渭河流域水土流失治理效率的时空格局演化与影响因素
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Spatio-temporal Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors of Governance Efficiency of Soil andWater Loss in theWeihe River Catchment
  • 作者:王怡菲 ; 姚顺波 ; 邓元杰
  • 英文作者:Wang Yifei;Yao Shunbo;Deng Yuanjie;Resources and Environmental Economics and Management Center, College of Economic and Management, Northwest A & F University;
  • 关键词:退耕还林(草) ; Bootstrap-DEA ; 地理空间加权模型(GWR ; Model) ; 探索性空间分析(ESDA) ; 渭河流域 ; 治理效率
  • 英文关键词:sloping land conversion program;;Bootstrap-DEA;;Geographically Weighted Regression(GWR);;exploratory spatial data analysis(ESDA);;the Weihe River catchment;;control efficiency
  • 中文刊名:地理科学
  • 英文刊名:Scientia Geographica Sinica
  • 机构:西北农林科技大学经济管理学院/资源经济与环境管理研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-03 11:10
  • 出版单位:地理科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:05
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(71473195);; 林业公益性行业科研专项经费项目(201504424)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:134-144
  • 页数:11
  • CN:22-1124/P
  • ISSN:1000-0690
  • 分类号:S157
摘要
运用Bootstrap-DEA模型计算2000~2015年渭河流域陕西段39个县区水土流失治理效率;结合探索性空间分析方法(ESDA)和地理加权回归模型(GWR)分析各县水土流失治理效率的时空演化特征及其影响因素。研究结果表明:①2000~2015年,研究区水土流失治理效率从0.263增至0.336,整体治理效率仍处较低水平;前期生态治理效率的增加缘于纯技术效率的提高,后期规模效率对治理效率的增加起到了主导作用。②县域的治理效率在空间上呈现集聚状态;热点分析结果进一步显示,2005年治理效率表现出2个热点集聚区,即以宝鸡市千阳县为热点区、乾县和武功县为核心辐射至永寿县和礼泉县的热点集聚区,冷点区域则以临潼为中心,辐射到西安市辖区、高陵、富平和三原县;2010~2015年治理效率的热点区域与冷点区域较2005年有所收缩且保持相对稳定。③渭河流域水土流失治理效率的时空变化是降水、坡度、灌草面积覆盖度、人口经济和农业生产共同作用的结果,且各影响因素在不同时期对各县的治理效率的贡献呈动态变化,这意味着政策制定者需要从全局角度权衡不同因素的影响效果。
        Objectively assessing the effectiveness of ecological restoration measures and analyzing effective ways to promote the efficiency of ecological management are important scientific and policy issues in the Weihe River Basin. Using an interdisciplinary approach, the aim of this study is to measure the control efficiency of the Sloping Land Conversion Program(SLCP)and terrace fields on soil and water loss by adopting the Bootstrap-DEA model and using a comprehensive dataset(including biophysical and socioeconomic data) from 39 counties in the period 2000-2015. Then, exploratory spatial data analysis(ESDA) was used to capture the spatial correlation in overall control efficiency. Finally, geographically weighted regression(GWR) was employed to identify the spatial heterogeneity and evolutionary characteristics in the relationship between control efficiency and natural conditions and socioeconomic development in each sample county. Results show that the control efficiency of soil erosion increased from 0.263 to 0.336 during the study period. The increase of the treatment efficiency for soil and water loss in the early stage was due to the improvement of pure technical efficiency; while later the scale efficiency played a leading role in promoting the treatment efficiency. In addition,the efficiency showed a stable spatial agglomeration. The hotspots of efficiency were concentrated primarily in Baoji City, while the cold-spot center was Lintong, the radius of which extended to the municipality districts of Xi'an, Gaoling, and Fuping. The difference in control efficiency is the result of a combination of multiple factors; the factors affecting control efficiency vary across counties, indicating that regional governments should consider full-scale initiatives.
引文
[1]党小虎,吴彦斌,刘国彬,等.生态建设15年黄土高原生态足迹时空变化[J].地理研究,2018,37(4):761-771.[Dang Xiaohu,Wu Yanbin, Liu Guobin et al. Spatial-temporal changes of ecological footprint in the Loess Plateau after ecological construction between 1995 and 2010. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(4):761-771.]
    [2]陕西省统计局,国家统计局陕西调查总队.陕西统计年鉴[M].西安:中国统计出版社,2001-2016.[Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics, NBS Survey Office in Shaanxi. Shaanxi Statistical Yearbook. Xi’an:China Statistics Press, 2001-2016.]
    [3] Wang Y F, Yao S B. Effects of restoration practices on controlling soil and water losses in the Wei River Catchment,China:an estimation based on longitudinal field observations[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2019,100:120-128.
    [4]孔凡斌,廖文梅.集体林分权条件下的林地细碎化程度及与农户林地投入产出的关系——基于江西省8县602户农户调查数据的分析[J].林业科学,2012,48(4):119-126.[Kong Fanbin,Liao Wenmei. Relationships between the woodland fragmentation, farmers’investment and forest productivity in the reform of collective forest property right system. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012,48(4):119-126.]
    [5] CerdàA,Rodrigo-Comino J,Giménez-Morera A et al. Policies can help to apply successful strategies to control soil and water losses. The case of chipped pruned branches(CPB)in Mediterranean citrus plantations[J]. Land Use Policy,2018,75:734-745.
    [6]牛最荣,赵文智,刘进琪,等.甘肃渭河流域土地利用及覆被变化对径流的影响研究[J].水利水电技术, 2012, 43(4):5-10.[Niu Zuirong, Zhao Wenzhi, Liu Jinqi et al. Study on impact from change of land-use and land-cover on runoff in Wei River Basin in Gansu Province. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2012, 43(4):5-10.]
    [7]刘晓燕,刘昌明,杨胜天,等.基于遥感的黄土高原林草植被变化对河川径流的影响分析[J].地理学报,2014,69(11):1595-1603.[Liu Xiaoyan, Liu Changming, Yang Shengtian et al. Influences of shrubs-herbs-arbor vegetation coverage on the runoff based on the remote sensing data in Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(11):1595-1603.]
    [8]刘晓燕,杨胜天,王富贵,等.黄土高原现状梯田和林草植被的减沙作用分析[J].水利学报, 2014,45(11):1293-1300.[Liu Xiaoyan, Yang Shengtian, Wang Fugui et al. Analysis on sediment yield reduced by current terrace and shrubs-herbs-arbor vegetation in the Loess Plateau. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 45(11):1293-1300.]
    [9]王明玉,王百田.不同水土保持措施对黄土高原小流域年径流和产沙的影响——以平凉纸坊沟为例[J].林业科学, 2016, 52(8):10-20.[Wang Mingyu, Wang Baitian. Impacts of soil and water conservation measures on the annual runoff and sediment yield in small watershed of Loess Plateau of China:A case study of Zhifanggou in Pingliang City of Gansu. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(8):10-20.]
    [10]王雅,蒙吉军.基于INVEST模型的黑河中游土地利用变化水文效应时空分析[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2015, 51(6):1157-1165.[Wang Ya, Meng Jijun. Spatial-temporal features of hydrological effects caused by land use changes in middle reaches of Heihe River based on InVEST Model. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2015, 51(6):1157-1165.]
    [11]黎云云,畅建霞,王义民,等.渭河流域径流对土地利用变化的时空响应[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(15):232-238.[Li Yunyun, Chang Jianxia, Wang Yimin et al. Spatiotemporal responses of runoff to land use change in Wei River Basin. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(15):232-238.]
    [12]武国胜,林惠花,曾宏达.用RS和GIS技术评价福建省长汀县土壤保持功能对生态系统变化的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):321-330.[Wu Guosheng, Lin Huihua, Zeng Hongda. Responses of soil conservation function to ecosystem changes:An assessment based on RS and GIS in Changting County, Fujian Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017, 37(1):321-330.]
    [13]王连芬,孙平平.区域环境治理效率测的评价指标体系研究[J].统计与决策, 2012(10):60-62.[Wang Lianfen, Sun Pingping. Study on the evaluation index system of regional environmental governance efficiency test. Statistics and Decision, 2012(10):60-62.]
    [14]侯燕.中国生态治理效率及其变动[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(6):21-29.[Hou Yan. China’s ecological management efficiency and changes. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 17(6):21-29.]
    [15] Tenge A J, Graaff J D, Hella J P. Financial efficiency of major soil and water conservation measures in West Usambara highlands, Tanzania[J]. Applied Geography, 2005, 25(4):348-366.
    [16] Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs:U.S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):737-752.
    [17] DumbrovskyM, SobotkováV,?arapatka B et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of model design variants of broad-base terrace in soil erosion control[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 68:260-269.
    [18] Wang L F, Sun P P. Study on the evaluation index system of regional environmental governance efficiency test[J]. Statistics and Decision,2012(10):60-62.
    [19] Liu P, Yin R S, Zhao M J. Reformulating China's ecological restoration policies:What can be learned from comparing Chinese and American experiences[J]? Forest Policy and Economics,2019, 98:54-61.
    [20] Yin R S, Zhao M J. Ecological restoration programs and payments for ecosystem services as integrated biophysical and socioeconomic processes—China's experience as an example[J].Ecological Economics, 2012, 73:56-65.
    [21] Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R S et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387:253-260.
    [22] Leimona B, Van Noordwijk M, De Groot R et al. Fairly efficient, efficiently fair:Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2015,12:16-28.
    [23]陕西省水利厅.陕西水利统计年鉴[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2001-2016.[Shaanxi Provincial Department of Water Resources. Water conservancy statistical yearbook of Shaanxi. Xi’an:Shaanxi Science and Technology Press,2001-2016.]
    [24]中华人民共和国水利部.黄河流域水文资料年鉴(泾渭洛河水系)[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2001-2016.[The Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Hydrological statistics yearbook of Yellow River Bain. Beijing:China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, 2001-2016.]
    [25]刘纪远,匡文慧,张增祥,等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):3-14.[Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui, Zhang Zengxiang et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(1):3-14.]
    [26] National Climatic Center of the China Meteorological Administration. China’s surface climate data of daily value dataset. 2000-2015(v3.0, http://cdc.nmic.cn/).
    [27] ASTER-GDEMV2 30m DEM model. National Aeronautics and Space Administration(search.earthdata.nasa.gov)
    [28] Yin R, Yin G. China’s primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration:Initiation, implementation, and challenges[J].Environmental Management, 2010, 45(3):429-441.
    [29] Zhang D W. China's forest expansion in the last three plus decades:Why and how?[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019,98:75-81.
    [30] Song M L, Zhang L L, Liu W et al. Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’energy efficiency based on small sample data[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112(C):1049-1055.
    [31] Hawdon D. Efficiency, performance and regulation of the international gas industry—A bootstrap DEA approach[J]. Energy Policy,2003, 31(11):1167-1178.
    [32]王静爱.中国政区和流域的多样性与可持续发展[J].北京师范大学学报社会科学版,2002(4):115-121.[Wang Jingai. Diversities of administrations and drainage basions and sustainable development in China. Journal of Beijing Normal University(social sciences),2002(4):115-121.]
    [33] Fotheringham A S, Charlton M, Brunsdon C. The geography of parameter space:An investigation of spatial non-stationarity[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,1996,10(5):605-627.
    [34] Ord J K, Getis A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics:Distributional issues and an application[J]. Geographical Analysis.1995, 27(4):286-306.
    [35]刘晓燕,刘斌,杨胜天.黄土高塬沟壑区产沙驱动力及减沙潜力分析[J].人民黄河,2014, 36(5):1-3.[Liu Xiaoyan, Liu Bin,Yang Shengtian. Driving force of sediment production and potential of sediment reduction in the Gullied Rolling Loess Area.Yellow River,2014, 36(5):1-3.]
    [36]刘晓燕.黄河近年水沙锐减成因[M].北京:科学出版社, 2016.[Liu Xiaoyan. Causes of the Yellow River water and sediment reduction in recent years. Beijing:Science Press, 2016.]
    [37]李薇,谈明洪.西南山区人口空间重组及其对植被的影响—以河流沿线为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8879-8887.[Li Wei,Tan Minghong. Spatial redistribution of population in mountainous areas and its impact on vegetation change in southwest China:A riverside case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(24):8879-8887.]
    [38]苑韶峰,杨丽霞,杨桂山,等.耕地非农化的社会经济驱动因素异质性研究—基于STIRPAT和GWR模型的实证分析[J].经济地理,2013,33(5):137-143.[Yuan Shaofeng, Yang Lixia, Yang Guishan et al. The spatial heterogeneity of socio-economic driving factors of cultivated land conservation:A case based on STIRPAT and GWR models. Economic Geography, 2013,33(5):137-143.]
    [39]武玮,徐宗学,李发鹏.渭河关中段水文情势改变程度分析[J].自然资源学报, 2012, 27(7):1124-1137.[Wu Wei, Xu Zongxue,Li Fapeng. Hydrologic alteration analysis in the Guanzhong reach of the Wei River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(7):1124-1137.]
    [40]卓蓉蓉,余斌,曾菊新,等.湖北省经济空间格局演变与经济空间战略效应[J].经济地理, 2018, 38(3):37-45.[Zhuo Rongrong,Yu Bin, Zeng Juxin et al. Evolution of spatial pattern of economy and effect of space strategy for economy in Hubei Province.Economic Geography, 2018, 38(3):37-45.]
    (1)水利部黄河水利委员会.渭河流域防汛技术手册.2015
    (1)陕西省林业厅.退耕还林还草计划任务安排.1999-2010.
    (1)资源环境数据云平台.(http://www.resdc.cn).2000-2015.
    (2)41个水文观测站点包括流经甘肃、宁夏、陕西3个地区的所有观测点,其中还涉及泾河流域的7个观测点,目的在于提高插值结果的准确度。
    (3)全国地理信息资源目录服务系统.(http://www.webmap.cn/).2015.
    (1)资源环境数据云平台.(http:www.resdc.cn).2000-2015.
    (1)中华人民共和国水利部.关于全面推行河长制的意见.2016.(http://www.mwr.gov.cn/ztpd/gzzt/hzz/)