山东省新型城镇化与产业生态化耦合关系研究
|
摘要
运用熵值法、耦合协调度等模型对新型城镇化和产业生态化两者的耦合协调关系进行研究。研究发现:(1)山东省新型城镇化平均得分低于产业生态化水平平均得分,沿海地区和内陆地区差异较大;(2)新型城镇化与产业生态化的耦合度呈上升态势,中低强度耦合类型数量减少,高强度耦合类型数量增加;(3)新型城镇化与产业生态化的协调度呈增加趋势,濒临失调类型数量下降,勉强协调和初级协调数量上升。结合研究结果,从城市规划、资源配置、绿色消费等方面提出建议。
The entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model were used to study the coupling and coordination between new-type urbanization and industrial ecologization, and it was found that:( a) The average score of new-type urbanization was lower than the average score of industrial ecologicalization level in Shandong Province, and there was a big difference between coastal areas and inland areas.( b) The coupling degree between new-type urbanization and industrial ecologization was on the rise. The number of low-intensity coupling types decreased and the number of high-intensity coupling types increased.( c) The degree of coordination between new-type urbanization and industrial ecology was on the rise, the number of types of close to imbalance was decreasing, and the number of barely coordinated and primary coordinated types increased. Finally, some suggestions were put forward from the aspects of urban planning, resource allocation and green consumption.
The entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model were used to study the coupling and coordination between new-type urbanization and industrial ecologization, and it was found that:( a) The average score of new-type urbanization was lower than the average score of industrial ecologicalization level in Shandong Province, and there was a big difference between coastal areas and inland areas.( b) The coupling degree between new-type urbanization and industrial ecologization was on the rise. The number of low-intensity coupling types decreased and the number of high-intensity coupling types increased.( c) The degree of coordination between new-type urbanization and industrial ecology was on the rise, the number of types of close to imbalance was decreasing, and the number of barely coordinated and primary coordinated types increased. Finally, some suggestions were put forward from the aspects of urban planning, resource allocation and green consumption.
引文
[1]谢锐,陈严,韩峰,等.新型城镇化对城市生态环境质量的影响及时空效应[J].管理评论,2018,30(1):230-241.
[2]张国俊,王珏晗,庄大昌.广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素[J].地理研究,2018,37(6):1070-1086.
[3]马健,周忠学.西安城市化与产业生态化协调发展研究[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(5):178-182.
[4]王磊,龚新蜀.城镇化与产业生态化的互动关系———以西北五省(区)为例[J].城市问题,2014(5):61-67.
[5]杨洋,黄聪,何春阳,等.山东半岛城市群新型城镇化综合水平的时空变化[J].经济地理,2017,37(8):77-85.
[6]王建康,谷国锋,姚丽,等.中国新型城镇化的空间格局演变及影响因素分析———基于285个地级市的面板数据[J].地理科学,2016,36(1):63-71.
[7]陈航,王海鹰,张春雨.我国海洋产业生态化水平评价指标体系的构建与测算[J].统计与决策,2015,21(10):48-51.
[8]陆根尧,盛龙,唐辰华.中国产业生态化水平的静态与动态分析———基于省际数据的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2012,22(3):147-159.
[9]吴俊强,骆华松,陈长瑶,等.云南城市化与产业生态化协调发展研究———基于改进熵值法的协调度评价模型[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(2):138-140+178.
[10]刘子立.重庆市城市化与产业生态化耦合协调度研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2015.
[11]樊荣,孙希华.区域经济与资源环境耦合协调度研究——以山东半岛蓝色经济区为例[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2018,28(6):63-66+87.
[12]王立栋.秦皇岛市城镇化与生态环境耦合度分析及对策研究[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2015,25(5):22-25.
[2]张国俊,王珏晗,庄大昌.广州市产业生态化时空演变特征及驱动因素[J].地理研究,2018,37(6):1070-1086.
[3]马健,周忠学.西安城市化与产业生态化协调发展研究[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(5):178-182.
[4]王磊,龚新蜀.城镇化与产业生态化的互动关系———以西北五省(区)为例[J].城市问题,2014(5):61-67.
[5]杨洋,黄聪,何春阳,等.山东半岛城市群新型城镇化综合水平的时空变化[J].经济地理,2017,37(8):77-85.
[6]王建康,谷国锋,姚丽,等.中国新型城镇化的空间格局演变及影响因素分析———基于285个地级市的面板数据[J].地理科学,2016,36(1):63-71.
[7]陈航,王海鹰,张春雨.我国海洋产业生态化水平评价指标体系的构建与测算[J].统计与决策,2015,21(10):48-51.
[8]陆根尧,盛龙,唐辰华.中国产业生态化水平的静态与动态分析———基于省际数据的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2012,22(3):147-159.
[9]吴俊强,骆华松,陈长瑶,等.云南城市化与产业生态化协调发展研究———基于改进熵值法的协调度评价模型[J].资源开发与市场,2014,30(2):138-140+178.
[10]刘子立.重庆市城市化与产业生态化耦合协调度研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2015.
[11]樊荣,孙希华.区域经济与资源环境耦合协调度研究——以山东半岛蓝色经济区为例[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2018,28(6):63-66+87.
[12]王立栋.秦皇岛市城镇化与生态环境耦合度分析及对策研究[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2015,25(5):22-25.