华北平原高产区农田土壤条件与水氮利用效率定量评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
华北平原是我国最主要的冬小麦夏玉米生产基地。该地区粮食生产的高产稳产是国家粮食安全的重要保障。近几十年来,由于过量抽取地下水进行农业灌溉导致了地下水位急剧下降,氮肥的过度使用则导致了如地下水污染等一系列环境问题,同时造成了资源的浪费。在粮食高产条件下实现水氮资源的高效利用是实现我国农业可持续发展的前提保证。
     农田基础性质差异在华北平原冬小麦夏玉米轮作区十分常见,该差异造成了不同农田之间可观的产量差异。然而目前混乱且没有针对性的农业管理方式导致了该地区高地力农田生产潜力未完全发挥以及低地力农田由于水分氮素投入过量而造成水分养分浪费等问题。因此本论文研究目的为明确不同地力农田决定产量差异的关键土壤因素以及对应的农田水氮利用特征,并在此基础上提出提升低地力农田产量和水氮利用效率的有效途径。
     本研究在山东泰安高产农田开展了三周年(2009年10月至2012年9月)的冬小麦夏玉米轮作试验,选取三个具有不同地力水平的代表性农田,采用完全一致的田间管理模式。对各农田土壤剖面的基础理化性质,水分无机氮动态,以及作物的农学性状进行了测定。同时在低地力农田设置了正常施肥,单季作物增施40kg ha-1和80kg ha-1氮肥的三个氮水平试验。具体结论如下
     (1)对三个地力水平农田土壤剖面基本理化性质进行土壤质量评价结果表明,在华北平原冬小麦夏玉米高产轮作区,农田的土壤地力与土壤持水功能、土壤导水功能和土壤养分供应三个功能紧密相关。在本研究区,0-120cm剖面最大有效贮水量、剖面土壤饱和导水率分布和质地校正的土壤养分含量三个指标分别代表了每一类功能特征。其中高地力农田的0-120cm剖面最大有效贮水量较低地力农田高出22%,经过质地校正能直接反映土壤矿化能力的表层土壤有机质含量较低地力农田高出21%。
     (2)对三个地力水平农田的冬小麦夏玉米生长过程和产量的对比结果表明,华北平原冬小麦夏玉米高产轮作区农田生产力的形成受到地力因素和气候因素的共同作用。高地力农田在整个生育期都具有高的冬小麦夏玉米玉米干物质的积累速率;土壤地力水平主要通过影响千粒重来影响产量。土壤地力差异对作物生长和产量差异的影响程度受到气象因素的调节,其中干旱抑制养分优势发挥,高有效辐射促进养分优势发挥。
     (3)运用根区水质模型(RZWQM)对三个地力水平农田的水氮运移过程进行模拟,并进一步计算了各农田的水氮平衡,结果表明,土壤基础性质通过调节农田土壤水氮条件来影响作物生长和产量的形成。高地力农田由于高的剖面最大有效贮水量使得农田能保存更多的降雨和灌溉水,同时合理的剖面导水率分布降低了土壤的水分深层渗漏损失,高地力农田地表径流和渗漏造成的水分损失量较地力农田低26.4mm。尽管高地力农田年均蒸散量较低地力农田高34.7mm,但在大部分生育时期高地力农田作物生长依然受到较低的水分胁迫。高地力农田年均净矿化氮(矿化氮-固定氮)较低地力农田高出86.2kg ha-1氨挥发,淋洗和反硝化的氮损失量较低地力农田低10.9kg ha-1,使得高地力农田具有最佳的氮素供应条件,且受到较低的水氮胁迫,因此获得了最高的产量。良好的氮素条件能提高水分利用效率,高地力农田水分利用效率比低地力农田高0.25kgm-3.
     (4)以低地力农田三个氮水平处理试验为基本参照,运用RZWQM模型对低地力农田常规施肥,单季作物相对常规增施肥20kg ha-1、40kgha-1、80kg ha-1和120kg ha-15个氮肥处理,以及将低地力农田土壤性质改良至高地力农田水平后的产量和水氮过程进行了情景模拟,结果表明增施氮肥和改良农田土壤性质是两种行之有效的提升低地力农田产量水平的措施。通过增施氮肥方式提升低地力农田产量见效快,但增产幅度有限,容易出现氮肥使用过量并降低氮素利用效率的情况。在本研究中,相比常规施肥,低地力农田每季冬小麦夏玉米增施80kg ha-1氮肥时,产量平均增加14.3%。而增施120kg ha-1时,氮素利用效率却降低了9.4%。通过土壤改良的方式提高产量,增产效果显著,且能保障高的氮素利用效率。在本研究中,改良土壤应主要考虑提高有机质全氮含量和提高土壤有机质库的结构和活性,将低地力农田的有机质全氮含量和有机质库转化系数改良至高地力农田水平时,产量分别增加了9.2%和6.9%,WUE增加了9.3%和9.7%,NUE增加-0.3%和0.3%。
     上述结论明确了造成农田产量差异的关键土壤因子,并阐述了关键土壤因子如何通过调节农田土壤的水氮过程来调节作物的生长和产量形成的机制,为华北平原冬小麦夏玉米轮作区农田全面高产和水氮高效利用提供了科学的理论指导。
The North China Plain (NCP) is one of the major winter wheat and maize production areas in China. The high grain yield must be miantained in this area because of the food security problems in China. The excessive exploitation of groundwater resources from shallow and deep aquifers in this region has caused water tables to fall continuously. Excessive inputs of mineral fertilizer have led to resource waste and created many other environmental problems in the last decades. Thus it is necessary to keep high water nitrogen use effcicey for the agricultural sustainable development.
     The soil basical property spatial variation is considerable in NCP, and it leads to crop growth and grain yield variation. Because of the poor agriculture field management, the yield potential in high soil quality farmland could not be released sufficiently and water nitrogen waste always happened in low soil quality farmland. So the reseach objective was to identify the key soil indicators in relation to grain yield, the character of water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in the farmland with different soil quality in NCP. Meanwhile, some useful agriculture managment suggestion should be given to increase the yield, WUE and NUE in the farmland with low soil quality.
     The field experiments were conducted on a winter wheat and maize cropping system in the high yield region of Tai'an, Shandong Province, China during Oct2009to Sep2012. Three fields with different soil profile properties and grain yield levels were selected as main treatments with consistent field management strategies. The soil profile properties, water and nitrate content, crop growth and grain yield were measured. Meanwhile, three nitrogen (N) treatments (0kg ha-1,40kg ha-1and80kg ha-1higher than conventional practice) were applied in the field with the lowest soil quality field. The main results of our study were followed:
     (1) The soil quality about the three fields have been assessed. The soil quality was related to soil water retention capacity, water conductivity and nutrient storage and supply functions which was representd by profile maximum available soil moisture, saturated hydraulic conductivity and the ratio of nutrient content to silt+clay content. In this study, the profile maximum available soil moisture and the ratio of organic matter (OM) to silt+clay content of top soil in high soil quality field was22%and21%higher than the values in low soil quality field, respectively.
     (2) The winter wheat and maize growth dynamic and yield have been compared in our study. The winter wheat and maize growth and yield were affected by both soil quality and climate condition. The biomass accumulation was promoted in the high soil quality field. The yield variance was mainly caused by kernel weight variance in the different soil quality fields. Climate conditions affected the effect of soil quality on crop growth and yield. Drought decreased the effect of soil quality on crop growth and yield, and sufficient solar radiation increased the effect.
     (3)The water nitrogen movement was simulated by Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM), and the soil water and nitrogen balance was calculated by the model. The soil basic property affected the crop growth and yield through controlling the soil water and nitrogen condtions. In high quality fields, much more precipitation and irrigation water was retain for higher profile maximum available soil moiture, less drainage and runoff water loss for superior profile hydraulic conductivity structure. The water loss in high quality field was26.4mm less than the values in low quality field. Although the yearly evapotranspiration in high quality field was34.7mm higher than the values in low quality field, the crop growth in high quality field was sufferd less water stress in most of the growing season. The yearly mineralization nitrogen in high quality field was86.2kg ha-1more than the low quality field, and the nitrogen loss, included ammonia volatilization, denitrification and nitrate leaching, was10.9kg ha-1less than the low quality field. There was a better nitrogen supply condition in the high soil quality field with lower nitrogen stress. Thus higher yield was achieved in high quality field. WUE was promoted by superior nitrogen condtion. The WUE in high quality field was0.25kg m-3higher than the values in low quality field.
     (4) Two ways to promote the yield of low quality field are predicted by RZWQM. Both the way of increasing the nitrogen input and soil properties improvement could increase the yield level in low quality field. The method of increasement the nitrogen input can be operated easily, but the extent of yield increasment was limited and NUE was decreased as the nitrogen input incrased. The yield increasd14.3%while more80kg ha-1nitrogen was input at each crop growth season. The NUE decreasd9.4%while more120kg ha-1nitrogen was input each crop growth season. The way of soil properties improvement can significantly promote the yield level with little NUE loss. Improving the soil OM content, structure and activity can best promte the yield level in low quality field. When the model parameter soil OM content and the transformation coefficient between the OM pools in low quality filed was improve to the according parameter in high quality field respectively, the yield level was increased9.2%and6.9%, the WUE was increased9.3%and9.7%, and the NUE was increased-0.3%and0.3%.
     The result above indicated the key soil factors that affected the grain yield, and showed the mechanism that how soil factor differnce effect on crop growth and yield through controlling soil water and nitrogen process. The study offered a theoretical direction for increasing grain yield, WUE and NUE of the winter wheat and maize retention systems in North China Plain.
引文
曹巧红,龚元石.应用Hydrus-1D模型模拟分析冬小麦农田水分氮素运移特征.植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(2):139-145.
    陈凌静,王子芳,魏朝富,等.土壤有机碳,氮动态模型研究进展.土壤通报,2009,40(2):432-438.
    陈淑峰,吴文良,胡克林,等.华北平原高产粮区不同水氮管理下农田氮素的淋失特征.农业工程学报,2011,27(2):65-73.
    高鲁鹏,梁文举,姜勇,等.土壤有机质模型的比较分析.应用生态学报,2003,14(10):1804-1808.
    高如泰,陈焕伟,李保国,等.黄淮海平原冬小麦生长期土壤水氮利用效率模拟分析.中国农业科学,2006,39(3):552-562.
    龚元石.冬小麦和夏玉米农田土壤分层水分平衡模型.北京农业大学学报,1995,21(1):61-67.
    胡克林,陈德立.农田土壤养分的空间变异性特征.农业工程学报,1999,15(3):33-38.
    胡克林,李保国,黄元仿,等.农田尺度下土体硝酸盐淋失的随机模拟及其风险性评价.土壤学报,2005,42(6):909-915.
    黄元仿,李韵珠,李保国,等·区域农田土壤水和氮素行为的模拟·水利学报,2001,11:87-92.
    金梁,胡克林,李保国,等.作物生长与土壤水氮运移联合模拟的研究Ⅱ——模型验证与应用.水利学报,2007,38(8):972-980.
    李保国,胡克林.农田土壤表层饱和导水率的条件模拟.水利学报,2002,2:36-40.
    李保国,胡克林,黄元仿,等.土壤溶质运移模型的研究及应用.土壤,2005,37(4):345-352.
    李春友,任理,李保国.秸秆覆盖条件下土壤水热盐耦合运动规律模拟研究进展.水科学进展,2000,11(3):325-332.
    李韵珠,胡克林.蒸发条件下粘土层对土壤水和溶质运移影响的模拟.土壤学报,2004,41(4):493-502.
    林葆,林继雄,李家康.长期施肥的作物产量和土壤肥力变化.植物营养学报,1994,1:6-18.
    刘兴慧,山东统计年鉴.中国统计出版社,北京.2013.
    孟凡乔,吴文良.高产农田土壤有机质,养分的变化规律与作物产量的关系.植物营养与肥料学报,2000,6(4):370-374.
    盛来运,王文波,钟守洋.中国统计年鉴2013.中国统计出版社,北京.2013.
    王宏广等.中国粮食安全研究.中国农业出版社,北京.2005.
    王欢元,胡克林,李保国,等.不同管理模式下农田水氮利用效率及其环境效应.中国农业科学,2011,44(13):2701-2710.
    薛薇.统计分析与SPSS的应用.中国人民大学出版社,北京.2008.
    于红梅,李子忠,龚元石.不同水氮管理对蔬菜地硝态氮淋洗的影响.中国农业科学,2005,38(9):1849-1855.
    于红梅,李子忠,龚元石.传统和优化水氮管理对蔬菜地土壤氮素损失与利用效率的影响.农业工程学报,2007,23(2):54-59.
    宇振荣,王建武,邱建军.土地利用系统分析.中国农业科技出版社,北京.1997.
    张世熔,黄元仿,李保国,等.黄淮海冲积平原区土壤有机质时空变异特征.生态学报,2002,22(12):2041-2047.
    张世熔,黄元仿,李保国,等.黄淮海冲积平原区土壤速效磷,钾的时空变异特征.植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(1):3-8.
    朱兆良,孙波,杨林章,等.我国农业面源污染的控制政策和措施.科技导报,2005,23(4):47-51.
    Abrol I, Khosla, B, Bhumbla, D. Relationship of texture to some important soil moisture constants. Geoderma,1968,2(1):33-39.
    Andrade F H, Uhart, S A, Frugone, M I. Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize: shade versus plant density effects. Crop Science,1993,33(3):482-485.
    Andrews S S, Karlen, D L, Cambardella, C A. The soil management assessment framework. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(6):1945-1962.
    Arheimer B, Andreasson, J, Fogelberg, S, et al. Climate change impact on water quality:model results from southern Sweden. AMBIO:A Journal of the Human Environment,2005,34(7):559-566.
    Ahuja L R, Rojas K W, Hanson J D, Shafer M J, Ma L. Root Zone Water Quality Model, Modeling management effects on water quality and crop production. Water Resources Publ., Highlands Ranch, CO.1999.
    Aujla M, Thind, H, Buttar, G. Fruit yield and water use efficiency of eggplant (Solanum melongema L.) as influenced by different quantities of nitrogen and water applied through drip and furrow irrigation. Scientia horticulturae,2007,112(2):142-148.
    Bandaranayake W, Butters, G, Hamdi, M, et al. Irrigation and tillage management effects on solute movement. Soil and Tillage Research,1998,46(3):165-173.
    Barbieri P A, Echeverria, H E, Sainz Rozas, H R, et al. Nitrogen use efficiency in maize as affected by nitrogen availability and row spacing. Agronomy Journal,2008,100(4):1094-1100.
    Basso B, Cammarano, D, Troccoli, A, et al. Long-term wheat response to nitrogen in a rainfed Mediterranean environment:field data and simulation analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 2010,33(2):132-138.
    Blanco-Canqui H, Lal, R, Post, W M, et al. Changes in long-term no-till corn growth and yield under different rates of stover mulch. Agronomy Journal,2006,98(4):1128-1136.
    Borrell A, Hammer, G, Oosterom, E. Stay-green:A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Annals of Applied Biology,2001,138(1):91-95.
    Cakir R. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research,2004,89(1):1-16.
    Cameira M R, Fernando, R M, Ahuja, L R, et al. Using RZWQM to simulate the fate of nitrogen in field soil-crop environment in the Mediterranean region. Agricultural water management,2007, 90(1):121-136.
    Camillo P J, Gurney, R J. A resistance parameter for bare-soil evaporation models. Soil Science,1986, 141(2):95-105.
    Ciampitti I A, Vyn, T J. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Research,2011, 121(1):2-18.
    Claassen M, Shaw, R H. Water deficit effects on corn. I. Grain components. Agronomy Journal,1970, 62(5):652-655.
    Constantin J, Beaudoin, N, Launay, M, et al. Long-term nitrogen dynamics in various catch crop scenarios:Test and simulations with STICS model in a temperate climate. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2012,147:36-46.
    Derby N E, Steele, D D, Terpstra, J, et al. Interactions of nitrogen, weather, soil, and irrigation on corn yield. Agronomy Journal,2005,97(5):1342-1351.
    Di Paolo E, Rinaldi, M. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research,2008,105(3):202-210.
    Doran J W, Parkin, T B. Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment,1994(definingsoilqua):1-21.
    Driessen P, Konijn, N T, Wageningen, L. Land-use systems analysis. Wageningen Agricultural University,1992.
    Eitzinger J, Trnka, M, Hosch, J, et al. Comparison of CERES, WOFOST and SWAP models in simulating soil water content during growing season under different soil conditions. Ecological Modelling,2004,171(3):223-246.
    Elliott E T, Cole, C V. A perspective on agroecosystem science. Ecology,1989:1597-1602.
    Fang Q, Ma, L, Yu, Q, et al. Irrigation strategies to improve the water use efficiency of wheat-maize double cropping systems in North China Plain. Agricultural water management,2010,97(8): 1165-1174.
    Farahani H J, Ahuja, L R. Evapotranspiration modeling of partial canopy/residue:covered fields. Transactions of the ASAE,1996,39(6):2051-2064.
    Gabriel J, Munoz-Carpena, R, Quemada, M. The role of cover crops in irrigated systems:Water balance, nitrate leaching and soil mineral nitrogen accumulation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2012,155:50-61.
    Gehl R, Schmidt, J, Stone, L, et al. In situ measurements of nitrate leaching implicate poor nitrogen and irrigation management on sandy soils. Journal of environmental quality,2005,34(6): 2243-2254.
    Givi J, Prasher, S, Patel, R. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point. Agricultural water management,2004,70(2):83-96.
    Govaerts B, Sayre, K D, Deckers, J. A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research,2006,87(2):163-174.
    Gregorich E, Monreal, C, Carter, M, et al. Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,1994,74(4):367-385.
    Hachum A Y, Alfaro J F. Rain infiltration into layered soils:prediction. Journal of the Irrigation and
    Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers,1980,311-319.
    Halvorson A D, Mosier, A R, Reule, C A, et al. Nitrogen and tillage effects on irrigated continuous corn yields. Agronomy Journal,2006,98(1):63-71.
    Hansen S, Shaffer, M, Jensen, H. Developments in modeling nitrogen transformations in soil. Nitrogen fertilization in the environment,1995:83-107.
    Hanson J D, Ahuja, L R, Shaffer, M D, et al. RZWQM:Simulating the effects of management on water quality and crop production. Agricultural systems,1998,57(2):161-195.
    Hanson J D, Rojas, K W, Shaffer, M J. Calibrating the root zone water quality model. Agronomy Journal,1999,91(2):171-177.
    Hanson J D, Generic crop production model for the root zone water quality model.In Ahuja L R, Rojas K W, Hanson J D, Shaffer M J, Ma L. (Eds), The Root Zone Water Quality Model. highlands Ranch, Colo, Water Resources Publication,2000,81-118.
    Hassink J. Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1992,14(2):126-134.
    Hassink J, Bouwman, L A, Zwart, K B, et al. Relationships between soil texture, physical protection of organic matter, soil biota, and C and N mineralization in grassland soils. Geoderma,1993, 57(1):105-128.
    Hatfield J L, Sauer, T J, Prueger, J H. Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency. Agronomy Journal,2001,93(2):271-280.
    He J, Li, H, Rasaily, R G, et al. Soil properties and crop yields after 11 years of no tillage farming in wheat-maize cropping system in North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research,2011,113(1): 48-54.
    He Y, Hu, K, Wang, H, et al. Modeling of water and nitrogen utilization of layered soil profiles under a wheat-maize cropping system. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2013,58(3):596-605.
    Hu C, Delgado, J A, Zhang, X, et al. Assessment of groundwater use by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Luancheng Xian region and potential implications for water conservation in the northwestern North China Plain. Journal of soil and water conservation,2005,60(2):80-88.
    Hu C, Saseendran, S A, Green, T R, et al. Evaluating nitrogen and water management in a double-cropping system using RZWQM. Vadose Zone Journal,2006,5(1):493-505.
    Jabro J. Estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils from particle size distribution and bulk density data. Transactions of the ASAE,1992,35:557-560.
    Jagadamma S, Lai, R, Hoeft, R G, et al. Nitrogen fertilization and cropping system impacts on soil properties and their relationship to crop yield in the central Corn Belt, USA. Soil and Tillage Research,2008,98(2):120-129.
    Kim K I, Clay, D, Carlson, C, et al. Do synergistic relationships between nitrogen and water influence the ability of corn to use nitrogen derived from fertilizer and soil? Agronomy Journal,2008, 100(3):551-556.
    Kravchenko A N, Bullock, D G. Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agronomy Journal,2000,92(1):75-83.
    Latiri-Souki K, Nortcliff, S, Lawlor, D. Nitrogen fertilizer can increase dry matter, grain production and radiation and water use efficiencies for durum wheat under semi-arid conditions. European Journal of Agronomy,1998,9(1):21-34.
    Lemcoff J, Loomis, R. Nitrogen and density influences on silk emergence, endosperm development, and grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research,1994,38(2):63-72.
    Lenssen A, Johnson, G, Carlson, G. Cropping sequence and tillage system influences annual crop production and water use in semiarid Montana, USA. Field Crops Research,2007,100(1): 32-43.
    Li C, Frolking, S, Frolking, T A. A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres (1984-2012), 1992,97(D9):9759-9776.
    Li Y, White, R, Chen, D, et al. A spatially referenced water and nitrogen management model (WNMM) for (irrigated) intensive cropping systems in the North China Plain. Ecological Modelling,2007, 203(3):395-423.
    Liu Z, Zhou, W, Shen, J, et al. Soil quality assessment of Albic soils with different productivities for eastern China. Soil and Tillage Research,2014a,140:74-81.
    Liu Z, Zhou, W, Shen, J, et al. Soil Quality Assessment of Acid Sulfate Paddy Soils with Different Productivities in Guangdong Province, China. Journal of Intergrative Agriculture,2014b,13(1): 177-186.
    Ludwig B, Bergstermann, A, Priesack, E, et al. Modelling of crop yields and N2O emissions from silty arable soils with differing tillage in two long-term experiments. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011,112(2):114-121.
    Ma B, Wu, T, Tremblay, N, et al. On-farm assessment of the amount and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on ammonia volatilization. Agronomy Journal,2010,102(1):134-144.
    Ma L, Nielsen, D C, Ahuja, L R, et al. Evaluation of RZWQM under varying irrigation levels in eastern Colorado. Transactions of the ASAE,2003,46(1):39-49.
    Meng Q F, Sun, Q P, Chen, X P, et al. Alternative cropping systems for sustainable water and nitrogen use in the North China Plain. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2012,146(1):93-102.
    Muchow R, Sinclair, T, Bennett, J M. Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agronomy Journal,1990,82(2):338-343.
    Nangia V, Gowda, P H, Mulla, D J, et al. Water quality modeling of fertilizer management impacts on nitrate losses in tile drains at the field scale. Journal of environmental quality,2008,37(2): 296-307.
    Nimah M, Hanks, R. Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations:Ⅰ. Description and sensitivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1973,37(4):522-527.
    Novoa R, Loomis, R. Nitrogen and plant production. Plant and Soil,1981,58(1-3):177-204.
    Nyakudya I, Stroosnijder, L. Water management options based on rainfall analysis for rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) production in Rushinga district, Zimbabwe. Agricultural water management, 2011,98(10):1649-1659.
    Otegui M a E, Bonhomme, R. Grain yield components in maize:Ⅰ. Ear growth and kernel set. Field Crops Research,1998,56(3):247-256.
    Panda R, Behera, S, Kashyap, P S. Effective management of irrigation water for maize under stressed conditions. Agricultural water management,2004,66(3):181-203.
    Pandey R, Maranville, J, Admou, A. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment:Ⅰ. Grain yield and yield components. Agricultural water management,2000a, 46(1):1-13.
    Pandey R, Maranville, J, Chetima, M. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment:Ⅱ. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agricultural water management,2000b,46(1):15-27.
    Parton W, Yonker, C, Schimel, D, et al. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1989,53(3):800-805.
    Parton W, Yonker, C, Schimel, D, et al. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1989,53(3):800-805.
    Peterson G, Westfall, D, Cole, C. Agroecosystem approach to soil and crop management research. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1993,57(5):1354-1360.
    Pierce F J, Warncke, D D, Everett, M W. Yield and nutrient variability in glacial soils of Michigan. Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems, Proceedings of Second International Conference,1995:133-151.
    Pommel B, Gallais, A, Coque, M, et al. Carbon and nitrogen allocation and grain filling in three maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. European Journal of Agronomy,2006,24(3):203-211.
    Quiroga A, Funaro, D, Noellemeyer, E, et al. Barley yield response to soil organic matter and texture in the Pampas of Argentina. Soil & Tillage Research,2006,90(1-2):63-68.
    Rasool R, Kukal, S S, Hira, G S. Soil organic carbon and physical properties as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in maize-wheat system. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008,101(1-2):31-36.
    Rawls W, Gimenez, D, Grossman, R. Use of soil texture, bulk density, and slope of the water retention curve to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity. Transactions of the ASAE,1998,41(4): 983-988.
    Rozas H R S, Echeverria, H E, Barbieri, P A. Nitrogen balance as affected by application time and nitrogen fertilizer rate in irrigated no-tillage maize. Agronomy Journal,2004,96(6): 1622-1631.
    Sadras V O, Lawson, C, Hooper, P, et al. Contribution of summer rainfall and nitrogen to the yield and water use efficiency of wheat in Mediterranean-type environments of South Australia. European Journal of Agronomy,2012,36(1):41-54.
    Saseendran S A, Nielsen, D C, Ma, L, et al. Modeling nitrogen management effects on winter wheat production using RZWQM and CERES-Wheat. Agronomy Journal,2004,96(3):615-630.
    Sena M, Frighetto, R, Valarini, P, et al. Discrimination of management effects on soil parameters by using principal component analysis:a multivariate analysis case study. Soil and Tillage Research,2002,67(2):171-181.
    Setiyono T D, Walters, D T, Cassman, K G, et al. Estimating maize nutrient uptake requirements. Field Crops Research,2010,118(2):158-168.
    Setter T L, Flannigan, B A, Melkonian, J. Loss of kernel set due to water deficit and shade in maize. Crop Science,2001,41(5):1530-1540.
    Shaffer M J, Rojas K W, DeCoursey D G, and Hebson C S. Nutrient chemistry process-OMNI. In: Ahuja L R, Rojas K W, Hanson J D, Shaffer M J, Ma L. (eds.), Root Zone Water Quality Model. Modeling management effects on water quality and crop production. WaterResour. Publ., LLC, Highlands Ranch, CO,2000,119-144.
    Shukla M K, Lal, R, Ebinger, M. Principal component analysis for predicting corn biomass and grain yields. Soil Science,2004,169(3):215-224.
    Sommer R, Wall, P C, Govaerts, B. Model-based assessment of maize cropping under conventional and conservation agriculture in highland Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research,2007,94(1):83-100.
    Stone P, Sorensen, I, Jamieson, P. Effect of soil temperature on phenology, canopy development, biomass and yield of maize in a cool-temperate climate. Field Crops Research,1999,63(2): 169-178.
    Sys C, Van Ranst, E, Debaveye, E, Land evaluation.1991:General Administration for Development Cooperation.
    Woolhiser D, Smith, R, Giraldez, J V. Effects of spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity on Hortonian overland flow. Water Resources Research,1996,32(3):671-678.
    Wu D, Yu, Q, Lu, C, et al. Quantifying production potentials of winter wheat in the North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy,2006,24(3):226-235.
    Yan X, Gong, W. The role of chemical and organic fertilizers on yield, yield variability and carbon sequestration—results of a 19-year experiment. Plant and Soil,2010,331(1-2):471-480.
    Zhang K. Evaluation of a generic agro-hydrological model for water and nitrogen dynamics (SMCR_N) in the soil-wheat system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2010,137(1):202-212.
    Zhang X, Chen, S, Liu, M, et al. Improved water use efficiency associated with cultivars and agronomic management in the North China Plain. Agronomy Journal,2005,97(3):783-790.
    Zhang X Y, Pei, D, Hu, C S. Conserving groundwater for irrigation in the North China Plain. Irrigation Science,2003,21(4):159-166.
    Zinselmeier C, Jeong, B-R, Boyer, J S. Starch and the control of kernel number in maize at low water potentials. Plant physiology,1999,121(1):25-36.