摘要
以玉溪海绵城市试点区人工湿地项目为依托,对表面流、水平潜流和垂直潜流三种类型人工湿地净化能力进行了多参数评价。通过对多个污染物参数进行为期两年的污染物监测,对比分析了三种人工湿地的水质净化能力。通过试验研究发现,三种类型人工湿地对污染物的去除效果和机理不同,对BOD_5去除率最高;对水质中BOD_5、COD、TN、TP和高锰酸盐指数指标去除效果最好的为垂直潜流人工湿地,水平潜流人工湿地次之,去除效果最差的为表面流人工湿地;对水质中NH_4~+-N去除效果最好的为垂直潜流人工湿地,表面流人工湿地次之,去除效果最差的为水平潜流人工湿地;在不同类型人工湿地对植被的N含量、P含量、N积累量和P积累量方面,垂直潜流人工湿地均显著高于水平潜流和表面流人工湿地。
The purification ability of three types of constructed wetlands,namely free surface flow,horizontal subsurface flow and vertical subsurface flow wetlands were evaluated by multiple parameters based on the project of constructed wetland in the pilot area of Yuxi sponge city. The water purification ability of three different constructed wetlands were compared and analyzed by monitoring several pollutant parameters for two years. It was found that the removal efficiency and mechanism of three types of constructed wetlands were different,and the removal efficiency of BOD_5 was the highest among all the pollutants. The most effective removal of BOD_5,COD,TN,TP and potassium permanganate indexes was vertical subsurface flow wetland,followed by horizontal subsurface flow wetland,and free surface wetland had the worst effect. The best removal efficiency of NH_4~+-N was vertical flow wetland,followed by free surface wetland,and the worst removal efficiency was horizontal subsurface flow wetland. The average data of vertical subsurface flow wetland were significantly higher than horizontal subsurface flow wetland and free surface wetland in terms of N content,P content,N accumulation and P accumulation of vegetation in different types of constructed wetlands.
引文
[1]Wang Y T,Sun M X,Song B M.Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China[J].Resour Conserv Recycl,2017,122:11-20.
[2]Liu R,Wang J,Shi J,et al.Runoff characteristics and nutrient loss mechanism from plain farmland under simulated rainfall conditions[J].Sci Total Environ,2013,468/469C:1069-1077.
[3]Zhang Q,Miao L,Wang X,et al.The capacity of greening roof to reduce stormwater runoff and pollution[J].Landscape Urban Plan,2015,144:142-150.
[4]Hu Y,Zhao Y,Sorohan B.Removal of glyphosate from aqueous environment by adsorption using water industrial residual[J].Desalination,2011,271(1/3):150-156.
[5]Amado L,Albuquerque A,Santo A E.Influence of stormwater infiltration on the treatment capacity of a LECA-based horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland[J].Ecol Eng,2012,39:16-23.
[6]Maniquiz-Redillas M,Lee-Hyung Kim.Fractionation of heavy metals in runoff and discharge of a stromwater management system and its implications for treatment[J].J Environ Sci,2014,26(6):1214-1222.
[7]Villase1or J,Capilla P,Rodrigo M A,et al.Operation of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell treating wastewater under different organic loading rates[J].Water Res,2013,47(17):6731-6738.
[8]Doherty L,Zhao Y,Zhao X,et al.A review of a recently emerged technology:Constructed wetland-microbial fuel cells[J].Water Res,2015,85:38-45.
[9]李立青,朱仁肖,郭树刚,等.基于源区监测的城市地表径流污染空间分异性研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(12):2896-2904.Li Liqing,Zhu Renxiao,Guo Shugang,et al.Research on spatial differentiation of urban stormwater runoff quality by source area monitoring[J].Environmental Science,2010,31(12):2896-2904(in Chinese).