摘要
本文对企业专利质量做了较深入的分析,提出了专利质量的概念界定并构建了专利质量的概念模型,围绕着这一新概念进行解构,根据专利质量的三个构成要素,对企业专利产出效率进行了一系列探讨。
(1)在参考综合了大量有关专利质量概念的各学派观点后,本文提出了新的专利质量概念,并建立了概念模型。本文认为,专利质量是指专利的一组关于专利独占属性满足要求的程度。
(2)对专利质量进行了测度,在分析了专利质量测度的意义和必要性后,从法律、技术、产业、市场等方面分析了专利质量的影响因素,提出了对专利质量的组合评价的方法,建立了评价指标体系,并构建了评价模型。
(3)对企业专利产出机理进行了分析,并分析了企业专利产出的影响因素,建立了企业专利产出效率的数学模型和企业专利产出行为的数理模型。
(4)对专利质量与企业专利产出效率的相关性分析进行了分析,并探讨了专利长度和专利宽度最优组合问题,分析了专利质量内部支持因素R&D投入与企业专利产出效率的相关性。
(5)从专利生产溢出效应的成因和特征分析、企业专利生产中的溢出效应对专利研发投入(R&D)影响分析、基于专利质量测度的企业专利产出溢出效应分析三方面讨论了基于专利质量测度的企业专利产出溢出效应问题。
(6)根据前面几章的研究结果,提出了基于专利质量测度的企业专利产出效率优化对策。
Acts of patent applications in the 1960s in the latter part of a structural adjustment, the adjustment is characterized by: the number of patent applications decreased at the same time, a significant increase in patent quality. Obviously this is not due to the invention into the cause of the reduction, which is an attempt by the countries of the world "more patent" to "higher-quality patents," the result of the transition, which the patent race theory and research results of the match, the patent race , The quality of patents than the number of patents is more important.
The number of patents in China has reached a certain height, but the lower the quality of patents so that the patent lack of market value. Competition in the market to competition from capital deepening and technological competition of the world economic environment, low-quality patents have become the Chinese to improve the international competitiveness of the bottleneck.
This is indeed the real pressure, the paper-to-business patent quality has done a more in-depth analysis of patent quality and to define the concept of constructing a model of the concept of quality of patents around this new concept of deconstruction, according to the patent quality of three Constitutes an element of a patent on the output efficiency of the enterprise carried out a series to explore.
1. In reference to a combination of a large number of patents related to the concept of quality of the school's point of view, the paper proposes a new concept of the quality of patents and established a conceptual model. This article holds that patent quality is the patent on a set of attributes to meet the requirements of the patent monopoly. It includes:①to meet a group of users and other stakeholders of the requirements of the properties;②patent quality characteristics through technology, process or system design and development process and to achieve the formation of the properties;③is to meet the requirements to meet the explicit (such as patent Contract, patent norms, standards for patents, patents, patent document, patent drawings of well-defined), usually hidden (such as corporate patent production process, practices, etc.) or to be performed (for example, the patent system, patent laws and regulations, trade rules ) The needs and aspirations;④customers and other stakeholders on the patent quality is dynamic, development and relative.
And that the patent should be the quality of 3 elements:①also known as the length of the patent life of the patent or patent protection period, the patent refers to the length of the protected by law, are usually adopted by the government to clear the Patent Law, which for inventors and innovators to That the length of the patent is a constant, usually the same;②width of the patent, referring to the new patent covered areas, the greater the width of the patents, patent rights in the area covered by the more widely, will be able to prevent the invention in other To be free of charge in the field of application;③a high degree of patents, patent rights is the technical elements of the patent refers to the technology, patent novelty, creativity and practicality, which constitute the core of the technical quality of the patent. In this paper, which established the concept of three-dimensional quality of patent models, and this constitutes the three elements of the analysis of the elements.
2. Patent on the quality of the measure in the analysis of the patent quality of the significance and necessity of the measure, legal, technology, industry, in areas such as market analysis of the factors that affect the quality of patents, a patent on the combination of quality evaluation methods The establishment of the evaluation index system, and build a model of evaluation and test the quality of patent-assisted methods - patented technology life cycle analysis, the estimated number of patent law, the law icon, TCT calculated and analyzed to establish evidence.
3. Patent output from the characteristics of the core businesses and enhance the competitiveness of the effect of the patent output of the business model of power mechanism, the corporate Patents output of the process of analysis, enterprise patent output of the dissipation characteristics of the non-proliferation and balanced analysis, Enterprise patent output behavior analysis of the nonlinear dynamics of these aspects of the enterprise patent output mechanism analysis; analysis of the patent output of the macro-business policies, the patent system, intranet, extranet factors, and the establishment of enterprises Patent output mathematical model of efficiency and corporate patent output mathematical model of behavior.
4. On the quality of patents and patent output efficiency analysis of the relevance of an analysis from the quality of patents constitute the three elements, using the model of Nordhaus and Scherer's geometric theory to explain the length of patents and patent output efficiency of the enterprise The correlation analysis; innovative use of dynamic competition model, a patent production of dynamic business model competition and the breadth of patents and patent output efficiency of the business relevance of the analysis; application Granger Causality Test and EG co-integration test Quantitative Analysis of the patent and a high degree of business efficiency of the patent output of relevance, and to explore the length of patents and patent the optimal combination of the width of the problem, finally, an analysis of the quality of patent internal factors to support R & D input and output efficiency of the enterprise patent related to each other.
5. Spillover effects from the patent production of the causes and characteristics of the analysis of corporate patents in the production of the spillover effects of R & D patent (R & D) impact analysis, based on the patent measure the quality of corporate patent output analysis of the spillover effects on three patents based on the quality measure The output of business patent issues spillover effects.
6. According to the earlier chapters of the findings, based on the quality of patent patent output measure of business efficiency optimization measures should be patented enterprise output goals and strategies to optimize the system, the patent output of the organizational structure of enterprises and system optimization, enterprise patent production Process optimization, business intelligence patent output support technology development and applications.
引文
1黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
1黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
1黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
1黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
2张玉台等中国知识产权战略转型与对策中国发展出版社2008 8
1张玉台等中国知识产权战略转型与对策中国发展出版社2008 8
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1江镇华实用专利教程知识产权出版社2006 4
2宋运郊企业技术信息工作——专利与技术贸易山东教育出版社1995.6
1江镇华实用专利教程知识产权出版社2006 4
1王瑜王晓丰公司知识产权管理法律出版社2007 11
1王晋刚张铁军专利化生存知识产权出版社2005.5
1宋运郊企业技术信息工作——专利与技术贸易山东教育出版社1995.6
1宋运郊企业技术信息工作——专利与技术贸易山东教育出版社1995.6
1宋运郊企业技术信息工作——专利与技术贸易山东教育出版社1995.6
2陈昌柏知识产权经济学北京大学出版社2003.11
1陈昌柏知识产权经济学北京大学出版社2003.11
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
2刘林青谭力文国外“专利悖论”研究综述—从专利竞赛到专利组合竞赛外国经济与管理2005年4月
1刘林青谭力文国外“专利悖论”研究综述—从专利竞赛到专利组合竞赛外国经济与管理2005年4月
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
2杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1胡佐超企业专利管理北京理工大学出版社2008.9
1蔡莉等科技型企业创生机理及绩效评价吉林人民出版社2006.12
1李建蓉专利信息与利用知识产权出版社2006.9
1郭咸纲企业创新驱动模式清华大学出版社2005.5
1郭咸纲企业创新驱动模式清华大学出版社2005.5
1陈功玉企业技术创新行为非线性系统的动力学分析系统工程2005.12
2吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
1吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
1吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
2郭咸纲企业创新驱动模式清华大学出版社2005.5
1汪同三等技术市场商务印书馆1997.1
1葛仁良魏雪君广东专利投入产出效率的实证分析统计与决策2005.3
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
1吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
1李宜昭,郑冰梅专利制度之经济学分析北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) 2005.6
1潘士远最优专利制度研究经济研究2005.12
1周寄中,张黎,汤超颖专利制度的效率分析中国软科学2006.1
1鲁志国R&D投资作用于技术创新的传导机制分析深圳大学学报2005.9
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
1杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
1冯晓青企业知识产权战略知识产权出版社2008.3
1黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
1冯晓青企业知识产权战略知识产权出版社2008.3
1侯延香基于SWOT分析法的企业专利战略制定情报科学2007.1
2马一德中国企业知识产权战略商务印书馆2006.11
1马一德中国企业知识产权战略商务印书馆2006.11
1胡佐超企业专利管理北京理工大学出版社2008.9
1胡佐超企业专利管理北京理工大学出版社2008.9
1胡佐超企业专利管理北京理工大学出版社2008.9
1翟东升王明吉等基于专利地图和Multi-Agent思想的专利分析系统构建情报学报2006.6
[1]中国科学院.科学发展报告(2001)[M],北京;科学出版社,2001:16
[2]中华人民共和国科学技术部.国际科学技术发展报告(2004)[M],北京:科学出版社,2004:4
[3]中华人民共和国科学技术部.国际科学技术发展报告(2006)[M],北京:科学出版社,2006:113
[4]中华人民共和国科学技术部.国际科学技术发展报告(2004)[M],北京:科学出版社,2004:119
[5] Scotchmer , S. ,“On the Optimality of the Patent System”, RAND Journal of Economics , 1999 , 30 , pp. 181—196.
[6] Schumpeter , Joseph A. , Capitalism , Socialism and Democracy , New York : Harper , 1992.
[7]薛学通.标准战争与知识产权[J]2006(8):64-65
[8]高山行,戴荣.弗得伯格模型与我国企业专利竞赛策略[J],研究与发展管理,2002(5):29-33
[9]历宁.国家专利发展战略概念辨析[J]知识产权,2003(3):12-16
[10]陆新明.专利战略定义研究[J],知识产权,1996(5):17-20
[11]刘林青等.专利丛林、专利组合和专利联盟:从专利战略到专利群战略[J],研究与发展管理,2006(4):83-89
[12]Langinier C, Moschini G. The econom ics of patents: An overview[R].Iowa: Iowa State University Working Paper 02-WP293.2002.
[13]Pitkethly R H. Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: Patent licehsing decisions and leaming opportunities[J],Research Policy,2001,30:425-442
[14]Scherer F M.Nordhaus? theory of optimal patent life: A geometric reinterpretation[J],American Economic Review,1972,62:422-427
[15]刘林青等.为研发而申请专利还是为专利申请而研发[J],中国工业经济,2006(7):86-93
[16]Ahapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting[A].Massachusetts MIT Press,2001
[17]hall B H, Ziedonis R M. The paradox revisited: An empinical study of pateting in the semi conductor industry,1979~1995[J],RAND Joumal of Economics, 2001,32(1):101-128
[18]Wangner P R, Parchomovsky G Patentportfolios[R],Pennsylvania:school of Law and University of Pennsylvania,2004
[19]Kortum, S and J Lerner. Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting? [R],Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Pubic Policy,1998,48:247-304
[20]Gleen C Loury, Market sutucture and innovation[J],Quarterly Journal of Economics,1979,93(3):395-410
[21]Tom Lee, Louis L Wilde, Market structure and innovation: A reformulation[J],Quarterly Journal of Economics,1980,94(2):429-436
[22]Fudenberg D, Tirole J. et al Preernption, leapfogging and competition in atent r ace[J], European Economic Review, 1983,22(2)3-31
[23]Fudenberg D, Tirole J.Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology[J], Review of Economic Studies LII, 1985,383?01
[24]Rivette K G, Kline D. Disodvening hidden value in intellectual property[J],Harvard Business Review, 2000,78(1):54-66
[25]国家统计局编.工业企业科技活动统计资料[M],北京:中国统计出版社,2006:407
[26]古利平等.专利与R&D资源:中国创新的投入产出分析[J],管理工程学报,2006(1):147-151
[27]Kortum Samuel. Equilibrium R&D and the patern-R&D ratio: U.S.evidence[J].The American Economic Riview, 1993,83:450-457
[28]Evenson. R. E. Patents, R&D, and invention potential: International evidencd[J]. The American Economic Riview, 1993,83:463-468
[29]Lehmann, N. V. Age and achievement[M].Princeton, New Jersey. 1953
[30]Stephan, P., &Levin, S. Age and the Nobel prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28,1993(3):387-399
[31]Messeri, E(1988).Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonrics. Social Studies of Science, 18:101-121
[32]tewart, J.A.(1986).Drifting continents and colliding paradigms: A quantitative application of the interests perspective. Social Studies of Science, 16:261-279
[33]Romer , Paul M. ,“Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy , 1990a , 98 , pp. s71—s102.
[34]Scherer , F. M. ,“Nordhausp Theory of Optimal Patent Life : A Geometric Reinterpretation”, American Economic Review , 1972 , 62 , pp.422—427.
[35]张仲梁.日本企业技术积累研究[D],南开大学博士论文,1993
[36]陈德智等.上海市R&D人力资源投入现状与发展趋势分析报告[R],上海市科学技术委员会,2006.11
[37]Nesvetailov, G.A. The aging of research personnel[M], Knowledge & Policy, 9,1996,(4):17
[38]Dennis, M. Vanations in productivity among creative workers. Scientific Monthly[J],1955,80:277-278
[39][美]约翰·邓布尔顿著.高技术研究与发展的管理[M],北京:中国科学技术出版社,1989:138-155
[40]陈乐天编著.现代企业技术进步管理[M],上海:立信会计出版社,1997:226~227
[41]Sternberg. R. J. Suvances in the psychology of human intelligence, Hillsadale, NJ:Erlbaum. 1989,157-188
[42]Feldhusen, J. F. Creativity: a know ledge base, metacognitive sk ills, and personality facto rs. Journal of creative Behavio r.1995,(4):225~268
[43]M ednice, S. A. The associative basis of the creative process Psycho logical Review, 1982,69:200~232
[44]庄寿强,戎志毅著.普通创造学[M],中国矿业大学出版社,1997:61-62
[45]袁锁鸿.科技进步与科技人才素质结构初探[J],科学学研究,1989(4):71-75
[46]曾国屏,谭文华.国际研发和基础研究强度的发展轨迹及其启示[J].科学学研究,2003,(2):154-156
[47]谭文华等. R&D强度的“S”曲线与实现我国投入稳定增长的若干思考[J],中国软科学,2005(1):94-98
[48]葛仁良,魏雪君.广东专利投入产出效率的实证分析[J],统计与决策,2005(3):108-109
[49]鲁志国. R&D投资作用于技术创新的传导机制分析[J],深圳大学学报(社科版),2005(5):25-28
[50]窦艳,师萍.基于DEA的企业R&D投入绩效分析[J],工业技术经济,2006(5):63-65
[51]陈恒,陈伟.基于DEA的中外跨国公司研发效率比较分析[J],科技进步与对策,2005(8):7-9
[52]张承谦,张佩,陈利建.中外企业(R&D)投入和产出的比较研究[J],研究与发展管理,2000(4):31-35
[53]孙婷婷,唐五湘.专利申请量与R&D支出之关系的定量分析[J]北京机械工业学院学报,2003(4):47-52
[54]Klaus Wdea, Ulrich Woitekb., R&D expenditure in G7 countries and the implications for endogenous fluctuations and growth[J],Economics Letters,2004,82:91.7
[55]Performance and R&D expenditures in American and Japanese manufacturing firms[J],INT. J. PROD. RES.,1997,35,(12):3333-3348
[56]王学武.美国研究开发投资研究及启示[J],世界科技研究与发展,1999(2):97-101
[57]Griliches.Z. R&D and the Productivity slowdown[J],The American Economic Review, 1980,70(2):343-348
[58]Romer. P. M. Endogenous Technological change[J],Journal of political Economy, 1990,98:71-102
[59]Thorvaldur Gylfason. Principles of Economic Growth[M],London Oxford Univeersity Press,1999
[60]盛昭瀚等.企业RD投入动态竞争系统的全局复杂性分析[J],管理科学学报,2006(3):1-10
[61]陈功玉.企业技术创新行为非线性系统的动力学分析[J],系统工程,2005(12):74-78
[62]Aghion, P. Howitt, P, Research and development in the growth process[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 1996.1:49.3
[63]Atsushi Kato. Market structure and the allocation of R&D expenditures[J],Economics Letters, 2005,87:55.9
[64]陈功玉,闵晓平.研究与开发投入的博弈分析[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2002(5):107-110
[65]冯晓青企业知识产权战略知识产权出版社2008.3
[66]侯审香.基于SWOT分析法的企业专利战略制定[J].情报科学,2007,(1).
[67]马一德中国企业知识产权战略商务印书馆2006.11
[68]Romer,P.M.Endogenous Technological Change[J].Journal ofPolitical Economy,1990,Vo1.98 Issue 5 part 2,71—102.
[69]Thorvaldur Gylfason.Principles of Economic Growth[M].Lon—don:Oxford University Press,1 999.
[70]RosenbergNathan.Perspectives on Technology[M].New york: Cambridge University Press,1976.58-125.
[71]朱斌,李东.EIS的研究和实践:现状及问题[J].计算机系统应用,2002,(2):3—5.
[72]陈伟达.批发商业企业EIS可开发[J].系统工程,1997,9:57—60.
[73]李怀祖.决策理论导引[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1993
[74]Watsoll H J,Rainer R k,Kuhn C E.Executive Information Systems:A Framework for De.velopment and a Survey of Current Practices[J].MIS Quarterly。1991,(1):1—5.
[75]Denicolò, Vincenzo ,“Patent Races and Optimal Patent Breadth and Length”, Journal of Industrial Economic , 1996 , 44 , pp. 249—265.
[76]Dixit , Avinash and Joseph E. Stiglitz ,“Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, American Economic Review , 1977 , 67 ,
[77]Gilbert , Richard and Carl Shapiro ,“Optimal Patent Length and Breadth”, RAND Journal of Economics , 1990 , 21 , pp. 106—112.
[78]Goh , Ai2Ting and Jacques Oliver ,“Optimal Patent Protection in a Two2Sector Economy”, International Economic Review , 2002 , 43 , pp.1191—1214.
[79]Grossman , Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman , Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy , Cambridge , MA: MIT Press , 1991a.
[80]Hopenhayn , Hugo and Matthew F. Mitchell ,“Innovation Variety and Patent Breadth”, RAND Journal of Economics , 2001 , 32 , pp. 152—166.
[81]Judd , Kenneth L. ,“On the Performance of Patents”, Econometrica , 1985 , 53 , pp. 567—585.
[82]Klemperer , Paul ,“How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be ?”, RAND Journal of Economics , 1990 , 21 , pp. 113—130.
[83]Matutes , Carmen , Pieree Regibeau and Katharine Rockett ,“Optimal Patent Design and the Diffusion of Innovation”, RAND Journal of Economics , 1996 , 27 , pp. 60—83.
[84]Jaffe. Adam B. The U. S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process[J].Research Policy,2000,29:531-557
[85]Groshby. Mark. Patents, innovation and growth[J].EconomiC Record, 2000,76:255-262
[86]Guellec. Dominique, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. The internalization of technology analysed with patent data[J]. Research Policy, 2001,30:1253-1266
[87]Abraham. Biju Paul, Moitra. SOumyo D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis[J]. Research Policy,2001,30:1253-1266
[88]Waterson. Michael. The Economics of Product Patents[J].The American Economic Review, 1990,80:860-869
[89]Griliches. Zvi. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1990,28:1661-1707
[90]Groshby. Mark. Patents, innovation and growth[J].EconomiC Record,2000,76:255~262
[91]Griliches, Z. Productivity, R&D and basic research at firm level in the 1970s.American Economic Review, 1986,76,1:141.54
[92]Goto, A. and Suzuki, K. R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989,71,4,555.64
[93]Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1991)The impact of R&D investment on productivity: new evidence using linked R&D RD data. Economic Inquiry,29,2,203.29.
[94]Sakurai, N., Papaconstantinou, G. and Ioannidis, E.(1997)Impact of R&D and technology diffusion on productivity growth: empirical evidence for 10 OECD countries. Economic Systems Research, 9,1,81.10.
[95]Hanel, P. (2000) R&D ,inter-industry and international technology spillovers and total factor productivity growth of manufacturing industries in Canada,1974?988. Economic Systems Research,12,3,345.61
[96]Los, B. and Verspagen, B. (2000) R&D spillovers and productivity: evidence from US manufacturing micro data. Empirical Economics, 25,1,127.48.
[97]Wakelin, K(2001)Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 30,1079.090
[98]Kuen-Hung Tsai and Jiann-Chyuan Wang. The R&D performance in Taiwan electronics industry: a longitudinal examination[J], R&D Management,2004,34,2,179-189
[99]Luis Diaz-Balteiro, A Casimiro Herruzo. An analysis of productive efficiency and innovation activity using DEA: An application to Spain wood-based industry[J],Forest Policy and Economics8(2006)762.773
[100]H. C. Co and K. S. Chew. Performance and R&D expenditures in American and Japanese manufacturing firms[J], INT.J.PROD.RES.,35,1997,12:3333-3348
[101]Luis Diaz-Balteiro, A. Casimiro Herruzo, Margarita Martinez, Jacinto Gonzalez-Pachon. An analysis of productive efficiency and innovation activity using DES: An application to Spain wood-based industry[J],Forest Policy and Economics8(2006)762.773.
[102]赵敏.科技投入产出的DEA评价模型[J],科技管理研究,2006(6):90-93
[103]许治,师萍.基于DES方法的我国科技投入相对效率评价[J],科学学研究。2005(5):63-65
[104]窦艳,师萍.基于DES的企业R&D投入绩效分析[J],工业技术经济,2005(5):63-65
[105]时鹏将,许晓雯,蔡虹.R&D投入产出效率的DEA分析[J],科学学与科学技术管理,2004(1):28-30
[106]韩兆洲,王斌等. R&D投入产出效益研究[J],统计与预测,2003(2):17-20
[107]李双杰等.基于DEA模型的制造业技术创新资源配置效率分析[J],工业技术经济,2006(3):112-115
[108]古利平等.专利与R&D资源:中国创新的投入产出分析[J],管理工程学报,2006(1):147-151
[109]徐琼.技术效率与前沿面理论评述[J],财经论丛,2005(2):29-34
[110]王五祥,刘冰.基于PLS的R&D投入效果的实证分析[J],西北农林科技大学学报(社科),2005(6):41-46
[111]Eric C. Wang. R&Defficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach[J], Journal of Policy Modeling(2007)
[112]Sung Yeung K wack, Young Sun Lee. Analyzing the Korea growth experience: The application of R&D and human capital based[J], Journal of Asian Economics17(2006)818.31
[113]王五祥,刘冰.基于MGM(1,n)的R&D投入测试分析[J],2005(增刊):93-96
[114]冯春娟等.哈尔滨海格集团技术创新经费优化结构研究[J],哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005(12):1715-1176
[115]Griliches. Z. R&D, Patents, and Productivity[C]. Chicago: University of Chicago press,1984
[116]Pakes. A. Patent, R&D, and the stock market rates of return[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1985,93:390-409
[117]Evenson. R. International invention: implications for technology market analysis[A]. R&D, Patent, and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1984:89~123.
[118]John M. Hartwick. Patent race optimal with respect to entry[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1991,9(2):197-207
[119][韩]金麟洙著.从模仿到创新:韩国技术学习的动力[M],北京:新化出版社,1998.
[120]Klemperer,P..How Broad Should the Scope of A Patent Be?[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1990,(21):113—130.
[121]Matutes,C., P.Regibeau,and K.Roekett.Optimal Pa—tent Design and the Diffusion of Innovations[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1996。(27):60—83.
[122]黄贤涛等专利战略管理诉讼法律出版社2008 6
[123]张玉台等中国知识产权战略转型与对策中国发展出版社2008 8
[124]高山行等企业专利竞赛理论与策略科学出版社2005.6
[125]王瑜王晓丰公司知识产权管理法律出版社2007 11
[126]江镇华实用专利教程知识产权出版社2006 4
[127]宋运郊企业技术信息工作——专利与技术贸易山东教育出版社1995.6
[128]王晋刚张铁军专利化生存知识产权出版社2005.5
[129]陈昌柏知识产权经济学北京大学出版社2003.11
[130]刘林青谭力文国外“专利悖论”研究综述—从专利竞赛到专利组合竞赛外国经济与管理2005年4月
[131]Denicolo V. The optimal life of a patent when the timing of innovation is stochastic.International Journal of Industrial Organization,1999,17:827~846
[132]胡佐超企业专利管理北京理工大学出版社2008.9
[133]杨武技术创新与产权清华大学出版社1999.11
[134]李建蓉专利文献与信息知识产权出版社2002.6
[135]陈向东国际技术转移的理论与实践北京航空航天大学出版社2008.1
[136]蔡莉等科技型企业创生机理及绩效评价吉林人民出版社2006.12
[137]李建蓉专利信息与利用知识产权出版社2006.9
[138]郭咸纲企业创新驱动模式清华大学出版社2005.5
[139]吴欣望专利经济学社会科学文献出版社2005.5
[140]邱登科:《知识产权:风险投资决策的新要素》,《中国知识产权报》,2002.12.18
[141]吴欣望:《日美专利制度的差异及经济绩效分析》,《科技与管理》,2003年第5期。
[142]马秀山:《提高专利收费:非关税壁垒形式》,《中国企业报》,2002年8月19日。
[143]陈功玉企业技术创新行为非线性系统的动力学分析系统工程2005.12
[144]汪同三等技术市场商务印书馆1997.1
[145]葛仁良魏雪君广东专利投入产出效率的实证分析统计与决策2005.3
[146]李宜昭,郑冰梅专利制度之经济学分析北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版) 2005.6
[147]潘士远最优专利制度研究经济研究2005.12
[148]周寄中,张黎,汤超颖专利制度的效率分析中国软科学2006.1
[149]翟东升王明吉等基于专利地图和Multi-Agent思想的专利分析系统构建情报学报2006.6
[150]Ove Granstrand, The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2000.
[151]Griliches,Z.R&D and the Productivity slowdown [J].TheAmerican Economic Review,May,1980,Vo1.70,No.2,343—348.
[152]鲁志国R&D投资作用于技术创新的传导机制分析深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版) 2005年9月
[153]Nordhaus , W. D. , Invention , Growth , and Welfare ; A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change , Cambridge , Mass , 1969.