经济制度距离与贸易发展——基于跨国面板数据的实证研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Economic Institutional Distance and Trade Development——An Empirical Study Based on Cross-national Panel Data 作者：刘德学 ; 孙博文 英文作者：LIU Dexue;SUN Bow en;College of Economics,Jinan University; 关键词：制度距离 ; 国际接轨 ; 贸易发展 ; 影响机制 英文关键词：Institutional Distance;;International Connection;;Trade Development;;Influence Mechanism 中文刊名：国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报) 英文刊名：International Business 机构：暨南大学经济学院; 出版日期：2019-01-15 出版单位：国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报) 年：2019 期：01 基金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘一带一路’战略与中国参与全球经济治理问题研究”(15ZDA018);; 广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划项目“珠三角城市群分工与协调发展模式研究”(GD13CYJ09);; 广东省“‘理论粤军’重点项目政府负面清单管理的理论与实践问题研究”(WT1413) 语种：中文; 页：27-39 页数：13 CN：11-3645/F ISSN：1002-4034 分类号：F110;F740.2

摘要

通过计算一国与世界其他国家在经济制度方面的"平均制度距离",分析了这种距离对贸易发展的影响。同时,利用81个国家1995～2014年的跨国面板数据进行的实证检验证实了这种"平均制度距离"对一国的贸易发展有着显著的负向影响,即距离越小越有利于贸易的开展;进一步对影响机制的检验结果表明,制度距离的缩小主要是通过降低多边贸易成本、提高贸易自由度来实现对贸易发展的促进。此外,针对不同制度内涵的检验结果则显示,具体制度内涵上的相对差异对于贸易的影响也是不同的。
        Different from existing research focusing on bilateral relationship,this paper calculates an"average institution distance"with spatial economic theory,to analyze the impact of which on trade development. Based on an empirical study using a panel data of 81 countries during 1995-2014,this paper verifies the negative influence of this"average institution distance " on the trade development of a country,indicating that one country shall keep pace with the"world trend"on institutional development. Further analysis indicates that the narrowing of distance can improve trade expansion by decreasing multilateral trade costs,and enhancing trade freedom. In addition,empirical tests in connection with different institutional connotations reveal that relative diffenence in connotations of specific institutions have different impacts on trade development.

引文

[1]潘安,魏龙.制度距离对中国稀土出口贸易的影响——基于18个国家和地区贸易数据的引力模型分析[J].国际贸易问题,2013(4):96-104.
    [2]潘镇.制度质量、制度距离与双边贸易[J].中国工业经济,2006(7):45-52.
    [3]钱学锋,熊平.中国出口增长的二元边际及其因素决定[J].经济研究,2010,45(1):65-79.
    [4]邱斌,唐保庆,孙少勤,等.要素禀赋、制度红利与新型出口比较优势[J].经济研究,2014,49(8):107-119.
    [5]茹玉骢,张利风.债务融资、合约实施效率与中国地区产业比较优势[J].世界经济文汇,2014(3):39-56.
    [6]魏浩,何晓琳,赵春明.制度水平、制度差距与发展中国家的对外贸易发展——来自全球31个发展中国家的国际经验[J].南开经济研究,2010(5):18-34.
    [7]许家云,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.制度距离、相邻效应与双边贸易——基于“一带一路”国家空间面板模型的实证分析[J].财经研究,2017,43(1):75-85.
    [8]杨青龙.基于制度要素的比较优势理论拓展——以交易成本经济学为视角[J].财贸研究,2013,24(4):58-68.
    [9]印永龙,佘晓玉.制度质量与农产品比较优势——基于30个国家的面板数据分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2015(6):109-125.
    [10]ANGKINANDA P,CHIU E M P. Will institutional reform enhance bilateral trade flows? Analyses from different reform aspects[J]. Journal of Economic Policy Reform,2011,14(3):243-258.
    [11]ANTRAS P. Incomplete contracts and the product cycle[J]. America Economic Review,2005,95(4):1054-1073.
    [12]BELLOC M.Institutions and international trade:a reconsideration of comparative advantage[J]. Journal of Economic Survey,2006,20(1):3-26.
    [13]DE GROOT H et al,The institutional determinant of bilateral trade patterns[J]. Kyklos,2004,57(1):103-123.
    [14]KHANDELWAL A K,SCHOTT P K,WEI S J. Trade liberalization and embedded institutional reform:evidence from Chinese exporters[J]. The American Economic Review,2013,103(6):2169-2195.
    [15]KOSTOVA T. Country institutional profiles:concept and measurement[C]//Academy of Management proceedings.Academy of Management,1997(1):180-184.
    [16]LEVCHENKO A A. Institutional quality and international trade[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2007,74(3):791-819.
    [17]LEVCHENKO A A. International trade and institutional change[R]. NBER Working Ppaper,2011:No. 17675.
    [18]NORTH D C. Institutions,institutional change and economic performance[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
    [19]NUNN N. Relationship-specificity,incomplete contracts,and the pattern of trade[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007,122(2):569-600.
    [20]WANG Y,WANG Y,LI K. Judicial quality,contract intensity and exports:firm-level evidence[J]. China Economic Review,2014,31:32-42.
    [21]WEI S J,SHLEIFER A. Local corruption and global capital flows[J]. Brookings papers on economic activity,2000(2):303-346.