基于综合权重和改进物元可拓评价模型的地下水水质评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Groundwater Quality Assessment Based on Comprehensive Weight and Improved Matter-Element Extension Evaluation Model
  • 作者:虞未江 ; 贾超 ; 狄胜同 ; 李康 ; 袁涵
  • 英文作者:Yu Weijiang;Jia Chao;Di Shengtong;Li Kang;Yuan Han;School of Civil Engineering,Shandong University;Institute of Marine Science and Technology,Shandong University;
  • 关键词:层次分析法 ; 熵权法 ; 综合权重 ; 物元可拓评价模型 ; 地下水水质综合评价
  • 英文关键词:analytic hierarchy process;;entropy method;;comprehensive weight;;matter-element extension evaluation model;;comprehensive evaluation of groundwater quality
  • 中文刊名:吉林大学学报(地球科学版)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition)
  • 机构:山东大学土建与水利学院;山东大学海洋研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-26
  • 出版单位:吉林大学学报(地球科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:02
  • 基金:山东省省级水利科研与技术推广项目(SDSLKY201402)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:264-272
  • 页数:9
  • CN:22-1343/P
  • ISSN:1671-5888
  • 分类号:X824
摘要
鉴于物元可拓评价模型存在关联函数计算上的局限性,提出通过改进物元可拓评价模型的构造过程进行水质评价,并引入层次分析法和熵权法计算评价指标的综合权重以避免指标权重的绝对主观性和绝对客观性,建立了基于综合权重和改进物元可拓法的地下水水质评价模型,并从感官、一般化学、毒理学3个方面构建了地下水水质综合评价指标体系。将该模型应用于平度市古岘镇的地下水水质评价,并与综合评分法和属性识别法的水质评价结果进行比较分析。结果表明:该模型评价结果与其他两种方法评价结果的相同率均达70%,即使评价结果不同处的差异也基本在1个等级范围之内;而综合评分法和属性识别法评价结果的相同率仅为50%,且评价结果不同处的差异最大可达3个等级。
        In view of the deficiency of matter-element extension evaluation model in calculating correlation function,the authors built a groundwater quality evaluation model to improve the matterelement extension evaluation model,through using analytic hierarchy process and entropy method to work out comprehensive weight of every evaluating index,so as to avoid the absolute subjectivity and absolute objectivity of the index weight,and built a comprehensive evaluation index system of groundwater quality based on sensory,general chemistry and toxicology.This model was used to evaluate the groundwater quality of Guxian Town in Pingdu,and the application results of this model were compared with those obtained from integrated evaluating method and attribute recognition method.The result of this evaluation model is 70%the same as the result of the other two assessment methods;and the difference between them is basically within the same level;while between the other two methods,the result of one is only 50%the same as that of the another one,and the difference between these two assessment results can reach up to three levels.
引文
[1]张兆吉,费宇红,郭春艳,等.华北平原区域地下水污染评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(5):1456-1461.Zhang Zhaoji,Fei Yuhong,Guo Chunyan,et al.Regional Groundwater Contamination Assessment in the North China Plain[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2012,42(5):1456-1461.
    [2]Bhalla G,Swamee P K,Kumar A,et al.Assessment of Groundwater Quality Near Municipal Solid Waste Landfill by an Aggregate Index Method[J].International Journal of Environmental Sciences,2012,2(2):1492-1503.
    [3]Chapagain S K,Pandey V P,Shrestha S,et al.Assessment of Deep Groundwater Quality in Kathmandu Valley Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques[J].Water,Air and Soil Pollution,2010,210(1/2/3/4):277-288.
    [4]Kazakis N,Mattas C,Pavlou A,et al.Multivariate Statistical Analysis for the Assessment of Groundwater Quality Under Different Hydrogeological Regimes[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2017,76(9):349.
    [5]余文忠,唐德善,陆廷春.熵权属性识别法在地下水水质评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2013,31(7):41-43.Yu Wenzhong,Tang Deshan,Lu Tingchun.Application of Attribute Recognition Method Combined with Entropy Theory to Evaluation of Groundwater Quality[J].Water Resources and Power,2013,31(7):41-43.
    [6]房春生,孟赫,单玉书,等.基于GIS的吉林省地下水水质模糊评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(增刊1):293-297.Fang Chunsheng,Meng He,Shan Yushu,et al.Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on GIS of Jilin Province[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(Sup.1):293-297.
    [7]Hosseini-Moghari S M,Ebrahimi K,Azarnivand A.Groundwater Quality Assessment with Respect to Fuzzy Water Quality Index(FWQI):An Application of Expert Systems in Environmental Monitoring[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2015,74(10):7229-7238.
    [8]Kumar N V,Mathew S,Swaminathan G.Multifactorial Fuzzy Approach for the Assessment of Groundwater Quality[J].Journal of Water Resource and Protection,2010,2(6):597-608.
    [9]王冬生,李世华,周杏鹏.基于PSO-RBF神经网络模型的原水水质评价方法及应用[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,41(5):1019-1023.Wang Dongsheng,Li Shihua,Zhou Xingpeng.Assessment Method of Raw Water Quality Basedon PSO-RBF Neural Network Model and Its Application[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition),2011,41(5):1019-1023.
    [10]肖长来,危润初,梁秀娟,等.基于投影寻踪聚类模型的龙坑水源地地下水水质评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(增刊1):248-252.Xiao Changlai,Wei Runchu,Liang Xiujuan,et al.Assessment of Water Quality of Groundwater in Longkeng Based on Projection Pursuit Cluster Model[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(Sup.1):248-252.
    [11]兰双双,姜纪沂,王滨.基于物元可拓法的地下水水质评价:以梨树县平原区浅层地下水为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(4):722-727.Lan Shuangshuang,Jiang Jiyi,Wang Bin.Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on Matter-Element and Extension Means:Taking Shallow Groundwater of Plain Areas in Lishu for Example[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2009,39(4):722-727.
    [12]韩彰,陈健,李经纬,等.改进物元可拓法在水闸工程安全综合评估中的应用[J].水力发电,2015,41(4):82-85.Han Zhang,Chen Jian,Li Jingwei,et al.Application of Improved Matter-Element Extension Model to Sluice Structure Comprehensive Safety Assessment[J].Water Power,2015,41(4):82-85.
    [13]汪伦焰,袁杰,李娜,等.基于物元可拓模型的水生态文明城市建设评价:以许昌市为例[J].人民长江,2016,47(18):18-21.Wang Lunyan,Yuan Jie,Li Na,et al.Evaluation of Water Ecological Civilization City Construction Based on Matter-Element Extension Evaluation Model:Case of Xuchang City[J].Yangtze River,2016,47(18):18-21.
    [14]卢文喜,李迪,张蕾,等.基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价在水质评价中的应用[J].节水灌溉,2011(3):43-46.Lu Wenxi,Li Di,Zhang Lei,et al.Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on AHP in Water Quality Evaluation[J].Water Saving Irrigation,2011(3):43-46.
    [15]熊德明,张明峰,吴陈君,等.基于模糊层次分析方法的泥质有效低熟气源岩评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(6):1620-1630.Xiong Deming,Zhang Mingfeng,Wu Chenjun,et al.Evaluation Method of Terrestrial Low-Mature Gas Source Rocks by Fuzzy AHP[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(6):1620-1630.
    [16]宋丽婧,魏琛,宋玲梅.五元系数法-改进熵权法在水质评价中的应用[J].南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(2):268-273.Song Lijing,Wei Chen,Song Lingmei.Application of Five-Element Connection Number MethodImproved Entropy Method in Water Quality Evaluation[J].South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science&Technology,2015,13(2):268-273.
    [17]马荣,石建省,刘继朝.熵权耦合随机理论在含水层非均质综合指数研究中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(5):1520-1528.Ma Rong,Shi Jiansheng,Liu Jichao.Application of Entropy Weight and Stochastic Theory to Study the Heterogeneity Synthetic Index of Aquifer[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(5):1520-1528.
    [18]鲁璐.基于物元可拓模型的土地整理综合效益评价研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2012.Lu Lu.Study on the Comprehensive Benefits of the Land Consolidation Based on the Matter-Element Extension Model[D].Wuhan:Central China Normal University,2012.
    [19]石永莲,严宁珍,倪九派.基于模糊贴近度法的白河水质评价[J].中国农村水利水电,2014(9):47-52.Shi Yonglian,Yan Ningzhen,Ni Jiupai.Water Quality Evaluation of Bai River Based on Fuzzy Nearness[J].China Rural Water and Hydropower,2014(9):47-52.
    [20]吴海泽,余红,胡友彪,等.区域生态安全的组合权重评价模型[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(2):370-375.Wu Haize,Yu Hong,Hu Youbiao,et al.Research on the Establishment of the Regional Ecological Security Assessment Model by Means of the Combined Weights[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2015,15(2):370-375.
    [21]李刚,李建平,孙晓蕾,等.主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(12):17-26+61.Li Gang,Li Jianping,Sun Xiaolei,et al.Research on a Combined Method of Subjective-Objective Weighing and the Its Rationality[J].Management Review,2017,29(12):17-26+61.
    [22]地下水质量标准:GB/T 14848-2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.Quality Standard for Ground Water:GB/T 14848-2017[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2017.