中国自来水业规制体系改革研究
|
摘要
自来水业是人类生存和发展不可或缺的物质条件和重要资源,其能否稳健高效发展直接影响到国民经济的繁荣和发展以及社会的稳定。世界各国都高度重视并进一步加强了对自来水业的规制。我国自来水业规制改革已经取得阶段性成果,但仍然存在着进入规制限制多、价格规制的作用没有得到充分发挥、质量规制和环境规制滞后等问题,制约着自来水业的快速发展。目前中国正处于市场经济的全面推进期,自来水业落后的运作模式和传统的规制体制也很难适应这种新的形势,深化自来水业规制体系改革,拓宽融资渠道,引入竞争机制,规范市场运营,建立合理有效的规制体制,已成为提高自来水业效率,加快自来水业发展的必然要求。
本文运用历史的与逻辑的相统一、比较研究、规范分析与实证分析相结合、定性分析与定量分析相结合等分析方法,在对主要发达国家自来水业规制体系的改革经验进行比较借鉴的基础上,从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制四个侧面对自来水业的规制体系改革问题进行了探索性的分析和研究:
首先,介绍了国外和国内经典作家对自来水业的行业性质和行业特征的研究成果,在规制经济理论、自然垄断理论的基础上分析和探讨了自来水业规制体系改革的国内外研究现状,不仅为论文的写作奠定了坚实的理论基础,而且也提出了论文的研究方向和任务。
其次,从经济绩效、技术绩效和社会绩效三个方面研究了现行规制体系下自来水业的规制绩效及其影响因素。改革开放后我国的自来水业获得了很大发展,经历了改革起始阶段、逐步改革阶段和改革逐步深化阶段三个阶段的改革尝试,生产效率有所提高,但也存在一些不足:在经济绩效方面,行业亏损现象仍然比较严重;在技术绩效方面,自来水水质和管网漏损率均未达到国家规定标准;在社会绩效方面,自来水供求矛盾不断加剧,水污染和水浪费现象比较严重。影响我国自来水业规制绩效的原因很多,本文从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制等几个方面进行了分析。
再次,通过对美国、英国、法国自来水业规制体系改革的背景、主要做法、绩效的分析,总结出这些国家自来水业规制体系改革的共同点,这为我国自来水业的规制体系改革提供了丰富的理论支持和实践经验。这些共同点概括起来主要有四个方面:放松进入规制是规制体系改革的普遍趋势;构建激励性价格规制模型是价格规制改革的最佳方案;加强自来水水质规制以及污染控制是世界各国的共同做法;实行一体化的自来水业规制体制是深化规制体系改革的重要保障;完善的法律体系是自来水业有效规制的前提和保证。
最后,在分析中国自来水业规制绩效影响因素和借鉴主要发达国家自来水业规制改革经验的基础上,从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制四个方面提出深化中国自来水业规制体系改革的政策建议。在进入规制改革方面,实行市场结构重组,形成有效竞争的市场格局;深化城市自来水业投融资机制改革;规范自来水业的市场化改革;构建促进自来水业进入规制改革的规制体制。在价格规制改革方面,要规范自来水业的定价程序,完善成本定价方法,引进激励性规制方法,继续推行两部制价格、阶梯式计量水价,特殊行业要实行累进制水价,推广实行分类水价和按质定水价政策,按照地区、季节等差别,实行淡旺季水价,完善污水处理费的征收制度,建立和完善自来水听证价格制度,实现对自来水价格的有效监督。在质量规制方面,科学修订水质标准;建立城市自来水水质管理网络系统;各地区根据具体情况实行分质供水政策;加强管网改造,提高管网水质;采用新技术,提高自来水服务质量;建立相应的惩罚制度,保证水质和服务质量;加强城市自来水安全预警系统和应急系统的建设等。在环境规制改革方面,加强水源保护;加大城市污水处理和水污染防治的力度;采取有效措施实现污水回用,建设节水型城市;加大污染处罚力度,有效控制污染;推广排污权交易的做法等,以促进自来水业健康、稳定发展。
本文在以下几个方面对国内现有研究成果有所突破:一是在借鉴西方主要发达国家自来水规制改革经验的基础上,对中国自来水业规制改革,尤其是规制体系改革进行了系统研究,同时注意与规制体制改革的有效衔接。二是在对自来水业进入规制、价格规制、质量规制进行研究的同时,加强了对自来水业环境规制的研究,拓展了自来水业规制体系研究的视角。三是对自来水业的定价模式进行了深入分析和探讨,构建了激励性价格规制模型,在水价制度上引入浮动价格制度、插卡取水制度、淡旺季水价制度、分质供水制度等,并提出了适合我国国情的对策性建议,对深化自来水业规制体系改革具有参考和借鉴作用。
The running water is the essential substance and source for the existence and development of the human beings. Its steady and efficient development will directly influence the prosperity and development of the national economy and the stability of the society. Countries in the world think highly of the running water and strengthen the regulations of it. The reform of the running water in China has made a periodic achievement, but there are still restrictions to access to it, and the functions of the regulations have not been fully exercised, and the regulations on the quality of water and the regulations on environment protection seriously lag behind, which restricts the rapid development of the running water industry. Presently, China is now in the process of over-all advancement of the market economy. Neither the laggard operation mode nor the traditional systems of the regulations of the running water industry can adapt to the new conditions. Therefore, it is very essential to have a further reform on the system of the regulations of the running water industry, to have more financing channels, to introduce in competitive mechanisms, to regulate the market operations and to establish rational and effective systems of regulations so that the efficiency of the running water industry will be improved and that the development of the running water industry will be quickened.
In this dissertation, the author has, on the basis of the comparison with the experience in the reform of the system of the regulations on the running water industry in main developed countries, made a exploratory study of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry from the regulation of access, of price, of quality and of the environment by means of the unity of logic and history , the comparative study, the normative analysis, the qualitative and quantitative analysis etc:
Firstly, the author has introduced the achievements (made by famous writers home and abroad) on the nature and features of the running water industry. Then she has, on the basis of the analysis of the theory of the regulated economy and the natural monopoly theory, studied the present conditions of the research on the reform of the regulations of the running water industry inside and outside China. The author has not only built a strong theoretical foundation for the writing of this dissertation, but also put forward the direction and task of her study in this dissertation.
Secondly, the author has, from the perspective of economic performance, technological performance and the social performance, made a study of the performance and the influencing factors of the regulations in the present system of regulations. Although a big improvement in the running water industry in China has been made since the open-door policy after the reform outset stage, gradually reform stage and the reform deepens the stage gradually, the productivity efficiency has been, to some degree, improved, there are still some problems: the running water industry is now running a serious loss in terms of economy performance; there is still a long way to meet the national standard in terms of the quality of the running water and the rate of the leakage of the networks of the pipes as far as the technology performance is concerned. As to the social performance, the conflict between the demand and supply is getting more and more serious, so are the water pollution and irrational water consumption, whose reasons that influence the performance of the running water regulations are originally many: this article has carried on the analysis from regulations of access, regulations of price, regulations of quality, regulations of environment and so on several aspects.
Thirdly,through the analysis of the background, major measures and the performance of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry in the U.S. A., England, and France, the author has generalized common grounds from the reform of the system of the regulations of the running water, which has offered a rich theoretical support and experience for China’s reform of the system of the regulations of the running water industry. Five major aspects are included in these common grounds: the deregulation of access is the trend of the reform of the system of regulations; the construction excitability price rules and regulations model is the price rules and regulations reform preferred plan; the regulations of the quality of water and the control of the water pollution are the common measures adopted in the world; the unification of the system of the regulations of the running water is the important guarantee of the further reform of the system of the regulations; the improve legal system is the premise and guarantee of the effective regulations of the running water industry.
Finally, author has, through the analysis of the influencing factors on the performance of the regulations on China’s running water industry, and the reference to the experience in the system reform of the regulations of the running water industry in the major developed countries, made a exploratory study of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry from the regulation of access, the regulation of price, the regulation of quality and regulation of environment. She puts forward a suggestion on the policy of the further reform of the regulations of China’s running water industry. As far as the access to the reform of the regulations is concerned, the restructuring of the market shall be carried out so that an effective, competitive market structure will be formed. Besides, it is necessary that a reform of the investment and financing mechanisms of the urban running water industry should be further implemented, that the reform of the marketization of the running water industry should be standardized, and that the reform that promotes the regulation of access of the running water industry should be constructed. In terms of the reform of the price, it is very essential to normalize the pricing procedure in the running water industry and to improve cost-based pricing, to introduce the incentive mechanism, to continue to promote two-way pricing step-mode water-measurement pricing, to implement the accumulative water pricing in the special industries, to promote the categorized water pricing and quality-based pricing, to implement the busy and off season pricing as per the differences in different regions and in different seasons. In addition, it is necessary to improve the sewage disposal charging system, to institute and improve the auditing system of the price of the running water so that the price of running water can be effectively supervised. In terms of the quality regulations, it needs to revise the norms of the quality of water, to set up the urban running water- managing network; furthermore, it is necessary to carry out the quality-graded pricing policy in different areas according their specific conditions,to strengthens the pipe network to transform, enhances the pipe network water quality,to adopt new technologies to improve the running water service and to set up the relevant punishment system to protect the quality of the water and to improve the service. It is also important to enhance the construction of the security alarming system and emergency system of the urban running water. As far as the reform of the environment regulations is concerned, it is necessary to reinforce the protection of the water resources, to strengthen the urban sewage disposal and the protection from water pollution, to take effective measures to recycle the wastewater to built a water-saving city, to increases the pollution punishment dynamics, active control pollution and to promote the practice of the exchange of the sewage discharging right to promote the sound and steady development of the running water industry.
The author has made some breakthroughs of the present domestic research achievements: firstly, In profits from the Western main developed country running water rules and regulations reform experience's foundation, to the Chinese waterway and well construction rules and regulations reform, regulated the system reform to conduct the system research particularly originally, simultaneously paid attention to and the rules and regulations organizational reform effective engagement. Secondly, While regulations of access, regulations of price, regulations of quality to the waterway and well construction to conduct the research originally, strengthened to regulations of environment research, and the perspective of the study of the running water regulations has been developed. Thirdly, Carries on the thorough analysis and the discussion originally to the waterway and well construction fixed price pattern,and construct the incentive pricing regulation models in the running water industry; besides, in terms of the price of water, introduced are“the floating pricing system”,“the card-inserted and the water-out”system,“the off and busy season system”,“the graded-quality water supply system”etc., which are of some certain practicability and operability, and proposed suits our country national condition the countermeasure suggestion, to deepens the waterway and well construction rules and regulations system reform to have originally refers to and profits from the function.
本文运用历史的与逻辑的相统一、比较研究、规范分析与实证分析相结合、定性分析与定量分析相结合等分析方法,在对主要发达国家自来水业规制体系的改革经验进行比较借鉴的基础上,从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制四个侧面对自来水业的规制体系改革问题进行了探索性的分析和研究:
首先,介绍了国外和国内经典作家对自来水业的行业性质和行业特征的研究成果,在规制经济理论、自然垄断理论的基础上分析和探讨了自来水业规制体系改革的国内外研究现状,不仅为论文的写作奠定了坚实的理论基础,而且也提出了论文的研究方向和任务。
其次,从经济绩效、技术绩效和社会绩效三个方面研究了现行规制体系下自来水业的规制绩效及其影响因素。改革开放后我国的自来水业获得了很大发展,经历了改革起始阶段、逐步改革阶段和改革逐步深化阶段三个阶段的改革尝试,生产效率有所提高,但也存在一些不足:在经济绩效方面,行业亏损现象仍然比较严重;在技术绩效方面,自来水水质和管网漏损率均未达到国家规定标准;在社会绩效方面,自来水供求矛盾不断加剧,水污染和水浪费现象比较严重。影响我国自来水业规制绩效的原因很多,本文从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制等几个方面进行了分析。
再次,通过对美国、英国、法国自来水业规制体系改革的背景、主要做法、绩效的分析,总结出这些国家自来水业规制体系改革的共同点,这为我国自来水业的规制体系改革提供了丰富的理论支持和实践经验。这些共同点概括起来主要有四个方面:放松进入规制是规制体系改革的普遍趋势;构建激励性价格规制模型是价格规制改革的最佳方案;加强自来水水质规制以及污染控制是世界各国的共同做法;实行一体化的自来水业规制体制是深化规制体系改革的重要保障;完善的法律体系是自来水业有效规制的前提和保证。
最后,在分析中国自来水业规制绩效影响因素和借鉴主要发达国家自来水业规制改革经验的基础上,从进入规制、价格规制、质量规制和环境规制四个方面提出深化中国自来水业规制体系改革的政策建议。在进入规制改革方面,实行市场结构重组,形成有效竞争的市场格局;深化城市自来水业投融资机制改革;规范自来水业的市场化改革;构建促进自来水业进入规制改革的规制体制。在价格规制改革方面,要规范自来水业的定价程序,完善成本定价方法,引进激励性规制方法,继续推行两部制价格、阶梯式计量水价,特殊行业要实行累进制水价,推广实行分类水价和按质定水价政策,按照地区、季节等差别,实行淡旺季水价,完善污水处理费的征收制度,建立和完善自来水听证价格制度,实现对自来水价格的有效监督。在质量规制方面,科学修订水质标准;建立城市自来水水质管理网络系统;各地区根据具体情况实行分质供水政策;加强管网改造,提高管网水质;采用新技术,提高自来水服务质量;建立相应的惩罚制度,保证水质和服务质量;加强城市自来水安全预警系统和应急系统的建设等。在环境规制改革方面,加强水源保护;加大城市污水处理和水污染防治的力度;采取有效措施实现污水回用,建设节水型城市;加大污染处罚力度,有效控制污染;推广排污权交易的做法等,以促进自来水业健康、稳定发展。
本文在以下几个方面对国内现有研究成果有所突破:一是在借鉴西方主要发达国家自来水规制改革经验的基础上,对中国自来水业规制改革,尤其是规制体系改革进行了系统研究,同时注意与规制体制改革的有效衔接。二是在对自来水业进入规制、价格规制、质量规制进行研究的同时,加强了对自来水业环境规制的研究,拓展了自来水业规制体系研究的视角。三是对自来水业的定价模式进行了深入分析和探讨,构建了激励性价格规制模型,在水价制度上引入浮动价格制度、插卡取水制度、淡旺季水价制度、分质供水制度等,并提出了适合我国国情的对策性建议,对深化自来水业规制体系改革具有参考和借鉴作用。
The running water is the essential substance and source for the existence and development of the human beings. Its steady and efficient development will directly influence the prosperity and development of the national economy and the stability of the society. Countries in the world think highly of the running water and strengthen the regulations of it. The reform of the running water in China has made a periodic achievement, but there are still restrictions to access to it, and the functions of the regulations have not been fully exercised, and the regulations on the quality of water and the regulations on environment protection seriously lag behind, which restricts the rapid development of the running water industry. Presently, China is now in the process of over-all advancement of the market economy. Neither the laggard operation mode nor the traditional systems of the regulations of the running water industry can adapt to the new conditions. Therefore, it is very essential to have a further reform on the system of the regulations of the running water industry, to have more financing channels, to introduce in competitive mechanisms, to regulate the market operations and to establish rational and effective systems of regulations so that the efficiency of the running water industry will be improved and that the development of the running water industry will be quickened.
In this dissertation, the author has, on the basis of the comparison with the experience in the reform of the system of the regulations on the running water industry in main developed countries, made a exploratory study of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry from the regulation of access, of price, of quality and of the environment by means of the unity of logic and history , the comparative study, the normative analysis, the qualitative and quantitative analysis etc:
Firstly, the author has introduced the achievements (made by famous writers home and abroad) on the nature and features of the running water industry. Then she has, on the basis of the analysis of the theory of the regulated economy and the natural monopoly theory, studied the present conditions of the research on the reform of the regulations of the running water industry inside and outside China. The author has not only built a strong theoretical foundation for the writing of this dissertation, but also put forward the direction and task of her study in this dissertation.
Secondly, the author has, from the perspective of economic performance, technological performance and the social performance, made a study of the performance and the influencing factors of the regulations in the present system of regulations. Although a big improvement in the running water industry in China has been made since the open-door policy after the reform outset stage, gradually reform stage and the reform deepens the stage gradually, the productivity efficiency has been, to some degree, improved, there are still some problems: the running water industry is now running a serious loss in terms of economy performance; there is still a long way to meet the national standard in terms of the quality of the running water and the rate of the leakage of the networks of the pipes as far as the technology performance is concerned. As to the social performance, the conflict between the demand and supply is getting more and more serious, so are the water pollution and irrational water consumption, whose reasons that influence the performance of the running water regulations are originally many: this article has carried on the analysis from regulations of access, regulations of price, regulations of quality, regulations of environment and so on several aspects.
Thirdly,through the analysis of the background, major measures and the performance of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry in the U.S. A., England, and France, the author has generalized common grounds from the reform of the system of the regulations of the running water, which has offered a rich theoretical support and experience for China’s reform of the system of the regulations of the running water industry. Five major aspects are included in these common grounds: the deregulation of access is the trend of the reform of the system of regulations; the construction excitability price rules and regulations model is the price rules and regulations reform preferred plan; the regulations of the quality of water and the control of the water pollution are the common measures adopted in the world; the unification of the system of the regulations of the running water is the important guarantee of the further reform of the system of the regulations; the improve legal system is the premise and guarantee of the effective regulations of the running water industry.
Finally, author has, through the analysis of the influencing factors on the performance of the regulations on China’s running water industry, and the reference to the experience in the system reform of the regulations of the running water industry in the major developed countries, made a exploratory study of the reform of the systems of the regulations on the running water industry from the regulation of access, the regulation of price, the regulation of quality and regulation of environment. She puts forward a suggestion on the policy of the further reform of the regulations of China’s running water industry. As far as the access to the reform of the regulations is concerned, the restructuring of the market shall be carried out so that an effective, competitive market structure will be formed. Besides, it is necessary that a reform of the investment and financing mechanisms of the urban running water industry should be further implemented, that the reform of the marketization of the running water industry should be standardized, and that the reform that promotes the regulation of access of the running water industry should be constructed. In terms of the reform of the price, it is very essential to normalize the pricing procedure in the running water industry and to improve cost-based pricing, to introduce the incentive mechanism, to continue to promote two-way pricing step-mode water-measurement pricing, to implement the accumulative water pricing in the special industries, to promote the categorized water pricing and quality-based pricing, to implement the busy and off season pricing as per the differences in different regions and in different seasons. In addition, it is necessary to improve the sewage disposal charging system, to institute and improve the auditing system of the price of the running water so that the price of running water can be effectively supervised. In terms of the quality regulations, it needs to revise the norms of the quality of water, to set up the urban running water- managing network; furthermore, it is necessary to carry out the quality-graded pricing policy in different areas according their specific conditions,to strengthens the pipe network to transform, enhances the pipe network water quality,to adopt new technologies to improve the running water service and to set up the relevant punishment system to protect the quality of the water and to improve the service. It is also important to enhance the construction of the security alarming system and emergency system of the urban running water. As far as the reform of the environment regulations is concerned, it is necessary to reinforce the protection of the water resources, to strengthen the urban sewage disposal and the protection from water pollution, to take effective measures to recycle the wastewater to built a water-saving city, to increases the pollution punishment dynamics, active control pollution and to promote the practice of the exchange of the sewage discharging right to promote the sound and steady development of the running water industry.
The author has made some breakthroughs of the present domestic research achievements: firstly, In profits from the Western main developed country running water rules and regulations reform experience's foundation, to the Chinese waterway and well construction rules and regulations reform, regulated the system reform to conduct the system research particularly originally, simultaneously paid attention to and the rules and regulations organizational reform effective engagement. Secondly, While regulations of access, regulations of price, regulations of quality to the waterway and well construction to conduct the research originally, strengthened to regulations of environment research, and the perspective of the study of the running water regulations has been developed. Thirdly, Carries on the thorough analysis and the discussion originally to the waterway and well construction fixed price pattern,and construct the incentive pricing regulation models in the running water industry; besides, in terms of the price of water, introduced are“the floating pricing system”,“the card-inserted and the water-out”system,“the off and busy season system”,“the graded-quality water supply system”etc., which are of some certain practicability and operability, and proposed suits our country national condition the countermeasure suggestion, to deepens the waterway and well construction rules and regulations system reform to have originally refers to and profits from the function.
引文
①Beecher,J.P.Mann,and J.Landers.Cost Allocation and Rate Design for Water Utilities.Columbus[M] .Ohio:The National Regulatory Research Institute,1992
①S.E.Savas, Privatizing the Public Sector[M] .NJ: Chatham House, 1982:.33-36. Privatization and public-private partnerships[M] .NJ: Chatham House, 2000:.45-47.
①植草益.产业组织论[M] .北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:31
①Judith A.Rees.Regulation and Private Participation in the Water and Sanitation Sector[EB] . http://www.gwpforum.org , Jul, 1998.
①Judith A. Rees.Regulation and Participation in the Water and Sanitation Sector[EB] . http://www.gwpforum.org,Jul,1998
①Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche,Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M]. London :Spon press,2001(23):73
②Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche,Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M].London :Spon press,2001(23):70-71
①Harold Demsetz.Why Regulate Utilities[J]. Journal of Law and Economics. 1968:55-65
①Baumol,W.J.,J.Panzarhe and R.D.Willig, Contestable Market and the Theory of Industry Structure[M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
②OFWAT, Competition in the Water Industry :Inset Appointments and Their Regulation[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 1995
①Duncan Williamson.An Introduction to the Underlying Principles of Unbundling Costs:What it is and how to do it[EB].http://www.duncanwil.co.uk/pdfs/unbub.pdf, Dec,2001.
②V. Suresh .Strategies for Sustainable Watersupply for All:India Experience[EB]. http://www.oieau.fr/ciedd/contributions/at3/contribution/suresh.htm,(undated),1999
①Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche.Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M]. London :Spon press,2001:72--73
②Lawrence B.Morse.Acase for water utilities as cooperatives and the UK experience[EB]. http://www.ncat.edu/~econdept/wp/morsel.pdf, (undated)
③Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Electric Competition Work Group. Unbundling Electric Utility Rates and Services[EB]. http://wwwpuc.state.mn.us/docs/Unbun.pdf,Oct,1997
①S.Sundar and S.K.Sarkar.Private sector participation in water supply[EB]. http://www.terlin .org/features/art56.htm. Sep, 1999.
②IFC(International Finance Corporation).Introduction and background information on privately financed infrastructure projects[EB]. http://www.uncitral .org/English/texts/procurem/1-22-e.pdf, Feb,1996
③GWP(Global Water Partnership ).Toolbox for water resource management—option and experience[EB].http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/gwp.fau/toolbox1.pdf, May,1999.
④Dieter Prinz.Global and European Water Challenges in the 21st Century[EB]. http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/vvv/2000/bau-verm/9/9.pdf, Jun,2000.
⑤Thomas Zabel and Yvonne Rees.Institutional Framework for Water Management in the United Kingdom[EB]. http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=rivert%2Buk%2Bpriv atisation, Apr, 1999.
⑥S.E.Savas,Privatization and public-private partnerships[M].. NJ: Chatham House, 2000:228.
⑦Dupuit,J.A.and P.Navarro .Regulatory Climate and Cost of Capital in Regulation Reform and Public Utilities[M]..MA: Lexington Book .1982
①Mark Armstrong, Simon Cowan, and John Vichers,Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience[M].The MIT Press , 1994:329-330
②OFWAT.Financing of Major Environment Improvements, Birmingham: office of water Services.
③许保玖:论水工业。钱易等主编。水工业与可持续发展[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,1998,P1
①王雅莉、毕乐强。公共规制经济学[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
②王雅莉、毕乐强。公共规制经济学[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
①张昕竹,《供水和污水处理业的技术经济特征》[N].中国建设报,2003-08-01
②王俊豪:《政府规制经济学导论》[M]。北京:商务印书馆,2003
③王雅莉、毕乐强:《公共规制经济学》[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
④朱柏铭:《公共经济学》[M]。杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002
①茅于轼。公用事业的收费标准[J]。改革.1998(2):63-65
②王俊豪。英国政府规制体制改革研究[M]。上海:上海三联书店,1998:241-288
③张昕竹、拉丰,安·易斯塔什。网络产业:规制与竞争理论[M]。北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:288-290
①郭剑。水价理论与定价方法研究—重庆市主城区供水价格建议[D]。硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2003
②周耀东。不对称信息与激励性规制选择[J]。经济评论,2004(2):34-37
③林家园、陶小马。对阶梯式计量水价的认识与思考[J]。价格理论与实践,2004:52-53
④周勤。转型时期公用产品定价中的多重委托—代理关系研究[J],管理世界,2004(2):43-49
⑤于立、于左。美国收益率规制与英国价格上限规制的比较[J]。产业经济研究,2003 (2):11 -17
①丁科亮。浙江省可持续发展的城市水价研究[D]。硕士学位论文,浙江工业大学,2000
②蔡龙、黄贤金。城市公用事业价格改革的思路研究—以南京市自来水行业为例[J]。南京社会科学,2002:293-298
③程骥。供水定价及其实证研究[D]。硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2002
①何清。我国城市供水产业市场化模式研究[D]。硕士学位论文,石油大学,2001
②郭粤。湖北省城市供水现状及发展研究[D]。硕士学位论文,武汉理工大学2002
①李腾。向水工业进军。光明日报〔N〕。2000-06-02
①李贵宝,周怀东,刘晓茹.我国生活饮用水水质标准发展趋势及特点〔J〕.中国水利,2005, 9: 40-42.
①秦饪慧,张丽霞。我国生活饮用水水质卫生规范简介[J]。环境与健康杂志,2002.:19(1)
①高娟,李贵宝.最新颁布实施的《城市供水水质标准》的特点[M].中国水利,2005(15):51-53.
②建设部副部长仇保兴.在城乡污水处理与安全供水及第二次城镇水务发展国际研讨会新闻发布会上的讲话[EB]. 2007-07-27
①Schmalensee,”TheControl of Natural Monopolirs.”Lexington,Mass:Lexington Book.1979
①Joskow and Rose, "The Effect of Economic Regulation”,in Schmalensee and Willig ed, Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers,Inc. 1989
①杜坤.采取有效措施,提高管网水质[J].建筑与自然科学,2004(4): 81-82
①朱月海:浅述城市供水与国际先进水平接轨[J].给水排水。,2004,30(11):14-18
①损水面前话节水-有感于全国城市供水管网水量损失率高达30%[EB]. http://www.66wen.com/06gx/shuili/shuiwen/20060906/37415.html
①中国城镇供水协会网站.2001-02-15.
②数据来源:《中国统计年鉴》1987—2005年〔Z〕.北京:中国统计出版社,1987--2005
①见中国水星(http://www.chinawaterstar.com.cn. 2000-11-01.
①汪晶.Q3-BAC组合工艺对黄浦江微污染原水的净化效果研究[D].硕士学位论文,,同济大学,2005.
②数据来源:《中国统计年鉴》1987—2005年〔Z〕.北京:中国统计出版社,1987--2005
①数据来源:中国水务网, http://www.cnwaternews.com/
①南水北调城市水资源规划组.南水北调城市水资源规划简介[EB]. 2003-04-23,http://www.South-to-North water Transfer
②我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N]..人民日报,2006-08-23
①温桂芳.钟玉秀.我国水价形成机制和管理制度深化改革研究——深化水价改革:进程与问题[J].价格理论与实践.2004(12):7-9
②喻弼群.城市供水价格管理问题之我见.[J].大家谈.2004 (10) ,P 41
①我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N].人民日报,2006-08-23
①新华网北京2005年10月10日电新闻分析:城市污水处理厂为何不能正常运行?[EB]. http://www.sina.com.cn,2005-10-10
①杜红、杜英豪.美国自来水行业所有制结构及其成因分析[J].中国给水排水,2004(8)
①Geoffrey F Sega.l Many questions remain forAtlanta after UnitedWater [EB/OL]. www. gpp.f org, 2003 -01 -3
②Averch,H.and L.Johnson,1962,“Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint”,American Economic Review 52:pp.1052-1069.
③由于英国的苏格兰地区具有相对独立性的政治经济体制,它和英国的英格兰、威尔士地区具有较大的差异性,因此,本文主要讨论英格兰、威尔士地区的自来水规制体系改革问题。
①Malcolm Newson, Land, Water and Development:river basin systems and their sustainable management. London: Routledge, 1992,p263.
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①DOC,1996,Water:increasing Customer Choice,London:Department of the Environment ,转引自王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001:292
②王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①Ofwat.Guaranteed Standards Scheme [EB]. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/aptrix/ofwat/publish.nsf/Content/guaranteedstandardsscheme,Apr, 2002c.
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①更为详细地论述请参阅:(1) Ofwat,DEFRA.英格兰和威尔士水务产业的发展[R],内部翻译资料;(2) Emanuele Lobina, Arezzo, and David Hall. UK Water privatization——A Briefing[J].February 2001。
①水规总院.赴法国水资源规划与管理培训考察报告[J].水利技术监督,2003( 3 ): 1-3
①耿爱先.自然垄断管制与放松—对我国自来水行业制度变迁的研究[D].硕士学位论文,华南师范大学,2001.
②陈建明.法国水价制度研究[EB].http://www.wcb.yn.gov.cn/6-2.htm
①Quality et pollution de la ressource en eau. University de Picardie Jules Veme D.U.E.S.S 《Eau et Environnement》,2003.
②高弋绢.法国水展望[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2002: 18( 4 ): 54
①丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].中国水利报,2004-0 6-05
②丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].中国水利报,2004-0 6-05
[1] Averch.H. and L. Johson. Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint[M]. American Economic Review ,1962,52:1052—1069
[2]Beecher,J.P. Mann, and J. Landers.Cost Allocation and Rate Design for Water Utilities,Columbus[M] .Ohio:The National Regulatory Research Institute,1992
[3]Baumol,W.J.,J.Panzarhe and R.D.Willig, Contestable Market and the Theory of Industry Structure[M] . New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
[4]Baron,D.p., Noncooperative Regulation of a Nonlocalized Externality[J]. Rand Journal of Economics,1982, 16:553-568
[5]Berg,S.V.and J.Tschirhart, eds. Natural Monopoly Regulation[N].Cambridge University Press, 1988
[6]Baumol,W.J. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Shucture [M] .American Economic Review, 1982,Vo1.72:1-15
[7]Clive Harris. Private Participation in Infrastructure in Developing Countries-Trends, Impacts, and Policy Lessons [R] . world bank working paper,2003(5)
[8]Cosgrove,W.and F.Rijsberman. World Water Vision:Making Water Everybos Business[M] .United Kingdom: Earthscan Publications, Ltd,2000
[9]Crampes, Claude, and Antonio Estache. Regulating Water Concessions: Lessons from the Buenos Aires Concession, In Public Policy for the Private Sector [R] .Washington DC:World Bank,1996
[10]Crew,M., and Kleindorfer, P. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation[M] .Cambridge, MIT Press, 1986
[11]David Haarmeyer. Competition,contracts and regulation in water and sanitation-lessons from recent experience[R] .worldbank,1998
[12]Demsetz Harold. Why Regulate Utilities[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1968,Vo1.11,55-65
[13]Dierker,E. The Optimality of Boiteux-Ramsey Pricin[J].Econometrica, ,1991.vo1,59
[14]Dupuit, J.A. and P. Navarro .Regulatory Climate and Cost of Capital in Regulation Reform and Public Utilities[M].MA: Lexington Book,1982
[15]Duncan Williamson. An Introduction to the Underlying Principles of Unbundling Costs :What it is and how to do it[EB]. http://www.duncanwil.co.uk/pdfs/unbub.pdf, Dec,2001
[16]Dieter Prinz. Global and European Water Challenges in the 21st Century[EB]. http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/vvv/2000/bau-verm/9/9.pdf, Jun,2000
[17]Daniel p. Coyaud, Private and Public Alternatives for Providing Water Supply and Sewerage Service[EB].http://www.worldbank.org,Oct,1988
[18]D.Bradford. Optimal Departures from Marginal cost Pricing[J].American Economic Review, 1970:60(3), 265-283
[19]GWP(Global Water Partnership ). Toolbox for water resource management—option and experience[EB]. http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/gwp.fau/toolbox1.pdf, May,1999
[20] Emanuele Lobina, Arezzo, and David Hall. UK Water privatisation[N]. -a briefing, February,2001
[21]Haarmeyer,D.and A. Mo. Tapping the Private Sector: Reducing Risk to Attract Expertise and Capital to Water and Sanitation[R].Washington, DC: The World Bank,1997a.
[22] Haarmeyer,D. and A. Mo. World Water Privatization: Managing risks in water and sanitation[M].Singapore: Pearson,1997b
[23]Harold Demsetz.Why Regulate Utilities? [J]. Journal of Law and Economics. 1968:55-65
[24]Hall, David and Emanuele Lobina. Water Privatization in Latin America, 2002,Greenwich[M].UK: Public Services International Research Unit, 2002
[25]Hall, D. in Dinar, A. (ed.) The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms[M].London: Oxford University Press, 2000
[26]IFC(International Finance Corporation). Introduction and background information on privately financed infrastructure projects[EB]. http://www.uncitral .org/English/texts/procurem/1-22-e.pdf, Feb,1996
[27]Igler, GJ. Theory of Economic Regulation[M]. Bell Journal of Economics, Vo1.2,1971:3-21
[28]Judith A.Rees. Regulation and Private Participation in the Water and SanitationSector[EB]. http://www.gwpforum.org , Jul, 1998
[29]Joskow and Rose.The Effect of Economic Regulation.in Schmalensee and Willig ed, Handbook of Industrial Organization[M]. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers,Inc. 1989
[30]Kenneth W. Clarkson Roger Leroy Miller, Industrial Organization:Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy[M].McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982:119
[31]Kahn, A.E. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institution[J].Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press,1998
[32]Leibenstein,H. Allocative Efficiency S. X -Efficiency [M]. American Economic Review, Vo1. 1966,56(3):392-416
[33]Lawrence B.Morse.Acase for water utilities as cooperatives and the UK experience [EB].http://www.ncat.edu/~econdept/wp/morsel.pdf, (undated)
[34]M. Blue Gold: The Global Water Crisis and the mmodification of the World's Water Supply [R].A Special Report ssued by the International Forum on Globalization,June,1999.
[35]Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche.Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M].London :Spon press,2001
[36] Malcolm Newson. Land, Water and Development:river basin systems and their sustainable management[M]. London: Routledge, 1992 :263
[37]Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Electric Competition Work Group, Unbundling Electric Utility Rates. and Services[EB]. http://wwwpuc.state.mn.us/docs/Unbun.pdf,Oct,1997
[38]Mark Armstrong, Simon Cowan, and John Vichers,Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience[M].The MIT Press, 1994:329-330
[39]Noll, Roger 6. The Economics of Urban Water Systems. In Thirsting for Efficiency: The Economics and Politics of Urban Water System Reform, edited by Mary M. Shirley[M].Oxford UK:Pergamon,2002:43-64
[40]Nickson,Andrew, and Claudia Vargas. The Limitations of Water Regulation: The Failure of the Cochabamba Concession in Bolivia[R].Bulletin of Latin American Research 21, 2002:99-120
[41]OFWAT. Competition in the Water Industry :Inset Appointments and Their Regulation[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 1995
[42]OFWAT.Water and Regulation: Facts and Figures [EB]. http://www.ofwat.org.uk.Dec,2002e
[43]OFWAT, water and sewerage bills[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 2006-07
[44]OFWAT, Future Water and Sewerage Charges 2005-10:Final Determinations[R]. Birmingham: Office of Water Services,2004
[45]Peltzmann, S. Towards a more General Theory of Regulation [M]. Journal of Law and Economics, Vo1.19, 1976:211-240
[46]Quality et pollution de la ressource en eau. University de Picardie Jules Veme D.U.E.S.S,Eau et Environnement[R],2003
[47]S.E.Savas. Privatizing the Public Sector [M].NJ: Chatham House, 1982:33-36
[48]S.E.Savas.Privatization and public-private partnerships [M].NJ:Chatham House, 2000:45-47
[49]S.Sundar and S.K.Sarkar.Private sector participation in water supply[EB]. http://www.terlin.org/features/art56.htm. Sep, 1999
[50]Sscusi,W.K. Vemon,J.M. and Harrington, J.E. Economics of Regulation and Antihust[M].Massachusetts: The MIT Press,1995
[51]Schmalensee.TheControl of Natural Monopolirs[M]. Lexington,Mass:Lexington Book,1979
[52]Thomas Zabel and Yvonne Rees.Institutional Framework for Water Management in the United Kingdom[EB]. http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=rivert%2Buk%2Bpriv atisation, Apr, 1999
[53] Thomas O.Malle.Privatisation: a UK Success Story[EB]. http://www.freemarketfoudation.com/htmupload/PUBDoc393.doc,1998.
[54]Ted Kolderie .The Two Different Concepts of Privatization[R]. Public Administration Review, july /august,1986:285-291
[55]V. Suresh .Strategies for Sustainable Watersupply for All:India Experience[EB]. http://www.oieau.fr/ciedd/contributions/at3/contribution/suresh.htm,(undated),1999
[56]W.J.J.Panzar and R.D.Wi11ig.Contestable Market and the Theory of IndustryStructure[M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
[57]【美】B·盖伊·彼得斯.政府未来的治理模式[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[58]部建人、叶玲.城市市政公用事业市场化的路径选择[J].重庆大学学报,2004(2)
[59]【美】查尔斯·沃尔夫.市场或政府—权衡两种不完善的选择[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1994
[60]蔡龙、黄贤金.城市公用事业价格改革的思路研究—以南京市自来水行业为例[J].南京社会科学,2002,P293-298
[61]仇保兴、王俊豪.中国市政公用事业监管体制研究[M].北京:中国社学出版社,2006
[62]程骥.供水定价及其实证研究[D].硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2002
[63]陈梦玉、徐明.水价格学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2000
[64]陈洪博.推进城市公用事业市场化改革[J].特区理论与实践,2003(6)
[65]陈建明.法国水价制度研究[EB].http://www.wcb.yn.gov.cn/6-2.htm
[66]陈郁.所有权、控制权与激励:代理经济学文选[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1998
[67]德姆塞茨.所有权、控制与企业:论经济活动的组织[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[68]【美】戴维·奥斯本等.改革政府一企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1996
[69]【美】丹尼尔·耶金、【英】约瑟夫·斯坦尼斯罗.制高点一重建现代世界的政府与市场之争[M].北京:外文出版社,2000
[70]【美】丹尼尔·史吾博,余辉等译.规制与市场[M].上海:上海三联书店,1999
[71]丁科亮.浙江省可持续发展的城市水价研究[D].硕士学位论文,浙江工业大学,2000
[72]丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].北京:中国水利报,2004-06-05
[73]杜坤.采取有效措施,提高管网水质[J].建筑与自然科学.2004(4)
[74]杜红、杜英豪.美国自来水行业所有制结构及其成因分析[J].中国给水排水,2004(8)
[75]【美】E·S·萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[76]冯云廷.城市公共服务体制:理论探索与实践[M].中国财政经济出版社,2004
[77]傅平,谢华,张天柱等.完全成本水价与我国的水价改革[J].中国给水排水,2003(10)
[78]傅涛、陈吉宁、张丽珍.城市水业市场化的认识误区与政府角色[J].中国给水排水,2004(1)
[79]【美】G·J·斯蒂格勒.产业组织与政府管制[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996
[80]共用事业改革:深圳的探索与争议[EB].http://www.ccppp.org/ ,2005-7-8
[81]郭剑.水价理论与定价方法研究—重庆市主城区供水价格建议[D].硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2003
[82]郭粤.梅湖北省城市供水现状及发展研究[D].硕士学位论文,武汉理工大学,2002
[83]郭小聪:《政府经济学》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[84]高培勇、崔军.公共部门经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[85]高弋绢.法国水展望[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社科版),2002(4)
[86]高娟、李贵宝.最新颁布实施的《城市供水水质标准》的特点[J].中国水利,2005(15)
[87]耿爱先.自然垄断管制与放松—对我国自来水行业制度变迁的研究[D].硕士学位论文,华南师范大学.2001
[88]国家环保总局环境与经济政策研究中心.我国城市环境基础设施建设与运营市场化问题调研报告[R].2003-3-24
[89]霍衍杰.关于城市公用事业市场化产业化的思考[J].中国建设报,2003(4)
[90]何孝星.加快推进我国经营性公用事业民营化问题研究[J].经济学动态,2003(10)
[91]何清.我国城市供水产业市场化模式研究[D].硕士学位论文,石油大学,2001
[92]胡鞍钢、王绍光、周建民.国家制度建设[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003
[93]柯武刚、史漫飞.制度经济学[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001
[94]黄文夫.民营在中国[M].北京:中国城市出版社,2003
[95]黄继忠.自然垄断与规制:理论与经验[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004
[96]黄继忠、曲文较.自然垄断与规制:理论和经验[M].经济科学出版社,2004
[97]黄少军、何华权.政府经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1998
[98]黄永强.供水企业的运营模式及其公益性[J].业内视界,2002(9)
[99]姜文来.水资源价值论[M].北京科学出版社,1999
[100]蒋泽中.企业收购与兼并[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004
[101]加快民营经济健康发展研究课题组.中国民营经济发展前沿问题研究(2003——2004)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003
[102]建设部副部长仇保兴.在城乡污水处理与安全供水及第二次城镇水务发展国际研讨会新闻发布会上的讲话[Z]. 2007-07- 27
[103]建设部课题组.中国城市基础设施投融资体制改革研究报告[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002
[104]建设部城建司明确城市水业市场新改革监管[EB].http: //www, ccppp. Org,2005-04-l4
[105]李鹏.新公共管理及应用[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004
[106]李腾.向水工业进军[N].北京:光明日报,2000-06-02
[107]李长兴、赵彬彬、常爱敏.强化政府监督职能全面提高城市供水水质[J].水利发展研究,2004(6)
[108]李仕林.论我国城市污水处理的市场体制[J].城市管理与科技,2004(2)
[109]李晶、王新义、贺骥.英国和德国水环境治理模式鉴析[J].水利发展研究,2004(1)
[110]李贵宝,周怀东,刘晓茹.我国生活饮用水水质标准发展趋势及特点[J].中国水利,2005(9)
[111]李永康.四川瑞云集团经营邛崃市公用事业的案例分析[EB]. www.ccppp.org,2005-02-10
[112]李霞.自然垄断产业治理模式构想[J].经济体制改革,2005(1)
[113]林家园、陶小马.对阶梯式计量水价的认识与思考[J].价格理论与实践,2004(2):52-53
[114]吕松.我国城市水行业私人部门投资现状及问题[J].研究与探索,2004(9)
[115]吕守军.日本自来水定价方法变迁及对我国的启示[J].外国经济与管理, 2004(12):26-29
[116]刘戒骄.垄断产业改革一基于网络视角的分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005
[117]刘小兵.政府规制的经济分析[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004
[118]刘戒骄.城市公用事业的放松管制与管制改革[J].改革,2000(6)
[119]刘世庆.加入WTO与城市供水产业竞争化改革[J].改革,2002(4)
[120]娄成武、尹涛.论政府在公共服务民营化中的作用[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2003(5)
[121]垄断性行业的政府管制问题研究课题组.垄断性行业的政府管制问题研究[J].经济研究参考,2003(25)
[122]毛飞.公用事业民营化需政府良好规制[N].南方都市报,2004-02-10
[123]毛寿龙.公共政策与有限政府[N].21世纪经济报道,2003-12-27
[124]茅于轼.公用事业的收费标准[J].改革,1998(2):63-65
[125]迈克尔麦金尼斯.多中心体制与地方公共经济[M].上海:上海三联书店出版社,2000
[126]【美】N·格里高利·曼昆.宏观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
[127]南水北调城市水资源规划组.南水北调城市水资源规划简[EB].2003-04-23, http://www.South-to-North water Transfer
[128]欧文·E·休斯.公共管理导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001
[129]【美】平狄克、鲁宾费尔德.微观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
[130]【美】乔治·斯蒂格勒.人民与国家—管制经济学论文集[C].台北市:远流出版事业股份有限公司,1991
[131]钱颖一.现代经济学与中国经济改革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[132]钱易等主编.水工业与可持续发展[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998
[133]邱卫东.跨国水务抢占中国市场概述[J].城乡建设,2001 (7)
[134]秦虹.市政公用事业改革为城市发展注入活力[J].城市发展研究,2003(1)
[135]秦饪慧、张丽霞.我国生活饮用水水质卫生规范简介[J].环境与健康,2002(19)
[136]丘健雄、张晓慧.公私合营(PPP)与中国[N].北京:建筑时报,2005-03-10
[137]丘健雄、张晓慧.公私合营(PPP)与私人融资计划(PFI)背后的经济学原因[N].北京:建筑时报,2005-02-03
[138]清华大学水业政策研究中心.清华水业蓝皮书[EB].中国水网,2004—2006
[139]清华大学水业政策研究中心.城市水业市场研究[EB].中国水网,2004—2006
[140]清华水业蓝皮书(系列之四)一城市水业的BOT及其法律问题[R].清华大学水业政策研究中心,2004-07
[141]任俊生.中国公用产品价格管制[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2002
[142]【美】R·科斯、A·阿尔钦、D·诺斯等.财产权利与制度变迁一制度学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2003
[143]施波涛.谁来分享公用事业市场这块大“蛋糕”[N].市场报,2003-01-15
[144]自来水规划总院.赴法国水资源规划与管理培训考察报告[J].水利技术监督,2003(3)
[145]水利部水资源司.城市水务市场化改革调研[J].中国水利,2004(15)
[146]沈大军等.水价理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,1999
[147]盛洪.公用事业民营化“不禁止,则自由”[EB].http://www.ccppp.org 2004-1-19
[148]盛代林.政府在水资源统一管理中的角色定位—深圳水资源管理若干问题探讨[J].中国水利,2004(05)
[149]唐娟.英国水行业政府监管模式的改革[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(4)
[150]唐平、董瑛.“BOT”供水工程带动地方经济发展[N].黑龙江日报,2001- 2 -15
[151]调整改革思路,促进企业发展—沈阳市自来水公司[EB].2004年,中国水务网
[152]谭章荣.城市供排水的一体化管理[J].中国给水排水,2001(1)
[153]温桂芳、钟玉秀.我国水价形成机制和管理制度深化改革研究—深化水价改革:进程与问题[J].价格理论与实践,2004(12)
[154]我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N].人民日报,2006-08-23
[155]武亚军.可持续发展型的水资源定价:边际机会成本方法与一个动态定价模型[J].经济科学,1999(1):75-79
[156]王雅莉、毕乐强.公共规制经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005年版
[157]王宇光等.关于自来水价格管理问题的思考[J].中国物价,2002(6)
[158]王志飞.对我国城市供水价格改革的思考[J].改革与发展,2004(2)
[159]王浩等.面向可持续发展的水价理论与实践[M].科学出版社,2003
[160]王元京.民营经济与国有经济互补关系研究[J].经济研究参考,2004(53)
[161]王万山.浅议国外的水权交易与水权市场[J].水利经济,2004(4)
[162]王俊豪、周小梅.中国自然垄断行业民营化改革与政府规制政策[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004
[163]王俊豪.中国政府规制体制改革研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[164]王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2003
[165]王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
[166]汪恕诚.水权与水市场[J].中国水利,2000(11)
[167]汪晶.Q3-BAC组合工艺对黄浦江微污染原水的净化效果研究[D].硕士学位论文,同济大学,2005
[168]肖绍雍.论城镇供水行业面临的机遇与挑战[J].城镇供水,2003(2):27
[169]肖云.城市基础设施建设相关领域国有企业改革[J].改革,2002(3)
[170]肖兴志.自然垄断产业规制改革模式研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2003
[171]谢华,张天柱.公共供水定价方法分析[J].给水排水,2001(27)
[172]夏大慰、史东辉等.政府规制—理论、经验与中国的改革[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[173]薛梅、冯玉春.日本的自来水价格及水价制度面临的新课题[J].水利经济,2004(1)
[174]于良春等.自然垄断与政府规制一基本理论与政策分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[175]于立、于左.美国收益率规制与英国价格上限规制的比较[J].产业经济研究,2003 (2)
[176]喻弼群.城市供水价格管理问题之我见[J].大家谈,2004 (10)
[177]俞建德.谁动了我的“BOT”[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2002
[178]杨耕.深圳水务改革现状分析[J].特区经济,2002(2)
[179]杨君昌、曾学军.公共定价理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002
[180]杨重光.城市基础设施建设和管理产业化的几个理论问题[J].上海城市发展,2000(1)
[181]余晖.政府与企业:从宏观管理到微观管制[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1997
[182]庸娟.英国水行业政府监管模式的改革[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(4)
[183]【日】植草益.朱绍文、潘振民等译.微观规制经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社、中国发展出版社,1992
[184]【日】植草益.《产业组织论》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:31
[185]政府、私企如何面对城市水行业的发展[EB].http://www.h2o-china.com. 2005-04-18
[186]中国行政管理学会深化行政改革课题组.深化行政管理体制改革的理论与实践[J].中国行政管理,2003(3)
[187]中国水网.2003水业十大新闻揭晓[EB]. http://202.97.173.162/sw/zhxwl.htm,2004-01-18
[188]邹建锋.水务市场化:政府与市场如何跳好“双人舞”[N].中国经济时报,2003-10-14
[189]周耀东.不对称信息与激励性规制选择[J].经济评论,2004(2):34-37
[190]周继秀.民营企业的“未来水世界”[J].财经界,2003(11)
[191]周林军.公用事业规制要论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004
[192]周芬棉.行政性垄断何去何从[N].法制日报,2001-04-01
[193]周学荣.论政府规制[N].光明日报,2004-04-27
[194]周勤.转型时期公用产品定价中的多重委托—代理关系研究[J].管理世界,2004(2):43-49
[195]周小梅.关于自来水管制价格形成机制改革的思考[J].价格月刊,2001(6)
[196]张子鹏.公共产品:法治之基—特许经营立法破局[N].21世纪经济报道,2003-12-27
[197]张昕竹.中国供水与污水处理业的规制改革与发展.中国基础设施产业管制改革与发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版,2000
[198]张昕竹.中国规制与竞争:理论和政策[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[199]张昕竹.供水和污水处理业的技术经济特征[N].中国建设报,2003-08-01
[200]张昕竹、拉丰、安·易斯塔什.网络产业:规制与竞争理论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[201]张刚、米大鹏、余向荣.缺水条件下北京水市场构建与水价形成机制[J].中国水利,2004(13)
[202]张极井.项目融资[M].北京:中信出版社,2003
[203]张钢.公共管理学引论[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003
[204]朱自强.南京市发展市政公用经济的三大战略[J].上海城市发展,2000(2)
[205]朱新力、宋华琳、胡敏洁等.现代行政法学与政府规制[N].法制日报,2005-03-17
[206]朱光磊.当代中国政府过程[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1997
[207]朱柏铭.公共部门经济学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003
[208]朱柏铭.公共经济学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002
[209]朱月海.浅述城市供水与国际先进水平接轨[J].给水排水,2004,30(11)
①S.E.Savas, Privatizing the Public Sector[M] .NJ: Chatham House, 1982:.33-36. Privatization and public-private partnerships[M] .NJ: Chatham House, 2000:.45-47.
①植草益.产业组织论[M] .北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:31
①Judith A.Rees.Regulation and Private Participation in the Water and Sanitation Sector[EB] . http://www.gwpforum.org , Jul, 1998.
①Judith A. Rees.Regulation and Participation in the Water and Sanitation Sector[EB] . http://www.gwpforum.org,Jul,1998
①Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche,Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M]. London :Spon press,2001(23):73
②Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche,Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M].London :Spon press,2001(23):70-71
①Harold Demsetz.Why Regulate Utilities[J]. Journal of Law and Economics. 1968:55-65
①Baumol,W.J.,J.Panzarhe and R.D.Willig, Contestable Market and the Theory of Industry Structure[M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
②OFWAT, Competition in the Water Industry :Inset Appointments and Their Regulation[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 1995
①Duncan Williamson.An Introduction to the Underlying Principles of Unbundling Costs:What it is and how to do it[EB].http://www.duncanwil.co.uk/pdfs/unbub.pdf, Dec,2001.
②V. Suresh .Strategies for Sustainable Watersupply for All:India Experience[EB]. http://www.oieau.fr/ciedd/contributions/at3/contribution/suresh.htm,(undated),1999
①Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche.Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M]. London :Spon press,2001:72--73
②Lawrence B.Morse.Acase for water utilities as cooperatives and the UK experience[EB]. http://www.ncat.edu/~econdept/wp/morsel.pdf, (undated)
③Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Electric Competition Work Group. Unbundling Electric Utility Rates and Services[EB]. http://wwwpuc.state.mn.us/docs/Unbun.pdf,Oct,1997
①S.Sundar and S.K.Sarkar.Private sector participation in water supply[EB]. http://www.terlin .org/features/art56.htm. Sep, 1999.
②IFC(International Finance Corporation).Introduction and background information on privately financed infrastructure projects[EB]. http://www.uncitral .org/English/texts/procurem/1-22-e.pdf, Feb,1996
③GWP(Global Water Partnership ).Toolbox for water resource management—option and experience[EB].http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/gwp.fau/toolbox1.pdf, May,1999.
④Dieter Prinz.Global and European Water Challenges in the 21st Century[EB]. http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/vvv/2000/bau-verm/9/9.pdf, Jun,2000.
⑤Thomas Zabel and Yvonne Rees.Institutional Framework for Water Management in the United Kingdom[EB]. http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=rivert%2Buk%2Bpriv atisation, Apr, 1999.
⑥S.E.Savas,Privatization and public-private partnerships[M].. NJ: Chatham House, 2000:228.
⑦Dupuit,J.A.and P.Navarro .Regulatory Climate and Cost of Capital in Regulation Reform and Public Utilities[M]..MA: Lexington Book .1982
①Mark Armstrong, Simon Cowan, and John Vichers,Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience[M].The MIT Press , 1994:329-330
②OFWAT.Financing of Major Environment Improvements, Birmingham: office of water Services.
③许保玖:论水工业。钱易等主编。水工业与可持续发展[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,1998,P1
①王雅莉、毕乐强。公共规制经济学[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
②王雅莉、毕乐强。公共规制经济学[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
①张昕竹,《供水和污水处理业的技术经济特征》[N].中国建设报,2003-08-01
②王俊豪:《政府规制经济学导论》[M]。北京:商务印书馆,2003
③王雅莉、毕乐强:《公共规制经济学》[M]。北京:清华大学出版社,2005
④朱柏铭:《公共经济学》[M]。杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002
①茅于轼。公用事业的收费标准[J]。改革.1998(2):63-65
②王俊豪。英国政府规制体制改革研究[M]。上海:上海三联书店,1998:241-288
③张昕竹、拉丰,安·易斯塔什。网络产业:规制与竞争理论[M]。北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:288-290
①郭剑。水价理论与定价方法研究—重庆市主城区供水价格建议[D]。硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2003
②周耀东。不对称信息与激励性规制选择[J]。经济评论,2004(2):34-37
③林家园、陶小马。对阶梯式计量水价的认识与思考[J]。价格理论与实践,2004:52-53
④周勤。转型时期公用产品定价中的多重委托—代理关系研究[J],管理世界,2004(2):43-49
⑤于立、于左。美国收益率规制与英国价格上限规制的比较[J]。产业经济研究,2003 (2):11 -17
①丁科亮。浙江省可持续发展的城市水价研究[D]。硕士学位论文,浙江工业大学,2000
②蔡龙、黄贤金。城市公用事业价格改革的思路研究—以南京市自来水行业为例[J]。南京社会科学,2002:293-298
③程骥。供水定价及其实证研究[D]。硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2002
①何清。我国城市供水产业市场化模式研究[D]。硕士学位论文,石油大学,2001
②郭粤。湖北省城市供水现状及发展研究[D]。硕士学位论文,武汉理工大学2002
①李腾。向水工业进军。光明日报〔N〕。2000-06-02
①李贵宝,周怀东,刘晓茹.我国生活饮用水水质标准发展趋势及特点〔J〕.中国水利,2005, 9: 40-42.
①秦饪慧,张丽霞。我国生活饮用水水质卫生规范简介[J]。环境与健康杂志,2002.:19(1)
①高娟,李贵宝.最新颁布实施的《城市供水水质标准》的特点[M].中国水利,2005(15):51-53.
②建设部副部长仇保兴.在城乡污水处理与安全供水及第二次城镇水务发展国际研讨会新闻发布会上的讲话[EB]. 2007-07-27
①Schmalensee,”TheControl of Natural Monopolirs.”Lexington,Mass:Lexington Book.1979
①Joskow and Rose, "The Effect of Economic Regulation”,in Schmalensee and Willig ed, Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers,Inc. 1989
①杜坤.采取有效措施,提高管网水质[J].建筑与自然科学,2004(4): 81-82
①朱月海:浅述城市供水与国际先进水平接轨[J].给水排水。,2004,30(11):14-18
①损水面前话节水-有感于全国城市供水管网水量损失率高达30%[EB]. http://www.66wen.com/06gx/shuili/shuiwen/20060906/37415.html
①中国城镇供水协会网站.2001-02-15.
②数据来源:《中国统计年鉴》1987—2005年〔Z〕.北京:中国统计出版社,1987--2005
①见中国水星(http://www.chinawaterstar.com.cn. 2000-11-01.
①汪晶.Q3-BAC组合工艺对黄浦江微污染原水的净化效果研究[D].硕士学位论文,,同济大学,2005.
②数据来源:《中国统计年鉴》1987—2005年〔Z〕.北京:中国统计出版社,1987--2005
①数据来源:中国水务网, http://www.cnwaternews.com/
①南水北调城市水资源规划组.南水北调城市水资源规划简介[EB]. 2003-04-23,http://www.South-to-North water Transfer
②我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N]..人民日报,2006-08-23
①温桂芳.钟玉秀.我国水价形成机制和管理制度深化改革研究——深化水价改革:进程与问题[J].价格理论与实践.2004(12):7-9
②喻弼群.城市供水价格管理问题之我见.[J].大家谈.2004 (10) ,P 41
①我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N].人民日报,2006-08-23
①新华网北京2005年10月10日电新闻分析:城市污水处理厂为何不能正常运行?[EB]. http://www.sina.com.cn,2005-10-10
①杜红、杜英豪.美国自来水行业所有制结构及其成因分析[J].中国给水排水,2004(8)
①Geoffrey F Sega.l Many questions remain forAtlanta after UnitedWater [EB/OL]. www. gpp.f org, 2003 -01 -3
②Averch,H.and L.Johnson,1962,“Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint”,American Economic Review 52:pp.1052-1069.
③由于英国的苏格兰地区具有相对独立性的政治经济体制,它和英国的英格兰、威尔士地区具有较大的差异性,因此,本文主要讨论英格兰、威尔士地区的自来水规制体系改革问题。
①Malcolm Newson, Land, Water and Development:river basin systems and their sustainable management. London: Routledge, 1992,p263.
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①DOC,1996,Water:increasing Customer Choice,London:Department of the Environment ,转引自王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001:292
②王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①Ofwat.Guaranteed Standards Scheme [EB]. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/aptrix/ofwat/publish.nsf/Content/guaranteedstandardsscheme,Apr, 2002c.
①王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
①更为详细地论述请参阅:(1) Ofwat,DEFRA.英格兰和威尔士水务产业的发展[R],内部翻译资料;(2) Emanuele Lobina, Arezzo, and David Hall. UK Water privatization——A Briefing[J].February 2001。
①水规总院.赴法国水资源规划与管理培训考察报告[J].水利技术监督,2003( 3 ): 1-3
①耿爱先.自然垄断管制与放松—对我国自来水行业制度变迁的研究[D].硕士学位论文,华南师范大学,2001.
②陈建明.法国水价制度研究[EB].http://www.wcb.yn.gov.cn/6-2.htm
①Quality et pollution de la ressource en eau. University de Picardie Jules Veme D.U.E.S.S 《Eau et Environnement》,2003.
②高弋绢.法国水展望[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2002: 18( 4 ): 54
①丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].中国水利报,2004-0 6-05
②丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].中国水利报,2004-0 6-05
[1] Averch.H. and L. Johson. Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint[M]. American Economic Review ,1962,52:1052—1069
[2]Beecher,J.P. Mann, and J. Landers.Cost Allocation and Rate Design for Water Utilities,Columbus[M] .Ohio:The National Regulatory Research Institute,1992
[3]Baumol,W.J.,J.Panzarhe and R.D.Willig, Contestable Market and the Theory of Industry Structure[M] . New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
[4]Baron,D.p., Noncooperative Regulation of a Nonlocalized Externality[J]. Rand Journal of Economics,1982, 16:553-568
[5]Berg,S.V.and J.Tschirhart, eds. Natural Monopoly Regulation[N].Cambridge University Press, 1988
[6]Baumol,W.J. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Shucture [M] .American Economic Review, 1982,Vo1.72:1-15
[7]Clive Harris. Private Participation in Infrastructure in Developing Countries-Trends, Impacts, and Policy Lessons [R] . world bank working paper,2003(5)
[8]Cosgrove,W.and F.Rijsberman. World Water Vision:Making Water Everybos Business[M] .United Kingdom: Earthscan Publications, Ltd,2000
[9]Crampes, Claude, and Antonio Estache. Regulating Water Concessions: Lessons from the Buenos Aires Concession, In Public Policy for the Private Sector [R] .Washington DC:World Bank,1996
[10]Crew,M., and Kleindorfer, P. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation[M] .Cambridge, MIT Press, 1986
[11]David Haarmeyer. Competition,contracts and regulation in water and sanitation-lessons from recent experience[R] .worldbank,1998
[12]Demsetz Harold. Why Regulate Utilities[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1968,Vo1.11,55-65
[13]Dierker,E. The Optimality of Boiteux-Ramsey Pricin[J].Econometrica, ,1991.vo1,59
[14]Dupuit, J.A. and P. Navarro .Regulatory Climate and Cost of Capital in Regulation Reform and Public Utilities[M].MA: Lexington Book,1982
[15]Duncan Williamson. An Introduction to the Underlying Principles of Unbundling Costs :What it is and how to do it[EB]. http://www.duncanwil.co.uk/pdfs/unbub.pdf, Dec,2001
[16]Dieter Prinz. Global and European Water Challenges in the 21st Century[EB]. http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/vvv/2000/bau-verm/9/9.pdf, Jun,2000
[17]Daniel p. Coyaud, Private and Public Alternatives for Providing Water Supply and Sewerage Service[EB].http://www.worldbank.org,Oct,1988
[18]D.Bradford. Optimal Departures from Marginal cost Pricing[J].American Economic Review, 1970:60(3), 265-283
[19]GWP(Global Water Partnership ). Toolbox for water resource management—option and experience[EB]. http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/projects/gwp.fau/toolbox1.pdf, May,1999
[20] Emanuele Lobina, Arezzo, and David Hall. UK Water privatisation[N]. -a briefing, February,2001
[21]Haarmeyer,D.and A. Mo. Tapping the Private Sector: Reducing Risk to Attract Expertise and Capital to Water and Sanitation[R].Washington, DC: The World Bank,1997a.
[22] Haarmeyer,D. and A. Mo. World Water Privatization: Managing risks in water and sanitation[M].Singapore: Pearson,1997b
[23]Harold Demsetz.Why Regulate Utilities? [J]. Journal of Law and Economics. 1968:55-65
[24]Hall, David and Emanuele Lobina. Water Privatization in Latin America, 2002,Greenwich[M].UK: Public Services International Research Unit, 2002
[25]Hall, D. in Dinar, A. (ed.) The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms[M].London: Oxford University Press, 2000
[26]IFC(International Finance Corporation). Introduction and background information on privately financed infrastructure projects[EB]. http://www.uncitral .org/English/texts/procurem/1-22-e.pdf, Feb,1996
[27]Igler, GJ. Theory of Economic Regulation[M]. Bell Journal of Economics, Vo1.2,1971:3-21
[28]Judith A.Rees. Regulation and Private Participation in the Water and SanitationSector[EB]. http://www.gwpforum.org , Jul, 1998
[29]Joskow and Rose.The Effect of Economic Regulation.in Schmalensee and Willig ed, Handbook of Industrial Organization[M]. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers,Inc. 1989
[30]Kenneth W. Clarkson Roger Leroy Miller, Industrial Organization:Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy[M].McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982:119
[31]Kahn, A.E. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institution[J].Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press,1998
[32]Leibenstein,H. Allocative Efficiency S. X -Efficiency [M]. American Economic Review, Vo1. 1966,56(3):392-416
[33]Lawrence B.Morse.Acase for water utilities as cooperatives and the UK experience [EB].http://www.ncat.edu/~econdept/wp/morsel.pdf, (undated)
[34]M. Blue Gold: The Global Water Crisis and the mmodification of the World's Water Supply [R].A Special Report ssued by the International Forum on Globalization,June,1999.
[35]Matthias Finger and Jeremy Allouche.Water Privatization: Trans-National Corporations and the Re-Regulation of the Water Industry[M].London :Spon press,2001
[36] Malcolm Newson. Land, Water and Development:river basin systems and their sustainable management[M]. London: Routledge, 1992 :263
[37]Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Electric Competition Work Group, Unbundling Electric Utility Rates. and Services[EB]. http://wwwpuc.state.mn.us/docs/Unbun.pdf,Oct,1997
[38]Mark Armstrong, Simon Cowan, and John Vichers,Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience[M].The MIT Press, 1994:329-330
[39]Noll, Roger 6. The Economics of Urban Water Systems. In Thirsting for Efficiency: The Economics and Politics of Urban Water System Reform, edited by Mary M. Shirley[M].Oxford UK:Pergamon,2002:43-64
[40]Nickson,Andrew, and Claudia Vargas. The Limitations of Water Regulation: The Failure of the Cochabamba Concession in Bolivia[R].Bulletin of Latin American Research 21, 2002:99-120
[41]OFWAT. Competition in the Water Industry :Inset Appointments and Their Regulation[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 1995
[42]OFWAT.Water and Regulation: Facts and Figures [EB]. http://www.ofwat.org.uk.Dec,2002e
[43]OFWAT, water and sewerage bills[R].Birmingham: Office of Water Services, 2006-07
[44]OFWAT, Future Water and Sewerage Charges 2005-10:Final Determinations[R]. Birmingham: Office of Water Services,2004
[45]Peltzmann, S. Towards a more General Theory of Regulation [M]. Journal of Law and Economics, Vo1.19, 1976:211-240
[46]Quality et pollution de la ressource en eau. University de Picardie Jules Veme D.U.E.S.S,Eau et Environnement[R],2003
[47]S.E.Savas. Privatizing the Public Sector [M].NJ: Chatham House, 1982:33-36
[48]S.E.Savas.Privatization and public-private partnerships [M].NJ:Chatham House, 2000:45-47
[49]S.Sundar and S.K.Sarkar.Private sector participation in water supply[EB]. http://www.terlin.org/features/art56.htm. Sep, 1999
[50]Sscusi,W.K. Vemon,J.M. and Harrington, J.E. Economics of Regulation and Antihust[M].Massachusetts: The MIT Press,1995
[51]Schmalensee.TheControl of Natural Monopolirs[M]. Lexington,Mass:Lexington Book,1979
[52]Thomas Zabel and Yvonne Rees.Institutional Framework for Water Management in the United Kingdom[EB]. http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=rivert%2Buk%2Bpriv atisation, Apr, 1999
[53] Thomas O.Malle.Privatisation: a UK Success Story[EB]. http://www.freemarketfoudation.com/htmupload/PUBDoc393.doc,1998.
[54]Ted Kolderie .The Two Different Concepts of Privatization[R]. Public Administration Review, july /august,1986:285-291
[55]V. Suresh .Strategies for Sustainable Watersupply for All:India Experience[EB]. http://www.oieau.fr/ciedd/contributions/at3/contribution/suresh.htm,(undated),1999
[56]W.J.J.Panzar and R.D.Wi11ig.Contestable Market and the Theory of IndustryStructure[M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1982
[57]【美】B·盖伊·彼得斯.政府未来的治理模式[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[58]部建人、叶玲.城市市政公用事业市场化的路径选择[J].重庆大学学报,2004(2)
[59]【美】查尔斯·沃尔夫.市场或政府—权衡两种不完善的选择[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1994
[60]蔡龙、黄贤金.城市公用事业价格改革的思路研究—以南京市自来水行业为例[J].南京社会科学,2002,P293-298
[61]仇保兴、王俊豪.中国市政公用事业监管体制研究[M].北京:中国社学出版社,2006
[62]程骥.供水定价及其实证研究[D].硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2002
[63]陈梦玉、徐明.水价格学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2000
[64]陈洪博.推进城市公用事业市场化改革[J].特区理论与实践,2003(6)
[65]陈建明.法国水价制度研究[EB].http://www.wcb.yn.gov.cn/6-2.htm
[66]陈郁.所有权、控制权与激励:代理经济学文选[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1998
[67]德姆塞茨.所有权、控制与企业:论经济活动的组织[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[68]【美】戴维·奥斯本等.改革政府一企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1996
[69]【美】丹尼尔·耶金、【英】约瑟夫·斯坦尼斯罗.制高点一重建现代世界的政府与市场之争[M].北京:外文出版社,2000
[70]【美】丹尼尔·史吾博,余辉等译.规制与市场[M].上海:上海三联书店,1999
[71]丁科亮.浙江省可持续发展的城市水价研究[D].硕士学位论文,浙江工业大学,2000
[72]丁惠英、丁民.国外城市水务管理[N].北京:中国水利报,2004-06-05
[73]杜坤.采取有效措施,提高管网水质[J].建筑与自然科学.2004(4)
[74]杜红、杜英豪.美国自来水行业所有制结构及其成因分析[J].中国给水排水,2004(8)
[75]【美】E·S·萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002
[76]冯云廷.城市公共服务体制:理论探索与实践[M].中国财政经济出版社,2004
[77]傅平,谢华,张天柱等.完全成本水价与我国的水价改革[J].中国给水排水,2003(10)
[78]傅涛、陈吉宁、张丽珍.城市水业市场化的认识误区与政府角色[J].中国给水排水,2004(1)
[79]【美】G·J·斯蒂格勒.产业组织与政府管制[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996
[80]共用事业改革:深圳的探索与争议[EB].http://www.ccppp.org/ ,2005-7-8
[81]郭剑.水价理论与定价方法研究—重庆市主城区供水价格建议[D].硕士学位论文,重庆大学,2003
[82]郭粤.梅湖北省城市供水现状及发展研究[D].硕士学位论文,武汉理工大学,2002
[83]郭小聪:《政府经济学》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[84]高培勇、崔军.公共部门经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[85]高弋绢.法国水展望[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社科版),2002(4)
[86]高娟、李贵宝.最新颁布实施的《城市供水水质标准》的特点[J].中国水利,2005(15)
[87]耿爱先.自然垄断管制与放松—对我国自来水行业制度变迁的研究[D].硕士学位论文,华南师范大学.2001
[88]国家环保总局环境与经济政策研究中心.我国城市环境基础设施建设与运营市场化问题调研报告[R].2003-3-24
[89]霍衍杰.关于城市公用事业市场化产业化的思考[J].中国建设报,2003(4)
[90]何孝星.加快推进我国经营性公用事业民营化问题研究[J].经济学动态,2003(10)
[91]何清.我国城市供水产业市场化模式研究[D].硕士学位论文,石油大学,2001
[92]胡鞍钢、王绍光、周建民.国家制度建设[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003
[93]柯武刚、史漫飞.制度经济学[M].上海:商务印书馆,2001
[94]黄文夫.民营在中国[M].北京:中国城市出版社,2003
[95]黄继忠.自然垄断与规制:理论与经验[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004
[96]黄继忠、曲文较.自然垄断与规制:理论和经验[M].经济科学出版社,2004
[97]黄少军、何华权.政府经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1998
[98]黄永强.供水企业的运营模式及其公益性[J].业内视界,2002(9)
[99]姜文来.水资源价值论[M].北京科学出版社,1999
[100]蒋泽中.企业收购与兼并[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004
[101]加快民营经济健康发展研究课题组.中国民营经济发展前沿问题研究(2003——2004)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003
[102]建设部副部长仇保兴.在城乡污水处理与安全供水及第二次城镇水务发展国际研讨会新闻发布会上的讲话[Z]. 2007-07- 27
[103]建设部课题组.中国城市基础设施投融资体制改革研究报告[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002
[104]建设部城建司明确城市水业市场新改革监管[EB].http: //www, ccppp. Org,2005-04-l4
[105]李鹏.新公共管理及应用[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004
[106]李腾.向水工业进军[N].北京:光明日报,2000-06-02
[107]李长兴、赵彬彬、常爱敏.强化政府监督职能全面提高城市供水水质[J].水利发展研究,2004(6)
[108]李仕林.论我国城市污水处理的市场体制[J].城市管理与科技,2004(2)
[109]李晶、王新义、贺骥.英国和德国水环境治理模式鉴析[J].水利发展研究,2004(1)
[110]李贵宝,周怀东,刘晓茹.我国生活饮用水水质标准发展趋势及特点[J].中国水利,2005(9)
[111]李永康.四川瑞云集团经营邛崃市公用事业的案例分析[EB]. www.ccppp.org,2005-02-10
[112]李霞.自然垄断产业治理模式构想[J].经济体制改革,2005(1)
[113]林家园、陶小马.对阶梯式计量水价的认识与思考[J].价格理论与实践,2004(2):52-53
[114]吕松.我国城市水行业私人部门投资现状及问题[J].研究与探索,2004(9)
[115]吕守军.日本自来水定价方法变迁及对我国的启示[J].外国经济与管理, 2004(12):26-29
[116]刘戒骄.垄断产业改革一基于网络视角的分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005
[117]刘小兵.政府规制的经济分析[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2004
[118]刘戒骄.城市公用事业的放松管制与管制改革[J].改革,2000(6)
[119]刘世庆.加入WTO与城市供水产业竞争化改革[J].改革,2002(4)
[120]娄成武、尹涛.论政府在公共服务民营化中的作用[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2003(5)
[121]垄断性行业的政府管制问题研究课题组.垄断性行业的政府管制问题研究[J].经济研究参考,2003(25)
[122]毛飞.公用事业民营化需政府良好规制[N].南方都市报,2004-02-10
[123]毛寿龙.公共政策与有限政府[N].21世纪经济报道,2003-12-27
[124]茅于轼.公用事业的收费标准[J].改革,1998(2):63-65
[125]迈克尔麦金尼斯.多中心体制与地方公共经济[M].上海:上海三联书店出版社,2000
[126]【美】N·格里高利·曼昆.宏观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
[127]南水北调城市水资源规划组.南水北调城市水资源规划简[EB].2003-04-23, http://www.South-to-North water Transfer
[128]欧文·E·休斯.公共管理导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001
[129]【美】平狄克、鲁宾费尔德.微观经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000
[130]【美】乔治·斯蒂格勒.人民与国家—管制经济学论文集[C].台北市:远流出版事业股份有限公司,1991
[131]钱颖一.现代经济学与中国经济改革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
[132]钱易等主编.水工业与可持续发展[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998
[133]邱卫东.跨国水务抢占中国市场概述[J].城乡建设,2001 (7)
[134]秦虹.市政公用事业改革为城市发展注入活力[J].城市发展研究,2003(1)
[135]秦饪慧、张丽霞.我国生活饮用水水质卫生规范简介[J].环境与健康,2002(19)
[136]丘健雄、张晓慧.公私合营(PPP)与中国[N].北京:建筑时报,2005-03-10
[137]丘健雄、张晓慧.公私合营(PPP)与私人融资计划(PFI)背后的经济学原因[N].北京:建筑时报,2005-02-03
[138]清华大学水业政策研究中心.清华水业蓝皮书[EB].中国水网,2004—2006
[139]清华大学水业政策研究中心.城市水业市场研究[EB].中国水网,2004—2006
[140]清华水业蓝皮书(系列之四)一城市水业的BOT及其法律问题[R].清华大学水业政策研究中心,2004-07
[141]任俊生.中国公用产品价格管制[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2002
[142]【美】R·科斯、A·阿尔钦、D·诺斯等.财产权利与制度变迁一制度学派与新制度学派译文集[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2003
[143]施波涛.谁来分享公用事业市场这块大“蛋糕”[N].市场报,2003-01-15
[144]自来水规划总院.赴法国水资源规划与管理培训考察报告[J].水利技术监督,2003(3)
[145]水利部水资源司.城市水务市场化改革调研[J].中国水利,2004(15)
[146]沈大军等.水价理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,1999
[147]盛洪.公用事业民营化“不禁止,则自由”[EB].http://www.ccppp.org 2004-1-19
[148]盛代林.政府在水资源统一管理中的角色定位—深圳水资源管理若干问题探讨[J].中国水利,2004(05)
[149]唐娟.英国水行业政府监管模式的改革[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(4)
[150]唐平、董瑛.“BOT”供水工程带动地方经济发展[N].黑龙江日报,2001- 2 -15
[151]调整改革思路,促进企业发展—沈阳市自来水公司[EB].2004年,中国水务网
[152]谭章荣.城市供排水的一体化管理[J].中国给水排水,2001(1)
[153]温桂芳、钟玉秀.我国水价形成机制和管理制度深化改革研究—深化水价改革:进程与问题[J].价格理论与实践,2004(12)
[154]我国城市污水处理滞后局面没有根本扭转[N].人民日报,2006-08-23
[155]武亚军.可持续发展型的水资源定价:边际机会成本方法与一个动态定价模型[J].经济科学,1999(1):75-79
[156]王雅莉、毕乐强.公共规制经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005年版
[157]王宇光等.关于自来水价格管理问题的思考[J].中国物价,2002(6)
[158]王志飞.对我国城市供水价格改革的思考[J].改革与发展,2004(2)
[159]王浩等.面向可持续发展的水价理论与实践[M].科学出版社,2003
[160]王元京.民营经济与国有经济互补关系研究[J].经济研究参考,2004(53)
[161]王万山.浅议国外的水权交易与水权市场[J].水利经济,2004(4)
[162]王俊豪、周小梅.中国自然垄断行业民营化改革与政府规制政策[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004
[163]王俊豪.中国政府规制体制改革研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999
[164]王俊豪.政府规制经济学导论[M].上海:商务印书馆,2003
[165]王俊豪.英国政府规制体制改革研究[M].上海:上海三联书店,1998
[166]汪恕诚.水权与水市场[J].中国水利,2000(11)
[167]汪晶.Q3-BAC组合工艺对黄浦江微污染原水的净化效果研究[D].硕士学位论文,同济大学,2005
[168]肖绍雍.论城镇供水行业面临的机遇与挑战[J].城镇供水,2003(2):27
[169]肖云.城市基础设施建设相关领域国有企业改革[J].改革,2002(3)
[170]肖兴志.自然垄断产业规制改革模式研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2003
[171]谢华,张天柱.公共供水定价方法分析[J].给水排水,2001(27)
[172]夏大慰、史东辉等.政府规制—理论、经验与中国的改革[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[173]薛梅、冯玉春.日本的自来水价格及水价制度面临的新课题[J].水利经济,2004(1)
[174]于良春等.自然垄断与政府规制一基本理论与政策分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003
[175]于立、于左.美国收益率规制与英国价格上限规制的比较[J].产业经济研究,2003 (2)
[176]喻弼群.城市供水价格管理问题之我见[J].大家谈,2004 (10)
[177]俞建德.谁动了我的“BOT”[M].中国建筑工业出版社,2002
[178]杨耕.深圳水务改革现状分析[J].特区经济,2002(2)
[179]杨君昌、曾学军.公共定价理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002
[180]杨重光.城市基础设施建设和管理产业化的几个理论问题[J].上海城市发展,2000(1)
[181]余晖.政府与企业:从宏观管理到微观管制[M].福州:福建人民出版社,1997
[182]庸娟.英国水行业政府监管模式的改革[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(4)
[183]【日】植草益.朱绍文、潘振民等译.微观规制经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社、中国发展出版社,1992
[184]【日】植草益.《产业组织论》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:31
[185]政府、私企如何面对城市水行业的发展[EB].http://www.h2o-china.com. 2005-04-18
[186]中国行政管理学会深化行政改革课题组.深化行政管理体制改革的理论与实践[J].中国行政管理,2003(3)
[187]中国水网.2003水业十大新闻揭晓[EB]. http://202.97.173.162/sw/zhxwl.htm,2004-01-18
[188]邹建锋.水务市场化:政府与市场如何跳好“双人舞”[N].中国经济时报,2003-10-14
[189]周耀东.不对称信息与激励性规制选择[J].经济评论,2004(2):34-37
[190]周继秀.民营企业的“未来水世界”[J].财经界,2003(11)
[191]周林军.公用事业规制要论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004
[192]周芬棉.行政性垄断何去何从[N].法制日报,2001-04-01
[193]周学荣.论政府规制[N].光明日报,2004-04-27
[194]周勤.转型时期公用产品定价中的多重委托—代理关系研究[J].管理世界,2004(2):43-49
[195]周小梅.关于自来水管制价格形成机制改革的思考[J].价格月刊,2001(6)
[196]张子鹏.公共产品:法治之基—特许经营立法破局[N].21世纪经济报道,2003-12-27
[197]张昕竹.中国供水与污水处理业的规制改革与发展.中国基础设施产业管制改革与发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版,2000
[198]张昕竹.中国规制与竞争:理论和政策[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[199]张昕竹.供水和污水处理业的技术经济特征[N].中国建设报,2003-08-01
[200]张昕竹、拉丰、安·易斯塔什.网络产业:规制与竞争理论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[201]张刚、米大鹏、余向荣.缺水条件下北京水市场构建与水价形成机制[J].中国水利,2004(13)
[202]张极井.项目融资[M].北京:中信出版社,2003
[203]张钢.公共管理学引论[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003
[204]朱自强.南京市发展市政公用经济的三大战略[J].上海城市发展,2000(2)
[205]朱新力、宋华琳、胡敏洁等.现代行政法学与政府规制[N].法制日报,2005-03-17
[206]朱光磊.当代中国政府过程[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1997
[207]朱柏铭.公共部门经济学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2003
[208]朱柏铭.公共经济学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2002
[209]朱月海.浅述城市供水与国际先进水平接轨[J].给水排水,2004,30(11)
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |