农牧交错带乡村空间发展类型及影响因素研究
|
摘要
乡村空间发展类型识别与划分一直是乡村地理学研究热点之一。文章以宁夏盐池县为例,利用引力模型、可达性测度模型和空间自相关模型识别该县乡村地域空间发展类型,通过地理探测器探测其影响因素,揭示影响农牧交错带乡村发展核心要素的空间分异状况。结果表明:乡村空间发展系统分析框架对于新时期农牧交错带村域空间发展类型的识别与发展振兴具有一定的适用性和导向性;宁夏盐池村域空间发展类型可识别和划分为4种乡村地域空间发展类型,分别为城郊融合类、集聚提升类、适度挖潜类、搬迁撤并类,并对分类因素进行了探测分析,以期对乡村振兴能够进行靶向治疗,促进乡村振兴战略的落实落地。该研究结果可为农牧交错带"乡村空间重构"和"乡村振兴规划"提供科学依据。
The identification and classification of village spatial development has always been one of the research hotspots in rural geography. In this paper, a multi-level objective analysis method of "district-field-pole" is introduced.Taking Yanchi county in Ningxia as an example, gravitational model, reachability measurement model, and spatial autocorrelation model are used to identify the "rural area spatial development type" in the county, and detects its influencing factors by geo-detector, so as to reveal the spatial differentiation of the core factors affecting rural development in the agro-pastoral region. The results show that: The framework of rural spatial development system analysis has certain applicability and guidance for the identification and development of rural spatial development types in the agro-pastoral ecotone in the new era; and the spatial development type of the village of Yan-chi can be identified and classified. It is divided into four rural spatial development types, namely suburban integration, agglomeration promotion, moderate tapping potential, relocation and evacuation. The factors of the zoning are explored and analyzed in order to carry out targeted treatment for Rural Revitalization and promote the implementation of the strategy of rural revitalization. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the "rural restructuring" and "rural revitalization plan" in the farming-pastoral ecotone.
The identification and classification of village spatial development has always been one of the research hotspots in rural geography. In this paper, a multi-level objective analysis method of "district-field-pole" is introduced.Taking Yanchi county in Ningxia as an example, gravitational model, reachability measurement model, and spatial autocorrelation model are used to identify the "rural area spatial development type" in the county, and detects its influencing factors by geo-detector, so as to reveal the spatial differentiation of the core factors affecting rural development in the agro-pastoral region. The results show that: The framework of rural spatial development system analysis has certain applicability and guidance for the identification and development of rural spatial development types in the agro-pastoral ecotone in the new era; and the spatial development type of the village of Yan-chi can be identified and classified. It is divided into four rural spatial development types, namely suburban integration, agglomeration promotion, moderate tapping potential, relocation and evacuation. The factors of the zoning are explored and analyzed in order to carry out targeted treatment for Rural Revitalization and promote the implementation of the strategy of rural revitalization. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the "rural restructuring" and "rural revitalization plan" in the farming-pastoral ecotone.
引文
[1]刘彦随.中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J].地理学报，2018,73(4):637-650.
[2]李裕瑞，刘彦随，龙花楼.黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型[J].地理研究，2011,30(9):1 637-1 647.
[3]刘彦随.中国新农村建设地理论[M].北京：科学出版社，2010.
[4]刘彦随，严镔，王艳飞.新时期中国城乡发展的主要问题与转型对策[J].经济地理，2016,36(7):1-8.
[5]李琳娜，璩路路，刘彦随.乡村地域多体系统识别方法及应用研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):563-577.
[6]文琦，郑殿元.西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):509-521.
[7]龙花楼，邹健，李婷婷，等.乡村转型发展特征评价及地域类型划分——以“苏南—陕北”样带为例[J].地理研究，2012,31(3):495-506.
[8] Li Yurui,Long Hualong,Liu Yansui. Spatio-temporal pattern of China's rural development:A rurality index perspective[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2015,38:12-26.
[9] Yang Yuanyuan,Liu Yansui,Li Yurui,et al. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban expansion in Beijing during 1985-2013 with rural-urban development transformation[J]. Land Use Policy,2018,74:220-230.
[10]杨忍，刘彦随，龙花楼，等.中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架[J].地理科学进展，2015,34(8):1 019-1 030.
[11] Cheng Mingyang,Liu Yansui,Zhou Yang. Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry:A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2019,82:307-316.
[12]璩路路，李裕瑞，刘彦随.基于村镇空间“物—场”模型的乡村聚落布局优化研究[J].经济地理，2019,39(4):174-181.
[13]孟欢欢，李同昇，于正松，等.安徽省乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究[J].经济地理，2013,33(2):144-148.
[14]龙花楼，刘彦随，邹健.中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].地理学报，2009,64(4):426-434.
[15]王艳飞，刘彦随，李玉恒，等.乡村转型发展格局与驱动机制的区域性分析[J].经济地理，2016,36(5):135-142.
[16]周华，王炳君.江苏省乡村性及乡村转型发展耦合关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2013,23(9):48-55.
[17]郭艳军，刘彦随，李裕瑞.农村内生式发展机理与实证分析：以北京市顺义区北郎中村为例[J].经济地理，2012,32(9):114-125.
[18]周玉玉，马晓冬，赵彤.徐州市镇域乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].农业现代化研究，2013,34(6):728-732.
[19]焦鹏飞，张凤荣，李灿，等.基于引力模型的县域中心村空间布局分析——以山西省长治县为例[J].资源科学，2014,36(1):45-54.
[20] Comber Alexis,Brunsdon Chris,Green Edmund. Using a GISbased network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2008,86(1):103-114.
[21]王劲峰，胡艺.基于地理探测器的环境健康风探测[J].环境建模与软件，2012,33(7):114-115.
[22]陈秧分，刘彦随，杨忍.基于生计转型的中国农村居民点用地整治适宜区域[J].地理学报，2012,67(3):420-427.
[23] Liu Yansui,Li Yuheng. Revitalize the world's countryside[J].Nature,2017,548(7 667):275-277.
[24]刘彦随.新时代乡村振兴地理学研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):461-466.
[2]李裕瑞，刘彦随，龙花楼.黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型[J].地理研究，2011,30(9):1 637-1 647.
[3]刘彦随.中国新农村建设地理论[M].北京：科学出版社，2010.
[4]刘彦随，严镔，王艳飞.新时期中国城乡发展的主要问题与转型对策[J].经济地理，2016,36(7):1-8.
[5]李琳娜，璩路路，刘彦随.乡村地域多体系统识别方法及应用研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):563-577.
[6]文琦，郑殿元.西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):509-521.
[7]龙花楼，邹健，李婷婷，等.乡村转型发展特征评价及地域类型划分——以“苏南—陕北”样带为例[J].地理研究，2012,31(3):495-506.
[8] Li Yurui,Long Hualong,Liu Yansui. Spatio-temporal pattern of China's rural development:A rurality index perspective[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2015,38:12-26.
[9] Yang Yuanyuan,Liu Yansui,Li Yurui,et al. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban expansion in Beijing during 1985-2013 with rural-urban development transformation[J]. Land Use Policy,2018,74:220-230.
[10]杨忍，刘彦随，龙花楼，等.中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架[J].地理科学进展，2015,34(8):1 019-1 030.
[11] Cheng Mingyang,Liu Yansui,Zhou Yang. Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry:A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2019,82:307-316.
[12]璩路路，李裕瑞，刘彦随.基于村镇空间“物—场”模型的乡村聚落布局优化研究[J].经济地理，2019,39(4):174-181.
[13]孟欢欢，李同昇，于正松，等.安徽省乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究[J].经济地理，2013,33(2):144-148.
[14]龙花楼，刘彦随，邹健.中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].地理学报，2009,64(4):426-434.
[15]王艳飞，刘彦随，李玉恒，等.乡村转型发展格局与驱动机制的区域性分析[J].经济地理，2016,36(5):135-142.
[16]周华，王炳君.江苏省乡村性及乡村转型发展耦合关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2013,23(9):48-55.
[17]郭艳军，刘彦随，李裕瑞.农村内生式发展机理与实证分析：以北京市顺义区北郎中村为例[J].经济地理，2012,32(9):114-125.
[18]周玉玉，马晓冬，赵彤.徐州市镇域乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].农业现代化研究，2013,34(6):728-732.
[19]焦鹏飞，张凤荣，李灿，等.基于引力模型的县域中心村空间布局分析——以山西省长治县为例[J].资源科学，2014,36(1):45-54.
[20] Comber Alexis,Brunsdon Chris,Green Edmund. Using a GISbased network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2008,86(1):103-114.
[21]王劲峰，胡艺.基于地理探测器的环境健康风探测[J].环境建模与软件，2012,33(7):114-115.
[22]陈秧分，刘彦随，杨忍.基于生计转型的中国农村居民点用地整治适宜区域[J].地理学报，2012,67(3):420-427.
[23] Liu Yansui,Li Yuheng. Revitalize the world's countryside[J].Nature,2017,548(7 667):275-277.
[24]刘彦随.新时代乡村振兴地理学研究[J].地理研究，2019,38(3):461-466.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |