用户名: 密码: 验证码:
秸秆还田下生物炭和硫酸铵对稻田N_2O和CH_4排放的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of biochar and ammonium sulfate on N_2O and CH_4 emissions from paddy soil with straw returning application
  • 作者:韩自强 ; 宋贺 ; 夏炎 ; 车钊 ; 王军 ; 申田田 ; 武小亮 ; 董召荣
  • 英文作者:HAN Ziqiang;SONG He;XIA Yan;CHE Zhao;WANG Jun;SHEN Tiantian;WU Xiaoliang;DONG Zhaorong;College of Agriculture,Anhui Agriculture University;
  • 关键词:秸秆还田 ; N_2O ; CH_4 ; 综合温室效应 ; 温室气体强度 ; 生物炭 ; 硫酸铵
  • 英文关键词:straw application;;N_2O;;CH_4;;global warming potential;;greenhouse gas intensities;;biochar;;ammonium sulfate
  • 中文刊名:西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition)
  • 机构:安徽农业大学农学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-07-30 17:12
  • 出版单位:西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:02
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300908-02);; 农业部-世界银行-全球环境基金气候智慧型重要粮食作物生产项目(WB Pro No.144531/GEF Pro No.5121);; 安徽农业大学创新训练项目(AH201510364004)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:141-149
  • 页数:9
  • CN:61-1390/S
  • ISSN:1671-9387
  • 分类号:S154.1
摘要
【目的】以江淮地区麦茬稻田为对象,研究秸秆还田下不同施肥处理对稻田N_2O和CH_4排放的影响,并结合水稻产量计算不同处理综合温室效应(GWPs)和温室气体强度(GHGI)。【方法】试验采用裂区设计,主处理2个水平,为秸秆还田(S)和秸秆移除(NS),副处理4个水平,分别为不施氮肥(CK)、传统施肥(T0)、生物炭与尿素配施(T1)和单施硫酸铵(T2),共计8个处理,采用静态暗箱-GC气相色谱法检测不同处理稻田N_2O和CH_4排放通量,测定土壤温度、湿度和无机氮含量,统计水稻产量,计算综合温室效应和温室气体强度。【结果】无论是秸秆还田还是移除条件下,除CK外,其他施肥处理的N_2O和CH_4排放通量都会在基肥和追肥施用后出现峰值。无论秸秆还田与否,与传统施肥处理相比,生物炭与尿素配施和单施硫酸铵处理均能显著降低N_2O和CH_4累积排放通量。在秸秆还田和移除条件下,与传统施肥处理相比,生物炭与尿素配施处理均会导致水稻产量显著降低,但会提高土壤NO3-含量,增加对周围水体污染的风险。在秸秆移除和还田条件下,与传统施肥处理相比,单施硫酸铵均能显著增加水稻产量,增幅分别为12.27%和7.78%。与秸秆移除相比,秸秆还田条件下单施硫酸铵会显著促进N_2O排放,但显著降低CH_4的排放以及综合温室效应和温室气体强度。【结论】在目前秸秆还田造成CH_4排放增加的背景下,用硫酸铵替代尿素能显著降低CH_4排放,并提高水稻产量,降低综合温室效应,施用效果最佳。
        【Objective】This study analyzed effects of different fertilization treatments on N_2 O and CH_4 emissions from rice in wheat stubble field in Jianghuai area and calculated the global warming potentials(GWPs)and greenhouse gas intensities(GHGI)combined with rice yields under straw returning application.【Method】The split plot design was adopted with a total of 8 treatments.Two main treatments consisted of straw application(S)and straw removal(NS)and four sub-treatments included no nitrogen fertilizer(CK),traditional fertilization(T0),black carbon and urea(T1)and ammonium sulfate(T2).The N_2 O and CH_4 emission fluxes were monitored with a static chamber and gas chromatography method.The soiltemperature,humidity,inorganic nitrogen contents and rice yields under different fertilization treatments were measured and GWPs and GHGI were calculated.【Result】N_2 O and CH_4 emissions peaked after basal and topdressing application under all treatments expect CK regardless straw returning application.Compared to traditional treatments,the addition of biochar and ammonium sulfate effectively reduced N_2 O and CH_4 emissions.Compared to T0,the addition of biochar significantly decreased rice yield and increased soil NO-3 content and risk of NO-3 pollution to surrounding water regardless straw returning.Compared to T0,ammonium sulfate significantly increased rice yield by 12.27% without straw returning and 7.78% with straw returning.Compared with straw removal,ammonium sulfate addition under straw application promoted N_2 O emission but significantly reduced CH_4 emission,GWPs and GHGI.【Conclusion】With the increase of CH_4 emissions due to returning straw to paddy field,substitution of urea by ammonium sulfate was the best for reducing CH_4 emissions and GHGI,while increasing yield.
引文
[1]Solomon S.IPCC:climate change the physical science basis[J].American Geophysical Union,2007,9(1):123-124.
    [2]Smith P,Martino D,Cai Z C,et al.Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,2008,363(1492):789-813.
    [3]Xiong Z Q,Khalil M A K,Xing G,et al.Isotopic signatures and concentration profiles of nitrous oxide in a rice-based ecosystem during the drained crop-growing season[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences,2015,115(G2):383-384.
    [4]国家发展和改革委员会应对气候变化司.中华人民共和国气候变化第二次国家信息通报[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2013.National Development and Reform Commission for Climate Change.The People’s Republic of China second national communications on climate change[M].Beijing:China Economic Publishing House,2013.
    [5]郑侃,陈婉芝,杨宏伟,等.秸秆还田机械化技术研究与展望[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(9):9-13.Zheng K,Chen W Z,Yang H W,et al.Research and prospect of straw returning to field[J].Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(9):9-13.
    [6]常志强,何超波,蔡海涛.安徽省秸秆还田技术模式及完善措施[J].农机科技推广,2017(8):39-42.Chang Z Q,He C B,Cai H T.Anhui Province straw technology field and improve the measures[J].Agricultural Science and Technology Extension,2017(8):39-42.
    [7]李秀青.长期有机无机肥料配施对土壤微生物学特性及土壤肥力的影响[J].江西农业,2017,41(1):24-25.Li X Q.Effects of long-term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil microbiological properties and soil fertility[J].Jiangxi Agriculture,2017,41(1):24-25.
    [8]慕平,张恩和,王汉宁,等.不同年限全量玉米秸秆还田对玉米生长发育及土壤理化性状的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(3):291-296.Mu P,Zhang E H,Wang H N,et al.Effects of continuous straw return to soil on maize growth and soil chemical and physical characteristics[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2012,20(3):291-296.
    [9]汪军,王德建,张刚,等.连续全量秸秆还田与氮肥用量对农田土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):40-44.Wang J,Wang D J,Zhang G,et al.Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer rate with continuous full amount of straw incorporated on paddy soil nutrients[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,24(5):40-44.
    [10]王海候,沈明星,陆长婴,等.不同秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田稻季甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2014,30(4):758-763.Wang H H,Shen M X,Lu C Y,et al.Effect of patterns of straw returning to field on methane and nitrous oxide emissions during rice-growing season in a rice-wheat double cropping system[J].Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,30(4):758-763.
    [11]王小淇,索龙,季雅岚,等.添加几种秸秆并淹水对海南土壤N2O和CH4排放的影响[J].环境科学学报,2017,30(10):4004-4010.Wang X Q,Suo L,Ji Y L,et al.Effect of addition of several types of straws on N2O and CH4emissions from soil under flooding condition in Hainan Province[J].Journal of Environment Science,2017,30(10):4004-4010.
    [12]张卫红.秸秆还田方式与水稻品种对双季稻CH4和N2O排放的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2016.Zhang W H.The Impact of different straw returning forms and rice varieties on CH4and N2O emission in a double rice field[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2016.
    [13]Zou J W,Huang Y,Jiang J Y,et al.A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China:effects of water regime,crop residue,and fertilizer application[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2005,19(2):153-174.
    [14]Ma J,Li X L,Xu H,et al.Effects of nitrogen fertiliser and wheat straw application on CH4and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field[J].Soil Research,2007,45(5):359-367.
    [15]石生伟,李玉娥,刘运通,等.中国稻田CH4和N2O排放及减排整合分析[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(14):2923-2936.Shi S W,Li Y E,Liu Y T,et al.Mitigation options of CH4and N2O emissions from rice fileds[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2010,43(14):2923-2936.
    [16]章明奎,Walelign D B,唐红娟,等.生物质炭对土壤有机质活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):127-131.Zhang M K,Walelign D B,Tang H J,et al.Effects of biochar’s application on active organic carbon fractions in soil[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,26(2):127-131.
    [17]蒋晨,麻培侠,胡保国,等.生物质炭还田对稻田甲烷的减排效果[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(15):184-191.Jiang C,Ma P X,Hu B G,et al.Effect of biochar returning to paddy field on CH4emission reduction[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2013,29(15):184-191.
    [18]Liang B,Lehmann J,Solomon D,et al.Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soil[J].Soil Science Society of A-merica Journal,2006,70(5):1719-1730.
    [19]汤宏,沈健林,张杨珠,等.秸秆还田与水分管理对稻田土壤微生物量碳、氮及溶解性有机碳、氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):240-246.Tang H,Shen J L,Zhang Y Z,et al.Effect of rice straw incorporation and water management on soil microbial biomass carbon nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon,nitrogen in a rice paddy field[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(1):240-246.
    [20]郑立臣,解宏图,李维福,等.外源添加物对秸秆还田土壤中无机氮转化影响[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007,26(S2):275-277.Zheng L C,Xie H T,Li W F,et al.Effect of extraneous source supplement on inorganic nitrogen transformation in corn stalk-retuning soil[J].Journal of Liaoning Technical University,2007,26(S2):275-277.
    [21]柳铮铮,曾从盛,钟春棋,等.酸沉降对泥炭地甲烷排放和碳循环的影响[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(10):1799-1805.Liu Z Z,Zeng C S,Zhong C Q,et al.Effects of acid deposition on methane emission and carbon cycling in peatland[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2008,27(10):1799-1805.
    [22]贾晓珊,李顺义.厌气混合培养中产甲烷菌和硫酸盐还原菌的动力学竞争:Ⅱ.动力学推定的结果及讨论[J].中山大学学报自然科学版,2004,43(1):92-97.Jia X S,Li S Y.Kinetic competition between methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic cultures:Ⅱ.results and discussion[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyateseni,2004,43(1):92-97.
    [23]李娜,陈建中,李宇飞.湿地温室气体气相色谱分析及采样-进样技术研究进展[J].分析测试技术与仪器,2010,16(4):213-217.Li N,Chen J Z,Li Y F.Advances in GC analysis of wetland greenhouse gases and sampling-injection techniques[J].Analysis and Teseting Technology and Instruments,2010,16(4):213-217.
    [24]王跃思,刘广仁,王迎红,等.一台气相色谱仪同时测定陆地生态系统CO2、CH4和N2O排放[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2003,4(10):84-89.Wang Y S,Liu G R,Wang Y H,et al.Simultaneous measurement of CO2,CH4and N2O emission from terrestrial ecosystem with one improved gas chromatography[J].Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,2003,4(10):84-89.
    [25]张洪培.生物炭对旱作农田N2O排放及硝化作用的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.Zhang H P.Effects of biochar on N2O emissions and soil nitrification in dryland farming ecosystem[D].Yangling,Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University,2016.
    [26]黄剑.生物炭对土壤微生物量及土壤酶的影响研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2012.Huang J.The effect of biochar application on soil microbial biomass and soil enzymes[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2012.
    [27]Roberts K G,Gloy B A,Joseph S,et al.Life cycle assessment of biochar systems:estimating the energetic,economic,and climate change potential[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2010,44(2):827.
    [28]陈红霞,杜章留,郭伟,等.施用生物炭对华北平原农田土壤容重、阳离子交换量和颗粒有机质含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(11):2930-2934.Chen H X,Du Z L,Guo W,et al.Effects of biochar on soil bulk density,cation exchange capacity and particulate matter content in farmland of North China Plain[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(11):2930-2934.
    [29]赵维,蔡祖聪.氮肥品种对亚热带土壤N2O排放的影响[J].土壤学报,2009,46(2):248-254.Zhao W,Cai Z C.Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on N2O emission from subtropical soil[J].Journal of Soil Science,2009,46(2):248-254.
    [30]魏华,韩芸,张晓明,等.缺氧环境下硫酸盐还原对反硝化过程影响的特性试验研究[J].环境工程,2005,23(5):76-79.Wei H,Han Y,Zhang X M,et al.Experimental study on the effect of sulfate reduction on denitrification in anoxic environment[J].Environmental Engineering,2005,23(5):76-79.
    [31]张中杰,朱波,项红艳,等.氮肥施用对西南地区紫色土冬小麦N2O释放和反硝化作用的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(10):2033-2040.Zhang Z J,Zhu B,Xiang H Y,et al.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer for wheat on N2O emission and denitrification in purple soil[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2010,29(10):2033-2040.
    [32]陈晨,王春隆,周璐瑶,等.施用生物炭和硝化抑制剂对菜地N2O排放和蔬菜产量的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2017,40(2):287-294.Chen C,Wang C L,Zhou L Y,et al.Effects of biochar and nitrification inhibitors on N2O emission and vegetable yield in vegetable field[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2017,40(2):287-294.
    [33]Jeffery S,Fga V,Van V M,et al.A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis[J].Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2011,144(1):175-187.
    [34]Glaser B,Haumaier L,Guggenberger G,et al.The‘Terra Preta’phenomenon:a model for sustainble agriculture in the humid tropics[J].Naturwissenschaften,2001,88(1):37-41.
    [35]高海英,何绪生,陈心想,等.生物炭及炭基硝酸铵肥料对土壤化学性质及作物产量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(10):1948-1955.Gao H Y,He X S,Chen X X,et al.Effect of biochar and biochar-based ammonium nitrate fertilizers on soil chemical properties and crop yield[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2012,31(10):1948-1955.
    [36]潘达龙.不同氮肥对水稻生长和产量的影响[D].南宁:广西大学,2015.Pan D L.Influences of different nitrogen fertilizers on the growth and yield of rice[D].Nanning:Guangxi University,2015.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700