用户名: 密码: 验证码:
信息和沟通对不安全驾驶行为的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
研究者首先全面调研了我国从人因工程角度进行的道路交通安全研究。在此基础上,确定了本文的三个研究问题:风险驾驶,侵犯驾驶,机动车和自行车交互安全。并确定了本文的研究目的:第一,找到影响三类不安全驾驶行为的关键因素;第二,提出有效措施来改变这些因素,进而改变不安全行为;第三,验证该措施对降低风险驾驶和侵犯驾驶、提高自行车交互安全的有效性。
     首先,本研究通过问卷调研,研究了影响风险驾驶的关键因素。调研收集了324份有效问卷,通过因子分析和多元回归分析发现感觉寻求和自我准则两个因素显著影响驾驶员采取风险驾驶行为的可能性。影响侵犯驾驶的因素包括隐蔽性,自我防御和愤怒。影响机动车和自行车交互安全的主要因素是驾驶员注意和反应时间,以及车辆行驶方向。为了了解机动车与自行车的交互场景,研究者进行了实地观测。结果表明:骑车人最严重的三类违规行为是闯红灯、逆行、骑车带人。观察过程中的发生的365起冲突中,骑车人责任占66.9%。
     然后,研究者提出通过发送提示信息和沟通信息的方式来减少三类不安全驾驶行为。设计并开发了信息共享和沟通系统,简称为DISC系统。在风险驾驶时,DISC系统向驾驶员发送道路交通状况、驾驶行为、交通规定信息;在侵犯驾驶时,发送交通状况和其他驾驶人不当行为信息,以及来自相邻驾驶员的沟通信息;与自行车交互时,发送自行车行驶方向和速度信息。
     研究者提出了4个假设来探讨DISC系统对三类不安全驾驶行为及其关键因素的影响。设计并进行了3个仿真驾驶实验来检验以上假设。36位驾驶员参加了实验。实验数据统计分析结果表明:(1)DISC系统的提示信息显著提高了驾驶员的自我准则,降低了风险驾驶的感觉寻求以及行为意愿,最终减少了风险驾驶行为;(2)DISC系统提示信息和沟通信息,显著降低了驾驶员的主观隐蔽性,减少了侵犯驾驶行为;(3)DISC系统提示自行车方向和速度信息,帮助驾驶员提前注意到自行车并避让,提高了交互安全,降低了发生碰撞事故的可能性。本研究的理论探讨和实验研究为道路交通安全中的人因学研究提供了坚实的基础。研究者对改变不安全驾驶行为提出了可行的建议。
Based on review of road safety researches in China, there is gap between thehuman factors research and three salient problems of road safety. They are Chinesedrivers’ risk taking, aggressive driving and interacting with bicycles at intersections.There were three objective of this study:(1) to find out the most important factors of thethree unsafe behaviors;(2) to propose an approach which can be used to change thefactors and also unsafe driving behaviors;(3) to testify the effectiveness of thisapproach.
     First, a survey study was conducted to find out the most important motives behinddrivers’ risk taking, with324valid participants. Results of multiple regression analysisindicated that sensation seeking and personal norm are the two factors attributed themost of risky driving. The influential fators of aggressive driving are anonymity,ego-defensiveness and anger. The influential facotrs of vehicle-bicycle interaction aretime to notice and traveling direction.
     The driver information sharing and communication system (DISC) was proposedto send information and communication when drivers were taking risk, driving infrustrated situations and interacting with bicycles. In order to evaluate the effectivenessof the DISC system, three simulation-based experiments were conducted with36drivers participated. In experiment of risk taking, the DISC system sent real-timeinformation of road environment, drivers’ performance and related traffic regulation ofthe specific location both before and during drivers’ risk taking. Drivers’ sensationseeking, personal norm, intention to take risk and also risky driving behaviors weremeasured. In experiment of aggressive driving, the DISC system sent detailedinformation of the frustrating situations, and also communication with the neighboringdrivers. Drivers’ ego-defensiveness, subjective aggression and aggressive behaviorswere measured. In experiment of interacting with bicycles at intersections, the DISCsystem sent information of bicycle direction or information of both direction and speed.Drivers’ perceived risk of the interaction and their reaction performance were measured.
     The main results indicated that:
     Providing information was effective to increase drivers’ personal norm, to decrease sensation seeking, intention to take risk and risky driving behaviors.
     Drivers’ anonymity and aggressive behavior was significantly influenced byproviding the information of the frustrating situation and communication withneighboring drivers. However, no significant difference was found of drivers’ego-defensiveness, anger and subjective aggression.
     Providing bicycle information during interaction was effective to help driversnotice bicycle and have enough time to react, which decreased the possibility of crash.
     These findings provide a solid foundation to prevent risk taking, aggressive drivingand to enhance safety of vehicle-bicycle interaction. It also has implication forintelligent transportation system design.
引文
[1]公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报.江苏省无锡市:公安部交通管理科学研究所,2009.
    [2]刘玉芳.北京与国际城市的比较研究.城市经济,2008,15(2):104-110.
    [3]黄曙东,甘卫平,戴立操.道路交通事故的人因失误分析.人类工效学,2006,12(3):39-41.
    [4] Lee JD. Fifty Years of Driving Safety Research. Human Factors: The Journal of the HumanFactors and Ergonomics Society,2008,50:521-528.
    [5] Fishbein M, Trafimow D, Francis C, et al. AIDS Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices(KABP) in Two Caribbean Countries: A Comparative Analysis1. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology,1993,23:687-702.
    [6]王锦文,张殿业,李昌吉,等.机动车驾驶员身心条件及测评研究.职业卫生与病伤,1999,14(4):215-219.
    [7]艾力·斯木吐拉,李鑫,马晓松.基于驾驶适宜性检测的沙漠公路驾驶员生理、心理特性研究.中国安全科学学报,2009,19(1):10-17.
    [8]金会庆,余皖生,张树林,等.机动车驾驶员身体素质条件及测评指标的研究.人类工效学,2001,7(3):1-6.
    [9]张殿业,金键,杨京帅,等.驾驶员安全可靠性多因素分析.公路交通科技,2004,21(3):89-91.
    [10]袁伟,付锐,郭应时,等.汽车驾驶人感知决策校正行为模式.长安大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(3):80-83.
    [11] Wickens CD, Flach JM. Information processing. In Human factors in aviation,Ed. E. L.Wiener&D. C. Nagel Academic Press, San Diego,1998:111-155.
    [12]吕宣伟,张志刚,谷欣.夜视力与驾驶适应性.人类工效学,20006(3):60-63.
    [13]张殿业.驾驶员动态视野与行车安全可靠度.西南交通大学学报,2000,35(3):319-322.
    [14]郭伟力,何存道,葛旭海,等.卡车驾驶员的深度知觉研究.人类工效学,1999,5(3):10-13.
    [15]郭应时,付锐,张建峰,等.不同通道宽度条件下汽车驾驶员注视点分布规律.交通运输工程学报,2006,6(2):51-54.
    [16]金会庆,陈嵘,张树林.机动车驾驶员的速度估计、复杂反应判断和操纵机能特征研究.人类工效学,1995,1(1):13-18.
    [17]张殿业,王秀清,马至芹,等.机动车驾驶员反应特性研究.工业卫生与职业病,1991,17(5):268-269.
    [18]张殿业,金键,杨京帅.老年人驾驶反应行为分析.交通运输工程与信息学报,2004,3(2):1-5.
    [19]张开冉,李国芳.新驾驶员反应特性分析.中国安全科学学报,2008,18(8):115-118.
    [20] Liao KB, Yan JB, Liu AQ, et al. Comparative Study of Driver's Reaction to Road HazardsBased on Driving Simulation: Drivers in Hengyang versus Drivers in Beijing. Progress inSafety Science and Technology,2008,7:2076-2080.
    [21]李百川,殷国祥,苏如玉.汽车驾驶员注意特性与交通事故关系的分析研究.人类工效学,1996,2(2):38-41.
    [22]毛恩荣,周一鸣.汽车驾驶员注意品质与行车安全性关系的研究.人类工效学,1997,3(1):18-21.
    [23]李辉,景国勋,贾智伟,等.驾驶员注意力分配定量方法研究.中国安全科学学报,2009,19(2):148-151.
    [24] Feng ZX, Liu J, Ning SF. Study and development on the simulation system of driver's stresstraining based on DirectX. Proceedings of First International Conference of Modelling andSimulation,2008:400-407.
    [25]武安娜,王颖,张伟.驾驶模拟条件下移动电话对驾驶绩效影响研究.人类工效学,2007,13(3):44-46.
    [26]孙向红,杨帆.车辆驾驶心理负荷测量工具的测评与发展:一个现场研究的尝试.人类工效学,2008,14(3):27-31.
    [27] Zhang B, Huang YH, Rau PLP, et al. A study of Chinese truck drivers' attitudes towardfeedback by technology. Safety Science,2006,44:747-752.
    [28]陈爽.驾驶员心理应激与事故倾向性的相关研究.山东交通学院学报,2005,13(4):77-81.
    [29]刘江,田萍,荣建,等.驾驶员气质与行车速度关系的初步研究.北京工业大学学报,2006,32(1):27-32.
    [30]何存道,汤震东,郑宁华.卡车驾驶员情绪状态研究.人类工效学,2001,7(2):18-21.
    [31] Fleiter JJ, Gao LP, Qju C, et al. Availability, functionality, and use of seat belts in Beijing taxisprior to the2008Beijing Olympic Games. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2009,41:342-344.
    [32] Routley V, Ozanne-Smith J, Qin Y, et al. Taxi driver seat belt wearing in Nanjing, China.Journal of Safety Research,2009,40:449-454.
    [33] Huang Y-H, Zhang W, Murphy L, et al. Attitudes and behavior of Chinese drivers regardingseatbelt use. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2011,43:889-897.
    [34] Zhou R, Horrey WJ, Yu R. The effect of conformity tendency on pedestrians' road-crossingintentions in China: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2009,41:491-497.
    [35] Shi J, Bai Y, Tao L, et al. A model of Beijing drivers' scrambling behaviors. Accident Analysisand Prevention,2011,43:1540-1546.
    [36] Huang YH, Zhang W, Roetting M, et al. Experiences from dual-country drivers: Drivingsafely in China and the US. Safety Science,2006,44:785-795.
    [37] Zhang W, Huang YH, Roetting M, et al. Driver's views and behaviors about safety in China-What do they NOT know about driving? Accident Analysis and Prevention,2006,38:22-27.
    [38]李凤芝,李昌吉,詹承烈,等.攻击性驾驶行为量表中文译本的效度和信度.中国行为医学科学,2003,12(3):335-337.
    [39]李凤芝,李昌吉,龙云芳,等.汽车驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的心理因素分析.四川大学学报,2004,35(4):568-570.
    [40]庄明科,白海峰,谢晓非.驾驶人员风险驾驶行为分析及相关因素研究.北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,2(4):1-8.
    [41] Xie C, Parker D. A social psychological approach to driving violations in two Chinese cities.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2002,5:293-308.
    [42]丁靖艳.基于计划行为理论的侵犯驾驶行为研究.中国安全科学学报,2006,16(12):15-18.
    [43]丁靖艳.机动车驾驶人侵犯驾驶行为的调查研究.中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版),2009,59(1):88-92.
    [44] Li N, Chen WL. Comprehensive system of road safety management-Framework forimproving road safety in China. Transportation Research Record,2007,2038:34-41.
    [45]冯舒,段靓瑜,江朝晖,等.长时间单调模拟驾驶对疲劳的影响研究.中国安全科学学报,2007,17(2):66-71.
    [46]马艳丽,王要武,裴玉龙.疲劳与驾驶时间关系的实验心理学研究.西南交通大学学报,2009,44(4):535-540.
    [47]李斌,王猛,汪林,等.驾驶时间对营运驾驶员驾驶能力影响的试验研究.公路交通科技,2007,24(5):113-120.
    [48]段靓瑜,冯舒,江朝晖,等.不同时段下驾驶员复杂反应实验研究.人类工效学,2007,13(3):35-40.
    [49]任鑫峰,金治富,康慧.疲劳驾驶与年龄、驾龄的关系.道路交通与安全,2007,7(5):20-22.
    [50]舒红宇,李发权,易树平,等.汽车驾驶疲劳的一种综合性评定方法.上海交通大学学报,2008,42(8):1338-1343.
    [51] Liu GF, Han S, Liang DH, et al. Driver sleepiness and risk of car crashes in Shenyang, aChinese northeastern city: Population-based case-control study. Biomedical andEnvironmental Sciences,2003,16:219-226.
    [52]谌志强,李硕.高速公路车速与交通安全.道路交通与安全,2006,6(8):1-3.
    [53]郑安文.我国高速公路交通事故的基本特点与预防对策.公路交通科技,2002,19(4):109-112.
    [54]刘强,陆化普,张永波,等.我国道路交通事故特征分析与对策研究.中国安全科学学报,2006,16(3):123-128.
    [55]王永征,邵成领,何新阳,等.合宁高速公路交通事故流行病学分析.中华创伤杂志,1999,15(2):107-109.
    [56]侯德藻,陈光武,李百川.高速公路事故特征及预防对策的探讨.人类工效学,1999,6(5):55-57.
    [57] Shinar D. Personality and aggressive driving. In Traffic safety and human behavior, Elsevier,Oxford,2007:323-363.
    [58]武淑平,宋守信.高速公路驾驶中人因失误问题分析.交通安全,2008,5:125-128.
    [59] Routley V, Ozanne-Smith J, Li D, et al. China belting up or down? Seat belt wearing trends inNanjing and Zhoushan. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2008,40:1850-1858.
    [60] Wang Y, Hasselberg M, Wu Z, et al. Distribution and characteristics of road traffic crashes inthe Chaoyang District of Beijing, China. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2008,40:334-340.
    [61]吴立新,王永君.交通事故中驾驶行为与道路线形的关系.吉林建筑工程学院学报,2005,22(1):33-36.
    [62]张殿业,张开冉,金键.道路标线对驾驶行为模式的影响.中国公路学报,2001,14(4):89-90.
    [63]崔西奎,孙林辉,宋云峰.路宽对驾驶行为及司机负荷的影响.邯郸职业技术学院学报,2008,21(1):60-62.
    [64] Zhang W, Tsimhoni O, Sivak M, et al. Road Safety in China: Challenges and Opportunities:The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute,2008.
    [65] Zhang W, Tsimhoni O, Sivak M, et al. Road safety in China: Analysis of current challenges.Journal of Safety Research,2010,41:25-30.
    [66] Li G, Baker SP. Exploring the male-female discrepancy in death rates from bicycling injury:The decomposition method. Accident Analysis&Prevention,1996,28:537-540.
    [67] Turner C, McClure R, Pirozzo S. Injury and risk-taking behavior--a systematic review.Accident Analysis&Prevention,2004,36:93-101.
    [68] Shinar D. Driving style. In Traffic safety and human behavior, Elsevier, Oxford,2007:273-402.
    [69] Deffenbacher JL, Lynch RS, Oetting ER, et al. The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: ameasure of how people express their anger on the road. Behaviour Research and Therapy,2002,40:717-737.
    [70] Fahrenkrug H, Rehm J. Drinking patterns, risk taking and road accidents of young drivers:Results of a Swiss case-control study. Sozial-und Pr ventivmedizin/Social and PreventiveMedicine,1994,39:227-238.
    [71] Honkasalo A. Finnish divers' view of occupational risks and risk taking. Applied Ergonomics,1992,23:202-206.
    [72] Iversen H. Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F:Psychology and Behaviour,2004,7:135-150.
    [73] Stevenson MR, Palamara P. Behavioural factors as predictors of motor vehicle crashes:differentials between young urban and rural drivers. Australian and New Zealand Journal ofPublic Health,2001,25:245-249.
    [74] Crundall D, Bibby P, Clarke D, et al. Car drivers' attitudes towards motorcyclists: A survey.Accident Analysis&Prevention,2008,40:983-993.
    [75] Machin MA, Sankey KS. Relationships between young drivers' personality characteristics,risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2008,40:541-547.
    [76] Sixsmith J, Sixsmith A. Older people, driving and new technology. Applied Ergonomics,1993,24:40-43.
    [77] Ulleberg P, Rundmo T. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky drivingbehaviour among young drivers. Safety Science,2003,41:427-443.
    [78] Rothengatter T. Drivers' illusions--no more risk. Transportation Research Part F: TrafficPsychology and Behaviour,2002,5:249-258.
    [79] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory andresearch. Addison-Wesley,1975.
    [80] Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses,1991,50:179-211.
    [81] Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analyticreview. British Journal of Social Psychology,2001,40:471-499.
    [82] Paris H, Broucke SVd. Measuring cognitive determinants of speeding: An application of thetheory of planned behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology andBehaviour,2008,11:168-180.
    [83] Parker D, Manstead ASR, Stradling SG, et al. Intention to commit driving violations: Anapplication of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,1992,77:94–101.
    [84] Parker D, Stradling SG, Manstead ASR. Modifying Beliefs and Attitudes to Exceeding theSpeed Limit: An Intervention Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology,1996,26:1-19.
    [85] Wallen Warner H, Aberg L. Drivers' beliefs about exceeding the speed limits. TransportationResearch Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2008,11:376-389.
    [86] Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenuesfor Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1998,28:1429-1464.
    [87] Elliott MA. Predicting motorcyclists' intentions to speed: Effects of selected cognitions fromthe theory of planned behaviour, self-identity and social identity. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2010,42:718-725.
    [88] Parker D, Lajunen T, Stradling S. Attitudinal predictors of interpersonally aggressiveviolations on the road. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,1998,1:11-24.
    [89] Zuckerman M. Behavioural Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking.Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press,1994.
    [90] Arnett JJ. Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personalityand Individual Differences,1996,20:693-702.
    [91] Heino A, van der Molen HH, Wilde GJS. Risk perception, risk taking, accident involvementand the need for stimulation. Safety Science,1996,22:35-48.
    [92] Jonah BA. Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature.Accident Analysis&Prevention,1997,29:651-665.
    [93] Rosenbloom T. Sensation seeking and risk taking in mortality salience. Personality andIndividual Differences,2003,35:1809-1819.
    [94] Jonah BA, Thiessen R, Au-Yeung E. Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioraladaptation. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2001,33:679-684.
    [95] Short JF, Jr. The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis.American Sociological Review,1984,49:711-725.
    [96] Lyng S. Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking. The AmericanJournal of Sociology,1990,95:851-886.
    [97] Harland P, Staats H, Wilke HAM. Explaining Pro-environmental Intention and Behavior byPersonal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1999,29:2505-2528.
    [98] De Pelsmacker P, Janssens W. The effect of norms, attitudes and habits on speeding behavior:Scale development and model building and estimation. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2007,39:6-15.
    [99] Shi J, Bai Y, Ying X, et al. Aberrant driving behaviors: A study of drivers in Beijing. AccidentAnalysis&Prevention,2010,42:1031-1040.
    [100]韦华,张伟.中美两国汽车驾驶安全影响因素研究.中国安全科学学报,2004,14(9):24-28.
    [101] NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts. Washington DC: National Highway Traffic SafetyAdministration, U. S. Department of Transportation,1996.
    [102] Lajunen T, Parker D. Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationshipbetween self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. AccidentAnalysis&Prevention,2001,33:243-255.
    [103] Shinar D. Aggressive driving: the contribution of the drivers and the situation. TransportationResearch Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,1998,1:137-160.
    [104] Yagil D. Interpersonal antecedents of drivers' aggression. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2001,4:119-131.
    [105] Patricia E-P, Paul B, Jerry D. The Effects of Trait Driving Anger, Anonymity, and AggressiveStimuli on Aggressive Driving Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2001,31:431-443.
    [106] Pinsonneault A, Heppel N. Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A NewConceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework. Journal of ManagementInformation Systems,1997,14:89-108.
    [107] Ellison PA, Govern JM, Petri HL, et al. Anonymity and aggressive driving behavior: A fieldstudy. Journal of Social Behavior&Personality,1995,10:265-272.
    [108] Baumeister RF, Bushman BJ, Campbell WK. Self-Esteem, Narcissism, and Aggression.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2000,9:26-29.
    [109] Branscombe NR, Wann DL. Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogationwhen a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology,1994,24:641-657.
    [110] Neighbors C, Vietor NA, Knee CR. A Motivational Model of Driving Anger and Aggression.Pers Soc Psychol Bull,2002,28:324-335.
    [111] Jacobs G, Aeron-Thomas A, Astrop A. Estimating global road fatalities. London, England.:Transportation Research Laboratory,2000.
    [112] G rder P, Leden L, Thedéen T. Safety implications of bicycle paths at signalized intersections.Accident Analysis&Prevention,1994,26:429-439.
    [113] Wood JM, Lacherez PF, Marszalek RP, et al. Drivers' and cyclists' experiences of sharing theroad: Incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2009,41:772-776.
    [114] R s nen M, Summala H. Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions: anin-depth study. Accident Analysis&Prevention,1998,30:657-666.
    [115] Hofmann P, Rinkenauer G, Gude D. Preparing lane changes while driving in a fixed-basesimulator: Effects of advance information about direction and amplitude on reaction time andsteering kinematics. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2010,13:255-268.
    [116] Wang Y, Nihan NL. Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles atsignalized intersections. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2004,36:313-321.
    [117] Herslund M-B, Jorgensen NO. Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2003,35:885-891.
    [118]张磊,任刚,王卫杰.基于计划行为理论的自行车不安全行为模型研究.中国安全科学学报,2010,20(7):43-48.
    [119] Hatakka M, Keskinen E, Gregersen NP, et al. From control of the vehicle to personalself-control; broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2002,5:201-215.
    [120] Simpson HM. Community-based approaches to highway safety: Health promotion anddrinking-driving. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,1987,20:27-37.
    [121] Liu L. Quality of life as a social representation in China: A qualitative study. Social IndicatorsResearch,2006,75:217-240.
    [122] Wang P, Rau P-LP, Salvendy G. Chinese drivers' risky driving and risky taking in other lifesituations. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics,2011.
    [123] Bina M, Graziano F, Bonino S. Risky driving and lifestyles in adolescence. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2006,38:472-481.
    [124] Parker D, McDonald L, Rabbitt P, et al. Elderly drivers and their accidents: the Aging DriverQuestionnaire. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2000,32:751-759.
    [125] Weber EU, Blais A-r, Betz NE. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring riskperceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2002,15:263-290.
    [126] Nunnaly JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc,1987.
    [127]徐庆功,王岳.北京市女性驾驶员违法及事故特征的研究.道路交通与安全,2008,8(2):50-54.
    [128] Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale,1983.
    [129] Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: FourRecommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis.. Practical Assessment, Research&Evaluation,2005,10:1-9.
    [130] Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika,1974,39:31-36.
    [131] Dunteman GH. Principal Components Analysis. CA: SAGE publication Inc.,1989.
    [132]卢纹岱. SPSS for Windows统计分析.北京:电子工业出版社,2006
    [133] Wang P, Rau P-LP, Treek Bv, et al. Bicyclist’s Violation and Risk Perception in DifferentSituations. Paper presented at the9th Pan-Pacific Conference on Ergonomics,2010.
    [134] Jeske K-J, Werner U. Impacts on decision making of executives: Probabilities versusoutcomes. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics,2008,1:49-65.
    [135] Shead NW, Callan MJ, Hodgins DC. Probability discounting among gamblers: Differencesacross problem gambling severity and affect-regulation expectancies. Personality andIndividual Differences,2008,45:536-541.
    [136] Dingus TA, Hulse MC, McGehee DV, et al. Driver Performance Results from the TravtekIVHS Camera Car Evaluation Study. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society AnnualMeeting Proceedings,1994,38:1118-1122.
    [137] Mangharam R, Rajkumar R, Hamilton M, et al. Bounded-latency alerts in vehicular networks.Ieee, New York,2007.
    [138] Olson PL. Driver Perception-Response time In Human Factors in Traffic Safety, Ed. DewarRE.&Olson PL., Tucson: Lawyers and Judges Publishing company, Inc.,2002.
    [139] Lloyd M, Witherow K, Pierowicz J, et al. Using driver primary control input to determine thetiming of alerts and warnings. Advances in intelligent system design,1997,106:3379-3383.
    [140] NOKIA. Qt一个跨平台应用程序和UI开发框架,[2010-6-18]. http://qt.nokia.com/title-cn.
    [141] Comte SL, Jamson AH. Traditional and innovative speed-reducing measures for curves: aninvestigation of driver behaviour using a driving simulator. Safety Science,2000,36:137-150.
    [142] Wang Y, Zhang W, Wu S, et al. Simulators for Driving Safety Study–A Literature Review. InVirtual Reality, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg,2007:584-593.
    [143] Deffenbacher JL, Lynch RS, Filetti LB, et al. Anger, aggression, risky behavior, andcrash-related outcomes in three groups of drivers. Behaviour Research and Therapy,2003,41:333-349.
    [144] Deffenbacher JL, Richards TL, Filetti LB, et al. Angry Drivers: A Test of State-Trait Theory.Violence and Victims,2005,20:455-469.
    [145]夏凤萍.面包车超车和对车道公交车相撞致1死4伤.嘉兴频道.2010-06-28
    [2011-03-10]. http://jx.zjol.com.cn/05jx/system/2010/06/28/016714733.shtml.
    [146] Haynes CA, Miles JNV, Clements K. A confirmatory factor analysis of two models ofsensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences,2000,29:823-839.
    [147] Forward SE. The intention to commit driving violations-A qualitative study. TransportationResearch Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2006,9:412-426.
    [148] Forward SE. An assessment of what motivates road violations. Transportation Research Part F:Psychology and Behavior,2009,12:225-234.
    [149] Moller M, Hels T. Cyclists' perception of risk in roundabouts. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2008,40:1055-1062.
    [150] Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins,1990.
    [151]杜家菊,陈志伟.使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法.生物学通报,2010,45(2):4-6.
    [152]林嵩.结构方程模型原理与AMOS应用.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2008.
    [153] Chen XM, Gao L, Wei ZH, et al. Research on driver braking behavior under emergencysituations and relation between driver personalities and driving violations. Progress in SafetyScience and Technology,2005,5:748-755.
    [154] Crundall D, Van Loon E, Underwood G. Attraction and distraction of attention with roadsideadvertisements. Accident Analysis&Prevention,2006,38:671-677.
    [155] Dewar RE. In-vehicle information and driver overload. International Journal of VehicleDesign,1988,9:557-564.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700