青岛市城市化与水环境耦合协调关系评估
|
摘要
为了探究城市化与水环境之间的关系,找出促进城市化与水环境协调发展的途径,以青岛市为研究区域,利用耦合协调度模型和灰色关联度模型,对研究区域2000—2017年城市化综合指数、水环境综合指数、城市化与水环境两个系统的耦合协调关系以及两个系统不同指标之间的灰色关联度进行了分析,结果表明:2000—2017年青岛市城市化系统与水环境系统综合指数均呈上升趋势,两个系统在此期间经历了从低水平耦合失调到高水平耦合良好协调发展的阶段,同时两个系统各指标间的灰色关联度系数都大于0.5,关联性较强。
In order to explore the relationship between urbanization and water environment, and to find ways to promote the coordinated development of urbanization and water environment, Qingdao, an experimental "Sponge City" was selected and studied. The urbanization comprehensive index, the water environment comprehensive index, the coupling and coordination relationship between urbanization and water environment systems and gray correlation degree of different indicators between the two systems were analyzed with the model of coupling coordination degree and gray correlation degree from 2000 to 2017. The comprehensive index of urbanization and water environment in Qingdao has shown an upward trend from 2000 to 2017, the two systems experience stages from low-level coupling disordered coordination to high-level coupling well coordination during this period. The gray correlation degree is higher than 0.5, which is highly correlated.
In order to explore the relationship between urbanization and water environment, and to find ways to promote the coordinated development of urbanization and water environment, Qingdao, an experimental "Sponge City" was selected and studied. The urbanization comprehensive index, the water environment comprehensive index, the coupling and coordination relationship between urbanization and water environment systems and gray correlation degree of different indicators between the two systems were analyzed with the model of coupling coordination degree and gray correlation degree from 2000 to 2017. The comprehensive index of urbanization and water environment in Qingdao has shown an upward trend from 2000 to 2017, the two systems experience stages from low-level coupling disordered coordination to high-level coupling well coordination during this period. The gray correlation degree is higher than 0.5, which is highly correlated.
引文
[1] 刘威,刘昌平.老龄化、人口流动与养老保险基金可持续性[J].江西财经大学学报,2018,17(3):66-75.
[2] 周海丽,史培军,徐小黎.深圳城市化过程与水环境质量变化研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(2):273-279.
[3] GRANIEL C E,MORRIS L B,CARRILLO-RIVERA J J.Effects of Urbanization on Groundwater Resources of Merida,Yucatan,Mexico[J].Environmental Geology,1999,37(4):303-312.
[4] YOSHIKOSHI A,ADACHI I,TANIGUCHI T,et al.Hydro-Environmental Changes and Their Influence on the Subsurface Environment in the Context of Urban Development[J].Science of the Total Environment,2009,407(9):3105-3111.
[5] 宋新山,王朝生,汪永辉.我国城市化进程中的水资源环境问题[J].科技导报,2004,22(2):29-32.
[6] 方创琳,乔标.水资源约束下西北干旱区城市经济发展与城市化阈值[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2413-2422.
[7] 蒋元勇,章茹,丰锴斌.南昌城市化与水资源环境交互耦合作用关系分析[J].人民长江,2014,45(14):17-21.
[8] 李振中,郭少华,王强.青岛海绵城市的探索[J].四川水泥,2017(2):118.
[9] 刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(1):105-112.
[10] 张胜武,石培基,王祖静.干旱区内陆河流域城镇化与水资源环境系统耦合分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(8):142-148.
[11] 李娜,孙才志,范斐.辽宁沿海经济带城市化与水资源耦合关系分析[J].地域研究与开发,2010,29(4):47-51.
[12] 鲍超,方创琳.河西走廊城市化与水资源利用关系的量化研究[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):301-310.
[13] 熊东旭,陈荣.南京城市化与水资源环境耦合关系实证研究[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(5):95-101.
[14] 王吉苹,薛雄志.九龙江流域城市化进程与水资源耦合关系的定量辨识[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2014,53(4):561-567.
[15] SUN Qian,ZHANG Xiaohu,ZHANG Hanwei,et al.Coordinated Development of a Coupled Social Economy and Resource Environment System:a Case Study in Henan Province,China[J].Environment,Development and Sustainability,2018,20(3):1385-1404.
[16] 张卫民,安景文,韩朝.熵值法在城市可持续发展评价问题中的应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,20(6):115-118.
[17] 麦地那·巴合提江,阿不都沙拉木·加拉力丁,盛永财,等.乌鲁木齐市城市化与水资源协调度分析[J].人民长江,2018,49(7):42-51.
[18] 尹风雨,龚波,王颖.水资源环境与城镇化发展耦合机制研究[J].求索,2016(1):84-88.
[19] 陈彤,任丽军.山东省城市化与水环境耦合协调模式分析[J].人民黄河,2013,35(6):75-79.
[20] 刘耀彬,宋学锋.城市化与生态环境的耦合度及其预测模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(1):91-96.
[21] 刘耀彬.区域城市化与生态环境耦合特征及机制:以江苏省为例[J].经济地理,2006,26(3):456-462.
[22] 刘金萍,李为科,郭跃.重庆城市化过程与水资源环境变化关系研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,24(1):86-90.
[23] 李新贵,刘岳威,施凤英,等.我国城乡严重的水生态危机与水资源环境的综合管治:基于海绵城市建设的可持续发展理念[J].上海城市管理,2016,25(1):20-23.
[2] 周海丽,史培军,徐小黎.深圳城市化过程与水环境质量变化研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,39(2):273-279.
[3] GRANIEL C E,MORRIS L B,CARRILLO-RIVERA J J.Effects of Urbanization on Groundwater Resources of Merida,Yucatan,Mexico[J].Environmental Geology,1999,37(4):303-312.
[4] YOSHIKOSHI A,ADACHI I,TANIGUCHI T,et al.Hydro-Environmental Changes and Their Influence on the Subsurface Environment in the Context of Urban Development[J].Science of the Total Environment,2009,407(9):3105-3111.
[5] 宋新山,王朝生,汪永辉.我国城市化进程中的水资源环境问题[J].科技导报,2004,22(2):29-32.
[6] 方创琳,乔标.水资源约束下西北干旱区城市经济发展与城市化阈值[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2413-2422.
[7] 蒋元勇,章茹,丰锴斌.南昌城市化与水资源环境交互耦合作用关系分析[J].人民长江,2014,45(14):17-21.
[8] 李振中,郭少华,王强.青岛海绵城市的探索[J].四川水泥,2017(2):118.
[9] 刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(1):105-112.
[10] 张胜武,石培基,王祖静.干旱区内陆河流域城镇化与水资源环境系统耦合分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(8):142-148.
[11] 李娜,孙才志,范斐.辽宁沿海经济带城市化与水资源耦合关系分析[J].地域研究与开发,2010,29(4):47-51.
[12] 鲍超,方创琳.河西走廊城市化与水资源利用关系的量化研究[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):301-310.
[13] 熊东旭,陈荣.南京城市化与水资源环境耦合关系实证研究[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(5):95-101.
[14] 王吉苹,薛雄志.九龙江流域城市化进程与水资源耦合关系的定量辨识[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2014,53(4):561-567.
[15] SUN Qian,ZHANG Xiaohu,ZHANG Hanwei,et al.Coordinated Development of a Coupled Social Economy and Resource Environment System:a Case Study in Henan Province,China[J].Environment,Development and Sustainability,2018,20(3):1385-1404.
[16] 张卫民,安景文,韩朝.熵值法在城市可持续发展评价问题中的应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,20(6):115-118.
[17] 麦地那·巴合提江,阿不都沙拉木·加拉力丁,盛永财,等.乌鲁木齐市城市化与水资源协调度分析[J].人民长江,2018,49(7):42-51.
[18] 尹风雨,龚波,王颖.水资源环境与城镇化发展耦合机制研究[J].求索,2016(1):84-88.
[19] 陈彤,任丽军.山东省城市化与水环境耦合协调模式分析[J].人民黄河,2013,35(6):75-79.
[20] 刘耀彬,宋学锋.城市化与生态环境的耦合度及其预测模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2005,34(1):91-96.
[21] 刘耀彬.区域城市化与生态环境耦合特征及机制:以江苏省为例[J].经济地理,2006,26(3):456-462.
[22] 刘金萍,李为科,郭跃.重庆城市化过程与水资源环境变化关系研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,24(1):86-90.
[23] 李新贵,刘岳威,施凤英,等.我国城乡严重的水生态危机与水资源环境的综合管治:基于海绵城市建设的可持续发展理念[J].上海城市管理,2016,25(1):20-23.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |