2018年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2019年展望
|
摘要
研究目的:总结2018年国内外土地科学研究的重点进展,展望2019年中国土地科学的发展趋势以及《中国土地科学》重点关注方向。研究方法:文献调研法。研究结果:(1)土地经济领域重点关注城乡土地价格与农地流转影响因素、土地市场化改革与政府行为、土地产权制度变迁与征地冲突等;(2)土地管理领域研究热点主要围绕自然资源管理体制改革、农村土地制度改革与土地法律完善、土地权籍与耕地保护管理等实践问题;(3)土地资源、利用与规划领域研究以探索土地资源资产负债表编制、重视土地生态状况评估、深化土地利用视角下的碳排放研究、创新土地利用模式、探讨国土空间规划体系构建及村级规划为热点;(4)土地工程与技术领域在农地综合整治、复垦技术革新、土地污染修复方法等方面研究逐渐深入,土地信息采集、处理技术不断完善。研究结论:2019年,《中国土地科学》将重点关注国家战略实施下的土地制度改革与土地利用转型、自然资源统一管理下的空间治理体系构建、生态文明建设背景下的土地资源系统科学、信息通讯技术驱动下的土地资源智能管控等研究问题及相关选题方向。
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the key progress of land science research at home and abroad in 2018, and to discuss the development trend and focuses of China Land Science in 2019. The method employed is literature review. The results show that: 1)the research on land economy focuses on urban and rural and the influencing factors of farmland transfer, land marketization reform and government behaviors, institutional evolution of land property rights and land acquisition conflicts; 2)the research on land management mainly focuses on natural resources management reform, rural land institutional reform and land law amendment, land tenure and cultivated land protection management; 3)the research on land resources and land use planning mainly focuses on the preparation of land resource balance sheets, land ecological status assessment, carbon emissions from the perspective of land use, innovative land use models, construction of land spatial planning system and village-level planning; 4)the research on land engineering and information technology mainly focuses on the comprehensive improvement of agricultural land, innovation of reclamation technology, land pollution restoration, land information collection and processing technology. In 2019, China Land Science will focus on land institutional reform and land use transformation under the implementation of national strategies, the construction of spatial governance system under the unified management of natural resources, and the science of land resources system under the background of ecological civilization construction and intelligent control of land resources driven by communication technology.
The purpose of this paper is to summarize the key progress of land science research at home and abroad in 2018, and to discuss the development trend and focuses of China Land Science in 2019. The method employed is literature review. The results show that: 1)the research on land economy focuses on urban and rural and the influencing factors of farmland transfer, land marketization reform and government behaviors, institutional evolution of land property rights and land acquisition conflicts; 2)the research on land management mainly focuses on natural resources management reform, rural land institutional reform and land law amendment, land tenure and cultivated land protection management; 3)the research on land resources and land use planning mainly focuses on the preparation of land resource balance sheets, land ecological status assessment, carbon emissions from the perspective of land use, innovative land use models, construction of land spatial planning system and village-level planning; 4)the research on land engineering and information technology mainly focuses on the comprehensive improvement of agricultural land, innovation of reclamation technology, land pollution restoration, land information collection and processing technology. In 2019, China Land Science will focus on land institutional reform and land use transformation under the implementation of national strategies, the construction of spatial governance system under the unified management of natural resources, and the science of land resources system under the background of ecological civilization construction and intelligent control of land resources driven by communication technology.
引文
[1]韩立彬,陆铭.供需错配:解开中国房价分化之谜[J].世界经济,2018,41(10):126-149.
[2]余亮亮,蔡银莺.土地供给结构、财政压力与房价--来自广东省的经验分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):30-36.
[3]张清源,苏国灿,梁若冰.增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨--利用“撤县设区”的准实验研究[J].财贸经济,2018,39(4):20-34.
[4]全世文,胡历芳,曾寅初,等.论中国农村土地的过度资本化[J].中国农村经济,2018,33(7):2-18.
[5]朱文珏,罗必良.农地价格幻觉:由价值评价差异引发的农地流转市场配置“失灵”--基于全国9省(区)农户的微观数据[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(5):67-81.
[6]王倩,任倩,余劲.粮食主产区农地流转农户议价能力实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(2):47-59.
[7]焦娜.地权安全性会改变农户投资行为吗--基于CHARLS2011和2013年数据的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(9):42-53.
[8]林善浪,叶炜,梁琳.家庭生命周期对农户农地流转意愿的影响研究--基于福建省1570份调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):68-73.
[9]江激宇,张士云,李博伟.社会资本、流转契约与土地长期投资[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(3):67-75.
[10]甘臣林,谭永海,陈璐,等.基于TPB框架的农户认知对农地转出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):152-159.
[11]曾雅婷,吕亚荣,刘文勇.农地流转提升了粮食生产技术效率吗--来自农户的视角[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(3):41-55.
[12]匡远配,周丽.农地流转与农村减贫--基于湖南省贫困地区的检验[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(7):64-70.
[13]郭君平,曲颂,夏英,等.农村土地流转的收入分配效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):160-169.
[14]王雪琪,曹铁毅,邹伟.地方政府干预农地流转对生产效率的影响--基于水稻种植户的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(9):133-141.
[15]WANG J,LIN Y,ANTHONY G,et al.Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes[J].Land Use Policy.2018,75:375-387.
[16]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化--基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[17]甄江,黄季焜.乡镇农地经营权流转平台发展趋势及其驱动力研究[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(7):33-40.
[18]唐鹏,石晓平,曲福田.政府管制、土地违法与土地财政[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):15-21.
[19]唐云锋,吴琦琦.土地财政制度对房地产价格的影响因素研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018,37(3):43-56.
[20]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗--基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(5):92-102.
[21]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性--基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(9):118-127.
[22]应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资--基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(3):110-127.
[23]许恒周,田浩辰.农户生计多样化视角下农地确权政策实施效果评估--基于1254份农户问卷的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,31(2):30-36.
[24]曲颂,郭君平,夏英.确权和调整化解了农地纠纷吗--基于7省村级层面数据的实证分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(2):71-78.
[25]孔祥利,赵娜.农业转型:引入土地制度变迁的生产函数重建[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(5):34-42.
[26]吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊.农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施--基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J].中国农村经济,2018,33(8):46-63.
[27]韩振华.完善农地“三权分置”制度--一个基于“国家土地调节权”的新视角[J].政治经济学评论,2018,9(5):144-169.
[28]CAO Y,ZHANG X.Are they satisfied with land taking?aspects on procedural fairness,monetary compensation and behavioral simulation in China’s land expropriation story[J].Land Use Policy,2018,74:166-178.
[29]刘守英.土地制度变革与经济结构转型--对中国40年发展经验的一个经济解释[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):1-10.
[30]刘凯.中国特色的土地制度如何影响中国经济增长--基于多部门动态一般均衡框架的分析[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(10):80-98.
[31]刘新平,胡如梅,宋子秋.建设项目用地预审制度变迁的理论逻辑、演化特征与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):14-20.
[32]王博,吕沛璐,冯淑怡,等.中国建设用地配置中政府失灵的理论解析及其改良框架设计[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):20-28.
[33]郭仁忠,罗平,罗婷文.土地管理三维思维与土地空间资源认知[J].地理研究,2018,37(4):649-658.
[34]董祚继.从机构改革看国土空间治理能力的提升[J].中国土地,2018(11):4-9.
[35]严金明,王晓莉,夏方舟.重塑自然资源管理新格局:目标定位、价值导向与战略选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):1-7.
[36]黄贤金,杨红,罗明.农村土地制度的改革创新模式和绩效[J].中国土地,2018(5):13-15.
[37]朱道林,李瑶瑶.农村土地制度改革的经济学考察[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):1-5.
[38]晓叶.农村宅基地制度改革的特点与方向[J].中国土地,2018(5):1.
[39]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):1-8.
[40]陈美球,蒋仁开,朱美英,等.乡村振兴背景下农村产业用地政策选择--基于“乡村振兴与农村产业用地政策创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):90-96.
[41]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[42]宋志红.三权分置下农地流转权利体系重构研究[J].中国法学,2018(4):282-302.
[43]高飞.土地承包权与土地经营权分设的法律反思及立法回应--兼评《农村土地承包法修正案(草案)》[J].法商研究,2018,35(3):3-14.
[44]席志国.民法典编纂中集体土地权利体系新路径[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(1):109-113,151.
[45]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(7):46-57.
[46]宋志红.宅基地“三权分置”的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018,36(4):142-153.
[47]席志国.民法典编纂视域中宅基地“三权分置”探究[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):45-50.
[48]贺雪峰.如何理解征地冲突--兼论《土地管理法》的修改[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):111-117.
[49]桂华.论土地使用权转让的《宪法》秩序--《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)评析[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):118-124.
[50]印子.论宅基地使用权实现的法律制度模式--兼评《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):125-134.
[51]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究--17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):98-108.
[52]王亦白.不动产登记审查的模式选择和标准确立[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(11):10-15.
[53]漆信贤,张志宏,黄贤金.面向新时代的耕地保护矛盾与创新应对[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):9-15.
[54]陈正,王建强,王健.新形势下耕地占补平衡监管体系建设[J].中国土地,2018(2):39-41.
[55]韩璐,孟鹏,蒋仁开,等.新时代耕地占补平衡的逻辑根源、模式探索与管理创新--基于“新时代耕地占补平衡方式改进与管理创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):90-96.
[56]闫慧敏,杜文鹏,封志明,等.自然资源资产负债的界定及其核算思路[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):888-898.
[57]薛智超,闫慧敏,杜文鹏,等.自然资源资产负债表编制中土地资源过耗负债的核算方法研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):919-928.
[58]刘向敏.关于自然资源资产负债表编制中土地资源核算的思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2018,31(4):34-38.
[59]王勇,李海英,俞海.中国省域绿色发展的空间格局及其演变特征[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):96-104.
[60]陈瑜琦,张智杰,郭旭东,等.中国重点生态功能区生态用地时空格局变化研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(2):19-26.
[61]崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[62]赵文武,刘月,冯强,等.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(1):139-151.
[63]刘永强,龙花楼,李加林.长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(5):1009-1022.
[64]于潇,吕春艳,郭旭东,等.京津冀城市群地区土地生态状况评估[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):89-96.
[65]欧维新,张伦嘉,陶宇,等.基于土地利用变化的长三角生态系统健康时空动态研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):84-92.
[66]卢新海,匡兵,李菁.碳排放约束下耕地利用效率的区域差异及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(4):657-668.
[67]余娇,赵荣钦,侯丽朋,等.郑州市典型产业用地效益与碳排放强度的关系研究--基于181家企业的调查[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):74-80.
[68]李波,刘雪琪,王昆.中国农地利用结构变化的碳效应及时空演进趋势研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):43-51.
[69]李玉玲,李世平,祁静静.陕西省土地利用碳排放影响因素及脱钩效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):382-390.
[70]郑红玉,吴次芳,沈孝强.土地混合利用研究评述及框架体系构建[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):157-164.
[71]起晓星,李建春.基于互联网地图POI数据的城市地下空间需求度评价--以济南市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):36-44.
[72]徐志搏,罗婷文,文楚君,等.基于改进多边形面积法的城市土地立体化利用潜力评价--以深圳市为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(3):504-514.
[73]刘超,许月卿,刘焱序,等.基于系统论的土地利用多功能分类及评价指标体系研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(1):181-188.
[74]刘红梅,刘超,王克强,等.大都市郊区农村宅基地利用动态变化及驱动力研究--兼论上海郊区宅基地多功能与制度创新[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(7):74-83.
[75]张佰林,高江波,高阳,等.中国山区农村土地利用转型解析[J].地理学报,2018,73(3):503-517.
[76]赵小风,刘梦丽,王柏源.基于地理探测器的城市建设用地规模时空差异及影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):29-35.
[77]周滔,邬妮.城市更新片区土地利用变化规律研究--以重庆市渝中区为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):67-73.
[78]徐保根,胡倩,祝锦霞,等.基于扎根理论的企业节地行为影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):81-87.
[79]范建双,任逸蓉.违法用地对土地可持续集约利用的影响机制及效应研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):52-58.
[80]林坚,刘松雪,刘诗毅.区域-要素统筹:构建国土空间开发保护制度的关键[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):1-7.
[81]林坚,吴宇翔,吴佳雨,等.论空间规划体系的构建--兼析空间规划、国土空间用途管制与自然资源监管的关系[J].城市规划,2018,42(5):9-17.
[82]叶丽丽,付洒,崔许锋,等.村土地利用规划编制关键性问题分析--基于村土地利用特征的思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2018,31(6):48-54.
[83]张晓,王南.建立基于社区情境的规划:乡村规划多样性和差异性文献分析[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(1):70-76.
[84]王丹,方斌,陈正富.基于辐射模型及潜力模型划分城乡地域功能的土地整治模式[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(13):270-278.
[85]胡银根,董文静,余依云,等.土地整治供给侧结构性改革与乡村重构--潜江“华山模式”实证研究[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(5):731-738.
[86]沈悦,严金明,陈昊.基于“三生”空间优化的城乡交错区土地整治功能单元划定[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(11):243-252.
[87]姚树荣,周毓君.乡村城镇化的市场驱动模式与实现路径--以成都市福洪镇为例[J].农村经济,2018(5):81-86.
[88]胡振琪,多玲花,王晓彤.采煤沉陷地夹层式充填复垦原理与方法[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(1):198-206.
[89]王晓彤,胡振琪,梁宇生,等.基于水分特性的采煤沉陷地充填复垦黄河泥沙容重优选[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(16):258-264.
[90]区晓琳,陈志彪,陈志强,等.亚热带侵蚀红壤区植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体化学计量特征[J].土壤学报,2018,55(5):1156-1167.
[91]胡芳,杜虎,曾馥平,等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复对土壤养分含量和微生物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(6):2170-2179.
[92]薛忠财,李纪红,李十中,等.能源作物甜高粱对镉污染农田的修复潜力研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(4):1621-1627.
[93]王雨涵,陈冬月,江志勇,等.EDTA强化盐生植物修复Pb、Cd和盐渍化复合污染土壤[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(9):1866-1874.
[94]费杨,阎秀兰,李永华.铁锰双金属材料在不同pH条件下对土壤As和重金属的稳定化作用[J].环境科学,2018,39(3):1430-1433,1435-1437.
[95]李明,程寒飞,安忠义,等.化学淋洗与生物质炭稳定化联合修复镉污染土壤[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(3):904-913.
[96]马国超,王立娟,马松,等.无人机摄影测量在矿山尾矿库建设规划的应用[J].测绘科学,2018,43(1):84-88.
[97]贾曙光,金爱兵,赵怡晴.无人机摄影测量在高陡边坡地质调查中的应用[J].岩土力学,2018,39(3):1130-1136.
[98]李靖,廖和平,蔡进.基于风险评价的低丘缓坡土地开发建设适宜性情景模拟--以重庆市巴南区为例[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):967-979.
[99]张泽民,吕昌河,谢苗苗,等.基于WorldView2影像的矿区植被重建效果评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(4):1301-1310.
[100]余文波,蔡海生,张莹,等.基于RS及GIS的南昌市土地生态安全动态评价及分区[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):244-249,256.
[101]谢臻,张凤荣,高阳,等.基于遥感和GIS的平原和山区贫困县农村耕地利用演变对比[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):255-263.
[102]张瑜,赵晓丽,左丽君,等.黄土高原生态系统服务价值动态评估与分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):170-176.
[103]TELLES T S,REYDON B P,MAIA A G.Effects of no-tillage on agricultural land values in Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:124-129.
[104]CIAIAN P,GURI F,RAJCANIOVA M,et al.Land fragmentation and production diversification:a case study from rural Albania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:589-599.
[105]MURAOKA R,JIN S,JAYNE TS.Land access,land rental and food security:evidence from Kenya[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:611-622.
[106]ZENG D,ALWANG J,NORTON G,et al.Land ownership and technology adoption revisited:improved maize varieties in Ethiopia[J].Land use policy,2018,72:270-279.
[107]STEFANO M.Property as a human right and property as a special title.Rediscussing private ownership of land[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:273-280.
[108]CHUSAK W,IAN G.B.Communal land titling dilemmas in northern Thailand:from community forestry to beneficial yet risky and uncertain options[J].Land Use Policy,2018,71:320-328.
[109]JYOTI R.Fundamental functionings of landowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[110]TALAN B.Redistributive land reform and structural change in Japan,South Korea,and Taiwai[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2018,3:732-761.
[111]DYLAN F.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:155-167.
[112]BRENT H,NAVRUZ N.Land reform by default:uncovering patterns of agricultural decollectivization in Tajikistan[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies,2018,45:409-430.
[113]JUNG-HO P,MAN-HEE H.Modern state formation and land management in South Korea:1945-1960[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:662-671.
[114]COLLINS A M,GRANT J A,ACKAH-BAIDOO P.The glocal dynamics of land reform in natural resource sectors:insights from Tanzania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,81:889-896.
[115]CHAU K W,CHOY L H T,WEBSTER C J.Institutional innovations in land development and planning in the 20th and 21st centuries[J].Habitat International,2018,75:90-95.
[116]FITZ D.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:255-267.
[117]RAHIMZADEH A.Political ecology of land reforms in Kinnaur:Implications and a historical overview[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:570-579.
[118]SERGE G RARD N,EKPODESSI HITOSHI NAKAMURA.Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law 2013-01[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:61-69.
[119]WILY L A.Risks to the sanctity of community lands in Kenya.A critical assessment of new legislation with reference to forestlands[J].Land Use Policy,2018,75:661-672.
[120]TURA H A.Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2017,70:247-255.
[121]ABBOTT P,MUGISHA R,SAPSFORD R.Women.land and empowerment in Rwanda[J].Journal of International Development,2018,30(6):1006-1022.
[122]AMBE J N,LIORA B,ERICK O A,et al.Institutional,economic and socio-cultural factors accounting for genderbased inequalities in land title procurement in Cameroon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:116-125.
[123]DILLON B,VOENA A.Widows’land rights and agricultural investment[J].Journal of Development Economics,2018,135:449-460.
[124]LEGESSE B A,JEFFERSON-MOORE K,THOMAS T.Impacts of land tenure and property rights on reforestation intervention in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:494-499.
[125]ALICE C,YANN L,HAROLD L.What drives land take and urban land expansion?A systematic review[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:339-349.
[126]ANDERS W,QIAN Z.Keeping agriculture alive next to the city:the functions of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg,Sweden[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:447-459.
[127]WUBNEH M.Policies and praxis of land acquisition,use,and development in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,73:170-183.
[128]JYOTI R.Fundamental functionings of landowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[129]EVANCE M,RONNIE D.Urban land contestations,challenges and planning strategies in Malawi’s main urban centres[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:1-8.
[130]LUCY E,KATHERINE A S.Re-thinking sustainable land management planning:understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:684-694.
[131]ZHAO R,LIU Y,TIAN M,et al.Impacts of water and land resources exploitation on agricultural carbon emissions:the water-land-energy-carbon nexus[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:480-492.
[132]LIU D,LIU C,FU Q,et al.Construction and application of a refined index for measuring the regional matching characteristics between water and land resources[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,91:203-211.
[133]BUSSI G,WHITEHEAD P G,GUTI RREZC NOVAS C,et al.Modelling the effects of climate and land-use change on the hydrochemistry and ecology of the River Wye(Wales)[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,627:733-743.
[134]SUMIT V,VISHAL N,TIMOTHY K,et al.From the core to the periphery:conflicts and cooperation over land and water in periurban Gurgaon,India[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:382-390.
[135]JULIANA L,ALEXANDER T,JULIE P H,et al.Land use patterns and influences of protected areas on mangroves of the eastern tropical Pacific[J].Biological Conservation2018,227:82-91.
[136]MARA E Q,MAURICIO Q,JOS J V.Exploring land use/land cover change and drivers in Andean mountains in Colombia:a case in rural Quindío[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,634:1288-1299.
[137]SCHIELEIN J,B RNER J.Recent transformations of landuse and land-cover dynamics across different deforestation frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:81-94.
[138]MESFIN S,KUMELACHEW Y.Dynamics of land use land cover and their drivers study for management of ecosystems in the socio-ecological landscape of Gurage Mountains,Ethiopia[J].Remote Sensing Applications:Society and Environment,2018,18:48-56.
[139]QI X,FU Y,WANG R Y,et al.Improving the sustainability of agricultural land use:an integrated framework for the conflict between food security and environmental deterioration[J].Applied Geography,2018,90:214-223.
[140]SHARON T L,TENLEY M C.Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies:a case study of Ontario Municipalities[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:641-651.
[141]LENIN H D,TOM S J U,SEBASTI N V,et al.Integrating strategic land use planning in the construction of future land use scenarios and its performance:the Maipo River Basin Chile[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:353-366.
[142]IN-AE Y,EUNOK L.Quantitative study on environment and energy information for land use planning scenarios in ecocity planning stage[J].Applied Energy,2018,230:889-911.
[143]SALLUSTIO L,PETTENELLA D,MERLINI P,et al.Assessing the economic marginality of agricultural lands in Italy to support land use planning[J].Land Use Policy,2018,2:1-9.
[144]ZHANG R,MATSUSHIMA K,KOBAYASHI K.Can land use planning help mitigate transport-related carbon emissions?[J].Land Use Policy,2018,74:32-40.
[145]JANA B,MORITZ R,WOLFGANG K.Taming expansive land use dynamics:sustainable land use regulation and urban sprawl in a comparative perspective[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:837-845.
[146]HRVOJE T,SINI A M I,MIODRAG R.Land consolidation suitability ranking of cadastral municipalities:informationbased decision-making using multi-criteria analyses of official registers’data[J].ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,2018,7(3):1-17.
[147]JUSTYNA W L,PRZEMYSLAW L,KATARZYNA S M.The proposed algorithm for identifying agricultural problem areas for the needs of their reasonable management under land consolidation works[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2018,152:333-339.
[148]SKOUSEN J G,DALLAIRE K.Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed appalachian surface mines[J].New Forests,2018,49(5):599.
[149]AHIRWAL J,MAITI S K.Development of technosol properties and recovery of carbon stock after 16 years of revegetation on coal mine degraded lands,India[J].Catena,2018,166:114-123.
[150]ANIRWAL J,KUMAR A.Reclamation of coal mine spoil and its effect on technosol quality and carbon sequestration:a case study from India[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018,25(28):27992-28003.
[151]CHAN W P,REN F.A large-scale field trial experiment to derive effective release of heavy metals from incineration bottom ashes during construction in land reclamation[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,637:182-190.
[152]YIN K,CHAN W P.Cr,Cu,Hg and Ni release from incineration bottom ash during utilization in land reclamationbased on lab-scale batch and column leaching experiments and a modeling study[J].Chemosphere,2018,197:741.
[153]ANGEL H Z,STOVALL J P.Surface and subsurface tillage effects on mine soil properties and vegetative response[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2018,82(2):475-482.
[154]GONZALEZ A H,LONDONO D M.Bradyrhizobium and pseudomonas strains obtained from coal-mining areas nodulate and promote the growth of calopogonium muconoides plants used in the reclamation of degraded areas[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,DOI:10.1111/jam.14117.
[155]CARABASSA,VICENC,ORTIZ,et al.Sewage sludge as an organic amendment for quarry restoration:effects on soil and vegetation[J].Land Degradation&Development,2018,29(8):2568-2574.
[156]ELKHATIB,ELSAYED A,SHERIF,et al.Using nanoparticles from water treatment residuals to reduce the mobility and phyto availability of Cd and Pb in biosolid-amended soils[J].Environmental Geochemistry and Health,2018,40(32):1-12.
[157]CHANG,JIH-HSING,DONG,et al.The lead contaminated land treated by the circulation-enhanced electrokinetics and phytoremediation in field scale[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.8:85.
[158]KOMINKOVA,DANA,FABBRICINO,et al.Sequential application of soil washing and phytoremediation in the land of fires[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2018,206:1081-1089.
[159]DESJARDINS,DOMINIC,BRERETON,et al.Complementarity of three distinctive phytoremediation crops for multiple-trace element contaminated soil[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,610:1428-1438.
[160]HOSSEINALIZADEH M,KARIMINEJAD N,ALINEJAD M.An application of different summary statistics for modelling piping collapses and gully headcuts to evaluate their geomorphological interactions in Golestan Province,Iran[J].Catena,2018,171:613-621.
[161]YAPRAK S,YILDIRIM O,SUSAM T.New approach for agricultural research and monitoring of land slide:using of UAV system[J].Journal of Environmental Protection And Ecology,2018,19(1):246-256.
[162]KAZEMI H,AKINCI H.A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis(MCDA)and Geographic Information System(GIS)[J].Ecological Engineering,2018,116:1-6.
[163]LAMQADEM A,PRADHAN B,SABER H,et al.Desertification sensitivity analysis using MEDALUS model and GIS:a case study of the oases of Middle Draa Valley,Morocco[J].Sensors,2018,18(7):2230-2249.
[164]VAN IERSEL W,STRAATSMA M,MIDDELKOOP H,et al.Multitemporal classification of river floodplain vegetation using time series of UAV images[J].Remote Sensing,201810(7):1-4.
[165]MAFANYA M,TSELE P,BOTAI O,et al.Radiometric calibration framework for ultra-high-resolution UAV-derived orthomosaics for large-scale mapping of invasive alien plants in semi-arid woodlands:harrisia pomanensis as a case study[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2018,39(15-16):5119-5140.
[166]IMAIZUMI F,NISHIGUCHI T,MATSUOKA N,et al.Interpretation of recent alpine landscape system evolution using geomorphic mapping and L-band InSAR analyses[J].Geomorphology,2018,30:125-137.
[2]余亮亮,蔡银莺.土地供给结构、财政压力与房价--来自广东省的经验分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):30-36.
[3]张清源,苏国灿,梁若冰.增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨--利用“撤县设区”的准实验研究[J].财贸经济,2018,39(4):20-34.
[4]全世文,胡历芳,曾寅初,等.论中国农村土地的过度资本化[J].中国农村经济,2018,33(7):2-18.
[5]朱文珏,罗必良.农地价格幻觉:由价值评价差异引发的农地流转市场配置“失灵”--基于全国9省(区)农户的微观数据[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(5):67-81.
[6]王倩,任倩,余劲.粮食主产区农地流转农户议价能力实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(2):47-59.
[7]焦娜.地权安全性会改变农户投资行为吗--基于CHARLS2011和2013年数据的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(9):42-53.
[8]林善浪,叶炜,梁琳.家庭生命周期对农户农地流转意愿的影响研究--基于福建省1570份调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):68-73.
[9]江激宇,张士云,李博伟.社会资本、流转契约与土地长期投资[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(3):67-75.
[10]甘臣林,谭永海,陈璐,等.基于TPB框架的农户认知对农地转出意愿的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):152-159.
[11]曾雅婷,吕亚荣,刘文勇.农地流转提升了粮食生产技术效率吗--来自农户的视角[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(3):41-55.
[12]匡远配,周丽.农地流转与农村减贫--基于湖南省贫困地区的检验[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(7):64-70.
[13]郭君平,曲颂,夏英,等.农村土地流转的收入分配效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):160-169.
[14]王雪琪,曹铁毅,邹伟.地方政府干预农地流转对生产效率的影响--基于水稻种植户的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(9):133-141.
[15]WANG J,LIN Y,ANTHONY G,et al.Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes[J].Land Use Policy.2018,75:375-387.
[16]张琳,黎小明,刘冰洁,等.土地要素市场化配置能否促进工业结构优化--基于微观土地交易数据的分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):23-31.
[17]甄江,黄季焜.乡镇农地经营权流转平台发展趋势及其驱动力研究[J].农业技术经济,2018,36(7):33-40.
[18]唐鹏,石晓平,曲福田.政府管制、土地违法与土地财政[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):15-21.
[19]唐云锋,吴琦琦.土地财政制度对房地产价格的影响因素研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018,37(3):43-56.
[20]王士海,王秀丽.农村土地承包经营权确权强化了农户的禀赋效应吗--基于山东省117个县(市、区)农户的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(5):92-102.
[21]宁静,殷浩栋,汪三贵.土地确权是否具有益贫性--基于贫困地区调查数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(9):118-127.
[22]应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资--基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察,2018,38(3):110-127.
[23]许恒周,田浩辰.农户生计多样化视角下农地确权政策实施效果评估--基于1254份农户问卷的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,31(2):30-36.
[24]曲颂,郭君平,夏英.确权和调整化解了农地纠纷吗--基于7省村级层面数据的实证分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(2):71-78.
[25]孔祥利,赵娜.农业转型:引入土地制度变迁的生产函数重建[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(5):34-42.
[26]吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊.农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施--基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J].中国农村经济,2018,33(8):46-63.
[27]韩振华.完善农地“三权分置”制度--一个基于“国家土地调节权”的新视角[J].政治经济学评论,2018,9(5):144-169.
[28]CAO Y,ZHANG X.Are they satisfied with land taking?aspects on procedural fairness,monetary compensation and behavioral simulation in China’s land expropriation story[J].Land Use Policy,2018,74:166-178.
[29]刘守英.土地制度变革与经济结构转型--对中国40年发展经验的一个经济解释[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):1-10.
[30]刘凯.中国特色的土地制度如何影响中国经济增长--基于多部门动态一般均衡框架的分析[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(10):80-98.
[31]刘新平,胡如梅,宋子秋.建设项目用地预审制度变迁的理论逻辑、演化特征与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):14-20.
[32]王博,吕沛璐,冯淑怡,等.中国建设用地配置中政府失灵的理论解析及其改良框架设计[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):20-28.
[33]郭仁忠,罗平,罗婷文.土地管理三维思维与土地空间资源认知[J].地理研究,2018,37(4):649-658.
[34]董祚继.从机构改革看国土空间治理能力的提升[J].中国土地,2018(11):4-9.
[35]严金明,王晓莉,夏方舟.重塑自然资源管理新格局:目标定位、价值导向与战略选择[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):1-7.
[36]黄贤金,杨红,罗明.农村土地制度的改革创新模式和绩效[J].中国土地,2018(5):13-15.
[37]朱道林,李瑶瑶.农村土地制度改革的经济学考察[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):1-5.
[38]晓叶.农村宅基地制度改革的特点与方向[J].中国土地,2018(5):1.
[39]谭荣.集体建设用地市场化进程:现实选择与理论思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):1-8.
[40]陈美球,蒋仁开,朱美英,等.乡村振兴背景下农村产业用地政策选择--基于“乡村振兴与农村产业用地政策创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):90-96.
[41]高圣平.承包地三权分置的法律表达[J].中国法学,2018(4):261-281.
[42]宋志红.三权分置下农地流转权利体系重构研究[J].中国法学,2018(4):282-302.
[43]高飞.土地承包权与土地经营权分设的法律反思及立法回应--兼评《农村土地承包法修正案(草案)》[J].法商研究,2018,35(3):3-14.
[44]席志国.民法典编纂中集体土地权利体系新路径[J].国家行政学院学报,2018(1):109-113,151.
[45]申始占.农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J].农业经济问题,2018,38(7):46-57.
[46]宋志红.宅基地“三权分置”的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018,36(4):142-153.
[47]席志国.民法典编纂视域中宅基地“三权分置”探究[J].行政管理改革,2018(4):45-50.
[48]贺雪峰.如何理解征地冲突--兼论《土地管理法》的修改[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):111-117.
[49]桂华.论土地使用权转让的《宪法》秩序--《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)评析[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):118-124.
[50]印子.论宅基地使用权实现的法律制度模式--兼评《土地管理法(修正案)》(征求意见稿)[J].思想战线,2018,44(3):125-134.
[51]叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究--17省份调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):98-108.
[52]王亦白.不动产登记审查的模式选择和标准确立[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(11):10-15.
[53]漆信贤,张志宏,黄贤金.面向新时代的耕地保护矛盾与创新应对[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):9-15.
[54]陈正,王建强,王健.新形势下耕地占补平衡监管体系建设[J].中国土地,2018(2):39-41.
[55]韩璐,孟鹏,蒋仁开,等.新时代耕地占补平衡的逻辑根源、模式探索与管理创新--基于“新时代耕地占补平衡方式改进与管理创新研讨会”的思考[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):90-96.
[56]闫慧敏,杜文鹏,封志明,等.自然资源资产负债的界定及其核算思路[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):888-898.
[57]薛智超,闫慧敏,杜文鹏,等.自然资源资产负债表编制中土地资源过耗负债的核算方法研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):919-928.
[58]刘向敏.关于自然资源资产负债表编制中土地资源核算的思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2018,31(4):34-38.
[59]王勇,李海英,俞海.中国省域绿色发展的空间格局及其演变特征[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):96-104.
[60]陈瑜琦,张智杰,郭旭东,等.中国重点生态功能区生态用地时空格局变化研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(2):19-26.
[61]崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[62]赵文武,刘月,冯强,等.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(1):139-151.
[63]刘永强,龙花楼,李加林.长江中游经济带土地利用转型及其生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(5):1009-1022.
[64]于潇,吕春艳,郭旭东,等.京津冀城市群地区土地生态状况评估[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):89-96.
[65]欧维新,张伦嘉,陶宇,等.基于土地利用变化的长三角生态系统健康时空动态研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):84-92.
[66]卢新海,匡兵,李菁.碳排放约束下耕地利用效率的区域差异及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(4):657-668.
[67]余娇,赵荣钦,侯丽朋,等.郑州市典型产业用地效益与碳排放强度的关系研究--基于181家企业的调查[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):74-80.
[68]李波,刘雪琪,王昆.中国农地利用结构变化的碳效应及时空演进趋势研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):43-51.
[69]李玉玲,李世平,祁静静.陕西省土地利用碳排放影响因素及脱钩效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):382-390.
[70]郑红玉,吴次芳,沈孝强.土地混合利用研究评述及框架体系构建[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):157-164.
[71]起晓星,李建春.基于互联网地图POI数据的城市地下空间需求度评价--以济南市为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):36-44.
[72]徐志搏,罗婷文,文楚君,等.基于改进多边形面积法的城市土地立体化利用潜力评价--以深圳市为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(3):504-514.
[73]刘超,许月卿,刘焱序,等.基于系统论的土地利用多功能分类及评价指标体系研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(1):181-188.
[74]刘红梅,刘超,王克强,等.大都市郊区农村宅基地利用动态变化及驱动力研究--兼论上海郊区宅基地多功能与制度创新[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(7):74-83.
[75]张佰林,高江波,高阳,等.中国山区农村土地利用转型解析[J].地理学报,2018,73(3):503-517.
[76]赵小风,刘梦丽,王柏源.基于地理探测器的城市建设用地规模时空差异及影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(5):29-35.
[77]周滔,邬妮.城市更新片区土地利用变化规律研究--以重庆市渝中区为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(4):67-73.
[78]徐保根,胡倩,祝锦霞,等.基于扎根理论的企业节地行为影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):81-87.
[79]范建双,任逸蓉.违法用地对土地可持续集约利用的影响机制及效应研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):52-58.
[80]林坚,刘松雪,刘诗毅.区域-要素统筹:构建国土空间开发保护制度的关键[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(6):1-7.
[81]林坚,吴宇翔,吴佳雨,等.论空间规划体系的构建--兼析空间规划、国土空间用途管制与自然资源监管的关系[J].城市规划,2018,42(5):9-17.
[82]叶丽丽,付洒,崔许锋,等.村土地利用规划编制关键性问题分析--基于村土地利用特征的思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2018,31(6):48-54.
[83]张晓,王南.建立基于社区情境的规划:乡村规划多样性和差异性文献分析[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(1):70-76.
[84]王丹,方斌,陈正富.基于辐射模型及潜力模型划分城乡地域功能的土地整治模式[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(13):270-278.
[85]胡银根,董文静,余依云,等.土地整治供给侧结构性改革与乡村重构--潜江“华山模式”实证研究[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(5):731-738.
[86]沈悦,严金明,陈昊.基于“三生”空间优化的城乡交错区土地整治功能单元划定[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(11):243-252.
[87]姚树荣,周毓君.乡村城镇化的市场驱动模式与实现路径--以成都市福洪镇为例[J].农村经济,2018(5):81-86.
[88]胡振琪,多玲花,王晓彤.采煤沉陷地夹层式充填复垦原理与方法[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(1):198-206.
[89]王晓彤,胡振琪,梁宇生,等.基于水分特性的采煤沉陷地充填复垦黄河泥沙容重优选[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(16):258-264.
[90]区晓琳,陈志彪,陈志强,等.亚热带侵蚀红壤区植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体化学计量特征[J].土壤学报,2018,55(5):1156-1167.
[91]胡芳,杜虎,曾馥平,等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复对土壤养分含量和微生物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(6):2170-2179.
[92]薛忠财,李纪红,李十中,等.能源作物甜高粱对镉污染农田的修复潜力研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(4):1621-1627.
[93]王雨涵,陈冬月,江志勇,等.EDTA强化盐生植物修复Pb、Cd和盐渍化复合污染土壤[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(9):1866-1874.
[94]费杨,阎秀兰,李永华.铁锰双金属材料在不同pH条件下对土壤As和重金属的稳定化作用[J].环境科学,2018,39(3):1430-1433,1435-1437.
[95]李明,程寒飞,安忠义,等.化学淋洗与生物质炭稳定化联合修复镉污染土壤[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(3):904-913.
[96]马国超,王立娟,马松,等.无人机摄影测量在矿山尾矿库建设规划的应用[J].测绘科学,2018,43(1):84-88.
[97]贾曙光,金爱兵,赵怡晴.无人机摄影测量在高陡边坡地质调查中的应用[J].岩土力学,2018,39(3):1130-1136.
[98]李靖,廖和平,蔡进.基于风险评价的低丘缓坡土地开发建设适宜性情景模拟--以重庆市巴南区为例[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):967-979.
[99]张泽民,吕昌河,谢苗苗,等.基于WorldView2影像的矿区植被重建效果评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(4):1301-1310.
[100]余文波,蔡海生,张莹,等.基于RS及GIS的南昌市土地生态安全动态评价及分区[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):244-249,256.
[101]谢臻,张凤荣,高阳,等.基于遥感和GIS的平原和山区贫困县农村耕地利用演变对比[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):255-263.
[102]张瑜,赵晓丽,左丽君,等.黄土高原生态系统服务价值动态评估与分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):170-176.
[103]TELLES T S,REYDON B P,MAIA A G.Effects of no-tillage on agricultural land values in Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:124-129.
[104]CIAIAN P,GURI F,RAJCANIOVA M,et al.Land fragmentation and production diversification:a case study from rural Albania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:589-599.
[105]MURAOKA R,JIN S,JAYNE TS.Land access,land rental and food security:evidence from Kenya[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:611-622.
[106]ZENG D,ALWANG J,NORTON G,et al.Land ownership and technology adoption revisited:improved maize varieties in Ethiopia[J].Land use policy,2018,72:270-279.
[107]STEFANO M.Property as a human right and property as a special title.Rediscussing private ownership of land[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:273-280.
[108]CHUSAK W,IAN G.B.Communal land titling dilemmas in northern Thailand:from community forestry to beneficial yet risky and uncertain options[J].Land Use Policy,2018,71:320-328.
[109]JYOTI R.Fundamental functionings of landowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[110]TALAN B.Redistributive land reform and structural change in Japan,South Korea,and Taiwai[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2018,3:732-761.
[111]DYLAN F.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:155-167.
[112]BRENT H,NAVRUZ N.Land reform by default:uncovering patterns of agricultural decollectivization in Tajikistan[J].The Journal of Peasant Studies,2018,45:409-430.
[113]JUNG-HO P,MAN-HEE H.Modern state formation and land management in South Korea:1945-1960[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:662-671.
[114]COLLINS A M,GRANT J A,ACKAH-BAIDOO P.The glocal dynamics of land reform in natural resource sectors:insights from Tanzania[J].Land Use Policy,2018,81:889-896.
[115]CHAU K W,CHOY L H T,WEBSTER C J.Institutional innovations in land development and planning in the 20th and 21st centuries[J].Habitat International,2018,75:90-95.
[116]FITZ D.Evaluating the impact of market-assisted land reform in Brazil[J].World Development,2018,103:255-267.
[117]RAHIMZADEH A.Political ecology of land reforms in Kinnaur:Implications and a historical overview[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:570-579.
[118]SERGE G RARD N,EKPODESSI HITOSHI NAKAMURA.Land use and management in Benin Republic:an evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law 2013-01[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:61-69.
[119]WILY L A.Risks to the sanctity of community lands in Kenya.A critical assessment of new legislation with reference to forestlands[J].Land Use Policy,2018,75:661-672.
[120]TURA H A.Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia,Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2017,70:247-255.
[121]ABBOTT P,MUGISHA R,SAPSFORD R.Women.land and empowerment in Rwanda[J].Journal of International Development,2018,30(6):1006-1022.
[122]AMBE J N,LIORA B,ERICK O A,et al.Institutional,economic and socio-cultural factors accounting for genderbased inequalities in land title procurement in Cameroon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:116-125.
[123]DILLON B,VOENA A.Widows’land rights and agricultural investment[J].Journal of Development Economics,2018,135:449-460.
[124]LEGESSE B A,JEFFERSON-MOORE K,THOMAS T.Impacts of land tenure and property rights on reforestation intervention in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,70:494-499.
[125]ALICE C,YANN L,HAROLD L.What drives land take and urban land expansion?A systematic review[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:339-349.
[126]ANDERS W,QIAN Z.Keeping agriculture alive next to the city:the functions of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg,Sweden[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:447-459.
[127]WUBNEH M.Policies and praxis of land acquisition,use,and development in Ethiopia[J].Land Use Policy,2018,73:170-183.
[128]JYOTI R.Fundamental functionings of landowners:understanding the relationship between land ownership and wellbeing through the lens of‘capability’[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:74-84.
[129]EVANCE M,RONNIE D.Urban land contestations,challenges and planning strategies in Malawi’s main urban centres[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:1-8.
[130]LUCY E,KATHERINE A S.Re-thinking sustainable land management planning:understanding the social and economic drivers of farmer decision-making in Africa[J].Land Use Policy,2018,79:684-694.
[131]ZHAO R,LIU Y,TIAN M,et al.Impacts of water and land resources exploitation on agricultural carbon emissions:the water-land-energy-carbon nexus[J].Land Use Policy,2018,72:480-492.
[132]LIU D,LIU C,FU Q,et al.Construction and application of a refined index for measuring the regional matching characteristics between water and land resources[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,91:203-211.
[133]BUSSI G,WHITEHEAD P G,GUTI RREZC NOVAS C,et al.Modelling the effects of climate and land-use change on the hydrochemistry and ecology of the River Wye(Wales)[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,627:733-743.
[134]SUMIT V,VISHAL N,TIMOTHY K,et al.From the core to the periphery:conflicts and cooperation over land and water in periurban Gurgaon,India[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:382-390.
[135]JULIANA L,ALEXANDER T,JULIE P H,et al.Land use patterns and influences of protected areas on mangroves of the eastern tropical Pacific[J].Biological Conservation2018,227:82-91.
[136]MARA E Q,MAURICIO Q,JOS J V.Exploring land use/land cover change and drivers in Andean mountains in Colombia:a case in rural Quindío[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,634:1288-1299.
[137]SCHIELEIN J,B RNER J.Recent transformations of landuse and land-cover dynamics across different deforestation frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76:81-94.
[138]MESFIN S,KUMELACHEW Y.Dynamics of land use land cover and their drivers study for management of ecosystems in the socio-ecological landscape of Gurage Mountains,Ethiopia[J].Remote Sensing Applications:Society and Environment,2018,18:48-56.
[139]QI X,FU Y,WANG R Y,et al.Improving the sustainability of agricultural land use:an integrated framework for the conflict between food security and environmental deterioration[J].Applied Geography,2018,90:214-223.
[140]SHARON T L,TENLEY M C.Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies:a case study of Ontario Municipalities[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:641-651.
[141]LENIN H D,TOM S J U,SEBASTI N V,et al.Integrating strategic land use planning in the construction of future land use scenarios and its performance:the Maipo River Basin Chile[J].Land Use Policy,2018,78:353-366.
[142]IN-AE Y,EUNOK L.Quantitative study on environment and energy information for land use planning scenarios in ecocity planning stage[J].Applied Energy,2018,230:889-911.
[143]SALLUSTIO L,PETTENELLA D,MERLINI P,et al.Assessing the economic marginality of agricultural lands in Italy to support land use planning[J].Land Use Policy,2018,2:1-9.
[144]ZHANG R,MATSUSHIMA K,KOBAYASHI K.Can land use planning help mitigate transport-related carbon emissions?[J].Land Use Policy,2018,74:32-40.
[145]JANA B,MORITZ R,WOLFGANG K.Taming expansive land use dynamics:sustainable land use regulation and urban sprawl in a comparative perspective[J].Land Use Policy,2018,77:837-845.
[146]HRVOJE T,SINI A M I,MIODRAG R.Land consolidation suitability ranking of cadastral municipalities:informationbased decision-making using multi-criteria analyses of official registers’data[J].ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,2018,7(3):1-17.
[147]JUSTYNA W L,PRZEMYSLAW L,KATARZYNA S M.The proposed algorithm for identifying agricultural problem areas for the needs of their reasonable management under land consolidation works[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2018,152:333-339.
[148]SKOUSEN J G,DALLAIRE K.Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed appalachian surface mines[J].New Forests,2018,49(5):599.
[149]AHIRWAL J,MAITI S K.Development of technosol properties and recovery of carbon stock after 16 years of revegetation on coal mine degraded lands,India[J].Catena,2018,166:114-123.
[150]ANIRWAL J,KUMAR A.Reclamation of coal mine spoil and its effect on technosol quality and carbon sequestration:a case study from India[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018,25(28):27992-28003.
[151]CHAN W P,REN F.A large-scale field trial experiment to derive effective release of heavy metals from incineration bottom ashes during construction in land reclamation[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,637:182-190.
[152]YIN K,CHAN W P.Cr,Cu,Hg and Ni release from incineration bottom ash during utilization in land reclamationbased on lab-scale batch and column leaching experiments and a modeling study[J].Chemosphere,2018,197:741.
[153]ANGEL H Z,STOVALL J P.Surface and subsurface tillage effects on mine soil properties and vegetative response[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2018,82(2):475-482.
[154]GONZALEZ A H,LONDONO D M.Bradyrhizobium and pseudomonas strains obtained from coal-mining areas nodulate and promote the growth of calopogonium muconoides plants used in the reclamation of degraded areas[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,DOI:10.1111/jam.14117.
[155]CARABASSA,VICENC,ORTIZ,et al.Sewage sludge as an organic amendment for quarry restoration:effects on soil and vegetation[J].Land Degradation&Development,2018,29(8):2568-2574.
[156]ELKHATIB,ELSAYED A,SHERIF,et al.Using nanoparticles from water treatment residuals to reduce the mobility and phyto availability of Cd and Pb in biosolid-amended soils[J].Environmental Geochemistry and Health,2018,40(32):1-12.
[157]CHANG,JIH-HSING,DONG,et al.The lead contaminated land treated by the circulation-enhanced electrokinetics and phytoremediation in field scale[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.8:85.
[158]KOMINKOVA,DANA,FABBRICINO,et al.Sequential application of soil washing and phytoremediation in the land of fires[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2018,206:1081-1089.
[159]DESJARDINS,DOMINIC,BRERETON,et al.Complementarity of three distinctive phytoremediation crops for multiple-trace element contaminated soil[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,610:1428-1438.
[160]HOSSEINALIZADEH M,KARIMINEJAD N,ALINEJAD M.An application of different summary statistics for modelling piping collapses and gully headcuts to evaluate their geomorphological interactions in Golestan Province,Iran[J].Catena,2018,171:613-621.
[161]YAPRAK S,YILDIRIM O,SUSAM T.New approach for agricultural research and monitoring of land slide:using of UAV system[J].Journal of Environmental Protection And Ecology,2018,19(1):246-256.
[162]KAZEMI H,AKINCI H.A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis(MCDA)and Geographic Information System(GIS)[J].Ecological Engineering,2018,116:1-6.
[163]LAMQADEM A,PRADHAN B,SABER H,et al.Desertification sensitivity analysis using MEDALUS model and GIS:a case study of the oases of Middle Draa Valley,Morocco[J].Sensors,2018,18(7):2230-2249.
[164]VAN IERSEL W,STRAATSMA M,MIDDELKOOP H,et al.Multitemporal classification of river floodplain vegetation using time series of UAV images[J].Remote Sensing,201810(7):1-4.
[165]MAFANYA M,TSELE P,BOTAI O,et al.Radiometric calibration framework for ultra-high-resolution UAV-derived orthomosaics for large-scale mapping of invasive alien plants in semi-arid woodlands:harrisia pomanensis as a case study[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2018,39(15-16):5119-5140.
[166]IMAIZUMI F,NISHIGUCHI T,MATSUOKA N,et al.Interpretation of recent alpine landscape system evolution using geomorphic mapping and L-band InSAR analyses[J].Geomorphology,2018,30:125-137.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |