学开发利用湖南园林植物资源[J]..湖南林业,2006,(4)：15.
[117]李保印,周秀梅,林紫玉,孙红岩.红色叶树种资源及其在园林中的应[J].河北林果研究,2003,18(2)：191-194.
[118]敖慧修.广州室内观叶植物的光合作用特征[J].中国科学院华南植物研究所集刊,1986,(3)：50.
[119]白伟岚,任建武,高永伟等.园林植物的耐荫性研究[J].林业科技通讯1999,(2)：12-15.
[120]陈灵芝.中国的生物多样性现状及其保护对策[M].北京：科学出版社,1993,210-212.
[121]国家中医管理局中华本草编委会.中华本草(8)[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,2000：479.
[122]陈俊愉,程绪珂.中国花经[M].上海：上海文化出版社,1990,214-226.
[123]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护[J].园林,2001,(7)：35-3.
[124]陈冀胜主编.中国有毒植物[M].北京：科学技术出版社,1987：132.
[125]李颖,钟章成,何跃军.三种土壤类型中南天竹差异性的研究[J].广西植物2006,26(2)：137-141.
[126]陈自新.城市园林植物生态学研究动向及发展趋势[J].北京园林,1995,(2)：1-6.
[127]陈少瑜.分子标记及其在林木种质资源和遗传育种研究中的应甩[J].云南林业科技,2002,101(4)：63-70.
[128]龙江峰.科学开发利用湖南园林植物资源[J].湖南林业,2006,(4)：34.
[129]刘克旺,童新旺,王晓明,等.湖南野生园林观赏植物资源及开发利用的探讨[J].湖南林业科技,2002,29(3)：54-58.
[130]马兵钢,牛建新,潘立忠心,等.RAPD-PCR对梨属植物品种鉴定的研究[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(1)：84-88.
[131]李继东,桑玉强,李淑玲等.RAPD技术及其在林木遗传研究中的应用[J].河南农业大学学报,2002,36(1)63-66.
[132]G.Besnard.A.Berville.On chloroplast DNA variat ions in the olive(olea europaeal)complex: comparison of RFLP and PCR polymorphisms[J].Theor Appl Genet(2002)104:1157-1163.
[133]黄义江,王宗清.苹果属果树抗寒性的细胞学鉴定[J].园艺学报,1982,9(3)：23-30.
[134]何若锡,王光洁.植物寒冷驯化机制[J].植物生理生化进展,1987,5：17-29.
[135]简令成.植物冻害和抗冻性的细胞生物学研究.植物生理生化进展.1987,(2)：1-6.
[136]蒋齐,梅曙光.宁夏黄土地区主要灌木树种抗早机制的初步研究[J].宁夏农林科技,1992,(5)：25-27.
[137]金研铭,徐惠风,李亚东等.牡丹引种及其抗寒性的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报1999,21(2)：46-48.
[138]孔令让.粗山羊草随机扩增多态性DNA研究[J].植物学报,1998,40(3)：223-227.
[139]潘青.扶芳藤遗传多样性研究及抗逆性选择[D].北京：北京林业大学研究生处,2004.
[140]李桂芬,龙庄如,梁玉堂.美国白松生长特性的研究[J].山东林业科技,1999,(1)：1-6.
[141]李艳菊.元宝枫繁殖技术与应用研究[D].北京：北京林业大学研究生处,2004.
[142]阎爱民.陈文新.苜蓿.草木樨.锦鸡儿根瘤菌的表型多样性分析[J].生物多样性,1999,7(2):112-118.
[143]Nakajima,Yet al.Characterization of genetic diversity of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in Daucus varities by RAPD and AFLP[J].Plant Cell Reports,1998,17:848-853.
[144]李宽饪.青杨的遗传分化[J].植物学报,1997,39(8)：753-758.
[145]李力.青岛耐冬山茶的多样性(Ⅱ)居群的遗传多样性分析[J].生物多样性.1996,4(1)：1-6.
[146]李俊清.中国水青冈种内种间遗传多样性的初步研究[J].生物多样性,1996,4(2)：63-68.
[147]中南林学院.经济林研究法[M]北京：中国林业出版社,1988,190-197.
[148]Rohlf F J.Numerical taxonnony and multivariate analysis system[M].New York,Exter Publishers,1994.
[149]R.J Schnell,C.T.Olano,R.J.Campbell.AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within ajackfruit germp;asm collection[J].Scientia Horticulturae 91(2001):261-274.
[150]陈守智,吴兴恩,钟瑞芳.大树杨梅果实数量性状的主成分分析[J].云南农业大学学报,2003,18(2)： 163-166.
[151]文彬,晁瑞堂,陈玉山.草莓品种的数量分类研究[J].华南师范大学学报,2000(1)：99-103.
[152]鲁生霞.主成分分析及其在动物遗传育种中的应用[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2003,33(5)：37-38.
[153]徐克学.生物数学[M].北京：科学出版社,2004,51-70.
[154]方彦.园林植物[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005
[155]Schaal,B.A., W.J.Leverich, S.H. Rogstad.Comparison of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology[M]. Genetics and conservation of Rare plants. New York:Oxford University Press, 199,123-124.
[156]胡能书,万国贤.同工酶技术及其应用[M].长沙：湖南科技出版社,1985：2-17.
[157]雷泞菲,苏智先,陈劲松.同工酶技术在植物研究中的应用[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2000,21(4)：321-324.
[158]龚大洁,周开亚.同工酶及其在爬行动物系统学中的应用[J].西北农业大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(1)：111-1.
[159]樊守金,赵遵田.中国苋属植物酯酶同工酶研究[J].植物研究,1999,19(2):148-152
[160]祝朋芳,陈长青.同工酶技术在十字花科作物遗传育种上的应用[J].辽宁农业科学,2004(6)：30-31.
[161]马缘生,谭富娟,李灵芝等.异花授粉作物大白菜和荞麦基因库种子繁殖技术研究[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(2):16-22.
[162]张君增,方起程,梁晓天等.从化学成分探讨白豆杉属的系统位置[J].植物分类学报,1996,34(3)：282-287.
[163]唐延林,方宗熙.过氧化物同工酶在海带和裙带菜各部分的初步研究[J].山东海洋学研究学报,1982,12(2)：47-50.
[164]增樵,文军,Hedges K L et al. Computer-based profile analysis in Aralia (Araliaceae) [J].Cathaya,1993,17(5)：69-79.
[165]尹淑霞,韩烈保,王月华,等.Co-γ射线对多年生黑麦草植株过氧化物同工酶和酯酶同工酶的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(5)：596-598.
[166]夏阳.苹果过氧化物同工酶研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,1996,31(1)：77-80.
[167]张宪政,陈凤玉,王荣富.植物生理实验技术[M].哈尔滨：辽宁科学出版社,1994.
[168]勒水年.桑树同工酶研究进展与应用[J].蚕桑通报,1995,26(3)：5-8.
[169]雷宁菲,苏智先,陈劲松.同工酶技术在植物研究中的应用[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2000,21(4)：321-325.
[170]刘鹏,徐根娣,土玮嫔.不同生境七子花同工酶的研究[J].浙江师范大学学报,2002,25(3)：285-287.
[171]孟学平,杨恒山,侯立自,等.冬小麦不同发育时期过氧化物酶研究[J].华北农学报,2001,16(3)：56-60.
[172]孙焕顷,沈洪国, 黄毅.芦荟超氧化物歧化酶同工酶Ⅱ的分离纯化及部分性质[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版2003,28(5)：784-787.
[173]赖人斌.花生品种子叶的脂酶同工酶研究初报[J].中国油料,1985,(4)：18-20.
[174]王中仁.植物等位酶分析[M].北京：科学出版社1996：95-119.
[175]余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M].北京：人民邮电出版社,2006,2.
[176]孔秋生.萝卜种质资源遗传多样性及其亲缘关系研究[D].武汉,华中农业大学研究生处,2003.
[177]Kuhus L J, Fretz T A.Distingguishing Rose cultivars by polyacryla mide gel electrophoresis.I.Extraction and storage of protein and active enzymes from rose leaves[J].Amer, Soc Sci,103 (4):503-508.
[178]苏应娟,刘启宏.湖北八角莲属植物过氧化物酶同下酶分析[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,12(1)：44-48.
[179]李昌林,陈默君,颜艳.二色胡枝子品种SOD、POD同工酶的酶谱分析[J].草地学报,2003,11(3)：210-212.
[180]Dhiraj V yas.Genetic structure of walnut genoty pe using leaf isozymes as variability measure [J].Scientia Horticulturae,2003,97 (2):141-152.
[181]Magoma G N. Biochemical differentiationin Camellia sinensisand its wild relatives as revealed by isozyme and catechin patterns[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2003,31 (9):995-1010.
[182]张宗文.红花种质资源的同工酶遗传多样性及分类研究[J].植物遗传资源科学,2000,1(4)：6-13.
[183]何忠效,张树政.电泳(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社.1999：284,296-298.
[184]詹秋文,夏孝勤.高粱和苏丹草过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J].安徽技术师范学院学报,2003,17(4)：310-312.
[185]王述明,潭富娟,胡家蓬.小豆种质资源同工酶遗传多样性分析与评价[J].中国农业科学,2003,35(11)：1311-1318.
[186]王立泽,叶家栋,游庄信,等.向日葵种植[M].合肥：安徽科学技术出版社,1995,1：432-439.
[187]郭水良,毛郁薷,强胜.温度对过氧化物酶同工酶谱的影响fJl.广西植物,2002,22(6)：557-562.
[188]卫国,罗冬梅,徐颖利,陈志勇.10个品种向日葵过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2006,21(5)：528-531.
[189]胡志昂.杨属植物的同工过氧化物酶[J].植物分类学报,1981,19(3)：291.
[190]邓思平,刘楚吾.赤点石斑鱼4种同工酶的组织分布及基因位点分析[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2004,23(2)：103-106.
[191]刘文彬,陈合格,张轩杰.黄颡鱼不同组织中同工酶的表达模式[J].激光生物学报,2003,12(14)：274-278.
[192]谭晓风,桂君.山茶植物叶片DNA提取.中南林学院学报,1999,19(4)：14-17.
[193]李明芳.荔枝SSR标记的研究及对部分荔枝种质的遗传多样性研究[D].海口.华南热带农业大学研究生处.2003.
[194]Harmrick, J.L, W.j.W.Godt.Aliozyme diversity in plant species [M].Plant population genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources.Sunderland:Sinauer,1990.43-46.
[195]庞小明.用分子标记研究柑桔属及其近缘属植物的亲缘关系和枳的遗传多样性[D].武汉.华中农业大学研究生处.2002.
[196]Lefebve V, Goffinet B, Chauvet JC.Evalution of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivars protection purposes:comparison of AFLP, RAPD and phenotypic data[J]. Theor Apple Genet,2001,102 (5):741-750.
[197]R.J.Schnell, C.T.Olano, R.J.CampbeH.AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within a jackfruit germplasm collection[J]. Scientia Horticulture,2001,91:261-274.
[198]Burstin J, Charcosset A.Relationships between phenotypic and marker distance:theortial and experimental investigations[J].Heredity,1997,78:477-483.
[199]Noli E, Salvis Tuberos R.Comparative analysis of genetic relationships in barley based on RELP and RAPD marker[J].Genome,1997,40:607-616.
[200]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护花木盆景[J].花卉园艺,1994(2)：24-24.
[201]高延厅.新优园林绿化树种[J].中国花卉园艺,2002,1：29.
[202]张长发,胡一民.南天竹播种育苗新法[J].绿化与生活,2000,(5)：33.
[203]周南鏰,黄一青,王青华.等.火焰南天竹的组织培养[J].农业科技通讯,2002,11：17.
[204]侯碧清,刘克旺,王海峰.湖南野生观赏植物及其园林应用[J].林业调查规划,2006,31(2)：140-145.
[205]訾兴中,张定成.琅琊山植物志[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1999.
[206]刘锦春.南天竹资源利用与开发研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2004,23(6)：22-23.
[207]李新峥,周俊国.观赏南瓜的观赏特性及其生产的发展[J].浙江农业科学,2006,(1)：91-93.
[208]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护[J].园林,2001,(7)：35-3.
[209]赵旺兔.榉树生物学特性及园林应用研究[D].南京林业大学,20006.
[210]金晓鹏,李沛然.观赏竹在城市园林绿化中的作用[J].江西林业科技,2006(1)：53-54.
[211]林绍生,李华芬,陈义增.应用模糊数学评价观叶植物的观赏性[J].亚热带植物通讯,2000,29(2)：43-47.
[212]建德锋,庞建松。吉林市秋季景观树木调查及观赏特性分析[J].吉林农业科技学院学报,2006,15,(1)：4-7.
[213]杨秀坚,罗富英,窦萍珍.植物调节剂对菊花观赏性状及相关特性的影响[J].北方园艺2006(1):45-46.
[214]彭慧,赵冰,李树和,刘立尊,宋生印.采用灰色关联分析法综合评价华北地区主栽山药品种[J].2006,(5)：15-17.
[215]禹玉华,梁承邺,段俊,等.超甜玉米新品种灰色关联综合评估初报[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2001,9(1)75-80.
[216]刘家勇,范源洪,杨洪昌等.31个国外甘蔗引进种灰色多维综合评估[J].2006,19(4)：683-687.
[217]文建成,符菊芬,陈学宽,等.甘蔗品种灰色模糊多维综合评估析[J].中国糖料,2001(3)：5-8.
[218]李勇,邵诚,候晓星.一种新的灰关联分析算法——一致关联度[J].信息与控制,2006,35(4)：462-466.
[219]武菊英,滕文军,王庆海.耐旱多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报.2006,21(1)：129-132
[220]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2002.122-154.
[221]杨纶标,高英仪.模糊数学原理及应用[M].广州：华南理工大学出版社,2001.115-125.
[222]李宏艳.关于灰色关联度计算方法的研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9)：1231-1234
[223]武菊英等：耐早多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报,2006,21(1)：129-13
[224]吴键明.灰色关联度分析法就用于水稻品种综合评判的探索[J].种子,1990,(3)：33-35.
[225]刘滨谊,姜允芳.中国城市绿地系统规划评价指标体系的研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002,(2)：27-29.
[226][美]T·L·萨蒂.层次分析法———在资源分配管理和冲突中的应用[M].许树柏,等译.北京：煤炭工业出版社,1988.
[227]李自超,张洪亮,曾亚文,申时全,孙传清,王象坤.云南稻种资源表型遗传多样性的研究[J].作物学报,2001,27(6)：832-837.
[228]Dong Y S, Zhuang B C, Zhao L M, Sun H, He M Y. The genetic diversity of annual wild soybeans grown in China[J]. Theor Appi Genet,2001,103:98-103.
[229]阳含熙,卢泽遇.植物生态学的数量分类方法[M.]北京：科学出版社,1983.
[230]Smith J S C, Chin E C L, Shu H, Smith O S, Wall S J, Senior M L, Mitchell S E, Kresovich S, Ziegle J. An evaluation of theutility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.):comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree[J]. TheorAppl Genet,1997,95:163-173.
[231]武耀廷,张天真,殷剑美.利用分了标记和形态学性状检测的陆地棉栽培品种遗传多样性[J].遗传学报, 2001,28(11)：1040-1050.
[232]Shim S 1, Jorgensen R B. Genetic structure in cultivated and wild carrots (Daucus carota L.) revealed by AFLP analysis[J]. TheorAppl Genet,2000,101:227-233.
[233]Renganayaki K, Read J C, Fritz A K. Genetic diversity among Texas bluegrass genotypes (Poa arachniferaTorr.) revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers[J]. Theor Appl Genet,2001,102:1037-1045.
[234]Sun G, Bond M, Nass H, Martin R, Deng Z. RAPD polymorphisms in spring wheat cultivars and lines with different level of Fusarium resistance[J]. Theor Appl Genet,2003,106:1059-1067.
[2]Hamrick, J. L. et al. Allozyme diversity in plant species, In Brown A. H. D. et al. (eds.) Plant Population Genetics, breeding, and Genetic Resources[J]. Sunderland:Sinauer.1990.43-63.
[3]Grant, V. The Evolutionary Process:A Critical Study of Evolutionary Theory (2nd ed.) [J]. New York:Columbia University Press.1991.
[4]Millar, C.I. and W. J. Lib. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct population diversity in widespread species, In Falk D. A. and K. E. Hols inger (eds.) Genetics and Conservation of Rare plants[J]. New York:Oxford University Press.1991.149-170.
[5]尚占环,姚爱兴(2002)生物遗传多样性研究方法及其保护措施[J].宁夏农学院学报.23(1)：66-69.
[6]王明庥.林木育种学概论[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1989,36-56..
[7]Bretting, P. K., Widrlechner, M. P. Genetic markers and plant genetic resource management in Julea Janick (ed.) Plant Breading Review[J]. John Wiley&Sons, Inc USA.1995,13:11-18.
[8]Davidson RH, Edwards, DGW et al. Genetic variation in germination parameters am ong populations of Pacific silver fir[J]. Sflvae Genetica.1996,45 (2-3):165-171.
[9]曹家树,曹寿春,缪颖等.中国白菜各类型的分枝分析和演化关系研究[J].园艺学报,1997,24(1)：35-42.
[10]Ziegenhagen, B. Kormut, A. Restriction site polymorphisms in chloroplast DNA of silver fir (Abies alba Mill) [J].Forest Genetics,1995,2 (2):99-107.
[11]Merrell,D.J.(黄瑞复等译).生态遗传学[M].北京：科学出版社,1991：278-279.
[12]12]王斌.水稻的ALFP研究初报—反应条件的优化及对温敏核不育等位突变系的分析[J].植物学报,1999,41(5)：502-507.
[13]葛颂.遗传多样性及其检查方法.见：生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M].北京：中国科技出版社,1994,123-140.
[14]张兴平,王鸣.甜瓜种质资源同工酶电泳分析[J].西北农业大学学报,1988,16(2)：5-10
[15]Tanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J. Isoryme in Plant Genetics and Breeding[J]. Part A E B. B. V. msterdam: Elsvier Science Publishers,1983,231-233.
[16]Botstein, Annalisa, Rotondi, Massimiliano Magli, Claudia Ricciolini etc. Morphological and molecular analyses for the characterization of a group of Italian olive cultivars[J]. Euphytica 2003, (132):129-137.
[17]潘莹,赵桂仿.分子水平的遗传多样性及其测量方法[J].西北植物学报.1998,18(4)：645-653.
[18]陈向明,郑国生,张圣旺.牡丹栽培品种的RAPD分析[J].园艺学报,2001,28 (4):370-372.
[19]Hashizume, H., Shimamoto, L, Harushima, Y, et al. Construction of a linkage map for watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum&Nakai) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [J]. Euphytica.1996.90:265-273.
[20]Vos, P. K. et al. AFLP:a new technique ror DNA finger printing[J]. Nucleic Acid Res.1995, 23 (21):4407-4414.
[21]尹佟明,孙晔,易能君,等.美洲黑杨无性系AFLP指纹分析[J].植物学报,1998,40(8)：778-780
[22]Hartl, L. And S. Seefelder. Diversity of selected hop cultivars detected by fluorescent AFLPs[J]. Theor Appl Genet,1998,96:112-116.
[23]陈杰中,徐春香,梁立峰.低温对香蕉叶片中蛋白质及脯氨酸的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,1999,20(3)：54-58.
[24]张德强,张志毅,杨凯.FLP在林木遗传改良中的应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(6)：75-78.
[25]Hayashi, E, bukata, M. Genetic diferentiation of organele DNA polymorphisms in fir from Hokkuido [J]. Forest Genetics,2000,7(1):31-38.
[26]Tohme, J., Orlando, G. D., Beebe, S. et al. AFLP analysis of Gene Pools of a WildBean Core Collection[J]. Crop Science.1996,36:1375-1384.
[27]Tautz, D., Hypervariability of simple sequence as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers[J]. Nucl Acids Res.1989,17:6463-6471.
[28]Rongwen, J., Akkaya, M.S. Bhagwat, A. A. et al. The use of microsatel lite DNA markers for soybean genotype identification[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet.1995,90:43-48.
[29]L. Parducci, A, E, Szmidt. Genetic variation at chloroplast microsatelites (cpssRs) in Abies nebrodensis (jac.) Mattei and three neighboring Abiesspocies[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics.2001,102 (5):733-740.
[30} Senior, M. L., Murphy, J. p., Goodman, M. M. et al. Utility of SSRs for determing genetic similarties and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system[J]. crop Sci 1998, 38:1088-1098.
[31]Ziekiewicz, Alain Charcosset &Laurence Moreau. et al. Use of molecular markers for the development of new cultivars amd the evaluation of gene4ic diversily[J]. Euphytica.2004, 37:81-94,
[32]Jiang Jing, YANG Chuan-ping, LIU Gui-Feng, WU Jin-hua, et al. Genetic relation of interspecies for eight birch species [J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2002,13 (4):281-284.
[33]Fang Xiu-xu and Mei Sun. Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetic Relation of Grain Amaramtbus and Their Wild Relation (Amaranthus, Amarantliaceae)Using inter Transcribed Spaced, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism, and Double-Primer Fluorescent Intersimple Sequence Repeat Markers [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2001,3 (21):372-387.
[34]祁建民,周东新,吴为人,等.用RAPD和ISSR检测黄麻属遗传多样性的比较研究[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(12)：2006-2010.
[35]JIN Yan, ZHANG Wen-Ju. Sampling Strategy Within a Wild Soybean Population Based on Its Genetic Variation Detected ISSR Marker [J]. Acta Botanica Sinica 2003,45 (8):995-1002.
[36]Li Ang, Song Ge. Genetic Variation and Clonal Diversity of Psammochloa villosa (Poaceae) Detected by ISSR Markers [J]. Annals of Botany,2001,87:585-590.
[37]Ge-Xuejun, ZHAO Li-Ming, WANG Hua. Molecular Genetic Variation in a Clonal Plant Population of Leyrnus cjzirzerzsis (Trin) Tzvel [J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2005,47 (9):1055 - 1064.
[38]A. Asankar, Tomkins J. P, T. C. Wood, L. S. Barnes, A. Westan, R. A. Wing, et al. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hetnerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers [J]. Theory Apple Genet 2001,102:489-496.
[39]Masumi Yamagishi, Hiromi Abe, Micliibaru Nakano, et al. PCR-based molecular markers in Asiatic hybrid lily [J]. Scientia Horticulture 2002,96:225-234.
[40]Ratnaparkhe M. B, D. K. Santra. Inheritance of inter-simple-sequence-repeat polymorphisms and Linkage with a fusatium wilt resistance gene in chickpea [J] Theory Apple Genet,1998, 96:348-353.
[41]Hiromori Akagi, Tsumura Y., K. Obba, S. H. Strauss. Diversity and inheritance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) [J]. Theory Apple Genet,1996,92:40-45.
[42]Wiesnerova D., L Wiesner. ISSR-Based Clustering of Cultivated Flax Germplasm is Statistically Correlated to Thousand Seed Mass[J]. Molecular Biotechnology,2004,26 (3):207-214.
[43]M. V. Camaclio, M. Matos, B. Pernaure. Secalecereale intermicrosatellite (SCIMs):Chromosomal location and genetic inheritance [J]. Genetica 2005,123:303-311.
[44]宣继萍,章镇,房经贵,高志红,车胜科.苹果品种ISSR指纹图谱构建[J]果树学报,2002,19(5)21-23, Secale cereal.
[45]王心宇,陈佩度,业生物技术学报,马正强等.ISSR标记在小麦指纹图谱分析中的应用研究初探[J].农2001,9(3)：261-263.
[46]Prevost, Chia-Szu Wen and Ju-Ying Hsiao. Genetic differentiation of Lilium longiflorum Thunb var. scabrum Masam. (Liliaceae) in Taiwan using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Bot. Bull. Acad Sin,1999,40:65-71.
[47]K. Vijayan, Collard B. C. Y, E. C. K. Pang&P. WJ. Taylor. Selection of wild Cicer accession for the generation of mapping population segregating for resistance to ascochyta blight[J].Euphytica,2003,130:1-9.
[48]Tapan Kwnar Mondal, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity of tea Camellia sinensis by Inter-simple seallence repeat polymerase chain reaction [J]. Eupliytica 128:307-315.200-2.
[49]PaplauskieneV, M.W Humphreys. Anchored simple-sequence repeals as primers to generate species-specific DNA marker in Lilium and Festuca grasses [J].Theory Apple Genet,2000, 100:384-390.
[50]Blair M. W,0. Panaud, S. R. McCouch. Inter-simple sequence repeals (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Theory Apple Genet,1999,98:780-792.
[51]Chunlan, Lian. Taizo, Hogetsu. Development of microsatellite markers from an ectomycorrhizal fungus Tricholorma matsutake, by ISSR-suppression-PCR method [J]. Mycorrhiza,2003,13:27-31.
[52]胡志昂,张亚平.中国动植物的遗传多样性[M].杭州：浙江科技出版社,1997,67-74.
[53]赵华伟,陈希周.城市化进程中加快园林绿化发展的探讨[J].中国园林,2004(4)：62-64.
[54]陈自新.城市大园林—现代城市发展的必由之路[J].中国园林,2001,(5)：7-10.
[55]易小林.当前植物造景中的几个问题分析及对策研究[J].中国园林,2002,(1)：84-86.
[56]朱建宁.植物景观设计应以自然为师[N].中国花卉报,2005.8.4第5版.
[57]史素珍.我国城市园林绿化中存在的问题及对策[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(6)：80-83.
[58]吴宏.生态园林是现代城市园林绿化的发展方向[J].中外建筑,2004,(4)：83-85.
[59]周向频.景观规划中的审美研究[J].城市规划汇刊,1995,(2)：54-60.
[60]陈俊愉.中国农业百科全书·观赏园艺卷[M].北京：农业出版社,1996.213-225.
[61]陈植.观赏树木学.北京：中国林业出版社,1984增订版.
[62]陈有民.园林树木学北京：中国林业出版社,1998.
[63]赵耘,胡文英.沪沽湖自然保护区园林树木资源功能分类研究.云南地理环境研究,2004,16(3)：32-37.
[64]商洪池.浅议园林植物的分类及其在城市园林中的应用河北林业科技,2004,(1)：1-1.
[65]刘俊磊.辉县市野生园林绿化植物资源的开发利用[J].中国林特产,2002(2)：53-54.
[66]吴征谧主编.中国植被[M].北京：科学出版社,1980.
[67]继成.国内外红豆杉及紫杉醇系列产品开发和市场前景看好[J].中国制药信息,2004,20(4)
[68]林夏珍,赵建强中国野生花卉种质资源调查综述[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,18(4)：441-444.
[69]刘慧涛等.吉林省西部草原观赏植物资源研究[J].北方园艺,1997. (6)：59-62.
[70]包满珠,陈龙清等.鄂西南地区观赏植物种质资源初报[J].园艺学报,1994,21(4)：408-409.
[71]张克,郁东宁.宁夏野生花卉及观赏树木资源调查及利用[J].北京农学院学报2002,17,(1)：18-21.
[72]关传友.皖西大别山区野生草本观赏植物资源的分类及评价[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(2)：195-197.
[73]王玉勤,王希华.安徽黔县野生观赏植物资源的研究[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)2001,(2)：89-95.
[74]张敏.阿诺德·伯林特的环境美学建构[J].文艺研究,2004,(4)：90-94.
[75]俞孔坚.论景观概念及其研究的发展[J].北京林业人学学报,1987,9(4)：433-438.
[76]李泽厚.美的历程[M].天津：天津社会科学院出版社,2001.
[77]周维权.中国古典园林史[M].北京：清华人学出版社,1999.
[78]李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版).2005,38(1)：143-147.
[79]虞晓芬,傅玳.多指标综合评价方法综述[J].统计与决策,2004,11：119-121.
[80]唐东芹.生态园林观及其实施发展途径[J].上海交通大学学报,2001,(2)：130-134.
[81]杨芸,祝龙彪.城市生态支持系统指标体系研究——以上海为例[J].城市发展研究,2001,(1)：45-49.
[82]封培波.上海露地宿根花卉景观价值的综合评价[J],北京林业大学学报,2003,25(6)：84-87.
[83]刘娜娜,达良俊.城市住区水景生态评价指标体系的构建[J].现代城市研究,2005(4)：36-40.
[84]刘秀晨.抓住机遇,勇于探索,绘就首都现代园林新景观[J].中国园林,2004,(2)：36-37.
[85]欧阳勋志.婆源县森林景观美学评价及其对生态旅游影响的研究[D].南京：南京林业大学,2004.
[86]王欢.关于城市生态园林建设[J].南京农专学报,2003,19(3)：31-35.
[87]马军山.现代园林种植设计研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2005.
[88]李文.园林植物在景观设计中的应用[J].林业科技,2003,28(4)：54-56.
[89]周廷刚.模糊综合法在城市绿地系统景观生态综合评价中的应用——以上海市为例[J].城市环境与城市生杰,1999,12(4)：23-25.
[90]李仲信,刘学.园林空间设计[J].齐鲁艺苑(山东艺术学院学报),2002,(3)：27-28.
[91]李端杰.植物空间构成与景观设计[J].规划师,2002,18(5)：83-86.
[92]邓云兰.住宅区水景评价体系研究——以杭州市为例[J].中国园林,2003,(6)：64-67.
[93]谢花林.乡村景观美感效果评价指标体系及其模糊综合评价——以北京市海淀区温泉镇百家瞳村为例[J],中国园林,2003(1)：59-61.
[94]张洁.基于模糊数学的旅游地现实形象评价系统[J].科技进步与对策,2003,(10)：133-135.
[95]马光艳,朱洪革.城市绿化工程质量的模糊综合评价[J].中国园林,2004,(4)：65-67.
[96]张振良.应用模糊数学[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,1985,88-93.
[97]祁海文.走向生态美育——对生态美学发展的一种思考[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,33(5)：70-74.
[98]袁鼎生.生态人类学的审美走向[J].广西民族研究,2004(4)：39-43.
[99]潘辉,张晓萍,许春如.日本森林景观计量化研究现状及发展动向[J].世界林业研究.1988(4)：55-60.
[100]杨种,梁光义,钟幻思等.德务淫羊藿的化学成分研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(1)：34-35.
[101]苏应娟,刘启宏,程莲银等.湖北八角莲属3种植物的解剖学研究[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,12(2)：111-116.
[102]马绍宾,胡志浩.小檗科鬼臼亚科植物的核型研究[J].云南植物研究,1996,18(3)：325-330.
[103]SuYingjuan, WangTing, Yang Weidong etal. DNA extraction and RAPD analysis of Podocarpus[J].ACTASCI.NAT.U-NIV.SUNYATSENI.1998,37:13-18.
[104]诚静容,黄普华.中国植物志[M].北京：科学出版社,1999,45(3)：9.
[105]王艇,苏应娟,朱建明等.部分小檗科植物的RAPD分析[J].植物研究,2001,21(3)：428-431.
[106]王志安,宋克.红叶小檗的繁育与管理[J].河南林业科技,2006,26(3).
[107]高延厅.新优园林绿化树种[J].中国花卉园艺,2002,1：29.
[108]郭学望,包满珠.园林树木栽培养护学[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2002,246-248.
[109]刘锦春.南天竹资源利用与开发研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2004,23(6)：22-23.
[110]文国琴,何道文,何震.南天竹不同叶色与若干生理生化指标关系的研[J].亚热带植物科学,2005,34(4)38-40.
[111]朱志祥,蒋伟,刘燕,冯菊芳.野生南天竹的驯化栽培技术[J].江苏林业科技,2006,33(3)：31-33.
[112]张长发,胡一民.南天竹播种育苗新法[J].绿化与生活,2000,(5)：33.
[113]杜永芹,倪林娟,王玉勤.耐寒彩叶树种火焰南天竹的快繁技术研究[J].上海农业学报,2004,20(4)：1-4.
[114]周南鏰,黄一青,王青华等.火焰南天竹的组织培养[J].农业科技通讯,2002,11：17.
[115]周峰,胡水华.南天竹夏插育苗技术[J].林业科技开发,2002,16(4)：58-59.
[116]龙江峰.科学开发利用湖南园林植物资源[J]..湖南林业,2006,(4)：15.
[117]李保印,周秀梅,林紫玉,孙红岩.红色叶树种资源及其在园林中的应[J].河北林果研究,2003,18(2)：191-194.
[118]敖慧修.广州室内观叶植物的光合作用特征[J].中国科学院华南植物研究所集刊,1986,(3)：50.
[119]白伟岚,任建武,高永伟等.园林植物的耐荫性研究[J].林业科技通讯1999,(2)：12-15.
[120]陈灵芝.中国的生物多样性现状及其保护对策[M].北京：科学出版社,1993,210-212.
[121]国家中医管理局中华本草编委会.中华本草(8)[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,2000：479.
[122]陈俊愉,程绪珂.中国花经[M].上海：上海文化出版社,1990,214-226.
[123]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护[J].园林,2001,(7)：35-3.
[124]陈冀胜主编.中国有毒植物[M].北京：科学技术出版社,1987：132.
[125]李颖,钟章成,何跃军.三种土壤类型中南天竹差异性的研究[J].广西植物2006,26(2)：137-141.
[126]陈自新.城市园林植物生态学研究动向及发展趋势[J].北京园林,1995,(2)：1-6.
[127]陈少瑜.分子标记及其在林木种质资源和遗传育种研究中的应甩[J].云南林业科技,2002,101(4)：63-70.
[128]龙江峰.科学开发利用湖南园林植物资源[J].湖南林业,2006,(4)：34.
[129]刘克旺,童新旺,王晓明,等.湖南野生园林观赏植物资源及开发利用的探讨[J].湖南林业科技,2002,29(3)：54-58.
[130]马兵钢,牛建新,潘立忠心,等.RAPD-PCR对梨属植物品种鉴定的研究[J].西北农业学报,2004,13(1)：84-88.
[131]李继东,桑玉强,李淑玲等.RAPD技术及其在林木遗传研究中的应用[J].河南农业大学学报,2002,36(1)63-66.
[132]G.Besnard.A.Berville.On chloroplast DNA variat ions in the olive(olea europaeal)complex: comparison of RFLP and PCR polymorphisms[J].Theor Appl Genet(2002)104:1157-1163.
[133]黄义江,王宗清.苹果属果树抗寒性的细胞学鉴定[J].园艺学报,1982,9(3)：23-30.
[134]何若锡,王光洁.植物寒冷驯化机制[J].植物生理生化进展,1987,5：17-29.
[135]简令成.植物冻害和抗冻性的细胞生物学研究.植物生理生化进展.1987,(2)：1-6.
[136]蒋齐,梅曙光.宁夏黄土地区主要灌木树种抗早机制的初步研究[J].宁夏农林科技,1992,(5)：25-27.
[137]金研铭,徐惠风,李亚东等.牡丹引种及其抗寒性的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报1999,21(2)：46-48.
[138]孔令让.粗山羊草随机扩增多态性DNA研究[J].植物学报,1998,40(3)：223-227.
[139]潘青.扶芳藤遗传多样性研究及抗逆性选择[D].北京：北京林业大学研究生处,2004.
[140]李桂芬,龙庄如,梁玉堂.美国白松生长特性的研究[J].山东林业科技,1999,(1)：1-6.
[141]李艳菊.元宝枫繁殖技术与应用研究[D].北京：北京林业大学研究生处,2004.
[142]阎爱民.陈文新.苜蓿.草木樨.锦鸡儿根瘤菌的表型多样性分析[J].生物多样性,1999,7(2):112-118.
[143]Nakajima,Yet al.Characterization of genetic diversity of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in Daucus varities by RAPD and AFLP[J].Plant Cell Reports,1998,17:848-853.
[144]李宽饪.青杨的遗传分化[J].植物学报,1997,39(8)：753-758.
[145]李力.青岛耐冬山茶的多样性(Ⅱ)居群的遗传多样性分析[J].生物多样性.1996,4(1)：1-6.
[146]李俊清.中国水青冈种内种间遗传多样性的初步研究[J].生物多样性,1996,4(2)：63-68.
[147]中南林学院.经济林研究法[M]北京：中国林业出版社,1988,190-197.
[148]Rohlf F J.Numerical taxonnony and multivariate analysis system[M].New York,Exter Publishers,1994.
[149]R.J Schnell,C.T.Olano,R.J.Campbell.AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within ajackfruit germp;asm collection[J].Scientia Horticulturae 91(2001):261-274.
[150]陈守智,吴兴恩,钟瑞芳.大树杨梅果实数量性状的主成分分析[J].云南农业大学学报,2003,18(2)： 163-166.
[151]文彬,晁瑞堂,陈玉山.草莓品种的数量分类研究[J].华南师范大学学报,2000(1)：99-103.
[152]鲁生霞.主成分分析及其在动物遗传育种中的应用[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2003,33(5)：37-38.
[153]徐克学.生物数学[M].北京：科学出版社,2004,51-70.
[154]方彦.园林植物[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005
[155]Schaal,B.A., W.J.Leverich, S.H. Rogstad.Comparison of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology[M]. Genetics and conservation of Rare plants. New York:Oxford University Press, 199,123-124.
[156]胡能书,万国贤.同工酶技术及其应用[M].长沙：湖南科技出版社,1985：2-17.
[157]雷泞菲,苏智先,陈劲松.同工酶技术在植物研究中的应用[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2000,21(4)：321-324.
[158]龚大洁,周开亚.同工酶及其在爬行动物系统学中的应用[J].西北农业大学学报(自然科学版),1999,35(1)：111-1.
[159]樊守金,赵遵田.中国苋属植物酯酶同工酶研究[J].植物研究,1999,19(2):148-152
[160]祝朋芳,陈长青.同工酶技术在十字花科作物遗传育种上的应用[J].辽宁农业科学,2004(6)：30-31.
[161]马缘生,谭富娟,李灵芝等.异花授粉作物大白菜和荞麦基因库种子繁殖技术研究[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(2):16-22.
[162]张君增,方起程,梁晓天等.从化学成分探讨白豆杉属的系统位置[J].植物分类学报,1996,34(3)：282-287.
[163]唐延林,方宗熙.过氧化物同工酶在海带和裙带菜各部分的初步研究[J].山东海洋学研究学报,1982,12(2)：47-50.
[164]增樵,文军,Hedges K L et al. Computer-based profile analysis in Aralia (Araliaceae) [J].Cathaya,1993,17(5)：69-79.
[165]尹淑霞,韩烈保,王月华,等.Co-γ射线对多年生黑麦草植株过氧化物同工酶和酯酶同工酶的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(5)：596-598.
[166]夏阳.苹果过氧化物同工酶研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,1996,31(1)：77-80.
[167]张宪政,陈凤玉,王荣富.植物生理实验技术[M].哈尔滨：辽宁科学出版社,1994.
[168]勒水年.桑树同工酶研究进展与应用[J].蚕桑通报,1995,26(3)：5-8.
[169]雷宁菲,苏智先,陈劲松.同工酶技术在植物研究中的应用[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2000,21(4)：321-325.
[170]刘鹏,徐根娣,土玮嫔.不同生境七子花同工酶的研究[J].浙江师范大学学报,2002,25(3)：285-287.
[171]孟学平,杨恒山,侯立自,等.冬小麦不同发育时期过氧化物酶研究[J].华北农学报,2001,16(3)：56-60.
[172]孙焕顷,沈洪国, 黄毅.芦荟超氧化物歧化酶同工酶Ⅱ的分离纯化及部分性质[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版2003,28(5)：784-787.
[173]赖人斌.花生品种子叶的脂酶同工酶研究初报[J].中国油料,1985,(4)：18-20.
[174]王中仁.植物等位酶分析[M].北京：科学出版社1996：95-119.
[175]余建英,何旭宏.数据统计分析与SPSS应用[M].北京：人民邮电出版社,2006,2.
[176]孔秋生.萝卜种质资源遗传多样性及其亲缘关系研究[D].武汉,华中农业大学研究生处,2003.
[177]Kuhus L J, Fretz T A.Distingguishing Rose cultivars by polyacryla mide gel electrophoresis.I.Extraction and storage of protein and active enzymes from rose leaves[J].Amer, Soc Sci,103 (4):503-508.
[178]苏应娟,刘启宏.湖北八角莲属植物过氧化物酶同下酶分析[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,12(1)：44-48.
[179]李昌林,陈默君,颜艳.二色胡枝子品种SOD、POD同工酶的酶谱分析[J].草地学报,2003,11(3)：210-212.
[180]Dhiraj V yas.Genetic structure of walnut genoty pe using leaf isozymes as variability measure [J].Scientia Horticulturae,2003,97 (2):141-152.
[181]Magoma G N. Biochemical differentiationin Camellia sinensisand its wild relatives as revealed by isozyme and catechin patterns[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2003,31 (9):995-1010.
[182]张宗文.红花种质资源的同工酶遗传多样性及分类研究[J].植物遗传资源科学,2000,1(4)：6-13.
[183]何忠效,张树政.电泳(第二版)[M].北京：科学出版社.1999：284,296-298.
[184]詹秋文,夏孝勤.高粱和苏丹草过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J].安徽技术师范学院学报,2003,17(4)：310-312.
[185]王述明,潭富娟,胡家蓬.小豆种质资源同工酶遗传多样性分析与评价[J].中国农业科学,2003,35(11)：1311-1318.
[186]王立泽,叶家栋,游庄信,等.向日葵种植[M].合肥：安徽科学技术出版社,1995,1：432-439.
[187]郭水良,毛郁薷,强胜.温度对过氧化物酶同工酶谱的影响fJl.广西植物,2002,22(6)：557-562.
[188]卫国,罗冬梅,徐颖利,陈志勇.10个品种向日葵过氧化物酶同工酶分析[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2006,21(5)：528-531.
[189]胡志昂.杨属植物的同工过氧化物酶[J].植物分类学报,1981,19(3)：291.
[190]邓思平,刘楚吾.赤点石斑鱼4种同工酶的组织分布及基因位点分析[J].浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2004,23(2)：103-106.
[191]刘文彬,陈合格,张轩杰.黄颡鱼不同组织中同工酶的表达模式[J].激光生物学报,2003,12(14)：274-278.
[192]谭晓风,桂君.山茶植物叶片DNA提取.中南林学院学报,1999,19(4)：14-17.
[193]李明芳.荔枝SSR标记的研究及对部分荔枝种质的遗传多样性研究[D].海口.华南热带农业大学研究生处.2003.
[194]Harmrick, J.L, W.j.W.Godt.Aliozyme diversity in plant species [M].Plant population genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources.Sunderland:Sinauer,1990.43-46.
[195]庞小明.用分子标记研究柑桔属及其近缘属植物的亲缘关系和枳的遗传多样性[D].武汉.华中农业大学研究生处.2002.
[196]Lefebve V, Goffinet B, Chauvet JC.Evalution of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivars protection purposes:comparison of AFLP, RAPD and phenotypic data[J]. Theor Apple Genet,2001,102 (5):741-750.
[197]R.J.Schnell, C.T.Olano, R.J.CampbeH.AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within a jackfruit germplasm collection[J]. Scientia Horticulture,2001,91:261-274.
[198]Burstin J, Charcosset A.Relationships between phenotypic and marker distance:theortial and experimental investigations[J].Heredity,1997,78:477-483.
[199]Noli E, Salvis Tuberos R.Comparative analysis of genetic relationships in barley based on RELP and RAPD marker[J].Genome,1997,40:607-616.
[200]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护花木盆景[J].花卉园艺,1994(2)：24-24.
[201]高延厅.新优园林绿化树种[J].中国花卉园艺,2002,1：29.
[202]张长发,胡一民.南天竹播种育苗新法[J].绿化与生活,2000,(5)：33.
[203]周南鏰,黄一青,王青华.等.火焰南天竹的组织培养[J].农业科技通讯,2002,11：17.
[204]侯碧清,刘克旺,王海峰.湖南野生观赏植物及其园林应用[J].林业调查规划,2006,31(2)：140-145.
[205]訾兴中,张定成.琅琊山植物志[M].北京：中国林业出版社,1999.
[206]刘锦春.南天竹资源利用与开发研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2004,23(6)：22-23.
[207]李新峥,周俊国.观赏南瓜的观赏特性及其生产的发展[J].浙江农业科学,2006,(1)：91-93.
[208]张林生.南天竹盆景的造型与养护[J].园林,2001,(7)：35-3.
[209]赵旺兔.榉树生物学特性及园林应用研究[D].南京林业大学,20006.
[210]金晓鹏,李沛然.观赏竹在城市园林绿化中的作用[J].江西林业科技,2006(1)：53-54.
[211]林绍生,李华芬,陈义增.应用模糊数学评价观叶植物的观赏性[J].亚热带植物通讯,2000,29(2)：43-47.
[212]建德锋,庞建松。吉林市秋季景观树木调查及观赏特性分析[J].吉林农业科技学院学报,2006,15,(1)：4-7.
[213]杨秀坚,罗富英,窦萍珍.植物调节剂对菊花观赏性状及相关特性的影响[J].北方园艺2006(1):45-46.
[214]彭慧,赵冰,李树和,刘立尊,宋生印.采用灰色关联分析法综合评价华北地区主栽山药品种[J].2006,(5)：15-17.
[215]禹玉华,梁承邺,段俊,等.超甜玉米新品种灰色关联综合评估初报[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2001,9(1)75-80.
[216]刘家勇,范源洪,杨洪昌等.31个国外甘蔗引进种灰色多维综合评估[J].2006,19(4)：683-687.
[217]文建成,符菊芬,陈学宽,等.甘蔗品种灰色模糊多维综合评估析[J].中国糖料,2001(3)：5-8.
[218]李勇,邵诚,候晓星.一种新的灰关联分析算法——一致关联度[J].信息与控制,2006,35(4)：462-466.
[219]武菊英,滕文军,王庆海.耐旱多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报.2006,21(1)：129-132
[220]邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉：华中科技大学出版社,2002.122-154.
[221]杨纶标,高英仪.模糊数学原理及应用[M].广州：华南理工大学出版社,2001.115-125.
[222]李宏艳.关于灰色关联度计算方法的研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(9)：1231-1234
[223]武菊英等：耐早多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报,2006,21(1)：129-13
[224]吴键明.灰色关联度分析法就用于水稻品种综合评判的探索[J].种子,1990,(3)：33-35.
[225]刘滨谊,姜允芳.中国城市绿地系统规划评价指标体系的研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002,(2)：27-29.
[226][美]T·L·萨蒂.层次分析法———在资源分配管理和冲突中的应用[M].许树柏,等译.北京：煤炭工业出版社,1988.
[227]李自超,张洪亮,曾亚文,申时全,孙传清,王象坤.云南稻种资源表型遗传多样性的研究[J].作物学报,2001,27(6)：832-837.
[228]Dong Y S, Zhuang B C, Zhao L M, Sun H, He M Y. The genetic diversity of annual wild soybeans grown in China[J]. Theor Appi Genet,2001,103:98-103.
[229]阳含熙,卢泽遇.植物生态学的数量分类方法[M.]北京：科学出版社,1983.
[230]Smith J S C, Chin E C L, Shu H, Smith O S, Wall S J, Senior M L, Mitchell S E, Kresovich S, Ziegle J. An evaluation of theutility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.):comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree[J]. TheorAppl Genet,1997,95:163-173.
[231]武耀廷,张天真,殷剑美.利用分了标记和形态学性状检测的陆地棉栽培品种遗传多样性[J].遗传学报, 2001,28(11)：1040-1050.
[232]Shim S 1, Jorgensen R B. Genetic structure in cultivated and wild carrots (Daucus carota L.) revealed by AFLP analysis[J]. TheorAppl Genet,2000,101:227-233.
[233]Renganayaki K, Read J C, Fritz A K. Genetic diversity among Texas bluegrass genotypes (Poa arachniferaTorr.) revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers[J]. Theor Appl Genet,2001,102:1037-1045.
[234]Sun G, Bond M, Nass H, Martin R, Deng Z. RAPD polymorphisms in spring wheat cultivars and lines with different level of Fusarium resistance[J]. Theor Appl Genet,2003,106:1059-1067.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |