稻麦两熟农田径流养分循环利用模式的能值分析与生态补偿标准测算
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Emergy analysis and ecological compensation standard of the runoff nutrient recycling system in rice-wheat rotation systems
  • 作者:朱冰莹 ; 陈留根 ; 盛婧 ; 郑建初
  • 英文作者:ZHU Bing-ying;CHEN Liu-gen;SHENG Jing;ZHENG Jian-chu;College of Humanity and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University;Center of Circular Agriculture, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science;
  • 关键词:稻麦轮作 ; 径流 ; 养分流失 ; 循环农业 ; 能值分析 ; 生态补偿
  • 英文关键词:rice-wheat rotation;;runoff;;nutrient loss;;recycling agriculture;;emergy analysis;;ecological compensation
  • 中文刊名:农业资源与环境学报
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment
  • 机构:南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院;江苏省农业科学院循环农业研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-09-10
  • 出版单位:农业资源与环境学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:05
  • 基金:江苏省农业科技自主创新资金重点项目(CX(16)1003-13)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:44-51
  • 页数:8
  • CN:12-1437/S
  • ISSN:2095-6819
  • 分类号:X322;F326.11
摘要
为探讨稻麦两熟农田径流养分循环利用模式的运作可持续性和生态补偿标准,应用生产-生态系统能值测算方法,综合分析其环境安全性和运作持续性;结合生产运营实践,深入分析了基于生命周期过程的物能投入与输出,提出生态补偿依据;并基于能值收益差异估算出其持续运行的生态补偿标准。结果表明,与传统模式相比,径流养分循环模式的环境负载率降低39.62%,而能值可持续发展指数和环境安全性指数分别提高64.89%和36.73%。径流养分循环模式的生物辅助能投入增加42.16%,而污染产能降低了70.09%。养分循环模式的氮磷养分环境排放量分别降低34.85%和30.43%。同时,循环模式的净能值收益比传统模式低2.15×1016Sej·hm-2·a-1。研究表明,径流养分循环模式提高了环境安全性但降低了经济效益,其生态补偿标准应不低于4 153.78元·hm-2·a-1。
        To investigate the sustainability and ecological compensation standard for the runoff nutrient recycling system in rice-wheat rotation systems, the environmental safety and sustainability of operations was analyzed based on emergy analysis and evidence of ecological compensation was proposed based on energy and material flow analysis over the entire life cycle of production practice; The payment standard based on the net emergy benefit difference was also calculated. Emergy analysis suggested that the environmental loading ratio was reduced by 39.62%, while the emergy sustainability index and environmental safety index were increased by 64.89% and 36.73% under the nutrient recycling system, respectively. Energy flow analysis showed that the biological auxiliary energy input was increased by 42.16%,while energy output through pollutants was reduced by 70.09%. Material flow analysis showed that the recycling system decreased nitrogen and phosphorus output to the surrounding water environment by 34.85% and 30.43%. Likewise, the net emergy benefit was lower by 2.15×1016 Sej·hm-2·a-1 for the recycling system than for the conventional system. These results suggested that the recycling system improved environmental safety but reduced economic profit, which thus required ecological compensation for its ecosystemic services, and the payment standard was estimated to be 4 153.78 yuan·hm-2·a-1.
引文
[1]杨建昌,杜永,刘辉.长江下游稻麦周年超高产栽培途径与技术[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(6):1611-1621.YANG Jian-chang,DU Yong,LIU Hui.Cultivation approaches and techniques for annual super-high yielding of rice and wheat in the lower reaches of Yangtze River[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2008,41(6):1611-1621.
    [2]中国农业年鉴编委会.中国农业年鉴2012[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2013.Editorial Committee of China Agricultural Yearbook.China agricultural yearbook 2012[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2013.
    [3]Yang H S,Yang B,Dai Y J,et al.Soil nitrogen retention is increased by ditch-buried straw return in a rice-wheat rotation system[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2015,69:52-58.
    [4]郑建初,常志州,陈留根,等.水葫芦治理太湖流域水体氮磷污染的可行性研究[J].江苏农业科学,2008(3):247-250.ZHENG Jian-chu,CHANG Zhi-zhou,CHEN Liu-gen,et al.Feasiblity study of hyacinth(Eichhornia crassipes)used in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus content in polluted water in the Lake Taihu[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Science,2008(3):247-250.
    [5]高旺盛,陈源泉,梁龙.论发展循环农业的基本原理与技术体系[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(6):731-734.GAO Wang-sheng,CHEN Yuan-quan,LIANG Long.Discussion about the basic principles and technological systems of circular agriculture[J].Research in Agricultural Modernization,2007,28(6):731-734.
    [6]刘红江,陈留根,朱普平,等.稻田流失养分循环利用系统构建研究初探[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2275-2279.LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Liu-gen,ZHU Pu-ping,et al.Primary research for nutrient rycling from runoff in rice paddy fields[J].Ecology and Environment Sciences,2010,19(10):2275-2279.
    [7]刘红江,陈留根,朱普平,等.农田施用水葫芦对水稻产量形成的影响[J].中国农学通报.2011,27(3):184-188.LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Liu-gen,ZHU Pu-ping,et al.Effect of Eichhornia crassipes residue application on rice yield formation[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2011,27(3):184-188.
    [8]盛婧,郑建初,陈留根,等.水葫芦富集水体养分及其农田施用研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(10):2119-2123.SHENG Jing,ZHENG Jian-chu,CHEN Liu-gen,et al.Nutrient enrichment from runoff by Eichhornia crassipes and its residue application in the rice fields[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2009,28(10):2119-2123.
    [9]毛德华,胡光伟,刘慧杰,等.基于能值分析的洞庭湖区退田还湖生态补偿标准[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(2):525-532.MAO De-hua,HU Guang-wei,LIU Hui-jie,et al.Ecological compensation standard in Dongting Lake region of returning cropland to lake based on emergy analysis[J].Journal of Chinese Applied Ecology,2014,25(2):525-532.
    [10]周连第,胡艳霞,王亚芝,等.京郊农业生物循环系统生态经济能值评估---以密云尖岩村为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(23):7346-7354.ZHOU Lian-di,HU Yan-xia,WANG Ya-zhi,et al.Emergy evaluation of an agro-circulation system in Beijing suburb:Take Jianyan village as a case study[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(23):7346-7354.
    [11]赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292.ZHAO Jing-zhu,XIAO Han,WU Gang.Comparison analysis on physical and value assessment methods for ecosystems services[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(2):290-292.
    [12]唐丽静,王冬艳,杨园园.基于“多规合一”和生态足迹法的土地利用结构优化[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(1):243-251.TANG Li-jing,WANG Dong-yan,YANG Yuan-yuan.Optimization of land use structure based on"multiple planning integration"and ecological footprint[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(1):243-251.
    [13]Odum H T.Handbook of emergy evaluation:A compendium of data for emergy computation.Folio No.1:Introduction and global budget[R/OL].[2019-03-21].http://www.ees.ufl.edu/cep/.
    [14]王小龙.基于生命周期评价与能值分析的循环农业评价理论、方法与实证研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2016:143.WANG Xiao-long.An integrated framework based on life cycle assessment and emergy evaluation for circular agriculture:Methods and cases[D].Beijing:China Agricultural University,2016:143.
    [15]钟珍梅,黄秀声,黄勤楼,等.规模化牛场“肉牛-沼气-牧草”循环农业模式能值分析[J].家畜生态学报,2009,30(6):112-116.ZHONG Zhen-mei,HUANG Xiu-sheng,HUANG Qin-lou,et al.Emergy analysis of"Beef-Methane-Forage"circular agriculture in scale cattle farm[J].Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici,2009,30(6):112-116.
    [16]杨欣,蔡银莺.农田生态补偿方式的选择及市场运作--基于武汉市383户农户问卷的实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(5):591-596.YANG Xin,CAI Yin-ying.Farmer′s selection of farmland ecological compensation mode and its relevant factors:A case of 383 households in Wuhan City[J].Resource and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2012,21(5):591-596.
    [17]崔新蕾,蔡银莺,张安录.基于农业面源污染防治的农田生态补偿标准测算[J].广东土地科学,2011,10(6):34-39.CUI Xin-lei,CAI Yin-ying,ZHANG An-lu.Agricultural land′s ecological compensaton criteria based on the non-point source pollution[J].Guangdong Land Science,2011,10(6):34-39.
    [18]李颖,葛颜祥,刘爱华,等.基于粮食作物碳汇功能的农业生态补偿机制研究[J].农业经济问题,2014(10):33-40.LI Ying,GE Yan-xiang,LIU Ai-hua,et al.A study of agricultural ecological compensation based on carbon sequestration of food crops[J].Agricultural Economic Problems,2014(10):33-40.
    [19]蓝盛芳,钦佩.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:245-250.LAN Sheng-fang,QIN Pei.Emergy analysis of eco-economic system[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2002:245-250.
    [20]王小龙,韩玉,陈源泉,等.基于能值分析的无公害设施蔬菜生产系统效率和可持续性评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(7):2136-2145.WANG Xiao-long,HAN Yu,CHEN Yuan-quan,et al.Efficiency and sustainability evaluation of a pollution-free vegetable production system based on emergy analysis[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(7):2136-2145.
    [21]Cavalett O,Queiroz J F,Ortega E.Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains,pig and fish in small farms in the south Brazil[J].Ecological Modelling,2006,193(3/4):205-224.
    [22]Brandt-Williams S L.Handbook of emergy evaluation:A compendium of data for emergy computation.Folio No.4:Emergy of florida agriculture[R/OL].[2019-03-21].http://www.ees.ufl.edu/cep/.
    [23]Brown M T,Bardi E.Handbook of emergy evaluation:A compendium of data for emergy computation.Folio No.3:Emergy of ecosystems[R/OL].[2019-03-21].http://www.emergysystems.org.
    [24]Hu Q H,Zhang L X,Wang C B.Emergy-based analysis of two chicken farming systems:A perspective of organic production model in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(23):7227-7234.
    [25]钟珍梅,翁伯琦,黄勤楼,等.基于能值理论的循环复合农业生态系统发展评价--以福建省福清星源循环农业产业示范基地为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(18):5755-5762.ZHONG Zhen-mei,WENG Bo-qi,HUANG Qin-lou,et al.Evaluating the ecosystem sustainability of circular agriculture based on the emergy theory:A case study of the Xingyuan circular agriculture demonstration site in Fuqing City,Fujian[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(18):5755-5762.
    [26]陈阜.农业生态学[M].2版.北京:中国农业出版社,2011:315.CHEN Fu.Agroecology[M].2nd Edition.Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2011:315.
    [27]李加林,张正龙,曾昭鹏.江苏环境经济系统的能值分析与可持续发展对策研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2003,13(2):76-81.LI Jia-lin,ZHANG Zheng-long,ZENG Zhao-peng.Study on emergy analysis and sustainable development of Jiangsu environment-economic system[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2003,13(2):76-81.
    [28]郭媛,王艳君,刘长坤.近50年来(1960-2007年)长江流域20cm口径蒸发皿蒸发量与太阳辐射变化的对比[J].南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版),2012,4(6):496-505.GUO Yuan,WANG Yan-jun,LIU Chang-kun.Comparative analysis of variations of 20 cm pan evaporation and global solar radiation over the Yangtze River basin during 1960-2007[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology:Natural Science Edition,2012,4(6):496-505.
    [29]关颖慧.长江流域极端气候变化及其未来趋势预测[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.GUAN Ying-hui.Extreme climate change and its trend prediction in the Yangtze River basin[D].Yangling:Northwest A&F University,2015.
    [30]Yang H S,Xu M M,Koide R,et al.Effects of ditch-buried straw return on water percolation,nitrogen leaching and crop yields in a ricewheat rotation system[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2016,96:1141-1149.
    [31]Ulgiati S,Brown M.Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems[J].Ecological Modelling,1998,108(1/2/3):23-36.
    [32]邓远建,肖锐,严立冬.绿色农业产地环境的生态补偿政策绩效评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(1):120-126.DENG Yuan-jian,XIAO Rui,YAN Li-dong.Research on the evaluation of ecological compensation policies of green agricultural producing areas[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2015,25(1):120-126.