烤烟根系分泌物成分鉴定与分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为探明烤烟根系分泌物中的化感物质成分、化感作用及其在土壤中的消解规律,本实验采用砂培法,对中烟100、NC89、K326三个品种中不同组分根系分泌物进行了提取,并结合硅烷化反应,采用GC/MS检测,分离鉴定出烤烟根系分泌物主要物质组成;通过对根系分泌物具体成分的含量和化学特性的分析并结合文献参考,选取主要根系分泌物延胡索酸、肉桂酸、丁二酸、苯甲酸和烟碱进行生物化感测定,具体方法为:通过人为添加控制浓度的方式,研究这些物质对烟草种子发芽率、发芽势和烟苗生长发育的影响。在确定了不同化感物质对烟草生长的化感作用后,通过室内培养法模拟研究了不同温度、水分和不同浓度条件下,烤烟根系分泌物主要成分(延胡索酸、丁二酸、苯甲酸和肉桂酸)在植烟土壤中的消解规律。研究结果如下:
     (1)3个烤烟品种不同组分根系分泌物主要成分为酸性成分,其中在中性提取条件下,百分含量较高的物质有2-羟基丙酸、肉豆蔻酸、新植二烯、东莨菪素、辛酸等;在酸性提取条件下,百分含量相对较高的物质有3-羟基丁酸、新植二烯、丁二酸、棕榈酸、肉桂酸等;在碱性提取条件下,百分含量较高的物质有新植二烯、棕榈酸、硬脂酸等。2-羟基丙酸、苯甲酸、丁二酸、烟碱、新植二烯、肉豆蔻酸、棕榈酸、延胡索酸等为3个烤烟品种根系分泌物的共有成分。中烟100不同组分根系分泌物对种子发芽率和发芽势的影响程度依次为:中性组分>酸性组分>碱性组分。
     (2)在研究烤烟主要根系分泌物延胡索酸、肉桂酸、丁二酸、苯甲酸和烟碱对烟草种子发芽率、发芽势和烟苗生长发育影响的试验中发现,随着根系分泌物浓度的提高,种子发芽率和发芽势,以及烟草的农艺性状调查数值都出现逐渐减小的趋势。并且不同浓度根系分泌物对种子发芽率、发芽势以及幼苗生长发育的抑制作用存在一致性。结果表明,烟草根系分泌物对烤烟种子萌发和幼苗生长有一定的抑制作用;同时延胡索酸、丁二酸、肉桂酸、苯甲酸和烟碱在不同浓度条件下也能显著抑制烤烟种子萌发和幼苗生长,且抑制作用随浓度的增加而增大,但是五种物质对烤烟种子萌发和幼苗生长的抑制程度不一致,主要表现为:苯甲酸>肉桂酸>丁二酸>延胡索酸>烟碱。
     (3)延胡索酸、丁二酸、苯甲酸和肉桂酸在土壤中的消解速度较快,各个处理在连续培养7天后基本可以消解完全,温度对各物质消解速度的影响主要变现为,在30℃培养条件下降解速度略快于20℃;在湿度控制方面,土壤湿度为田间最大持水量的60%和80%时,土壤中各种有机酸的消解速度显著快于40%田间最大持水量;各有机酸在土壤中的浓度对其消解速度影响显著,主要表现为随浓度的升高其消解速率逐渐降低,特别是在低浓度时,在土壤培养的前3天内,各个根系分泌物就基本能消解完全,而高浓度的根系分泌物消解速度较慢。
In order to study the chemical compositions of root exudates from flue-cured tobacco, theirallelopathy and their dispel rate in tobacco-planting soils, three varieties of tobacco (Zhongyan100,NC89,K326) were used to identify the root exudates in different extracting conditions. The mainmethods of the research are sandy culture, silane treating and GC-MS identification. Through analysingthe content, structure of root exudates from flue-cured tobacco and related articles, benzoic acid、cinnamic acid、fumaric acid、succinic acid and nicotine were used to study their allelopathy on tobaccoseed and tobacco seedlings. After confirming the main allelochemicals', decomposition speed of essentialcomponent of root exudates(fumaric acid、succinic acid、benzoic acid and cinnamic acid)in plantingtobacco soil was researched by house culture in different temperature、humidness and concentrationsituations.
     (1) Root exudates in different extracting conditions of the three varieties mainly involve phenols,organic acids and ketones. Under neutral condition, the components of root exudates included2-hydroxyl propionic acid, Tetradecanoic acid, Neophytadiene, Scopoletin and Octanoic acid. Underacid condition, the components of root exudates included3-hydroxy butyrate, Neophytadiene, Succinicacid, Hexadecanoic acid and Cinnamic acid. Under alkaline condition, the components of root exudatesincluded Neophytadiene, Hexadecanoic acid and Stearic acid.2-hydroxyl propionic acid, Benzoic acid,Succinic acid, Nicotine, Neophytadiene, Tetradecanoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid and Fumaric acid wereidentified in the root exudates of all the three varieties of tobacco. The grade of influence by rootexudates of Zhongyan100in different extracting conditions on tobacco seed are (from high to low):neutral condition, alkaline condition and acid condition. Fumaric acid, Succinic acid and Nicotine hascertain inhibition on the germination rate of the tobacco seeds.
     (2) After a period of time, found that along with the increase of the concentration of the rootexudates(benzoic acid、cinnamic acid、fumaric acid、succinic acid and nicotine), the tobacco seedlings,seed germination and tobacco plant characters all appear reduce gradually. And the tobacco seedlings,seed germination and tobacco plant characters were had the same inhibitory action among differentconcentrations of root exudates. The result showed that, the root exudates could inhibit the growth oftobacco seedlings, seed germination and tobacco plant characters. Different concentrations of benzoicacid、cinnamic acid、fumaric acid、succinic acid and nicotine could inhibit the growth of tobaccoseedlings, seed germination and tobacco plant characters, and the higher the concentration the bettereffect of the inhibition. But there were great differences in the extent of inhibition between the5rootexudates, benzoic acid>cinnamic acid>succinic acid>fumaric acid>nicotine.
     (3) Decomposition speed of fumaric acid、succinic acid、benzoic acid and cinnamic acid wasquickly,which could be disappear completely in7days. Temperature had little influence on thedecomposition speed,4kinds of organic acids at20℃decomposed faster than30℃. When the soilmoisture was60%of the maximum moisture capacity, the decomposition speed of4kinds of organicacids faster than40%and80%. Concentration had more influence on the decomposition speed, withincreasing of organic acids in the soil, the decomposition speed of them decreases quickly.
引文
1.柴强,黄高宝,黄鹏,等.鹰咀豆根系分泌物的分离鉴定及典型分泌物苯甲醛的化感效应[J].草业学报,2005,14(1):106-111.
    2.陈长宝,王艳艳,刘继永,等.人参根际土壤中化感物质鉴定[J].特产研究,2006,28(2):12-14.
    3.陈华癸.微生物学[A].北京:农业出版社,1988:130-132.
    4.陈绍莉,周宝利,王茹华,等.嫁接对茄子根系分泌物中肉桂酸和香草醛的调节效应[J].应用生态学报2008,19(11):2394-2399.
    5.邓阳春,黄建国.长期连作对烤烟产量和土壤养分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,(04):840-845.
    6.杜英君,靳月华.连作大豆植株化感作用的模拟研究[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(2):209-212.
    7.冯建永,陶晡,庞民好,等.黄顶菊化感物质释放途径的初步研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2009,32(01):72-77.
    8.耿坤,罗文富,杨艳丽,等.烟草黑胫病菌的田间群体分布规律[J].云南农业大学学报,2002,17(4):389-392.
    9.郭亚利,李明海,吴洪田,等.烤烟根系分泌物对烤烟幼苗生长和养分吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,(03):458-463.
    10.韩丽梅,王树起,鞠会艳,等.大豆根分泌物的鉴定及其化感作用的初步研究[J].大豆科学,2000,19(02):119-125.
    11.胡元森,李翠香,杜国营,等.黄瓜根分泌物中化感物质的鉴定及其化感效应[J].生态环境,2007,16(03):954-957.
    12.黄奔立,许云东,伍烨,等.两个不同抗性黄瓜品种和云南黑籽南瓜根系分泌物对黄瓜枯萎病发生的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(03):559-563.
    13.侯永侠,周宝利,吴晓玲,等.辣椒根系分泌物化感作用的研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007,38(04):505-507.
    14.姜超荚,潘文杰.作物连作的土壤障碍因子综述[J].中国农村小康科技,2007,(3):26-28.
    15.鞠会艳,韩丽梅,王树起,等.邻苯二甲酸和丙二酸对大豆根腐病病原菌的化感作用[J].吉林农业科学,2002,27(5):38-40.
    16.柯文辉.烟草连作障碍的根际微生态研究[D].福建农林大学,2009.
    17.孔维栋,刘可星,廖宗文,等.不同腐熟程度有机物料对土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2291-2296.
    18.李锋民,胡洪营,种云霄,等.芦苇化感物质对藻类细胞膜选择透性的影响[J].环境科学,2007,28(11):2453-2456.
    19.李阜棣.土壤微生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.
    20.李花粉,张福锁,李春俭,等.根分泌物对根际重金属动态的影响[J].环境科学学报,1998,18(2):199-203.
    21.李隆,李晓林,张福锁.小麦-大豆间作中小麦对大豆磷吸收的促进作用[J].生态学报,2000,20(4):629-633.
    22.李瑞华,郭霞,黄晓亚,等.红豆草根系分泌物对7种杂草的化感作用[J].安徽农业科学,2009,(15):7059-7061.
    23.李天福,王彪,王树会,等.云南烤烟轮作的现状分析与保障措施[J].中国烟草科学,2006,(02):48-51.
    24.李天金.烤烟主要灾害性病害及其防治措施[J].植保技术与推广,2000,20(2):22-23.
    25.李湘民,兰波,黄瑞荣,等.植物与微生物的互作和微生物群落管理研究进展[J].江西农业学报,2008,20(1):41-43.
    26.李艳宾,张琴,万传星,等.棉秆腐解物的化感作用及其主要化学成分分析[J].棉花学报,2009,21(06):497-502.
    27.梁文举,张晓珂,姜勇,等.根分泌的化感物质及其对土壤生物产生的影响[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(3).330-335.
    28.林思祖,杜玲,曹光球,等.化感作用在林业中的研究进展及应用前景[J],福建林学院学报,2002,(2):184~189.
    29.林祥永,陈飞雄,王金文,等.烟草花叶病的发生规律与防治策略[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(3):4871-4873.
    30.刘德,吴凤芝.哈尔滨市郊蔬菜大棚土壤盐分状况及其影响[J].北方园艺,1998(6):1-3.
    31.刘方,何腾兵,刘元生,等.舒英格长期连作黄壤烟地养分变化及其施肥效应分析[J].烟草科技,2002,(06):30-33.
    32.刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
    33.刘华山,张玉丰,韩锦峰,等.烟草花叶病防治研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2005,33(8):1482-1483.
    34.刘建新.不同农田土壤酶活性与土壤养分相关关系研究[J].土壤通报,2004,35(4):523-525.
    35.刘素萍,王汝贤,张荣,等.根系分泌物中糖和氨基酸对棉花枯萎菌的影响[J].西北农业大学学报,1998,26(06):33-38.
    36.刘文菊,张西科,张福锁,等.根表铁氧化物和缺铁根分泌物对水稻吸收镉的影响[J].土壤学报,1999,36(4):463-468.
    37.刘晓燕,何萍,金继运,等.氯化钾对玉米根系糖和酚酸分泌的影响及其与茎腐病菌生长的关系[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(05):929-934.
    38.刘欣,周科,熊磊,等.葎草挥发性物质化感作用及其化感物质的分析研究[J].生物学杂志,2011,28(03):34-38.
    39.刘新虎,赵小亮,万传星,等.棉花根系分泌物对棉苗生长及生理活性的影响[J].棉花学报,2009,(04):335-337.
    40.吕卫光,张春兰.化感物质抑制连作黄瓜生长的作用机理.中国农业科学,2002,35(1):106-109.
    41.马沅,陈放,王胜华,等.麻疯树水浸液对两种经济作物的化感作用研究[J].北方园艺,2009,(08):19-23.
    42.牟金明,李万辉.根系分泌物及其作用[J].吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(4):114-118.
    43.潘凯,姚友.不同黄瓜品种根系分泌物对根际土壤微生物及土壤养分的影响[J].北方园艺,2008,(08):18-20.
    44.盘莫谊.烟草连作和土壤生态改良增效剂对植烟土壤微生物及酶的影响[D].湖南农业大学,2010.
    45.邱莉萍,刘军,王益权,等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(3):277-280.
    46.沈建波,张福锁.根分泌物的生态效应[J].中国农业科技导报.1999,1(4):21-27.
    47.石秋环,焦枫,耿伟,等.烤烟连作土壤环境中的障碍因子研究综述[J].中国烟草学报,2009,15(6):81-84.
    48.孙冰玉,于方玲,元野,等.烤烟连作对耕层土壤理化性质和土壤脲酶的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,(04):1826-1827.
    49.孙磊,陈兵林,周治国,等.麦棉套作Bt棉花根系分泌物对土壤速效养分及微生物的影响[J].棉花学报,2007,19(01):18-22.
    50.孙瑞莲,周启星.植物对金属抗性中有机酸的作用及其机理[A].第二届全国环境化学学术报告会论文集[C].中国上海,2004.
    51.汤东生,王斌,毛忠顺,等.大蒜根系分泌物对石榴枯萎病菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的作用[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(09):5294-5296.
    52.唐咏,梁成华,刘志恒,等.日光温室蔬菜栽培对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1999,(01):16-19.
    53.童有为,陈淡飞.温室土壤次生盐渍化的形成和治理途径的研究[J].园艺学报,1991,18(2):159-162.
    54.王树起,韩丽梅,杨振明.不同有机酸对大豆生长的化感效应[J].大豆科学,2002,(04):267-273.
    55.王学翠,童晓茹,温学森,等.植物与根际微生物关系的研究进展[J].山东科学,2007,20(6):40-44.
    56.吴凤芝,黄彩红,邓旭红,等.酚酸类物质对黄瓜幼苗养分吸收的化感作用[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,(03):131-133.
    57.吴凤芝,赵凤艳.根系分泌物与连作障碍[J].东北农业大学学报,2003,(01):114-118.
    58.吴文祥.烟草自毒物质及其对根际土壤微生物影响的研究[D].导师:林文雄.福建农林大学,2010.
    59.肖枢,龙荣,王锡云,等.瑞丽地区烟草寄生性线虫与栽培关系研究[J].植物检疫,1997,11(1):8-101.
    60.杨广君,赵尊练,巩振辉,等.线辣椒根系分泌物对辣椒等受体作物的化感效应[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,(10):146-152+157.
    61.杨佳玫.连作对烟叶产量质量的影响[D].湖南农业大学,2010.
    62.叶陈英.水稻根系酚酸类化感物质分泌动态及其对土壤生理生化特性的影响[D].福建农林科技大学,2010.
    63.尹春芹.轮作方式对烟草土壤生态系统及产量和质量的影响[D].东北农业大学,2005.
    64.于宁,关连珠,娄翼来,等.施石灰对北方连作烟田土壤酸度调节及酶活性恢复研究[J].土壤通报,2008,(04):849-851.
    65.郁继华,张韵,牛彩霞,等.两种化感物质对茄子幼苗光合作用及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006,(09):1629-1632.
    66.张长华,王智明,陈叶君,等.连作对烤烟生长及土壤氮磷钾养分的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2007,(04):62-65.
    67.张福锁.根系分泌物及其在植物营养中的作用[J].北京农业大学学报,1992,18(4):353-356.
    68.张吉立.重茬对烤烟养分吸收、产量及品质的影响[D].黑龙江八一农垦大学,2011.
    69.张俊英,王敬国,许永利,等.大豆根系分泌物中氨基酸对根腐病菌生长的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,(02):308-315.
    70.张康健,董娟娥.药用植物次生代谢[M]西安:西北大学出版社,2001:1-2.
    71.张庆平.荞麦根分泌物对小麦全蚀病菌的抑制及根际微生物种群数量观察[J].内蒙古农业科技,1994,(1):8-9.
    72.赵大君,郑师章.凤眼莲根分泌物氨基酸组分对根际肠杆菌属F2细菌的趋化作用[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(2):207-212.
    73.赵凯,娄翼来,王玲莉,等.烤烟连作对烟叶产量和质量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2008,(08):118-119.
    74.甄文超,王晓燕,孔俊英,等.草莓根系分泌物和腐解物中的酚酸类物质及其化感作用[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,27(4):74-78.
    75.周明,涂书新,孙锦荷,等.富钾植物籽粒苋(Amaran-thusspp.)对土壤矿物钾的吸收利用研究[J].核农学报,2005,19(4):291.
    76.周宝利,陈志霞,杜亮,等.不同抗病性茄子根系分泌物对黄萎菌的化感作用[J].生态学报,2011,(14):3964-3972.
    77.周宝利,孙传齐,韩琳,等.邻苯二甲酸二丁酯对茄子根际土壤黄萎菌数量及土壤微生物组成的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,(06):150-153.
    78.周艳丽,王艳,李金英,等.大蒜根系分泌物的化感作用[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(05):1368-1372.
    79.朱斌,王军,乔永信.陕南烟草根结线虫病发病规律研究初报[J].陕西农业科学,2005,(1):6-8.
    80.朱文杰.入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis L.)对土传病菌的化感作用[D].浙江大学,2011.
    81. Garcia-Gil J, Plaza C C, Soler-Rovira P, et al. Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compostapplication on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass [J]. Soil Biol Biochem,2000,32:1907-1913.
    82. Abenavoli M R, Cacco G, Sorgona A, et al. The inhibitory effects of coumarin on the germinationof durum wheat (Triticum turgidumssp.durum, cv. Simeto) seeds [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,2006,32(2):489-450.
    83. Arovira A D. Note on terminology: orlmaterials in the rhizosphere [A].In: Harley J L.The Soil-RootInterface [M].London:Academic Press,1979:1-4.
    84. Baziramakenga R, Leroux GD, Simard RR, et al. Allelopathic effects of phenolic acids on nucleicacid and protein levels in soybean seedlings [J].Canadian Journal of Botany,1997,75(3):445-450.
    85. Bertin C, Yang X, Weston L A. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere[J].Plant Soil,2003,256(1):67-83.
    86. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET. Invasive plant versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism forexotic invasion.Seienee.2000,290:521-23.
    87. Dayan F E, Watson S B, Galindo J C G, et al. Phytotoxicity of quassinoids: physiological responsesand structural requirements [J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,1999,65(1):15-24.
    88. Dinkelaker, B, V. Romheld and H. Marschner, plant, Cell and Environment,1989,(12):285-292.
    89. Giller, K E, Beare M H, Lavelle Petal. Agriculture intensification, soil biodiversity andagroecosystem function [J].Applied Soil Ecology,1997,6(1):3-16.
    90. Gonzalez, de.Parra M.,Anaya,A.L.Espinosa, F.et al.Allelopathic po-tential of poqueriatrinervia(Aomposite)and piquerola A and B.J. Chem.Ecol.1981,7:209-215.
    91. Gramss G, Voigt K-D, Kirsche B. Oxidoreductase enzymes liberated by plant roots and their effectson soil humic material[J].Chemo-sphere,1999,38:1481-1494.
    92. Higuchi K, Kanazawa K, Nishizawa N K, et al.Purification and characterization of nicotianaminesynthase from Fe-deficient barley root [J].Plant and Soil,1994,165:173-179.
    93. Hoffland E, Findenegg G R, Nelmans J A. Solubilization of rock phosphate by rape.I: Evaluation ofthe role of the nutrient uptake pattern [J].Plant and Soil,1989,113:155-160.
    94. Hyder P W, Ferdriekson E L, Estell R E, et al. Tnarsport of Phenolic compounds from leaf surfaceof creosotebush and tarbush to soil surface by precipitation. Journal of Chemical Eeology,2002,28(12):2475-2482.
    95. Jones D L, Brassington D S. Sorption of organic acids in acid soils and its implications in therhizosphere[J].European Journal of Soil Science1998,49(3):447-455.
    96. Komai, K.Iwamrua, J., and Ueki, K. Plant growth inhibitor in the seed of catch weed [J].Weed Res.(Japan)1983,28:205~209.
    97. Leusch H J, Buchenauer H. Einfluss von Bodenbehandlungen misiliziumreichen kalken andNatriumsilikat of den Mehlaubefall vonWeizen [J]. Kali-Brefe(Buntehof),1988,19:1-11.
    98. Lipton D S.Citrate, malate and succinate concentration in exudates from p-sufficient and p-stressed,Medicago sativa L.seedling.Plant Physiol,1987,85:315-317.
    99. Molisch H. Dee Einfluss einre Pflanzze auf die Andere-Al-lelopathie. G.Ficher.K.Jena mustard(Brassica juncea L.)seeding growth [J].Plant Physiol Biochem,2005,43(1):77-81.
    100. Nakano H, Morita S, Shigemori H,et al. Plant growth inhibitory compounds from aqueous leachateof wheat straw [J]. Plant Growth Regulation,2006,48:215.
    101. Niemeyer, H. M., and Perez, F. J. Potential of hydroxamicacids in the control of cereal pests,diseases, and weeds. ACS Symp.Ser.1995.582:260-270.
    102. Patrick, Z. A., and L. W.Koch.Inhibition of respiration,germination and growth by substancesarising during the decomposition of certain plant roots in homogenized soils [J].Plant andsoil,1992,142:69-79.
    103. RiceEL. AlleloPahty(Zededition)[M].NweYokr:AeadmeiePerss,1984.
    104. Romagni JG, Allen SN,Dayan FE.Allelopathic effects of volatile cineoles on twoweedy plant [J].JChem Ecol,2000,26(1):303-314.
    105. Schutter M, Dick R. Shifts in substrate utilization potential and structure of soil microbialcommunities in response to carbon substrates [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry.2001,33(11):1481-1491.
    106. Siegel B Z.Plant peroxidases-an organismic perspective [J].Plant Grow Regul,1993,12:303-312.
    107. Smiley R W, Cook R J. Relationship between take-all of wheat and rhizosphere pH in soilsfertilized with ammonium vs. Nitrate-nitrogen [J].Phytopothol,1973,63:882-890.
    108. Stermitza F R, Baisb H P, Foderaroc T A, et al.7,8-Ben-zoflavone: a phytotoxin from root exudatesof invasive Russianknapweed [J]. Phytochemistry,2003,64:493-495.
    109. Strobel B W. Influence of vegetation on low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids in soil solution-areview[J].Geoderma,2001,99:169-198.
    110. Vanstaden, J, and Grobbelaar, N.The effect of sesbanimide and Sesbania seed extracts ongermimfon and seedling growth of a number of plant species [J].Envir.Exp.Bot.1995,35:321-329.
    111. Wink M, Latz-bruning B.Modes of action of allelochemicals: Interaction with neuroreceptors DNAand other molecular targets. Chem Ecol,1998,24:1881-1937.
    112. YU J Q,MATSUI Y.Effect s of root exudates of cucumber(Curcumas sati-vus)and allelochemicalson ion uptake by cucumber seedling [J].Journal of Chemical Ecology,1997,23:817-827.