西藏沙棘属3种植物光合特性及光响应曲线拟合研究
|
摘要
为研究西藏沙棘属植物光合特性及光响应曲线规律,以云南沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides subsp.Yunnanensis)、江孜沙棘(Hippophae gyantsensis)和肋果沙棘(Hippophae neurocarpa)一年实生苗为材料,利用Li-6400便携式光合仪测定西藏3种沙棘属植物Pn、Gs、Ci和Tr等光合参数,应用直角双曲线、非直角双曲线、指数和直角双曲线修正4种模型对西藏3种沙棘属植物光合参数进行拟合,筛选西藏3种沙棘属植物的最佳拟合模型,并对光合能力进行比较。结果表明:直角双曲线修正模型拟合出的决定系数最高(R2=0.999),可拟合出光抑制现象,为拟合最佳模型;3种沙棘属植物Gs和Tr随PAR的增加呈上升趋势,Ci呈下降趋势;云南沙棘Pnmax、α、Ic、WUE和CE均最大、Ci最小,利用弱光的能力最强;肋果沙棘生长耗水多,节水能力和抗旱性弱。3种沙棘属植物中,云南沙棘可用于干旱半干旱地区造林树种。
In order to study the photosynthesis characteristics and light response curves of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. Yunnanensis, Hippophae gyantsensis and Hippophae neurocarpa,portable photosynthetic apparatus Li-6400 was used to determine the photosynthesis parameters of Pn, Gs, Ci and Tr of three species of Hippophae rhamnoides in Tibet. The photosynthetic parameters of three species of Hippophae in Tibet were studied using four models of right angle hyperbolic, non-orthogonal hyperbolic, exponential and right angle hyperbolic correction.Screening the best fitting models of three species of Hippophae in Tibet, the photosynthesis ability was compared. The results showed that the right-angle hyperbolic correction model had the highest coefficient of determination(R~2=0.999), which fitted the light suppression phenomenon and fit the best model. The Gs and Tr of three species of Hippophae increased with the increase of PAR, and Ci decreased. The P_(nmax), α, Ic, WUE and CE of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp.Yunnanensis were the largest, Ci was the smallest, and the ability to use weak light was the strongest.The growth of Hippophae neurocarpa was more water-consuming. Water saving capacity and drought resistance were weak. Among the three species of Hippophae rhamnoides,Yunnan seabuckthorn can be used for afforestation in arid and semi-arid areas.
In order to study the photosynthesis characteristics and light response curves of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. Yunnanensis, Hippophae gyantsensis and Hippophae neurocarpa,portable photosynthetic apparatus Li-6400 was used to determine the photosynthesis parameters of Pn, Gs, Ci and Tr of three species of Hippophae rhamnoides in Tibet. The photosynthetic parameters of three species of Hippophae in Tibet were studied using four models of right angle hyperbolic, non-orthogonal hyperbolic, exponential and right angle hyperbolic correction.Screening the best fitting models of three species of Hippophae in Tibet, the photosynthesis ability was compared. The results showed that the right-angle hyperbolic correction model had the highest coefficient of determination(R~2=0.999), which fitted the light suppression phenomenon and fit the best model. The Gs and Tr of three species of Hippophae increased with the increase of PAR, and Ci decreased. The P_(nmax), α, Ic, WUE and CE of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp.Yunnanensis were the largest, Ci was the smallest, and the ability to use weak light was the strongest.The growth of Hippophae neurocarpa was more water-consuming. Water saving capacity and drought resistance were weak. Among the three species of Hippophae rhamnoides,Yunnan seabuckthorn can be used for afforestation in arid and semi-arid areas.
引文
[1]陈根云,俞冠路,陈悦等.光合作用对光和二氧化碳响应的观测方法探讨[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006(06):691-696.
[2]钟楚,朱勇.几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析[J].中国农业气象,2013,34(01):74-80.
[3]叶子飘,于强.一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007(06):771-775.
[4]申文辉,李志辉,彭玉华等.格木不同种源光合作用光响应分析研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(06):13-18.
[5]叶子飘,高峻.光响应和CO2响应新模型在丹参中的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(01):129-134.
[6]叶子飘,李进省.光合作用对光响应的直角双曲线修正模型和非直角双曲线模型的对比研究[J].井冈山大学学报:自然科学版,2010,31(3):38-44.
[7]叶子飘,王建林.植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析[J].井冈山学院学报:自然科学,2009,30(4):9-13.
[8]张弥,吴家兵,关德新等.长白山阔叶红松林主要树种光合作用的光响应曲线[J].应用生态学报,2006(09):1575-1578
[9]徐斌,朱报著,潘文等.广东含笑的光响应特性及其最适模型研究[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(04):604-609.
[10]王修兰.CO2-作物生长模拟实验及光合模型[J].气象学报,2000(06):745-749.
[11]钟楚,朱勇.几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析[J].中国农业气象,2013,34(01):74-80.
[12]闫小红,尹建华,段世华等.四种水稻品种的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(03):604-610.
[13]廖小锋,刘济明,张东凯等.野生小蓬竹的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(03):124-128.
[14]赵晶,张庆钢,郭丽华,等.不同冻藏温度和时间对沙棘果中Vc含量的影响[J].食品科技,2008(10):243-245.
[15]侯冬岩,回瑞华,李铁纯.沙棘的研究进展[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2002,4(1):49-53.
[16]李霓,蒋严妃,苏雪等.肋果沙棘北缘居群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J].广西植物.2016,36(5):557-563.
[17]Zoya Ozherelieva,Pavel Prudnikov,Natalia Bogomolova.Frost hardiness of introduced sea buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)genotypes in Central Russia[J].Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences.Section B.Natural,Exact,and Applied Sciences.,2016,70(2):88-95.
[18]Eva Vítová,Kate?ina S?kalová,Martina Mahdalová,Lenka Butorová,Marcela Melikantová.Comparison of selected aroma compounds in cultivars of sea buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)[J].Chemical Papers,2015,69(6).
[19]马彦广.大果沙棘引种栽培试验研究[J].防护林科技,2018(10):32-33.
[20]张琼姝.山西引种沙棘的生物学特征和适应性研究[D].山西:山西大学,2017.
[21]麦拉苏.沙棘的培育与开发价值分析[J].现代园艺,2017(04):33.
[22]塔吉古丽.肉孜.沙棘育种与开发利用[J].农业工程技术,2016,36(17):78.
[23]关冰冰,孙萍.沙棘属植物资源概况及其培育技术研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(22):7401-7403+7520.
[24]夏善智.不同氮肥处理对紫叶稠李苗木生长及光合特性的影响[J].林业勘查设计,2019(01):79-81.
[25]陈利青,张瑞杰,张伟,等.不同糜子品种光合特性及农艺性状比较[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(04):553-55
[26]Baly EC(1935).The kinetics of photosynthesis[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society.(Biological sciences),1935,117(104):218-239.
[27]Thornley JHM(1976).Mathematical models in plant physiology[M].academic press,1976:86-110.
[28]侯智勇,洪伟,李键等.不同桉树无性系光响应曲线研究[J].福建林学院学报,2009.29(2):114-119.
[29]Photosynthetic capacity and specific leaf mass in twenty woody species of Cerrado vegetation under field condition[J].Photosynthesis,2010,(33):103-112.
[30]邱磊,吴丽丽.大豆不同时期不同节位叶片光合速率,气孔导度,蒸腾速率的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2009(03):35-37+49.
[31]李志军,董晓颖,李培环.水分胁迫下短枝型桃叶片的水分利用效率和羧化效率研究[J].当代生态农业,2005(Z1):91-92.
[32]邓云鹏,雷静品,潘磊等.不同种源栓皮栎光响应曲线的模型拟合及参数比较[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(02):387-394.
[33]张倚铭,黎云祥,余茂蕾等.红花酢浆草光合模型适用性研究[J].生态科学,2018,37(02):18-24.
[34]曾继业,谭正洪,三枝信子.近似贝叶斯法在光合模型参数估计中的应用[J].植物生态学报,2017,41(03):378-385.
[35]何应会,马锦林,梁文汇等.六个油茶优良无性系光响应曲线分析[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(07):1577-1580.
[36]孔文娟,刘学录,姚小华等.4个油茶物种的光合特性研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(01):16-22.
[37]叶航,廖建勇,杨丹,等.利用光合特性初步筛选耐弱光油茶品种[J].广西林业科学,2012,41(04):323-326+348.
[38]周小玲,田大伦,许忠坤等.中亚热带四川桤木与台湾桤木幼林的光合生态特性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2007(01):40-49+54.
[39]胡婧楠.三种楠木光合生理特性及叶子养分年变化的比较研究[D].安徽农业大学,2010.
[2]钟楚,朱勇.几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析[J].中国农业气象,2013,34(01):74-80.
[3]叶子飘,于强.一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007(06):771-775.
[4]申文辉,李志辉,彭玉华等.格木不同种源光合作用光响应分析研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(06):13-18.
[5]叶子飘,高峻.光响应和CO2响应新模型在丹参中的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(01):129-134.
[6]叶子飘,李进省.光合作用对光响应的直角双曲线修正模型和非直角双曲线模型的对比研究[J].井冈山大学学报:自然科学版,2010,31(3):38-44.
[7]叶子飘,王建林.植物光合-光响应模型的比较分析[J].井冈山学院学报:自然科学,2009,30(4):9-13.
[8]张弥,吴家兵,关德新等.长白山阔叶红松林主要树种光合作用的光响应曲线[J].应用生态学报,2006(09):1575-1578
[9]徐斌,朱报著,潘文等.广东含笑的光响应特性及其最适模型研究[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(04):604-609.
[10]王修兰.CO2-作物生长模拟实验及光合模型[J].气象学报,2000(06):745-749.
[11]钟楚,朱勇.几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析[J].中国农业气象,2013,34(01):74-80.
[12]闫小红,尹建华,段世华等.四种水稻品种的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(03):604-610.
[13]廖小锋,刘济明,张东凯等.野生小蓬竹的光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(03):124-128.
[14]赵晶,张庆钢,郭丽华,等.不同冻藏温度和时间对沙棘果中Vc含量的影响[J].食品科技,2008(10):243-245.
[15]侯冬岩,回瑞华,李铁纯.沙棘的研究进展[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2002,4(1):49-53.
[16]李霓,蒋严妃,苏雪等.肋果沙棘北缘居群的遗传多样性与遗传结构[J].广西植物.2016,36(5):557-563.
[17]Zoya Ozherelieva,Pavel Prudnikov,Natalia Bogomolova.Frost hardiness of introduced sea buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)genotypes in Central Russia[J].Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences.Section B.Natural,Exact,and Applied Sciences.,2016,70(2):88-95.
[18]Eva Vítová,Kate?ina S?kalová,Martina Mahdalová,Lenka Butorová,Marcela Melikantová.Comparison of selected aroma compounds in cultivars of sea buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides L.)[J].Chemical Papers,2015,69(6).
[19]马彦广.大果沙棘引种栽培试验研究[J].防护林科技,2018(10):32-33.
[20]张琼姝.山西引种沙棘的生物学特征和适应性研究[D].山西:山西大学,2017.
[21]麦拉苏.沙棘的培育与开发价值分析[J].现代园艺,2017(04):33.
[22]塔吉古丽.肉孜.沙棘育种与开发利用[J].农业工程技术,2016,36(17):78.
[23]关冰冰,孙萍.沙棘属植物资源概况及其培育技术研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(22):7401-7403+7520.
[24]夏善智.不同氮肥处理对紫叶稠李苗木生长及光合特性的影响[J].林业勘查设计,2019(01):79-81.
[25]陈利青,张瑞杰,张伟,等.不同糜子品种光合特性及农艺性状比较[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(04):553-55
[26]Baly EC(1935).The kinetics of photosynthesis[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society.(Biological sciences),1935,117(104):218-239.
[27]Thornley JHM(1976).Mathematical models in plant physiology[M].academic press,1976:86-110.
[28]侯智勇,洪伟,李键等.不同桉树无性系光响应曲线研究[J].福建林学院学报,2009.29(2):114-119.
[29]Photosynthetic capacity and specific leaf mass in twenty woody species of Cerrado vegetation under field condition[J].Photosynthesis,2010,(33):103-112.
[30]邱磊,吴丽丽.大豆不同时期不同节位叶片光合速率,气孔导度,蒸腾速率的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2009(03):35-37+49.
[31]李志军,董晓颖,李培环.水分胁迫下短枝型桃叶片的水分利用效率和羧化效率研究[J].当代生态农业,2005(Z1):91-92.
[32]邓云鹏,雷静品,潘磊等.不同种源栓皮栎光响应曲线的模型拟合及参数比较[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(02):387-394.
[33]张倚铭,黎云祥,余茂蕾等.红花酢浆草光合模型适用性研究[J].生态科学,2018,37(02):18-24.
[34]曾继业,谭正洪,三枝信子.近似贝叶斯法在光合模型参数估计中的应用[J].植物生态学报,2017,41(03):378-385.
[35]何应会,马锦林,梁文汇等.六个油茶优良无性系光响应曲线分析[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(07):1577-1580.
[36]孔文娟,刘学录,姚小华等.4个油茶物种的光合特性研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(01):16-22.
[37]叶航,廖建勇,杨丹,等.利用光合特性初步筛选耐弱光油茶品种[J].广西林业科学,2012,41(04):323-326+348.
[38]周小玲,田大伦,许忠坤等.中亚热带四川桤木与台湾桤木幼林的光合生态特性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2007(01):40-49+54.
[39]胡婧楠.三种楠木光合生理特性及叶子养分年变化的比较研究[D].安徽农业大学,2010.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |