基于粗糙集理论的淡水湖泊湿地生态系统健康评价研究
|
摘要
该文旨在通过构建淡水湖泊湿地生态健康评价指标体系,对比分析长江流域中的鄱阳湖、西洞庭湖、洪湖3个淡水湖泊湿地的生态系统健康状况.首先从水环境、土壤、生物、景观和社会等1级指标中列出13个2级指标,并利用粗糙集理论对13个指标进行约简,得到由5个1级指标和8个2级指标构成的湖泊湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系;然后运用层次分析法对1级指标进行主观赋权,以及采用基于信息粒度的属性重要度原理对2级核心指标进行客观赋权,再将2种权重组合起来得到评价指标的权重系数;最后通过加权和的方式计算出3个淡水湖泊湿地的综合健康指数,以便进行生态系统健康状况比较.研究结果表明:3个湖泊湿地生态系统的健康等级均为中等,综合健康指数排序为洪湖(6. 063)>鄱阳湖(5. 997)>西洞庭湖(5. 458).
The purpose of this paper is to compare the ecosystem health condition of three freshwater lake wetlands,including Poyang Lake,Dongting Lake and Honghu Lake in the Yangtze River basin,by constructing the evaluation index system of ecological health on freshwater lake wetland. For achieving this objective,13 second grade indexes are firstly given under 5 first grade indexes that involve water environment,soil,biology,landscape and society. Thirteen indexes are reduced by using rough set theory,and so a set of evaluation index system of ecosystem health on lake wetland,which is composed of five first grade indexes and eight second grade indexes,is obtained. Secondly,the subjective weights are used to assign five first grade indexes by the analytic hierarchy process( AHP) method,and the objective weights are used to assign eight second grade core indexes by using the attribute significance principle based on information granularity,then two kinds of weight are combined to get the weight coefficients of the evaluation indexes. Lastly,the comprehensive health indexes of three freshwater lake wetlands are calculated by means of weighted sum so as to compare the ecosystem health conditions of three freshwater lake wetlands. The results show that all of the ecosystem health grade of three lake wetlands are medium,and the value of comprehensive health index follows the order of Honghu Lake( 6. 063) > Poyang Lake( 5. 997) > West Dongting Lake( 5. 458).
The purpose of this paper is to compare the ecosystem health condition of three freshwater lake wetlands,including Poyang Lake,Dongting Lake and Honghu Lake in the Yangtze River basin,by constructing the evaluation index system of ecological health on freshwater lake wetland. For achieving this objective,13 second grade indexes are firstly given under 5 first grade indexes that involve water environment,soil,biology,landscape and society. Thirteen indexes are reduced by using rough set theory,and so a set of evaluation index system of ecosystem health on lake wetland,which is composed of five first grade indexes and eight second grade indexes,is obtained. Secondly,the subjective weights are used to assign five first grade indexes by the analytic hierarchy process( AHP) method,and the objective weights are used to assign eight second grade core indexes by using the attribute significance principle based on information granularity,then two kinds of weight are combined to get the weight coefficients of the evaluation indexes. Lastly,the comprehensive health indexes of three freshwater lake wetlands are calculated by means of weighted sum so as to compare the ecosystem health conditions of three freshwater lake wetlands. The results show that all of the ecosystem health grade of three lake wetlands are medium,and the value of comprehensive health index follows the order of Honghu Lake( 6. 063) > Poyang Lake( 5. 997) > West Dongting Lake( 5. 458).
引文
[1]吕宪国,刘红玉.湿地生态系统保护与管理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
[2]周静,万荣荣.湿地生态系统健康评价方法研究进展[J].生态科学,2018,37(6):209-216.
[3]吕宪国.中国湿地与湿地研究[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2008.
[4]Mitsch W J,Gosselink J G.Wetlands[M].2nd ed.New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1993:507-527.
[5]Stapanian M A,Waite T A,Krzys G,et al.Rapid assessment indicator of wetland integrity as an unintended predictor of avian diversity[J].Hydrobiologia,2004,520(1):119-126.
[6]贾慧聪,曹春香,马广仁,等.青海省三江源地区湿地生态系统健康评价[J].湿地科学,2011,9(3):209-217.
[7]王斌,郭胜华,张震.华北地区滨海湿地生态系统健康评价体系构建研究[J].中国环境监测,2012,28(4):29-32.
[8]谭娟,黄沈发,王卿.上海市滩涂湿地生态系统健康评价及成因分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(12):1706-1713.
[9]张淼.黄旗海湿地生态系统健康评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[10]王书可,李顺龙,谢学军,等.基于集对分析法的三江平原湿地生态系统健康评价研究[J].林业经济,2015(8):68-73,115.
[11]宋创业,胡慧霞,黄欢,等.黄河三角洲人工恢复芦苇湿地生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2019,36(9):2705-2714.
[12]张容.翠湖湿地生态系统健康评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[13]冯倩,刘聚涛,韩柳,等.鄱阳湖国家湿地公园湿地生态系统健康评价研究[J].水生态学杂志,2016,37(4):48-54.
[14]吴春莹,陈伟,曹春香,等.北京市重要湿地生态系统健康评价[J].湿地科学,2017,15(4):516-521.
[15]姚萍萍,王汶,孙睿,等.长江流域湿地生态系统健康评价[J].气象与环境科学,2018,41(1):12-18.
[16]赵志江,崔丽娟,朱利,等.指标体系法在我国湿地生态系统健康评价研究中的应用进展[J].湿地科学,2018,14(4):9-13.
[17]钟嘉鸣,李订芳.基于粗糙集理论的属性权重确定最优化方法研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2008,44(20):51-53.
[18]彭连贵,阎瑞霞,陈昭君.多粒度粗糙集粒度权重确定的综合方法[J/OL].计算机应用研究,2019,36(11).[2018-08-10].http://www.arocmag.com/article/02-2019-11-027.html.
[19]Pawlak Z.Rough set[J].International Journal of Information and Computer Science,1982,11(5):341-356.
[20]施振佺,陈世平.基于粗糙集和知识粒度的特征权重确定方法[J].科技管理研究,2018(12):248-253.
[21]庞发虎,庞振凌,杜瑞卿.粗糙集理论对湖泊生态系统健康评定指数法的评价[J].生物数学学报,2008,23(2):337-344.
[22]文益君,周根苗,张晓蕾,等.基于粗糙集的风景林景观美学评价[J].林业科学,2009,45(1):1-7.
[23]闫正龙,高凡,黄强.基于PSR模型和粗糙集的平原地区河流系统健康评价指标体系研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(12):200-208,219.
[24]黄国如,武传号,向碧为.基于粗糙集理论的东江流域水基系统健康集对分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(5):1345-1351.
[25]吕勇,孙谦,张超家.基于粗糙集的湿地景观质量评价研究:以重庆市阿蓬江国家湿地公园为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(7):12-18.
[26]史果香,周彤,杜艳爽,等.基于粗糙集的旅游区道路生态恢复评价体系研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2016,45(5):112-118.
[27]苗夺谦,李道国.粗糙集理论、算法与应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008.
[28]万伟,王命延,陈熹.一种基于Rough集理论的多属性综合评价方法[J].计算机与现代化,2007(1):49-51,59.
[29]张文修,仇国芳.基于粗糙集的不确定决策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[30]张文修,吴伟志,梁吉业,等.粗糙集理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[31]徐优红,竺定宏.粗糙集近似与信息粒度[J].计算机科学,2008,35(3):222-224.
[32]周辉,鲁燕飞,王黔英,等.基于信息粒度的属性权重确定方法[J].统计与决策,2006(10):134-136.
[33]陈悦华,黄刚.基于改进的粗糙集与AHP法的组合权重确定方法[J].测控技术,2017,36(6):132-135,141.
[34]吴良冰,张华,孙毅,等.湿地生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].中国农村水利水电,2009(10):22-26.
[35]Rapport D J,Friend A M.Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics:a stress-response approach[M].Ottawa:Statistics Canada,1979:11-510.
[36]Costanza R,Norton B G,Haskell B D.Ecosystem health:new goals for environment management[M].Washington D C:Island Press,1992.
[37]吴昊.国际重要湿地生态系统评价:以辽宁双台河口为例[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2014.
[38]马广仁,鲍达明,曹春香,等.中国国际重要湿地生态系统评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[39]胡嘉东,郑丙辉,万峻.潮间带湿地栖息地功能退化评价方法研究与应用[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(2):171-175.
[40]孙永光.长江口不同年限围垦区景观结构与功能分异[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.
[2]周静,万荣荣.湿地生态系统健康评价方法研究进展[J].生态科学,2018,37(6):209-216.
[3]吕宪国.中国湿地与湿地研究[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2008.
[4]Mitsch W J,Gosselink J G.Wetlands[M].2nd ed.New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1993:507-527.
[5]Stapanian M A,Waite T A,Krzys G,et al.Rapid assessment indicator of wetland integrity as an unintended predictor of avian diversity[J].Hydrobiologia,2004,520(1):119-126.
[6]贾慧聪,曹春香,马广仁,等.青海省三江源地区湿地生态系统健康评价[J].湿地科学,2011,9(3):209-217.
[7]王斌,郭胜华,张震.华北地区滨海湿地生态系统健康评价体系构建研究[J].中国环境监测,2012,28(4):29-32.
[8]谭娟,黄沈发,王卿.上海市滩涂湿地生态系统健康评价及成因分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(12):1706-1713.
[9]张淼.黄旗海湿地生态系统健康评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[10]王书可,李顺龙,谢学军,等.基于集对分析法的三江平原湿地生态系统健康评价研究[J].林业经济,2015(8):68-73,115.
[11]宋创业,胡慧霞,黄欢,等.黄河三角洲人工恢复芦苇湿地生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2019,36(9):2705-2714.
[12]张容.翠湖湿地生态系统健康评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[13]冯倩,刘聚涛,韩柳,等.鄱阳湖国家湿地公园湿地生态系统健康评价研究[J].水生态学杂志,2016,37(4):48-54.
[14]吴春莹,陈伟,曹春香,等.北京市重要湿地生态系统健康评价[J].湿地科学,2017,15(4):516-521.
[15]姚萍萍,王汶,孙睿,等.长江流域湿地生态系统健康评价[J].气象与环境科学,2018,41(1):12-18.
[16]赵志江,崔丽娟,朱利,等.指标体系法在我国湿地生态系统健康评价研究中的应用进展[J].湿地科学,2018,14(4):9-13.
[17]钟嘉鸣,李订芳.基于粗糙集理论的属性权重确定最优化方法研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2008,44(20):51-53.
[18]彭连贵,阎瑞霞,陈昭君.多粒度粗糙集粒度权重确定的综合方法[J/OL].计算机应用研究,2019,36(11).[2018-08-10].http://www.arocmag.com/article/02-2019-11-027.html.
[19]Pawlak Z.Rough set[J].International Journal of Information and Computer Science,1982,11(5):341-356.
[20]施振佺,陈世平.基于粗糙集和知识粒度的特征权重确定方法[J].科技管理研究,2018(12):248-253.
[21]庞发虎,庞振凌,杜瑞卿.粗糙集理论对湖泊生态系统健康评定指数法的评价[J].生物数学学报,2008,23(2):337-344.
[22]文益君,周根苗,张晓蕾,等.基于粗糙集的风景林景观美学评价[J].林业科学,2009,45(1):1-7.
[23]闫正龙,高凡,黄强.基于PSR模型和粗糙集的平原地区河流系统健康评价指标体系研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(12):200-208,219.
[24]黄国如,武传号,向碧为.基于粗糙集理论的东江流域水基系统健康集对分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(5):1345-1351.
[25]吕勇,孙谦,张超家.基于粗糙集的湿地景观质量评价研究:以重庆市阿蓬江国家湿地公园为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(7):12-18.
[26]史果香,周彤,杜艳爽,等.基于粗糙集的旅游区道路生态恢复评价体系研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2016,45(5):112-118.
[27]苗夺谦,李道国.粗糙集理论、算法与应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008.
[28]万伟,王命延,陈熹.一种基于Rough集理论的多属性综合评价方法[J].计算机与现代化,2007(1):49-51,59.
[29]张文修,仇国芳.基于粗糙集的不确定决策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[30]张文修,吴伟志,梁吉业,等.粗糙集理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[31]徐优红,竺定宏.粗糙集近似与信息粒度[J].计算机科学,2008,35(3):222-224.
[32]周辉,鲁燕飞,王黔英,等.基于信息粒度的属性权重确定方法[J].统计与决策,2006(10):134-136.
[33]陈悦华,黄刚.基于改进的粗糙集与AHP法的组合权重确定方法[J].测控技术,2017,36(6):132-135,141.
[34]吴良冰,张华,孙毅,等.湿地生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].中国农村水利水电,2009(10):22-26.
[35]Rapport D J,Friend A M.Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics:a stress-response approach[M].Ottawa:Statistics Canada,1979:11-510.
[36]Costanza R,Norton B G,Haskell B D.Ecosystem health:new goals for environment management[M].Washington D C:Island Press,1992.
[37]吴昊.国际重要湿地生态系统评价:以辽宁双台河口为例[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2014.
[38]马广仁,鲍达明,曹春香,等.中国国际重要湿地生态系统评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[39]胡嘉东,郑丙辉,万峻.潮间带湿地栖息地功能退化评价方法研究与应用[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(2):171-175.
[40]孙永光.长江口不同年限围垦区景观结构与功能分异[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |