用户名: 密码: 验证码:
居民收入分布及其变迁的统计研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
居民收入分布(Income Distribution)是反映居民收入和财富分配结构状态、变化趋势最重要的概念之一,是经济发展过程中收入和财富分配结果的表现,是定量研究居民收入分配问题的基础。从统计学意义上讲,居民收入分布是指不同收入水平与相应人口比重之间的统计规律或函数形式,最常见的表现形式是收入分布函数(CumulativeDistribution Function,简称CDF)和收入密度函数(Probability Density Function,简称PDF)。如果能合理估计居民收入分布,则几乎可以掌握居民收入分配的全部信息,就能清晰地描述居民收入分布的结构和规律。
     非参数统计(Non-parameter Statistics)方法可以分为传统和现代两大类。其中,传统非参数统计方法主要是基于秩的、以检验为主的非参数统计推断,需要假设居民收入服从某些分布形式,并通过非参数检验进行判断和选择。现代非参数统计方法主要是指近二三十年发展起来的非参数回归、非参数密度估计等方法。现代非参数统计方法中的核密度估计方法,能够在总体收入分布未知的情况下,尽量从数据本身来获得所需要的信息,估计居民收入分布。
     论文研究目的。针对实际研究中居民收入分布大多未知的情况,基于现代非参数统计方法中的核密度估计方法,围绕估计居民收入分布、测度居民收入分布变迁、分解影响居民收入分布变迁的因素方法进行拓展和创新,并将所有方法应用到我国实际问题研究中。具体包括:
     (1)对比研究估计居民收入分布的参数统计方法、传统非参数统计方法与现代非参数统计方法;
     (2)研究居民收入分布的现代非参数方法中核密度估计方法;
     (3)系统提出测度居民收入分布变迁的相对分布方法;
     (4)完整构建居民收入分布变迁影响因素的点分解和区间分解的非参数统计方法;
     (5)使用微观数据,对我国居民收入分布及其变迁进行实证分析。估计我国居民收入分布、测算我国居民收入分布变迁过程,定量分解影响我国居民收入分布变迁的增长因素和分配因素,分析我国居民收入分布变迁的经济意义;
     (6)将现代非参数统计方法应用到我国中等收入问题研究中。静态标准和动态标准相结合,估计我国中等收入群体比重及其变化趋势,对影响我国中等收入群体比重变化的增长因素、分配因素以及标准线变动因素进行分解和测度。
     论文理论、方法基础与创新。综合对比居民收入分布的各种估计理论和方法,分析各种估计方法的特点,分析核密度估计方法具有的不可替代的优势,提出居民收入分布核密度估计方法的改进及其步骤,在计算机上通过R语言编程实现。这部分内容构成本论文的理论和方法基础,由此形成本论文力图创新的第一个方面内容。
     论文研究重点、难点与创新。居民收入分布估计、居民收入分布变迁测度、影响收入分布变迁的因素分解等现代非参数方法研究,构成为本论文的核心内容和显著特色。其一,综合提出测度居民收入分布变迁的相对分布方法,完整阐述其经济含义。通过相对密度函数取值变化判断不同收入水平下人口比重的变动,通过相对分布函数取值变化判断不同收入区间累计人口比重的变动;其二,发现和描述了居民收入相对分布不动点现象,并在研究中加以分析运用;其三,引入补偿的居民收入密度曲线,提出影响居民收入分布变迁因素的点分解方法,构建影响不同收入区间居民比重变动的区间分解和测度方法,将影响收入分布变迁的因素分解为增长因素、分配因素和标准线变动因素三部分,既可以用来分解和测度整体收入分布变迁的影响因素,也可以用来分解和测度任何收入水平下或收入区间收入分布变迁的增长效应、分配效应和标准线变动效应,首次从方法上实现了居民收入分布变迁影响因素的静态和动态完全分解。这部分内容构成本论文的研究重点和难点,也是现代非参数统计方法在居民收入分布研究中的拓展,是本论文力图创新的第二个方面内容。
     论文实践特色与创新。使用调查的微观收入数据,将论文的所有方法用于实证分析我国居民收入分布和中等收入问题,给出比较符合实际趋势的重要解释和结论。对我国中等收入群体含义和界定标准进行系统梳理,基于中等收入群体的静态标准和动态标准,测算对中等收入群体比重,分析其变迁过程。首次动态分解、测算影响我国中等收入群体比重变动的增长因素、分配因素和标准线变动因素及各自的影响效应,给出比较符合实际情况的解释和结论。此部分内容形成本论文理论与实际相结合的实证特色,也是本论文力图创新的第三个方面内容。
Resident income distribution is one of the most important definitions which reflect the structural status and changes of income and wealth distribution in residents. It is also the basis of further quantitative researches on income distribution. In the view of Statistics, resident income distribution is law or function of the relationship between income levels and the corresponding population scale. The most common forms are the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) and Probability Density Function (PDF). If the income distributin can be estimated suitably, we can find all information about the income distribution, then find the structure and law of the distribution.
     Non-parametric statistical methods can be divided into two parts: Traditional Non-parametric Statistics and Modern Non-parametric Statistics. Basing on the rank and non-parametric statistical tests, the former mainly assumes the specific form of resident income distribution and make inferences. The latter are methods developing in the past three decades which includes non-parametric regression, nonparametric density estimation and so on. When the exact form of resident income distribution is unknown, non-parametric kernel estimation methods estimate the income distribution form basing on the information from the real data.
     Purposes of this paper are doing researches on the non-parametric methods when the income distribution is unknow. These researches include estimating the distributional form of resident income, measuring the changes of income distribution, decomposing the factors affecting the changes and applying all the methods in our country's practice. Concretely speaking, they are as followings:
     (1) Comparing and analyzing the methods of Modern Non-parametric Statistics, Parametric Statistics and Traditional non-parametric Statistics in estimating the form of resident income distribution.
     (2) Researching the non-parametric kernel estimation method and applying it to estimating the form of resident income distribution.
     (3) Presenting the relative distribution method which can measure the income distribution changes systematically.
     (4) Constructing the point and interval decomposition methods which can decompose the factors affecting the income distribution changes.
     (5) Using the real micro-data, this paper analyzes the resident income distribution in China. Mainly includes: estimating Chinese resident income distribution form, measuring its changing process, decomposing and measuring the growth effect and distribution effect which lead to the changes, analyzing the economic meanings of the changes.
     (6) Applying the modern non-parametric methods to the researches of the middle-income matters. Basing on the static and dynamic standards, this paper estimates the scale of Chinese middle-income residents; decomposes the growth effect, distribution effect and the standard effect which affect the changes of the scale.
     Theory, Methods, and Innovation: Through a comprehensive comparison to different theories and methods estimating the income distribution form, analyzing the irreplaceable advantages of non-parametric kernel estimation method; presenting the operation steps of kernel method in estimating income distribution forms and applying them in the R language software. All the above contents form the foundation of the theories and methods in this paper which constitutes the first innovation of this paper.
     Focuses, Difficulties and Innovation: Researching on the methods of estimating resident income distribution form, measuring its changes, decomposing the factors affecting the changes is the core and significant feature of this paper. First, this paper puts forward the relative distribution methods measuring the changes of income distribution and expounds its economic meanings perfectly. Through the relative distribution function and relative density function values, it measures the changes of the population scale at different income point and the cumulative population scale in different income intervals. Secondly, this paper describes the fixed points in income distribution changing process and applying this phenomenon in practical researches. Thirdly, this paper originally introduces the compensated income distribution density curve and constructs the decomposition methods. The method concludes point decomposition and range decomposition, both of which can be used to measure the overall impact of changes in income distribution. This part is not only the most important and difficult content in this paper, but also constitute the second innovation in this paper.
     Practical Characteristics and Innovation: Basing on the micro data, this paper applies the modern non-parametric methods developed in this paper to the research of the resident income distribution and the middle-income issues, giving reasonably explaination and conclusion. This paper systematically analyzes the meaning and the standards of the middle-income residents, puts forward the static and dynamic standards of their income, estimates their scale, measures the scale changes, decomposes the factors affecting the changes. This paper dynamically decomposes and measures the growth effect, distribution effect and standard effect which affect the Chinese middle-income residents for the first time and give out the explainations and conclusions consistent with the fact. This paper implements all the methods into empirical study which constitutes the third innovation.
引文
[1]I.A.Ahmad.On Multivariate Kernel Estimation for Samples from Weighted Distributions.Statistics and Probability Leters,1995,22:121-129.
    [1]例证参看:[美]L.沃塞曼著,吴喜之译.现代非参数统计,科学出版社,2008:43-44.
    [1][美]L.沃塞曼著,吴喜之译.现代非参数统计,科学出版社,2008:109。
    [1]陆学艺:《当代中国社会阶层研究报告》,2002,社会科学文献出版社出版,252-254页。
    [1]郑杭生:《中国社会结构变化趋势变化》,中国人民大学出版社,2004年第1版,57页。
    [2]郑杭生:《中国社会结构变化趋势变化》,中国人民大学出版社,2004年第1版,34页。
    [1]本文强调“中等收入者”的收入水平并非摒弃了中等收入者质的特征,而是认为:质的形成,即中等收入者的政治见解、生活方式、文化心理、审美情趣、道德意识的形成是一个历史的自然的过程,收入水平提高是其形成的根本前提条件,在我国当前条件下,“中等收入者”应该强调其“前提条件”——收入水平。正如许海峰(2003)所说“与西方社会的‘中产'悠闲自由的生活方式相比,中国‘新中产'显得更为紧张和忙碌,也许只能算是正在形成的‘中产',或者说算是当前‘具有中国特色的中产”'。本文认为用中等收入者来替用“具有中国特色的中产”更好,中国人要达到外国中产阶级或中产阶层的生活水准,还需要走很长的路,所以从收入角度研究我国中等收入群体具有很强的现实意义。
    [2]反映到统计学上就是一个中等收入区间。
    [3]国家发改委宏观经济研究院课题组(课题组成员:陈新年、杨宜勇、常兴华、曾智泽、徐振斌、常虹、程凯、温运娟),《进一步扩大中等收入者比重》,红旗文稿,2006年12期。
    [1]纪玉山等《中等收入者比重的扩大及“橄榄型”财富结构的达致》,社会科学研究,2005年2期。
    [2]刁永祚,《中等收入群体的基本分析》,北京社会科学,2006年第3期。
    [1]王开玉.中国中等收入者研究[M].社会科学文献出版社,2006:15-15.
    [1]国家发改委宏观经济研究院课题组(课题组成员:陈新年、杨宜勇、常兴华、曾智泽、徐振斌、常虹、程凯、温运娟),《进一步扩大中等收入者比重》,红旗文稿,2006年12期。
    [1]陈新年(2005)详细阐述了我国中等收入者收入水平的界定方法,并对得到的中等收入者收入水平进行了评价,参见:陈新年,《中等收入者论》,中国计划出版社,2005:pp30-34.
    [1]Pareto,V.Manual of Political Economy[M].in A.S.Schwier and A.N.Page,ed.London:Macmillian,1972.
    [2]Harold Lydall.The Structure of earning[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1968.
    [3]Cowell,F.A.Measuring Inequality(2nd Edition)[M].London:Prentice Hall,1995.
    [4]Lange,Oscar.Introduction to Econometrics[M].Oxford:Pergamon Press Ltd,1962.
    [5]Cowell,F.A.Measuring Inequality—Techniques for the Social Sciences[M].New York:John Wiley &Sons,1977.
    [6]Kmietowicz,Z.W.and Ding,H.Statistical Analysis of Income Distribution in the Jiangsu Province of China[J].The Statistician,1993,42(2):107-121.
    [7]Salem and Mount.A Convenient Descriptive Model of Income Distribution:The Gamma Density[J].Econometrica,1974,42(6).
    [8]王海港.中国居民收入分配的格局—帕雷托分布方法[J].南方经济,2006,5:73-82.
    [9]王海港.中国居民家庭收入变动及其对长期平等的影响[J].经济研究,2005,1:56-66.
    [10]徐建国.收入分布和耐用消费品的增长方式[R].北京大学中国经济研究中心学术刊物,2000,3.
    [11]林伯强.中国的经济增长、贫困减少与政策选择[J].经济研究,2003(12):15-26.
    [12]成邦文.研究与开发机构统计数据质量与异常点的对数正态分布检验与识别[J].统计研究,2000,1:42-46.
    [13]成邦文.科技规模指标对数正态分布规律[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000,9:9-13.
    [14]成邦文.基于对数正态分布的洛伦兹曲线与基尼系数[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,2:127-135.
    [15]王兢.拟合收入分布函数在贫困线、贫困率测算中应用[J].经济经纬,2005,2:66-68.
    [16]Silverman,B.W.Density estimation for statistics and data analysis[M].New York:Chapman and Hall Ltd,USA,1986:34-72.
    [17]Silverman,B.W.Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality[J].J.Roy.Statist.Soc.B.1981,43:97-99.
    [18]Jensins,S.P.Van Kerm,P.Accounting for income distribution trends:a density function decomposition approach[J].J.Econ.Inequal,2005(3):43-61.
    [19]Pittau,M.G.,Zelli,R.Testing for changing shapes of income distribution:Italian evidence in the 1990s from kernel density estimates[J].Empir.Econ,2004(25):330-415.
    [20]Pittau,M.G.,Zelli,R..Trends in income distribution in Italy:.a non~parametric and a semi~parametric analysis[J].J.Income Distrib,2006(15):90-118.
    [21]Yates,J.Imputed rent and income distribution[J].Rev.Income Wealth,1994,40(1):43-46.
    [22]Fields,G.S.Accounting for income inequality and its changes:A new method with application to the distribution of earning in the United States[J].Research in Labor Economics,2003(22):1-38.
    [23]Shorrocks,A.F.Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components[J].Econometrica,1982,50(1):193-211.
    [24]Gustafsson,Bjorn,and Li Shi.The Effect of Transition of the Distribution of Income in China[J].Economics of Transition,2001,9(3):593-617.
    [25]Morduch,Jonathan,and Terry Sicular.Rethinking Inequality Decompositon with Evidence from Rural China[J].Economic Journal,2002(112):93-106.
    [26]Knight,John,Song Lina.Increasing Urban Wage Inequality in China:Extent,Elements and Evaluation[J].Economics of Transition,2003,11(4):597-619.
    [27]Dart,G.and Ravallion,M.Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures:A Decomposition with Application to Brazil and India in the 1980s[J].Journal of Development Economics,1992(38):275-295.
    [28]Bourguignon,F.The Growth Elasticity of Poverty Reduction:Explaining Heterogeneity Across Countries and Time Periods.T.Eicher and S.Turnovsky,eds.Inequality and Growth.Theory and Policy Implications[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press,2003.
    [29]Shorrocks Anthony,Hoeven Rolph.Growth,Inequality,and Poverty:Prospects for Pro~poor Economic Development[M].Oxford University Press,2004.
    [30]Oaxaca,Ronald.Male Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Market[J].International Economic Review,1973,14:693-709.
    [31]Koenker,R.,Bassett,G.Quantile regression[J].Econemetrica,1978,46:33-50.
    [32]Machado,Jose A.F.& Jose Mata.Counter factual Decomposition of Changes in Wage Distributions Using Quantile Regression[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics,2005,20:445.
    [33]刘扬.当前我国收入差距的实证分析[J].税务研究,2002,7:12-17.
    [34]刘扬.现阶段我国国民收入分配格局实证分析[J].财贸经济,2002,11:64-69.
    [35]刘扬,纪宏.中国居民收入分配问题研究——以北京市为例的考察[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2007.
    [36]万广华,张茵.收入增长与不平等对我国贫困的影响[J].经济研究,2006(6):112-123.
    [37]冯星光,张晓静.经济增长、收入分配与贫困规模变动相关性研究——来自北京市城市居民的经验数据[J].财经研究,2006,4:136-144.
    [38]纪宏,阮敬.基于收入分布的亲贫困增长测度及其分解[J].经济与管理研究,2007,8:38-45.
    [39]吴喜之.非参数统计[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999:1-16.
    [40][美]L.沃塞曼著,吴喜之译.现代非参数统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:100-110.
    [41]陈希孺,柴根象.非参数统计教程[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1993:247-274.
    [42]M.Rosenblatt.Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Function[J].Ann.Math.Statist.,1956,27(3):832-837.
    [43]Bean,S.J.and Tsokos,C.E.Developments in nonparametric density estimation[J].Int.Stat.Rev.,1980,48:267-287.
    [45]A.R.Mugdadi,I.A.Ahmad.A Bandwidth Selection for Kernel Density Estimation of Functions of Random Variables[J].Computation Statistics & Data Analysis,2004,47:49-62.
    [46]M.Rudemo.Empirical Choice of Histograms and Kernel Density Estimation[J].Scand.J.Statist.,1982,9:65-78.
    [47]王启华.随机删失下的概率密度核估计的光滑Bootstrape逼近[J].应用数学学报,1997,20:368-277.
    [48]C.O.Wu.Kernel Smoothing of the Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation for biased Sampling Models[J].Math Methods Statist,1996,5:275-298.
    [49]薛留根,谷震离,郑忠国.密度核估计的随机加权法[J].系统科学与数学,2001,1:87-96.
    [50]薛留根,廖靖宇.条件密度近邻核估计的逼近速度[J].应用概率统计,2001,2:163-167.
    [51]钱伟民.核密度核估计的Bootstrap逼近[J].同济大学学报,1992,20:87-36.
    [52]李玉忍,高社生,张学渊.核密度的随机加权估计及其应用[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2008,3:351-361.
    [53]许建华,张学工,李衍达.一种基于核函数的非线性感知器算法[J].计算机学报,2002,25:689-695.
    [54]吴涛,贺汉根,贺明科.基于插值的核函数构造[J].计算机学报,2003,26:990-996.
    [55]I.A.Ahmad.On Multivariate Kernel Estimation for Samples from Weighted Distributions[J].Statistics and Probability Leters,1995,22:121-129.
    [56]Sheather,S.J.,Jones,M.C.A reliable data~based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1991,Series B53:683-690.
    [57]Wand,M.P.and Jones,M.C..Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection[J].Comput.Statist.,1994(9):97-166.
    [58]Bowman,A..An alternative method of cross-validation for the smoothing of density estimates[J].Biometrika,1984(71):353-360.
    [59]Wu,T.J..Adaptive root n estimates of integrated squared density derivatives[J].Ann.statist.,1995(23):1474-1495.
    [60]Au S K,Beck J L.A new adaptive important sampling scheme[J].Structural Safety,1999,21(2):135-158.
    [61]Ibrahim A Ahmad,Yanqin Fan.Optimal Bandwidth for Kernel Density Estimators of Functions of Observations[J].Statistics & Probability Letters,2005,51(3):245-251.
    [62]袁修开,吕震宙,池巧君.基于核密度估计的自适应性重要抽样可靠性灵敏度分析[J].西北工业大学学报,2008(3):297-302.
    [63]郭照庄.密度核估计中最优窗宽选的选择,燕山大学理学硕士学位论文:11-13.
    [64]于传强,郭晓松,张安等.基于估计点的滑动窗宽核密度估计计算法[J].兵工学报,2009(2):231-235.
    [65]邹文辉.依概率收敛与依分布收敛的关系[J].工科数学,2001,5:41-43.
    [66]Parzen,E.On estimation of a probability density function and mode[J].Math.Statist,1962,33:1065-1076.
    [67]Nadaraya,E.A.On nonparametric estimates of density function and regression curves[J].Theor.Probab.Appl.,1965,10:186-190.
    [68]张志强,谭鲜明,朱建平.非对称核密度估计在生命表构造中的应用[J].南开大学学报(自然科学版),2005,6:47-52.
    [69]唐林俊,杨虎,张洪阳.核密度估计在预测风险价值中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2005,25(10):29-35.
    [70]刘艳,马劲松.核密度估计法在西藏人口空间分布研究中的应用[J].西藏科技,2007,4:6-8.
    [71]牛君,李贻斌,宋锐..核密度估计在立体匹配中的应用[J].计算机工程,2008,34(2): 40-42.
    [72]白丽,夏乐天,魏玉华.加权核密度估计在洪水频率分析中的应用[J].水文,2008,5:36-41.
    [73]峁诗松,周纪芗..概率论与数理统计[M],北京:中国统计出版社,2000:50-70.
    [74]Parzen,E.Nonparametric statistical data science:A unified approach based on density estimation and testing for'white noise'[J].Technical Report 47,Statistical Sciences Division,State University of New York at Buffalo,Buffalo,NY,1977.
    [75]Parzen,E.Comparison change analysis,in Nonparametric Statistics and Related Topics[M].A Saleh(ed.) Elsevier,Holland,1992:3-15.
    [76]Prihoda,TJ.A generalized approach to the two sample problem:The quantile approach[J].Unpublished Ph.D.thesis,Department of Statistics,Texas A&M University,1981:34-37.
    [77]Allexander,WP.Boundary kernel estimation of the two sample comparison density function[J].Unpublished Ph.D.thesis,Statistics,Texas A&M University,1989:35-67.
    [78]Morris,M.,Bernhardt,A.D.,Handcock,M.S..Economic inequality:new methods for new trends.Am.Sociol[J].Rev.2004(59):205-219.
    [79]Cwik,J and Mielniczuk,J.Estimating density ratios with application to discriminant analysis[J].Communications in Statistics,1989,18:3057-3069.
    [80]Cwik,J and Mielniczuk,J.Data-dependent bandwidth choice for a grade density kernel estimate[J].Statistics and Probability Letters,1993,16:397-405.
    [81]Gijbels,I and Mielniczuk,J.Asymptotic properties of kernel estimators of the Radon~Nikodym detrivative with applications to discriminant analysis[J].Statistica Sinica,1995,5:261-278.
    [82]Eubank RL,Lariccia VN,Rosenstein,RB.Test statistics derived as components of Peason's phi~squared distance measure[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1987,82:816-825.
    [83]Eubank,RL,Lariccia VN,Schuenemeyer,JL.Component type tests with estimated parameters[J].Probability and Mathematical Statistics,1995,15:275-289.
    [84]Holmgren,EB.The P~p plot as a method for comparing treatment effects[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1995,90:360-365.
    [85]M.B.Wilk,R.Gnanadesikan.Probability Plotting Methods for the Analysis of Data[J].Biometrika,1968,Vol.55,No.1:1-17.
    [86]陈云.中国城镇居民收入差距现状及对策研究综述[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2008,6:116-121.
    [87]Lehmann,EL.(1983)The Theory of Point Estimation[M].John Wiley & Sons,New York,1983.
    [88]Picot G.,Myles J.,Wannel T..Good jobs/Bad jobs and the declining middle class:1967~86[J].Research Paper 28,Statistics Canada,Business and Labor Market Analysis Group,Ottawa,Ontario,1990.
    [89]Koenker R.,Bassett G..Regression quantiles[J].Econometrica,1978,46:33-50.
    [90]Koenker R.,D'Orey V.A Remark on Computing Regression Quantiles[J],Applied Statistics,1993,43:410-414.
    [91]Koenker,R.,Hallock,K..Quantile regression[Electronic version][J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2001,15(4):143-156.
    [92]Simonoff,JS.Smoothing Methods in Statistics[M].Springer Verlag,New York,1996.
    [93]Lehmann,EL.The power of rank tests[J].Annals of Mathematical Statistics,1953,24:23-43.
    [94]Lin,C-H,Sukhatme,S..Hoeffding type theorem and power comparisons of some two sample rank tests[J].Journal of the Indian Statistical Association,1993,31:71-83.
    [95]Gastwirth,JL.The first-median test:A two-sided version of the control sored data[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1968(63):692-706.
    [96]陈宗胜.库兹涅茨倒U理论统计检验评析[J].上海社会科学院学术季刊,1991(2):51-59.
    [97]王亚芬,肖晓飞,高铁梅.我国城镇居民收入分配差距的实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2007,6:65-71.
    [98]邓涛.我国城镇居民规模收入分配格局[J].企业经济,2006(12):122-124.
    [99]张沂,龚德恩.中国城镇居民规模收入分配格局研究[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(3):37-43.
    [100]吴得民.对我国城镇居民收入分配差距问题的再认识[J].经济体制改革,2002(2):82-84.
    [101]吴碧英.中国城镇居民收入区域差距的实证分析[J].经济界,2002(2):90-93.
    [102]王小鲁,樊纲.中国收入差距的走势和影响因素分析[J].经济研究,2005(4):24-36.
    [103]施峰.缩小居民收入差距:中国和平发展亟待解决的一个重要问题[J].经济研究参考,2005(38):2-20.
    [104]宋桂霞,苏德民.中国居民收入分配差距扩大现状、原因与对策[J].经济研究导刊,2007(1):144-147.
    [105]国务院研究课题组.关于城镇居民个人收入差距的分析和建议[J].经济研究参考,1997(64):17-33.
    [106]韩文秀、尹艳林、冯建林.中国居民收入差距研究综述[J].经济研究参考,2003(83):13-30.
    [107]李实,赵人伟.中国居民收入再分配研究[J].经济研究,1999(4):3-17.
    [108]于新华.我国国有企业如何适应市场经济[J].中国统计,1993(2):35-37.
    [109]陈宗胜,周云波.体制改革对城镇居民收入差别的影响——天津市城镇居民差别再研究[J].中国社会科学,2001(6):54-62.
    [110]王云多.中国城镇居民收入差距问题分析及对策研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(7):417-420.
    [111]霍海燕.现阶段我国收入分配政策的缺陷与调整思路[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(1):88-91.
    [112]曾国安.20世纪70年代末以来中国居民收入差距的演变趋势、现状评价与调节政策选择[J].经济评论,2002(5):35-46.
    [113]杨婷.城镇居民收入差距扩大的成因分析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2007(12):97-97.
    [114]陈宗胜,周云波.文化程度等人口特征对城镇居民收入及收入差别的影响——三论经济发展对收入分配的影响[J],南开经济研究,2001(4):38-42.
    [115]陈宗胜,周云波.城镇居民收入差别及制约其变动的其他因素——就天津市城镇居民家庭特征的影响进行的一些讨论[J].经济学,2002(3):563-574.
    [116]王天夫,王丰.中国城市收入分配中的集团因素:1986~1995[J].社会学研究,2005(3):156-181,245.
    [117]李爽.城镇居民收入差距分析[J].宏观经济管理,2001(6):25-27.
    [118]蔡晓辉.收入分配差距问题研究综述[J].和田师范专科学校学报,2007(5):21-23.
    [119]朱明,吴伟.我国城镇居民收入差距问题研究[J].边疆经济与文化,2007(2):72-73.
    [120]Hal R.Varian.Microeconomic Analysis[M].北京,经济科学出版社,2002.
    [121]Gustafsson,Li.The effects of Transition on the Distribution of Income in China[J].Economics of Transition,2001,9(3):593-617.
    [122]Morduch,Jonathan& Terry Sicular.Rethingking Inequality Decomsition,With Evidence form Rural China[J].Economic Journal,2002,112:93-106.
    [123]程永宏.改革以来全国总体基尼系数的演变及城乡分解[J].中国社会科学,2007(4):45-60.
    [124]程永宏.二元经济中城乡混合基尼系数的计算与分解[J].经济研究,2006,41(1):109-120.
    [125]冯士雍,倪加勋,邹国华编著.抽样调查理论与方法[M].中国统计出版社,1998.
    [126]朱农,骆许蓓.收入增长、不平等和贫困[J].中国人口科学,2008(2):12-24.
    [127]薛毅,陈立萍.统计建模与R软件[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008.
    [128](日)大前研一著,刘锦秀,江裕真译.M型社会:中产阶级消失的危机与商机[M].中信出版社,2007.
    [129]陆学艺.当代中国社会阶层研究报告[R].社会科学文献出版社,2002.
    [130]郑杭生.中国社会结构变化趋势变化[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004年.
    [131]李春玲.断裂与碎片:当代中国社会阶层分化实证分析[M].社会科学文献出版社,2005.
    [132]张宛丽,高鸽.现阶段中国社会新中间阶层的构成特征[J].江苏社会科学,2004(6):100-107.
    [133]苏海南.努力扩大我国的中等收入者比重[J].宏观经济研究,2003(4):12-14.
    [134]陈新年.中等收入者论[M].中国计划出版社,2005.
    [135]颜俊学.关于扩大中等收入者比重的几点思考[J].广州市经济管理干部学院学报,2004(3):22-25.
    [136]王开玉.中国中等收入者研究[M].社会科学文献出版社,2006.
    [137]谭薇,郑小燕.关于我国中产阶层研究现状的概述及思考[J].湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版),2008(1):24-25.
    [138]许海峰.你“中产”了吗?[M].经济日报出版社,2003.
    [139]张东生.中国居民收入分配年度报告[2007][R].中国财政经济出版社,2008.
    [140]徐建华.对中等收入的界定研究[J].上海统计,2003(8):12-14.
    [141]陶冶.中等收入的可操作指标及对上海中等收入群体的分析[J].江淮论坛,2004(增刊).
    [142]国家发改委宏观经济研究院课题组.进一步扩大中等收入者比重[J].红旗文稿,2006(12):8-10.
    [143]纪玉山等.中等收入者比重的扩火及“橄榄型”财富结构的达致[J].社会科学研究,2005(2):35-40.
    [144]刁永祚.中等收入群体的基本分析[J].北京社会科学,2006(3):3-8.
    [145]国家统计局城调总队课题组.6万-50万:中国城市中等收入群体探究[J].数据,2005(6):39-41.
    [146]杨宜勇.透视中产“秘密”[J].中国经济周刊,2004(8):36-36.
    [147]顾纪瑞.界定中等收入者群体的概念、方法和标准之比较[J].现代经济探讨,2005(10):10-16.
    [148]李培林.关于扩大中等收入者比重的对策思路[J].中国经贸导刊,2007(18):7-8.
    [149]刘福垣.新发展观宣言[M].新华出版社,2004.
    [150]狄煌.合理界定中等收入者.经济参考报,2003-2-18.
    [151]法国巴黎百富勒公司.百富勤给中国中等收入阶层画像,青年参考报,2004-2-24.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700