秸秆还田技术的外溢效益价值评估研究综述
|
摘要
秸秆还田可以有效改善土壤理化性能,解决秸秆焚烧引起的大气污染问题,长期推广将给社会带来更多的福利而表现出显著的正外部性。文章剖析秸秆还田外溢效益产生的经济根源,重建秸秆还田技术外溢效益价值,从国际社会普遍采用的生态能值分析方法、成本—收益分析方法、层次分析方法和意愿价值评估方法四个方面,全面梳理并分析各类方法应用于生态价值评估的研究进展,认为现有评估方法的研究视角具有一定局限性,研究方法之间缺少有机的融合,导致评估结果的准确性受到质疑。最后提出应尽快建立多视域、多方法结合的评估方法体系,并逐步完善技术价值评估研究的反馈机制、动力引导机制及社会扶持机制,使研究能够为决策提供更有力的对策建议。
Returning the straw to the field can effectively improve the soil's physical and chemical properties and solve air pollution problems caused by burning straw.Improved social welfare can be achieved through its long term popularization,and it thus shows significant positive externality.This article analyzes the economic roots that generate the spillover effect in straw-returning technology,and reconstructs the spillover effect value for straw returning technology.It comprehensively sorts through and analyzes the progress made in studies using the ecological energy analysis method,the cost-profit analysis method,and the analytic hierarchy process and contingent valuation method,which have all been used internationally for the evaluation of ecological value.The article finds the existing evaluation methods to be limited in their study perspective,and to suffer from insufficient organic combination,rendering the accuracy of their evaluation results questionable.The article proposes to construct an evaluation method system which as quickly as possible integrates multiple perspectives and methods,while step by step perfects the feedback mechanism,power guidance mechanism and social support mechanism used in the evaluation study of this technical value,thus enables the study to provide more effective suggestions for decision making.
Returning the straw to the field can effectively improve the soil's physical and chemical properties and solve air pollution problems caused by burning straw.Improved social welfare can be achieved through its long term popularization,and it thus shows significant positive externality.This article analyzes the economic roots that generate the spillover effect in straw-returning technology,and reconstructs the spillover effect value for straw returning technology.It comprehensively sorts through and analyzes the progress made in studies using the ecological energy analysis method,the cost-profit analysis method,and the analytic hierarchy process and contingent valuation method,which have all been used internationally for the evaluation of ecological value.The article finds the existing evaluation methods to be limited in their study perspective,and to suffer from insufficient organic combination,rendering the accuracy of their evaluation results questionable.The article proposes to construct an evaluation method system which as quickly as possible integrates multiple perspectives and methods,while step by step perfects the feedback mechanism,power guidance mechanism and social support mechanism used in the evaluation study of this technical value,thus enables the study to provide more effective suggestions for decision making.
引文
[1]韩鲁佳,闫巧娟,刘向阳,等.中国农作物秸秆资源及其利用现状[J].农业工程学报,2002(3):87-91.
[2]石祖梁,刘璐璐,王飞,等.我国农作物秸秆综合利用发展模式及政策建议[J].中国农业科技导报,2016(6):16-22.
[3]潘涌璋.农民焚烧秸秆的经济学分析[J].经济论坛,2005(10):103-105.
[4]宋志伟,杨超.农作物秸秆综合利用技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2011.
[5]于晓蕾,吴普特,汪有科,等.不同秸秆覆盖量对冬小麦生理及土壤温、湿状况的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2007(4):41-44.
[6]吴宏伟,朱竹清,刘咏梅.秸秆焚烧的治理困境及其经济学分析[J].农村经济,2014(11):111-115.
[7]徐全红.我国农业财政补贴的经济学分析[J].经济研究参考,2006(93):21-26.
[8]陈超玲,杨阳,谢光辉.我国秸秆资源管理政策发展研究[J]中国农业大学学报,2016(8):1-11.
[9]杜守宇,田恩平,温敏,等.秸秆覆盖还田的整体功能效应与系列化技术研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1994(2):88-94.
[10]杨壬飞,吴方卫.农业外部效应内部化及其路径选择[J].农业技术经济,2003(1):6-12.
[11]赵邦宏,宗义湘,石会娟.政府干预农业技术推广的行为选择[J].科技管理研究,2006(11):21-23.
[12]Bescansa P,Imaz M J,Virto I,et al.Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain[J]Soil and Tillage Research,2006,87(1):19-27.
[13]陈春根.经济学原理(第二版)[M].浙江:浙江大学出版社,2014:24-31.
[14]芦文龙.技术的外部性探讨[C]//中国自然辩证法研究会.第三届全国科技哲学暨交叉学科研究生论坛文集.北京:中国自然辩证法研究会,2010:105-108.
[15][英]庇古.福利经济学[M].金镝,译.北京:华夏出版社,2007:134-163.
[16]魏廷举,程乐圃,朱丽娜.秸秆还田的经济效益分析及其措施[J].农机化研究,1990(2):48-52.
[17]Daily G C.Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington DC:Island Press,1997.
[18]Costanza R,d’Arge R,de Rudolf G,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[19]Pimentel D,Harvey C,Resosudarmo P,et al.Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits[J].Science,1995,267:1117-1123.
[20]Woodward R.T,Wui Y S.The economic value of wetland services:a meta-analysis[J].Ecological Economics,2001,37(2):257-270.
[21]Peters C A,Gentry A H,Mendelsohn R O.Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest[J].Nature,1989,339:655-656.
[22]Hanley N D,Ruffell R J.The contingent valuation of forest characteristics:two experiment[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,1993,44(2):218-229.
[23]Robinson D A,Hockley N,Cooper D M,et al.Natural capital and ecosystem services,developing an appropriate soils framework as a basis for valuation[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2013,57:1023-1033.
[24]赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007(1):346-356.
[25]李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M]北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[26]于谨凯,杨志坤,邵桂兰.基于影子价格法的碳汇渔业碳补偿额度分析--以山东海水贝类养殖业为例[J].农业经济与管理,2011(6):83-90.
[27]周维佳,廖望科,陈春艳.基于国际视野的中国生态经济研究方法进展综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(S1):300-304.
[28]Odum H T.Environmental accounting:Emergy and environmental decision making[M].New York:John Wiley&Sons,1996.
[29]王明全,王金达,刘景双,等.基于能值的生态足迹方法在黑龙江和云南二省中的应用与分析[J].自然资源学报,2009(1):73-81.
[30]左建兵,刘昌明,郑红星.北京市城市雨水利用的成本效益分析[J].资源科学,2009(8):1295-1302.
[31]赵玮,姜波.层次分析方法进展[J].数学的实践与认识,1992(3):63-71.
[32]屈小娥,李国平.意愿价值评估法:理论基础及研究进展[J]统计与决策,2011(7):156-160.
[33]Castellini C,Bastianoni S,Granai C,et al.Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach:Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2006,114(2-4):343-350.
[34]黄春,邓良基,杨娟,等.成都平原不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦轮作农田系统能值分析[J].水土保持通报,2015(2):336-343.
[35]Onthong U,Juntarachat N.Evaluation of biogas production potential from raw and processed agricultural wastes[J].Energy Procedia,2017,138:205-210.
[36]Samun I,Saeed R,Abbas M,et al.Assessment of bioenergy production from solid waste[J].Energy Procedia,2017,142:655-660.
[37]Song J N,Yang W,Higano Y,et al.Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues:An input-output approach[J].Applied Energy,2015,158:178-189.
[38]Delivand M K,Barz M,Gheewala S H,et al.Environmental and socio-economic feasibility assessment of rice straw conversion to power and ethanol in Thailand[J].Journal of Cleaner Production2012,37:29-41.
[39]Thorenz A,Wietschel L,Stindt D,et al.Assessment of agroforestry residue potential for the bioeconomy in the European Union[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,176:348-359.
[40]Dassanayake G D M,Kumar A.Techno-economic assessment of triticale straw for power generation[J].Applied Energy,2012,98:236-245.
[41]蒋碧,李明,吴喜慧,等.关中平原农田生态系统不同秸秆还田模式的能值分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012(6):178-185.
[42]陈春兰,侯海军,秦红灵,等.南方双季稻区生物质炭还田模式生态效益评价[J].农业资源与环境学报,2016(1):80-91.
[43]许光建,魏义方.成本收益分析方法的国际应用及对我国的启示[J].价格理论与实践,2014(4):19-21.
[44]Soam S,Borjesson P,Sharma P K,et al.Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India[J].Bioresource Technology,2017,228:89-98.
[45]Wassmann R,Pathak H.Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture:Ⅱ.Costbenefit assessment for different technologies,regions and scales[J].Agricultural Systems,2007,94(3):826-840.
[46]Zheng J F,Han J M,Liu Z W,et al.Biochar compound fertilizer increases nitrogen productivity and economic benefits but decreases carbon emission of maize production[J].Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2017,241:70-78.
[47]蒋碧,吴喜慧,于小玲,等.关中平原秸秆还田农业生产模式的价值流分析[J].生态经济,2012(2):19-23.
[48]平英华,彭卓敏,夏春华.江苏秸秆机械化还田经济效益分析与财政补贴政策研究[J].中国农机化学报,2013(6):50-55.
[49]赵旭强,穆月英,陈阜.保护性耕作技术经济效益及其补贴政策的总体评价--来自山西省农户问卷调查的分析[J].经济问题,2012(2):74-77.
[50]徐莹莹,高盼,王宇先,等.秸秆不同还田方式对土壤物理性状、玉米产量及经济效益的影响[EB/OL].(2018-02-13)http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1201.S.20180213.1639.012.html.
[51]周怀平,解文艳,关春林,等.长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013(2):321-330.
[52]王琼瑶,张世熔,涂卫国,等.稻麦轮作猪粪-秸秆还田的环境效益及经济效益[J].安徽农业科学,2016(22):56-59.
[53]李娇,田冬,黄容,等.秸秆及生物炭还田对油菜/玉米轮作系统碳平衡和生态效益的影响[J].环境科学,2018(9):4338-4347.
[54]孙小祥,常志州,靳红梅,等.太湖地区不同秸秆还田方式对作物产量与经济效益的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017(1):94-99.
[55]余进,陈维进,王弘,等.层次分析法在确定评估体系指标权重中的应用[J].中国医疗设备,2013(12):44-47.
[56]徐俊,刘娜.层次分析法的基本思想与实际应用[J].情报探索,2008(12):113-115.
[57]廖红强,邱勇,杨侠,等.对应用层次分析法确定权重系数的探讨[J].机械工程师,2012(6):22-25.
[58]Petrini M A,Rocha J V,Brown J C,et al.Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2016,51:85-94.
[59]Yavuz F,Baycan T.Use of swot and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management[J].Procedia Technology,2013,8:134-143.
[60]Oddershede A,Arias A,Cancino H.Rural development decision support using the analytic hierarchy process[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2007,46(7-8):1107-1114.
[61]田淑敏,刘瑞涵,侯富强.京郊农田保护性耕作技术实施效益的评价指标体系研究[J].北京农学院学报,2006(4):50-53.
[62]俞菊生,鲁珊珊,马佳,等.都市农业区稻麦秸秆连续还田综合效应评价指标体系研究[J].上海农业学报,2014(6):1-6.
[63]李洋阳,刘思宇,单春艳,等.保护性耕作综合效益评价体系构建及实例分析[J].农业工程学报,2015(15):48-54.
[64]汤秋香,谢瑞芝,李少昆,等.基于农户认知的保护性耕作模式产量效应模糊数学分析[J].生态学报,2009(8):4260-4266.
[65]张翼飞,赵敏.意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J].地球科学进展,2007(11):1141-1149.
[66]张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J]北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005(2):317-328.
[67]Mitchell R C,Carson R T.Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method[M].New York:RFF Press1989.
[68]Gebrezgabher S A,Meuwissen M P M,Kruseman G,et al.Factors influencing adoption of manure separation technology in the Netherlands[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2015150:1-8.
[69]Kurkalova L A,Kling C L,Zhao J H.The subsidy for adopting conservation tillage:Estimation from observed behavior[R]Chicago:Annual meeting,2001.
[70]Davey K A,Furtan W H.Factors that affect the adoption decision of conservation tillage in the prairie region of Canada[J]Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2008,56(3):257-275.
[71]Vanslembrouck I,Van Huylenbroeck G,Verbeke W.Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agrienvironmental measures[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2002,53(3):489-511.
[72]Gaglias A,Mirasgedis S,Tourkolias C,et al.Implementing the contingent valuation method for supporting decision making in the waste management sector[J].Waste Management,2016,53:237-244.
[73]芮雯奕,周博,张卫建.江苏省农户秸秆还田的影响因素分析[J].生态环境学报,2009(5):1971-1975.
[74]钱加荣,穆月英,陈阜,等.我国农业技术补贴政策及其实施效果研究--以秸秆还田补贴为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2011(2):165-171.
[75]刘明月,陆迁.农户秸秆还田意愿的影响因素分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):34-38.
[76]唐学玉,张海鹏,李世平.农业面源污染防控的经济价值--基于安全农产品生产户视角的支付意愿分析[J].中国农村经济,2012(3):53-67.
[77]何可,张俊飚,丰军辉.基于条件价值评估法(CVM)的农业废弃物污染防控非市场价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014(2):213-219.
[78]韦佳培,李树明,邓正华,等.农户对资源性农业废弃物经济价值的认知及支付意愿研究[J].生态经济,2014(6):126-130.
[2]石祖梁,刘璐璐,王飞,等.我国农作物秸秆综合利用发展模式及政策建议[J].中国农业科技导报,2016(6):16-22.
[3]潘涌璋.农民焚烧秸秆的经济学分析[J].经济论坛,2005(10):103-105.
[4]宋志伟,杨超.农作物秸秆综合利用技术[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2011.
[5]于晓蕾,吴普特,汪有科,等.不同秸秆覆盖量对冬小麦生理及土壤温、湿状况的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2007(4):41-44.
[6]吴宏伟,朱竹清,刘咏梅.秸秆焚烧的治理困境及其经济学分析[J].农村经济,2014(11):111-115.
[7]徐全红.我国农业财政补贴的经济学分析[J].经济研究参考,2006(93):21-26.
[8]陈超玲,杨阳,谢光辉.我国秸秆资源管理政策发展研究[J]中国农业大学学报,2016(8):1-11.
[9]杜守宇,田恩平,温敏,等.秸秆覆盖还田的整体功能效应与系列化技术研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1994(2):88-94.
[10]杨壬飞,吴方卫.农业外部效应内部化及其路径选择[J].农业技术经济,2003(1):6-12.
[11]赵邦宏,宗义湘,石会娟.政府干预农业技术推广的行为选择[J].科技管理研究,2006(11):21-23.
[12]Bescansa P,Imaz M J,Virto I,et al.Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain[J]Soil and Tillage Research,2006,87(1):19-27.
[13]陈春根.经济学原理(第二版)[M].浙江:浙江大学出版社,2014:24-31.
[14]芦文龙.技术的外部性探讨[C]//中国自然辩证法研究会.第三届全国科技哲学暨交叉学科研究生论坛文集.北京:中国自然辩证法研究会,2010:105-108.
[15][英]庇古.福利经济学[M].金镝,译.北京:华夏出版社,2007:134-163.
[16]魏廷举,程乐圃,朱丽娜.秸秆还田的经济效益分析及其措施[J].农机化研究,1990(2):48-52.
[17]Daily G C.Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington DC:Island Press,1997.
[18]Costanza R,d’Arge R,de Rudolf G,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[19]Pimentel D,Harvey C,Resosudarmo P,et al.Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits[J].Science,1995,267:1117-1123.
[20]Woodward R.T,Wui Y S.The economic value of wetland services:a meta-analysis[J].Ecological Economics,2001,37(2):257-270.
[21]Peters C A,Gentry A H,Mendelsohn R O.Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest[J].Nature,1989,339:655-656.
[22]Hanley N D,Ruffell R J.The contingent valuation of forest characteristics:two experiment[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,1993,44(2):218-229.
[23]Robinson D A,Hockley N,Cooper D M,et al.Natural capital and ecosystem services,developing an appropriate soils framework as a basis for valuation[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2013,57:1023-1033.
[24]赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007(1):346-356.
[25]李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M]北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[26]于谨凯,杨志坤,邵桂兰.基于影子价格法的碳汇渔业碳补偿额度分析--以山东海水贝类养殖业为例[J].农业经济与管理,2011(6):83-90.
[27]周维佳,廖望科,陈春艳.基于国际视野的中国生态经济研究方法进展综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(S1):300-304.
[28]Odum H T.Environmental accounting:Emergy and environmental decision making[M].New York:John Wiley&Sons,1996.
[29]王明全,王金达,刘景双,等.基于能值的生态足迹方法在黑龙江和云南二省中的应用与分析[J].自然资源学报,2009(1):73-81.
[30]左建兵,刘昌明,郑红星.北京市城市雨水利用的成本效益分析[J].资源科学,2009(8):1295-1302.
[31]赵玮,姜波.层次分析方法进展[J].数学的实践与认识,1992(3):63-71.
[32]屈小娥,李国平.意愿价值评估法:理论基础及研究进展[J]统计与决策,2011(7):156-160.
[33]Castellini C,Bastianoni S,Granai C,et al.Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach:Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2006,114(2-4):343-350.
[34]黄春,邓良基,杨娟,等.成都平原不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦轮作农田系统能值分析[J].水土保持通报,2015(2):336-343.
[35]Onthong U,Juntarachat N.Evaluation of biogas production potential from raw and processed agricultural wastes[J].Energy Procedia,2017,138:205-210.
[36]Samun I,Saeed R,Abbas M,et al.Assessment of bioenergy production from solid waste[J].Energy Procedia,2017,142:655-660.
[37]Song J N,Yang W,Higano Y,et al.Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues:An input-output approach[J].Applied Energy,2015,158:178-189.
[38]Delivand M K,Barz M,Gheewala S H,et al.Environmental and socio-economic feasibility assessment of rice straw conversion to power and ethanol in Thailand[J].Journal of Cleaner Production2012,37:29-41.
[39]Thorenz A,Wietschel L,Stindt D,et al.Assessment of agroforestry residue potential for the bioeconomy in the European Union[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,176:348-359.
[40]Dassanayake G D M,Kumar A.Techno-economic assessment of triticale straw for power generation[J].Applied Energy,2012,98:236-245.
[41]蒋碧,李明,吴喜慧,等.关中平原农田生态系统不同秸秆还田模式的能值分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012(6):178-185.
[42]陈春兰,侯海军,秦红灵,等.南方双季稻区生物质炭还田模式生态效益评价[J].农业资源与环境学报,2016(1):80-91.
[43]许光建,魏义方.成本收益分析方法的国际应用及对我国的启示[J].价格理论与实践,2014(4):19-21.
[44]Soam S,Borjesson P,Sharma P K,et al.Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India[J].Bioresource Technology,2017,228:89-98.
[45]Wassmann R,Pathak H.Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture:Ⅱ.Costbenefit assessment for different technologies,regions and scales[J].Agricultural Systems,2007,94(3):826-840.
[46]Zheng J F,Han J M,Liu Z W,et al.Biochar compound fertilizer increases nitrogen productivity and economic benefits but decreases carbon emission of maize production[J].Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2017,241:70-78.
[47]蒋碧,吴喜慧,于小玲,等.关中平原秸秆还田农业生产模式的价值流分析[J].生态经济,2012(2):19-23.
[48]平英华,彭卓敏,夏春华.江苏秸秆机械化还田经济效益分析与财政补贴政策研究[J].中国农机化学报,2013(6):50-55.
[49]赵旭强,穆月英,陈阜.保护性耕作技术经济效益及其补贴政策的总体评价--来自山西省农户问卷调查的分析[J].经济问题,2012(2):74-77.
[50]徐莹莹,高盼,王宇先,等.秸秆不同还田方式对土壤物理性状、玉米产量及经济效益的影响[EB/OL].(2018-02-13)http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1201.S.20180213.1639.012.html.
[51]周怀平,解文艳,关春林,等.长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013(2):321-330.
[52]王琼瑶,张世熔,涂卫国,等.稻麦轮作猪粪-秸秆还田的环境效益及经济效益[J].安徽农业科学,2016(22):56-59.
[53]李娇,田冬,黄容,等.秸秆及生物炭还田对油菜/玉米轮作系统碳平衡和生态效益的影响[J].环境科学,2018(9):4338-4347.
[54]孙小祥,常志州,靳红梅,等.太湖地区不同秸秆还田方式对作物产量与经济效益的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017(1):94-99.
[55]余进,陈维进,王弘,等.层次分析法在确定评估体系指标权重中的应用[J].中国医疗设备,2013(12):44-47.
[56]徐俊,刘娜.层次分析法的基本思想与实际应用[J].情报探索,2008(12):113-115.
[57]廖红强,邱勇,杨侠,等.对应用层次分析法确定权重系数的探讨[J].机械工程师,2012(6):22-25.
[58]Petrini M A,Rocha J V,Brown J C,et al.Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2016,51:85-94.
[59]Yavuz F,Baycan T.Use of swot and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management[J].Procedia Technology,2013,8:134-143.
[60]Oddershede A,Arias A,Cancino H.Rural development decision support using the analytic hierarchy process[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2007,46(7-8):1107-1114.
[61]田淑敏,刘瑞涵,侯富强.京郊农田保护性耕作技术实施效益的评价指标体系研究[J].北京农学院学报,2006(4):50-53.
[62]俞菊生,鲁珊珊,马佳,等.都市农业区稻麦秸秆连续还田综合效应评价指标体系研究[J].上海农业学报,2014(6):1-6.
[63]李洋阳,刘思宇,单春艳,等.保护性耕作综合效益评价体系构建及实例分析[J].农业工程学报,2015(15):48-54.
[64]汤秋香,谢瑞芝,李少昆,等.基于农户认知的保护性耕作模式产量效应模糊数学分析[J].生态学报,2009(8):4260-4266.
[65]张翼飞,赵敏.意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J].地球科学进展,2007(11):1141-1149.
[66]张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J]北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005(2):317-328.
[67]Mitchell R C,Carson R T.Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method[M].New York:RFF Press1989.
[68]Gebrezgabher S A,Meuwissen M P M,Kruseman G,et al.Factors influencing adoption of manure separation technology in the Netherlands[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2015150:1-8.
[69]Kurkalova L A,Kling C L,Zhao J H.The subsidy for adopting conservation tillage:Estimation from observed behavior[R]Chicago:Annual meeting,2001.
[70]Davey K A,Furtan W H.Factors that affect the adoption decision of conservation tillage in the prairie region of Canada[J]Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2008,56(3):257-275.
[71]Vanslembrouck I,Van Huylenbroeck G,Verbeke W.Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agrienvironmental measures[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,2002,53(3):489-511.
[72]Gaglias A,Mirasgedis S,Tourkolias C,et al.Implementing the contingent valuation method for supporting decision making in the waste management sector[J].Waste Management,2016,53:237-244.
[73]芮雯奕,周博,张卫建.江苏省农户秸秆还田的影响因素分析[J].生态环境学报,2009(5):1971-1975.
[74]钱加荣,穆月英,陈阜,等.我国农业技术补贴政策及其实施效果研究--以秸秆还田补贴为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2011(2):165-171.
[75]刘明月,陆迁.农户秸秆还田意愿的影响因素分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):34-38.
[76]唐学玉,张海鹏,李世平.农业面源污染防控的经济价值--基于安全农产品生产户视角的支付意愿分析[J].中国农村经济,2012(3):53-67.
[77]何可,张俊飚,丰军辉.基于条件价值评估法(CVM)的农业废弃物污染防控非市场价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014(2):213-219.
[78]韦佳培,李树明,邓正华,等.农户对资源性农业废弃物经济价值的认知及支付意愿研究[J].生态经济,2014(6):126-130.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |